Search

Soil texture and organic matter are considered overarching factors controlling a diversity of soil processes and properties. However, a more complete understanding of how these factors quantitatively affect other soil properties has been lacking due to either limited scope of land use and management conditions, confounding climate and environmental conditions with management, or narrow range of soil and management conditions. This study evaluated the strength of associations of sand and total soil N concentrations with soil physical, chemical, and biological properties and processes from 310 surface‐soil (0–10‐cm depth) samples (87% Ultisols, 4% Inceptisols, and ≤3% each of Alfisols, Spodosols, Entisols, and Histosols) collected under conventional‐till and no‐till cropland, grassland, and woodland in four physiographic regions of North Carolina. Sand concentration was most strongly associated with dry‐stable mean‐weight diameter (MWD), MWD product, and sieved soil density (|r| > 0.63, p < 0.001). Total soil N concentration was most strongly associated with particulate organic C and N and soil water content at water‐holding capacity (|r| > 0.74, p < 0.001). Soils under unfertilized woodlands deviated the most from general associations, suggesting that organic matter quality could be unique, and requires further investigation. Overall, sand concentration associated more closely with soil physical properties and total soil N concentration associated closely with both soil physical and biogeochemical properties. Soil chemical properties were only weakly associated with either property. This study suggests that soil texture and organic matter would be complementary, additional properties in holistic soil health assessments that already included routine soil chemical analyses. Core Ideas: Soil texture strongly associated with dry‐stable aggregation but weakly associated with water‐stable aggregation.Total soil N strongly associated with particulate organic C and N and soil water content at water‐holding capacity.Sand and total soil N concentrations were strong combined indicators of bulk density, sieved soil density, and cation‐exchange capacity.Sand and total soil N concentrations were unique soil health indicators in addition to routine soil chemical propertiesSieved soil density could be a relatively rapid and inexpensive indicator that combines the influences of soil texture and organic matter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Soil aggregation is considered a key indicator of soil health to protect soil against erosion, enhance organic C storage, and offer habitat for soil organisms. Various methods to assess aggregation may change interpretations of management, and therefore should be cross‐calibrated. We assessed the impact of initial sieve opening size (8 or 4.75 mm) prior to determination of dry‐stable and water‐stable mean‐weight diameter (MWD) from two fine‐textured soils—a Rhodic Hapludox from São Paulo, Brazil and a Rhodic Kanhapludult from North Carolina, United States. Both soils were subjected to management expected to alter surface soil conditions. As expected, initial sieving through 8 mm led to greater dry‐stable MWD (3.37 ± 0.60 mm) than initial sieving through 4.75 mm (1.94 ± 0.28 mm). However, soil stability index (water‐stable MWD/dry‐stable MWD) was not affected by initial sieve size opening (0.56 ± 0.13 mm mm−1 under both initial sieve openings). Management interpretations were consistent with both approaches as well, and in particular to detect the strong depth effect on water‐stable MWD (i.e., declining with depth). Water‐stable macroaggregates had 32% ± 25% greater C concentration than microaggregates; similarly under both initial sieving conditions. Soil stability index when initially sieved through 4.75 mm was highly associated with aggregate stability of 1–2‐mm sized dry aggregates, which is a more common procedure. We conclude that passing soil through a screen with 4.75‐mm openings to conduct a diversity of soil analyses can be appropriate for obtaining reasonable estimates of and interpretations about surface soil aggregation. Core Ideas: Soil stability index is water‐stable divided by dry‐stable mean‐weight diameter of whole soil.Soil stability index was similar whether soil was initially sieved through 8 or 4.75 mm.Water‐stable mean‐weight diameter and soil stability index declined with soil depth.Water‐stable macroaggregates had 32% ± 25% greater soil organic C than microaggregates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Soil erosion is a major constraint to agricultural sustainability. Land management that protects soil from water erosion can be assessed from the fraction of aggregates stable upon water immersion. Conservation management with minimal soil disturbance is known to enhance water‐stable aggregation, but how annual vs. perennial vegetative cover affects soil biological activity and aggregation from soils varying in texture remains relatively unexplored. This study assessed the effects of long‐term conventional‐till and no‐till cropland, grassland, and woodland on dry‐stable and water‐stable mean‐weight diameter (MWD) from 25 research stations across North Carolina. Soil clay concentration varied from 36 to 279 g kg–1 and sand concentration varied from 392 to 904 g kg–1 (5–95% distribution). Across locations, water‐stable MWD followed the order: conventional‐till cropland (0.64 mm) < no‐till cropland (0.87 mm) < woodland (1.12 mm) = grassland (1.15 mm). Soil stability index (i.e., water‐stable MWD/dry‐stable MWD) followed a similar order: conventional‐till cropland (0.59 mm mm–1) < no‐till cropland (0.76 mm mm–1) < grassland (0.92 mm mm–1) = woodland (0.96 mm mm–1). Although water‐stable MWD was positively associated with clay concentration (r =.50, p <.001, n = 310), soil‐test biological activity had the strongest association with water‐stable MWD (r =.80). Soil‐test biological activity reflected biological manipulation of surface‐concentrated organic matter, as mediated by conservation land uses. This study revealed the large impact of surface organic C and N resources on water‐stable aggregation through soil biological manipulations interacting across a textural gradient. Core Ideas: Conservation land uses of no‐till cropland, grassland, and woodland improved soil aggregation characteristics.Soil stability index discerned conservation land use impacts across a soil texture gradient.Soil aggregation characteristics were not different between grasslands and woodlands.Soil‐test biological activity and sand were strongly associated with soil aggregation characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]