Search

Prenatal trio exome sequencing (ES) has become integrated into the care for pregnant women when the fetus has structural anomalies. Details regarding optimizing indications for prenatal exome sequencing, its detection rates with different categories of fetal anomalies, and principles of interpretation of pathogenicity of sequence variants are still under investigation. However, there is now growing consensus about its benefits for finding the cause of fetal structural anomalies. What is not established, is whether exome or genome sequencing (GS) has a place in the care of all pregnant women. This report is a summary of the debate on this topic at the 26th International Conference on Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy. Both expert debaters considered the advantages and disadvantages. Advantages include the ability to diagnose serious childhood conditions without a prenatally observable phenotype, which creates the potential of early treatments. Disadvantages include difficulties with variant classification, counseling complexities, healthcare cost, and the burden on healthcare systems and families, in particular with the discovery of adult-onset disorders or variants of uncertain significance. Although both debaters weighed the balance of these conflicting arguments differently, they agreed that more research is needed to further explore the clinical utility and ethical aspects of GS for all pregnant women., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To determine the incremental diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) after negative chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in cases of prenatally diagnosed agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) and to identify the associated genes and variants. Methods: A systematic search was performed to identify relevant studies published up until June 2022 using four databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library. Studies in English reporting on the diagnostic yield of ES following negative CMA in prenatally diagnosed partial or complete ACC were included. Authors of cohort studies were contacted for individual participant data and extended cohorts were provided for two of them. The increase in diagnostic yield with ES for pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants was assessed in all cases of ACC, isolated ACC, ACC with other cranial anomalies and ACC with extracranial anomalies. To identify all reported genetic variants, the systematic review included all ACC cases; however, for the meta‐analysis, only studies with ≥ three ACC cases were included. Meta‐analysis of proportions was employed using a random‐effects model. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using modified Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy criteria. Results: A total of 28 studies, encompassing 288 prenatally diagnosed ACC cases that underwent ES following negative CMA, met the inclusion criteria of the systematic review. We classified 116 genetic variants in 83 genes associated with prenatal ACC with a full phenotypic description. There were 15 studies, encompassing 268 cases, that reported on ≥ three ACC cases and were included in the meta‐analysis. Of all the included cases, 43% had a P/LP variant on ES. The highest yield was for ACC with extracranial anomalies (55% (95% CI, 35–73%)), followed by ACC with other cranial anomalies (43% (95% CI, 30–57%)) and isolated ACC (32% (95% CI, 18–51%)). Conclusions: ES demonstrated an incremental diagnostic yield in cases of prenatally diagnosed ACC following negative CMA. While the greatest diagnostic yield was observed in ACC with extracranial anomalies and ACC with other central nervous system anomalies, ES should also be considered in cases of isolated ACC. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Prenatally detected central nervous system (CNS) anomalies present a diagnostic challenge. In this study, we compared the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with a major CNS anomaly.Methods: This was a retrospective study of 114 cases referred for genetic evaluation following termination of pregnancy (TOP) due to a major CNS anomaly detected on prenatal ultrasound. All fetuses were first analyzed by CMA. All CMA-negative cases were offered ES. CMA-positive cases were reanalyzed using ES to assess its ability to detect copy-number variants (CNVs).Results: CMA identified a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNV in 11/114 (10%) cases. Eighty-six CMA-negative cases were analyzed using ES, which detected P/LP sequence variants in 38/86 (44%). Among recurrent cases (i.e. cases with a previously affected pregnancy), the incidence of P/LP sequence variants was non-significantly higher compared with non-recurrent ones (12/19 (63%) vs 26/67 (39%); P = 0.06). Among the 38 cases with an ES diagnosis, 20 (53%) were inherited and carried a significant risk of recurrence. Reanalysis of 10 CMA-positive cases by ES demonstrated that the bioinformatics pipeline used for sequence variant analysis also detected all P/LP CNVs, as well as three previously known non-causative CNVs.Conclusions: In our study, ES provided a high diagnostic yield (> 50%) in fetuses with severe CNS structural anomalies, which may have been partly due to the highly selected case series that included post-TOP cases from a specialist referral center. These data suggest that ES may be considered as a first-tier test for the prenatal diagnosis of major fetal CNS anomalies, detecting both P/LP sequence variants and CNVs. This is of particular importance given the time constraints of an ongoing pregnancy and the risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This has been discussed in detail in a recent systematic review by Mellis I et al i .[2], demonstrating that the incremental diagnostic yield of ES over CMA/karyotyping was 15% for non-selected fetal anomalies, 42% for selected anomalies and 17% for CNS anomalies. While patients were offered concurrent chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and exome sequencing (ES), most opted for termination of pregnancy even before receiving a genetic test result due to the severity of anomalies and because ES in pregnancy is currently not covered by the Israeli healthcare system. Even if the fetal phenotype may not appear to be severe enough to warrant termination of pregnancy, a genetic test result may point to a severe neurodevelopmental issue that has only mild physical manifestations. [Extracted from the article]