Search

Most anti-cancer modalities are designed to directly kill cancer cells deploying mechanisms of action (MOAs) centered on the presence of a precise target on cancer cells. The efficacy of these approaches is limited because the rapidly evolving genetics of neoplasia swiftly circumvents the MOA generating therapy-resistant cancer cell clones. Other modalities engage endogenous anti-cancer mechanisms by activating the multi-cellular network (MCN) surrounding neoplastic cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). These modalities hold a better chance of success because they activate numerous types of immune effector cells that deploy distinct cytotoxic MOAs. This in turn decreases the chance of developing treatment-resistance. Engagement of the MCN can be attained through activation of immune effector cells that in turn kill cancer cells or when direct cancer killing is complemented by the production of proinflammatory factors that secondarily recruit and activate immune effector cells. For instance, adoptive cell therapy (ACT) supplements cancer cell killing with the release of homeostatic and pro-inflammatory cytokines by the immune cells and damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) by dying cancer cells. The latter phenomenon, referred to as immunogenic cell death (ICD), results in an exponential escalation of anti-cancer MOAs at the tumor site. Other approaches can also induce exponential cancer killing by engaging the MCN of the TME through the release of DAMPs and additional pro-inflammatory factors by dying cancer cells. In this commentary, we will review the basic principles that support emerging paradigms likely to significantly improve the efficacy of anti-cancer therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A cancer immune phenotype characterized by an active T-helper 1 (Th1)/cytotoxic response is associated with responsiveness to immunotherapy and favorable prognosis across different tumors. However, in some cancers, such an intratumoral immune activation does not confer protection from progression or relapse. Defining mechanisms associated with immune evasion is imperative to refine stratification algorithms, to guide treatment decisions and to identify candidates for immune-targeted therapy. Molecular alterations governing mechanisms for immune exclusion are still largely unknown. The availability of large genomic datasets offers an opportunity to ascertain key determinants of differential intratumoral immune response. We follow a network-based protocol to identify transcription regulators (TRs) associated with poor immunologic antitumor activity. We use a consensus of four different pipelines consisting of two state-of-the-art gene regulatory network inference techniques, regularized gradient boosting machines and ARACNE to determine TR regulons, and three separate enrichment techniques, including fast gene set enrichment analysis, gene set variation analysis and virtual inference of protein activity by enriched regulon analysis to identify the most important TRs affecting immunologic antitumor activity. These TRs, referred to as master regulators (MRs), are unique to immune-silent and immune-active tumors, respectively. We validated the MRs coherently associated with the immune-silent phenotype across cancers in The Cancer Genome Atlas and a series of additional datasets in the Prediction of Clinical Outcomes from Genomic Profiles repository. A downstream analysis of MRs specific to the immune-silent phenotype resulted in the identification of several enriched candidate pathways, including NOTCH1, TGF- |$\beta $|⁠ , Interleukin-1 and TNF- |$\alpha $| signaling pathways. TGFB1I1 emerged as one of the main negative immune modulators preventing the favorable effects of a Th1/cytotoxic response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]