Search

Mastectomy serves as the main surgical treatment for both invasive and in situ breast carcinoma and large phyllodes tumors. It is associated with skin necrosis, seroma, and surgical site infection in up to 30% of patients. In the present trial, we compared the complications in patients undergoing skin flap elevation by one of the 4 techniques: thick skin flap raised by scalpel(group1), thin skin flap raised with scalpel (group 2), thick skin flap raised with diathermy (group 3), and thin skin flap raised with diathermy (group 4). A randomized trial with superiority hypothesis and 2 × 2 factorial design was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi. Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSN) was recorded as the main outcome of interest. MSN was noted in 2.5% in group1, 10% in group 2, 7.5% in group 3, and 30% in group 4. MSN was observed in 5% cases with thick flap compared to 20% cases with a thin skin flap (p = 0.007). Raising the flap with scalpel was associated with MSN in 6.25% compared to 18.75% in the diathermy group (p = 0.029). We conclude that raising a thick flap with scalpel is associated with lowest risk of skin flap necrosis. Trial Registration: Clinical Trial Registry- India CTRI/2014/09/004978 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a common cutaneous side effect of capecitabine therapy. Apart from oral cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor (celecoxib), there are no proven strategies for the prevention of HFS. However, celecoxib is associated with significant cardiotoxicity. To date, no study has evaluated the role of topical COX inhibitor, diclofenac. In this study, we aim to compare topical 1% diclofenac gel with placebo in the prevention of capecitabine-induced HFS.Methods: This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group superiority trial: the Diclofenac Topical in Reducing Capecitabine induced HFS (D-TORCH) study. A total of 264 patients with breast and gastrointestinal malignancies will be randomly allocated (stratified by sex and type of therapy [monotherapy or combination regimen with capecitabine]) to receive either 1% topical diclofenac or placebo that will be applied over the palmar and dorsal surface of the hands twice daily whilst taking capecitabine for 12 weeks. The patients will be followed up until the end of four cycles. The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of topical diclofenac with placebo in preventing HFS (incidence of NCI CTCAEv5.0 grade 2 or higher HFS). The secondary objective is to compare the effect of topical diclofenac with placebo on preventing all grades of HFS (incidence of NCI CTCv5.0 all grade HFS), time to develop HFS (from the start of capecitabine), patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (HF-HRQoL questionnaire), adherence with the application (self-reported), capecitabine dose changes (number of patients with dose modifications due to HFS) and safety profile (NCICTCv5.0 all grade HFS) DISCUSSION: The D-TORCH study aims to determine if 1% topical diclofenac reduces the incidence of grade 2 or higher HFS in patients receiving capecitabine. To date, there have been a lot of trials for hand-foot syndrome prevention using agents like pyridoxine, vitamin E, carvedilol, and various polyherbal formulations, but none has been found successful. If the trial meets the primary end point, 1% topical diclofenac will be the new standard of care for HFS prevention.Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry of India  CTRI/2021/01/030592 . Prospectively registered on January 19, 2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]