Search

The large consumption of natural gas, one of the most important energy sources in the world, necessitates reliable, precise, and accurate calculation of gas flow rate and amount in order to use this resource in an efficient and sustainable way. The present computational study investigates the possibilities of several soft-computing strategies in estimating the mass flow rate of natural gas flow stream (kg/h) (output variable) based on four input variables of orifice plate diameter ratio, differential pressure of orifice plate (kPa), operating pressure of the natural gas (bar), and operating temperature of the natural gas (°C). A genotype/phenotype genetic algorithm (gene expression programming (GEP) technique), two decision tree-based methods (random forest (RF), random tree (RT) models), and two kernel-based approaches (Gaussian process regression (GPR) and support vector machines (SVM) methods) were applied for the first time to predict gas mass flow rate. Coefficient of correlation (CC), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), Scattering index (SI), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and mean absolute relative error (MARE) were computed as the statistical performance evaluators to determine of the best-performing soft-computing approach. The performance assessment indices corroborated the superiority of the Pearson VII universal kernel function-based GPR model (GPR-PUKF) model (CC = 0.9997, MAE = 64.8091 kg/h, RMSE = 248.7584 kg/h, SI = 0.0237, and NSE = 0.9993 for the testing dataset) over other data-intelligent models in predicting the gas mass flow rate. In addition, statistical results revealed that the predictions of the RF method were better than those of the GEP- and RT-based models, but the GEP approach showed the lowest performance among all applied models. Although the CC values of all models were satisfactory (>0.993), the percentile deviation of GPR model (1.7325%) from the actual values showed competitive lower values, indicating its superior performance than other models (GEP = 15.1436%, RF = 6.5403%, RT = 9.5576%, and SVM = 3.2107%). This study highlighted the significance of employing advanced soft-computing approaches in determining the mass flow rate of natural gas, a vital source of energy, as well as its value to the gas sector. [Display omitted] • Soft-computing implementation for prediction of natural gas mass flow rate. • Benchmarking of genetic/decision tree/kernel-based data-intelligent models. • Lower deviations (1.73% and 0.36%) of GPR-PUKF over other methods. • Superiority of RF (6.54%) over GEP (15.14%) and RT (9.56%) in terms of errors. • Flexibility of soft computation in highly nonlinear real-world gas measurement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Owing to its importance in extraction of natural gas from underground gas storage as well as its crucial role in determination of final gas mixture in the production facilities of gas/oil industry, the dry content of wet gas mixture needs to be calculated precisely. The present study explores the potential of different soft-computing techniques in estimation of the dry gas flow rate (kg/h) (output variable) of wet gas mixture based on two input variables of wet gas flow rate (kg/h) and absolute gas humidity (g/m3). Decision tree-based methods (M5P tree, random forest (RF), random tree (RT), and reduced error pruning tree (REPT) models), kernel function-based approaches (Gaussian process regression (GPR) and support vector machines (SVM)), and non-parametric regression-based technique (multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS)) were implemented for the first time to estimate the dry gas flow rate, and their respective prediction performances were analyzed statistically. Coefficient of correlation (CC), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Legates and McCabe's index (LMI), and Willmott's Index (WI) were used as the statistical indicators for validating the performance of each soft-computing model. While M5P model (MAE = 122.2382 kg/h, RMSE = 580.5626 kg/h, CC = 0.9875 for the testing data set) was better than other tree-based models (MAE = 363.2802–542.6119 kg/h, RMSE = 871.9363–1025.3444 kg/h, CC = 0.9587–0.9706 for the testing data set) and MARS model (MAE = 128.0083 kg/h, RMSE = 622.9515 kg/h, CC = 0.9852 for the testing data set), the statistical indicators approved the superiority of the radial basis kernel function-based GPR model (GPR-RBKF) model (MAE = 163.3266 kg/h, RMSE = 483.1359 kg/h, CC = 0.9915 for the testing data set) over other implemented models in predicting the dry gas flow rate. The findings highlighted the potential of soft-computing methodologies in precise estimation of dry gas flow rate in wet gas mixture, particularly, in situations where the measurement of such parameters with traditional deterministic models is practically not possible. [Display omitted] • Soft-computing methods for estimation of dry content of wet gas mixture. • Performance evaluation of M5P, RF, RT, REPT, GPR, SVM, and MARS. • Superiority of GPR-RBKF over other models in terms of accuracy. • Superiority of M5P over other tree decision tree models in terms of error. • Higher precision of Gaussian processing with kernel-based regression vector. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]