Search

Background Management of Scedosporium/Lomentospora prolificans infections remains challenging. We described predisposing factors, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of these rare mold infections, including predictors of early (1-month) and late (18-month) all-cause mortality and treatment failure. Methods We conducted a retrospective Australian-based observational study of proven/probable Scedosporium/L prolificans infections from 2005 to 2021. Data on patient comorbidities, predisposing factors, clinical manifestations, treatment, and outcomes up to 18 months were collected. Treatment responses and death causality were adjudicated. Subgroup analyses, multivariable Cox regression, and logistic regression were performed. Results Of 61 infection episodes, 37 (60.7%) were attributable to L prolificans. Forty-five of 61 (73.8%) were proven invasive fungal diseases (IFDs), and 29 of 61 (47.5%) were disseminated. Prolonged neutropenia and receipt of immunosuppressant agents were documented in 27 of 61 (44.3%) and 49 of 61 (80.3%) episodes, respectively. Voriconazole/terbinafine was administered in 30 of 31 (96.8%) L prolificans infections, and voriconazole alone was prescribed for 15 of 24 (62.5%) Scedosporium spp infections. Adjunctive surgery was performed in 27 of 61 (44.3%) episodes. Median time to death post–IFD diagnosis was 9.0 days, and only 22 of 61 (36.1%) attained treatment success at 18 months. Those who survived beyond 28 days of antifungal therapy were less immunosuppressed with fewer disseminated infections (both P <.001). Disseminated infection and hematopoietic stem cell transplant were associated with increased early and late mortality rates. Adjunctive surgery was associated with lower early and late mortality rates by 84.0% and 72.0%, respectively, and decreased odds of 1-month treatment failure by 87.0%. Conclusions Outcomes associated with Scedosporium/L prolificans infections is poor, particularly with L prolificans infections or in the highly immunosuppressed population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The current practice of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in Asia is poorly documented. Our aim was to capture and describe TDM services delivered in hospitals across Asia, including aspects such as assay availability, interpretation of results and clinical decision-making. Methods: An online survey about anti-infective TDM practices, available in English and involving 50 questions, was promoted to people involved in TDM in Asia. The survey was open for responses from September to November 2021. Results: Of 207 responses from participants working in 14 Asian countries, 150 responses from 10 countries could be included. TDM services are available for many anti-infectives, providing assays based on chromatographic assays (100.0%) or immunoassays (39.3%). Clinicians (82.6%) and pharmacists (86.8%) were responsible for ordering and interpreting TDM. Most services provided reference targets and dose recommendations. Interpretative support was available to a varying degree. Assay results were available and clinical decision-making could be completed within 24 h in most hospitals (87.9% and 88.9% respectively). As the turnaround time of assay results decreased, the proportion of clinical decision-making completed within 8 h increased. Barriers to implementation of TDM included lack of funding or equipment (71.1%), lack of clinician interest or cooperation (47.0%), and lack of expertise (42.3%). Lack of expertise was the primary barrier for using precision dosing software (50.5%). Conclusion: There are significant differences and challenges in the development and practice of anti-infective TDM in Asian countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]