Search

The origin of A-type granites is purely circumstantial. Granitic complexes are quite common and generally composed of different type granites. I- and A-type granite association in a granitic complex is often described in the literature. Here we present a granitic complex, i.e. the Pitou complex in southern Jiangxi province, South China that is composed of different varieties of A-type granites. Detailed zircon LA-ICP-MS U Pb chronology and in situ Hf isotope, mineral chemistry and whole-rock element and Sr Nd isotope data of this granitic complex are used to explore their origin and to further constrain the geodynamics of Mesozoic magmatism in South China. Our new data indicate that the Pitou complex was emplaced during the Late Triassic (237 Ma) (central to northern part) and Early Jurassic (188–185 Ma) (southern part), respectively and that both the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic granites belong to A-type but show contrasting origins. The Late Triassic granites show an association of alkali-feldspar granite-syenogranite-monzogranite and the rock type of the Early Jurassic granites is alkali-feldspar granite. All the granites are composed mainly of K-feldspar, quartz, plagioclase and biotite (ferri-biotite or annite) with biotite occurring as anhedral crystal, interstitial to quartz and feldspar. Both the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic granites have high SiO 2 (>70 wt%) and total alkalis (K 2 O + Na 2 O > 8 wt%) with high FeO T /(FeO T + MgO) and low Mg#. They are enriched in rare earth elements (except Eu) and depleted in Sr and Ba. They display Zr + Y + Ce + Nb >350 ppm, 10,000 × Ga/Al >2.6 and have high zircon saturation temperatures (>800 °C). Biotites in the granites are Fe-rich with very low Fe3+/Fe2+, indicating fairly reducing conditions. However, the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic granites also show some geochemical differences. The Late Triassic granites have lower FeO T /(FeO T + MgO) and higher Mg# than the Early Jurassic granites, with the Mg# of the former consistent with pure crustal melts and the Mg# of the latter much lower than pure crustal melts. In addition, the Late Triassic granites have lower zircon saturation temperatures (up to 843 °C, average 823 °C) than the Early Jurassic granites (up to 946 °C, average 875 °C). Furthermore, the Late Triassic granites have high 87Sr/86Sr (t) (0.7132–0.7226) and negative ε Nd (t) (−10.3 to −10.9) and ε Hf (t) (in situ zircon) (−11.5 to −11.6) that are similar to those of the early Paleozoic granitoids in the region whereas the Early Jurassic granites have low 87Sr/86Sr (t) (down to 0.7034) and positive ε Nd (t) (up to +3.0) and ε Hf (t) (in situ zircon) (up to +8.3) that are similar to those of the Early Jurassic gabbroic rocks in the region. Geochemical data and major element modeling suggest that the Late Triassic A-type granites were formed by shallow (ca. 15–20 km depth) dehydration melting of the early Paleozoic granitoids triggered by intraplating of basaltic magmas and the Early Jurassic A-type granites were produced by extensive fractionation (ca. 90% to 95%) from gabbroic magmas by removal of plagioclase, amphibole, K-feldspar, clinopyroxene and magnetite. We further suggest the origin of the Late Triassic A-type granites was related to the transtension of the regional NE–trending strike-slip faults caused by the early Indosinian continental collisions and the Early Jurassic A-type granites were emplaced in a back-arc extensional setting coupled with the slab rollback and subsequent slab break-off of the subducted Palaeo-Pacific plate. Our new data confirm that the early Mesozoic magmatism in South China was controlled by continental collisions during the Late Permian to Triassic amalgamation in Southeast Asia whereas the late Mesozoic magmatism was related to the northwestward subduction of the Palaeo-Pacific plate. A transition in the dominant tectonic regime from the Tethyan to the Pacific tectonic domain most likely took place during the Rhaetian. • The Pitou granitic complex emplaced during the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic. • Both Late Triassic and Early Jurassic granites are A-type but show contrasting origin. • Late Triassic granites formed by shallow dehydration melting of Paleozoic granitoids. • Early Jurassic granites formed by extensive fractionation from gabbroic magmas. • Origin of both A-type granites suggests different geodynamic mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]