Search

The production of advanced biofuels represents a near-term opportunity to decarbonize the heavy vehicle transportation sector. However, important barriers must be overcome and successful deployment of these technologies will require (i) catalyst and process development to reduce cost and improve carbon utilization and (ii) industry-relevant validation of operability to de-risk scale-up. Herein, we seek to address these challenges for an integrated two-step process involving catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) followed by co-hydrotreating of bio-oil with refinery streams. Technoeconomic and lifecycle analysis based on the data presented herein reveal the potential to generate low-carbon transportation fuels and chemical co-products with a modelled selling price of $2.83 gasoline gallon equivalent (2016$) and a 78% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil-based pathways. The feedstock for this research was a blend of 50 wt% loblolly pine and 50 wt% waste forest residues, and the CFP step was performed using an ex situ fixed bed of Pt/TiO2 with co-fed H2 at atmospheric pressure. Compared to previous state-of-technology benchmarks, advancements in catalyst design and synthesis methodology enabled a four-fold reduction in Pt loading and a 400% increase in time on stream without negatively impacting upgrading performance. Additionally, a first-of-its-kind integrated assessment of waste gas adsorption showed near quantitative recovery of acetone and 2-butanone, which collectively represent approximately 5% of the biomass carbon. The valorization of these co-products opens opportunities to support decarbonization of the chemical sector while simultaneously improving the overall process carbon efficiency to >40%. After condensation, the CFP-oil was co-hydrotreated with straight run diesel (10 : 90 vol%) to achieve 95% biogenic carbon incorporation. The oxygen content of the hydrotreated oil was below detection limits, and the diesel fraction exhibited a cetane number and cloud point suitable for a finished fuel. This manuscript concludes by highlighting remaining research needs associated with improving thermal management during catalyst regeneration, mitigating catalyst deactivation due to inorganic deposition, and demonstrating the durability of biomass feeding systems when operated in hydrogen-rich environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis (CFP) of woody biomass to produce hydrocarbon fuels. • Petroleum refinery co-hydroprocessing of CFP bio-intermediates. • Impact of chemical coproducts on economics and sustainability. • Impact of the source of hydrogen on sustainability. In this work we present model results for a scaled-up conceptual process informed by bench scale biomass catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) and hydrotreating experimental data. This process uses a Pt/TiO 2 catalyst during CFP, which produces a partially deoxygenated organic biocrude intermediate that is then hydroprocessed to a hydrocarbon fuel blendstock; the catalyst also enables high yields of acetone and methyl-ethyl-ketone (MEK) coproducts. Two options for hydroprocessing were modeled: (A) co-hydrotreating at a petroleum refinery using hydrogen sourced from steam reforming of natural gas and (B) standalone hydrotreating at a biorefinery using hydrogen sourced from CFP off gases. The results revealed that Case A was economically advantageous with a modeled minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) of $2.83/GGE or gallon gasoline equivalent (in 2016 US dollars), while the additional cost of standalone hydrotreating facilities in Case B increased the MFSP to $3.13/GGE. Conversely, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were lower for Case B (3.9 g CO 2 e/MJ) compared to Case A (21.5 g CO 2 e/MJ) due to the use of biogenic (Case B) and fossil-derived (Case A) hydrogen. In a third option (Case C), the requirements for separation and purification of acetone and MEK were removed from the refinery co-processing scenario (Case A) to evaluate the impacts of this process simplification. Elimination of these coproducts increased the MFSP to $3.21/GGE and GHG emissions to 35 g CO 2 e/MJ. These comparisons based on our detailed conceptual models provide economic and sustainability guidance regarding processing choices for future biorefineries. While refinery coprocessing using existing equipment and the production of relatively valuable coproducts can benefit the economics, the hydrogen-source and biogenic coproducts can have significant impacts on the sustainability of the process, and feasibility to use CFP off-gases or other renewable sources for hydrogen production can help lower GHG emissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]