Search

Background Sinonasal debridement is typically performed in the weeks following endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS). In the pediatric population, this second-look procedure may require general anesthesia; however, there is currently little evidence assessing the benefit of this practice. Methods This was a multicenter retrospective study of pediatric patients (age <18 years) undergoing a planned second-look debridement under general anesthesia following ESBS. Intraoperative findings, interventions performed, and perioperative complications were reviewed. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify associations between intraoperative findings and clinical factors. Results We reviewed 69 cases of second-look debridements (age mean 8.6 ± 4.2 years, range: 2–18 years), occurring a mean of 18.3 ± 10.3 days following ESBS. All abnormal findings were noted in patients age ≤12 years. Synechiae were noted in 8.7% of cases, bacterial rhinosinusitis in 2.9%, and failed reconstruction with cerebrospinal fluid leak in 4.5% (two cases of flap malposition and one case of flap necrosis). All failed reconstructions were noted following expanded endonasal cases for craniopharyngioma, and in each case, a revision reconstruction was performed during the second-look surgery. Synechiae were not significantly associated with younger age, revision cases, or cases with reconstructive flaps. There were no perioperative complications. Conclusion Second-look debridement under general anesthesia may be useful in the identification and intervention of sinonasal pathology following endoscopic skull base surgery, particularly in children ≤12 years old or those with pedicled flap reconstructions. Larger controlled studies are warranted to validate this practice and refine indications and timing of this second procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the use of an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for the resection of anterior skull base tumors in young children. Traditionally, these tumors have been treated with open craniotomy, but the EEA has become more common in pediatric patients. The article reviews a retrospective study of ten patients aged 5 or younger who underwent EEA for tumor resection. The results showed that the EEA was safe and effective, with successful reconstruction of the skull base in all cases. Further research is needed to evaluate the EEA in this population. [Extracted from the article]

Keywords: cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea; natural orifice endoscopic surgery; skull base; therapeutics EN cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea natural orifice endoscopic surgery skull base therapeutics 321 323 3 02/22/22 20220301 NES 220301 INTRODUCTION The last decade has seen the utilization of endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in resection of tumors with intradural components.1 EEA for intracranial masses is both possible and effective.2-4 When compared to transcranial approach, EEA has demonstrated superior vision outcomes, equivalent rates of total resection and complication, and stable quality of life outcomes.5,6 Successful EEA requires adequate skull base closure to prevent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. There was no significant difference in postoperative CSF leak rates between pediatric and adult groups, underscoring EEA with NSF repair as a successful and safe technique in the surgical resection of pediatric anterior skull base tumors. One recent study examined NSF skull base reconstruction in a cohort of 12 post-EEA pediatric patients.9 Complications included one CSF leak, with a leak rate of 8.33%. [Extracted from the article]