Search

Climate model evaluation work has made progress both in theory and practice, providing strong support for better understanding and predicting climate change. However, at the weather scale, there is relatively little assessment of climate models in terms of daily-scale climate phenomena, such as storm frequency and intensity. These weather-scale variables are of significant importance for our understanding of the impacts of climate change. In order to assess the capability of climate models to simulate weather-scale climate patterns, this study employs Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs) for weather pattern classification. By combining different evaluation metrics, varying the number of SOM types, changing the size of the study area, and altering the reference datasets, the climate models are evaluated to ensure the robustness of the assessment results. The results demonstrate that the size of the study area is positively correlated with observed differences, and there are correlations among different evaluation metrics. The highest correlation is observed between evaluation metrics in large-scale and small-scale spatial domains, while the correlation with SOM size is relatively low. This suggests that the choice of evaluation metrics has a minor impact on model ranking. Furthermore, when comparing the correlation coefficients calculated using the same evaluation metrics for different-sized regions, a significant positive correlation is observed. This indicates that variations in the size of the study area do not significantly affect model ranking. Further investigation of the relationship between model performance and different SOM sizes shows a significant positive correlation. The impact of dataset selection on model ranking is also compared, revealing high consistency. This enhances the reliability of model ranking. Taking into account the influence of evaluation metric selection, SOM size, and reanalysis data selection on model performance assessment, significant variations in model ranking are observed. Based on cumulative ranking, the top five models identified are ACCESS1-0, GISS-E2-R, GFDL-CM3, MIROC4h, and GFDL-ESM2M. In conclusion, factors such as evaluation metric selection, study area size, and SOM size should be considered when assessing model ranking. Weather pattern classification plays a crucial role in climate model evaluation, as it helps us better understand model performance in different weather systems, assess their ability to simulate extreme weather events, and improve the design and evaluation methods of model ensemble predictions. These findings are of great significance for optimizing and strengthening climate model evaluation methods and provide valuable insights for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Autumn is the transitional season when the atmospheric circulation pattern changes from summer to winter. The temperature and precipitation in Southeastern China in autumn are significantly influenced by the change in circulation patterns, and both show significant uniqueness. The clustering method can be used to observe the changes of circulation patterns in detail and to observe and analyze the transition from warm to cold seasons from a detailed view of the daily circulation pattern perspective. This method may have important research implications on how to study the generation and dissipation of extreme weather events. The Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) method is used to a 500 hPa geopotential height and 850 hPa wind and sea level pressure for 1981–2020 to identify the characteristic weather patterns (WTs) in autumn (September–November) over Southeastern China. Characteristics of the captured WTs are also analyzed in terms of the distribution characteristics of weather patterns, occurrence frequency, typical progression, precipitation and extreme precipitation (EP), temperature and extreme high temperature (EHT), and the relationship with atmospheric teleconnection. Nine WTs were identified in autumn, which represents a series of weather situations consisting of troughs and ridges. On this basis, these WTs were used to carry out the differentiation of seasonal differences between early and late autumn. The maximum mean and extreme precipitation occur in several early season patterns (WT1, WT2, WT4, and WT7). It is highly likely that extremely high temperatures occur in the WT1 and WT2 patterns. The most common progression between WTs is WT7−WT1−WT2−WT4 in the early season. This seasonality allows us to distinguish between early and late seasons based on daily weather types. A preliminary trend analysis suggests that patterns in the early season occur more frequently and last longer in the early season, and patterns in the late season occur less frequently and later. That is, the longer cool season pattern is shifting to the shorter warm season pattern. In addition, the persistence of both cool and warm patterns increased during 2001–2020 relative to 1981–2000, and the risk of both flooding and drought occurrence is on the rise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]