Search

The detrimental effects of Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms (PTSS) and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and the benefits of Post-Traumatic Growth (PTG) are well established for cancer survivors. Increased cancer survival rates necessitate an understanding of how these two paradoxical outcomes, PTSS/PTSD and PTG, are targeted through interventions. This systematic scoping review aims to (a) examine existing evidence on interventions targeting PTSS/PTSD and/or PTG among cancer survivors and (b) identify knowledge gaps to inform future research. Following the six steps of a scoping review, 76 articles met the inclusion criteria. Quantitative articles were examined using descriptive analysis. Frequency counts of the collated data were tabulated into summary tables. Qualitative articles were reviewed using meta-synthesis. Most articles were quantitative (n = 52) and targeted PTG (n = 68) through promising intervention approaches such as psychotherapy, mindfulness, physical activity, and psilocybin-assisted therapy. Three key implications for future research and practice were synthesized: (1) mechanistic considerations for intervention design that provide a roadmap for rigorous and theoretically-grounded research; (2) the need for improved representation of cancer survivors in trials; and (3) potential facilitators of intervention efficacy. Together, these findings can direct future research to optimize interventions to reduce PTSS/PTSD and promote PTG achievement among cancer survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: Many cancer survivors report issues with cognitive function following diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this single-arm pilot study was to test the feasibility and acceptability of virtual delivery of a cognitive rehabilitation intervention for participants in virtual groups. SAMPLE & SETTING: 37 adult cancer survivors reporting impaired cognitive function following primary treatment were enrolled from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and affiliates, the University of Kansas Cancer Center, and the Masonic Cancer Alliance. METHODS & VARIABLES: Two cohorts attended six weekly virtual sessions and completed pre- and postintervention patient-reported outcome questionnaires designed to measure perceived cognitive function, loneliness, and determinants of behavior change for exercise, sleep, and mindfulness. RESULTS: Postintervention scores for perceived cognitive function, determinants of behavior change, and loneliness ratings significantly improved. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Evidence continues to build in support of cognitive rehabilitation interventions for cancer survivors. Nurses play an important role in terms of patient identification, participation, and facilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is a need for low-risk nonpharmaceutical methods to support psychosocial distress associated with breast cancer (BC). This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and impact of an improvisational theater (improv) program for BC survivors. Methods: Female BC survivors (n = 17) participated in a six-week improv program. Feasibility was assessed through attendance frequency and percentage attrition. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Version 29 (PROMIS-29), and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale were used to measure well-being and quality of life at three time points: baseline, end of program, and one-month follow-up. Changes in these measures were assessed using a linear mixed-effects model. Results: The program had low attrition (5.88%) and high attendance (94%). FACT-G and loneliness scores improved significantly between baseline and end of program (p's < 0.05). Changes in FACT-G remained significant at follow-up (P = 0.009). Significant improvements between baseline and the end of the program were also present for anxiety, depression, fatigue, and ability to participate in social roles/activities as measured by the PROMIS-29 (p's < 0.05). Changes in anxiety and depression remained significant at follow-up (p's < 0.05). Conclusion: Improv represents a novel method for supporting the quality of life and well-being of BC survivors. This is the first study to examine improv among BC survivors. Findings demonstrate that an improv intervention is feasible in this population. A larger randomized controlled trial is warranted to more fully examine the impact of this novel intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]