Search

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often mimics symptoms of other diseases, and the interval between symptom onset and diagnosis may be long in some of these patients. Aims: To describe the characteristics associated with the time to SLE diagnosis and its impact on damage accrual and mortality in patients with SLE from a Latin American inception cohort. Methods: Patients were from a multi-ethnic, multi-national Latin-American SLE inception cohort. All participating centers had specialized lupus clinics. Socio-demographic, clinical/laboratory, disease activity, damage, and mortality between those with a longer and a shorter time to diagnosis were compared using descriptive statistical tests. Multivariable Cox regression models with damage accrual and mortality as the end points were performed, adjusting for age at SLE diagnosis, gender, ethnicity, level of education, and highest dose of prednisone for damage accrual, plus highest dose of prednisone, baseline SLEDAI, and baseline SDI for mortality. Results: Of the 1437 included in these analyses, the median time to diagnosis was 6.0 months (Q1–Q3 2.4–16.2); in 721 (50.2%) the time to diagnosis was longer than 6 months. Patients whose diagnosis took longer than 6 months were more frequently female, older at diagnosis, of Mestizo ethnicity, not having medical insurance, and having "non-classic" SLE symptoms. Longer time to diagnosis had no impact on either damage accrual (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.93–1.28, p = 0.300) or mortality (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.88–2.12, p = 0.200). Conclusions: In this inception cohort, a maximum time of 24 months with a median of 6 months to SLE diagnosis had no apparent negative impact on disease outcomes (damage accrual and mortality). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the predictors of the occurrence of severe autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and its impact on damage accrual and mortality in SLE patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The beneficial effect of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in decreasing LDL levels on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is well defined. The influence of this drug on HDL levels is still under debate and information about its effect on cholesterol reverse transport is lacking. Objective: To evaluate the effects of HCQ on HDL levels and the transfer of lipids to this lipoprotein in SLE. Methods: Nineteen SLE patients using only HCQ (SLE WITH HCQ), 19 SLE patients without any therapy (SLE WITHOUT THERAPY), and 19 healthy controls (CONTROL) were included. All three groups were premenopausal women age- and gender-matched. Serum lipids and apolipoproteins were determined by commercial kits. An in vitro transfer of four lipids (14C-Phospolipid, 3H-Cholesteryl ester, 3H-Triglyceride, and 14C-Unesterified cholesterol) from a radioactively labeled nanoemulsion donor to HDL was performed in all participants. Results: Groups had comparable mean age, weight, height, BMI(body mass index), and waist circumference (p >.05). Mean HDL levels were higher in SLE WITH HCQ group compared to SLE WITHOUT THERAPY(58.37 ± 14.04 vs 49.79 ± 8.0 mg/dL; p <.05) but lower than CONTROL (58.37 ± 14.04 vs 68.58 ± 9.99 mg/dL; p <.05). Total cholesterol (TC) and LDL levels were also significantly lower in SLE WITH HCQ compared SLE WITHOUT THERAPY(148.16 ± 16.43 vs 167.11 ± 30.18 mg/dL; p <.05, 75.05 ± 22.52 vs 96.05 ± 25.63 mg/dL; p <.05) and CONTROL (148.16 ± 16.43 vs 174.11 ± 23.70 mg/dL; p <.05, 75.05 ± 22.52 vs 88.53 ± 20.24 mg/dL; p <.05). The in vitro lipid transfer to HDL study revealed a significant difference among the three groups (p =.002) with a higher transfer of unesterified cholesterol(UC) in SLE WITH HCQ compared to SLE WITHOUT THERAPY(5.40 ± 1.05% vs. 4.44 ± 1.05%; p <.05). The latter was significantly decreased compared to CONTROL (5.40 ± 1.05% vs. 5.99 ± 1.71%; p <.05).The percentages of transfer of triacylglycerol (4.93 ± 0.69% vs. 4.50 ± 0.69% vs. 5.14 ± 1.01%; p =.054), esterified cholesterol (5.24 ± 0.70% vs. 4.96 ± 0.89% vs. 5.69 ± 1.27%; p =.079), and phospholipid (15.67 ± 1.03% vs. 15.34 ± 1.44% vs. 16.47 ± 1.89%; p =.066) were similar among groups. Conclusion: The present study is the first to demonstrate that HCQ promoted a higher transfer of unesterified cholesterol which may account for the increased HDL levels in lupus patients under HCQ. This desirable effect may underlie the reported reduced atherosclerosis in SLE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study is to assess the role of the 2019-European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (2019-EULAR/ACR) classification criteria at diagnosis and its domains in predicting long-term damage in systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE). We performed a retrospective analysis using an electronic chart database utilized in routine clinical care of SLE patients and established in 2000 in a tertiary hospital. Two hundred and nine consecutive SLE patients with disease onset ≥18 years old and long disease duration were included. Cumulative damage at the last visit was scored using the SLICC/ACR-Damage Index (SDI). The median age at SLE diagnosis was 28 years (18–63), disease duration was 14 years (8–25), and 88% were females. Damage (SDI≥1) was observed in 116/209 (55%). Patients with (SDI≥1, n=116) and without damage (SDI=0, n=93) had similar median disease duration [14 (8–25) vs. 12 (8–25) years, p=0.090] and age at diagnosis [23 (18–55) vs. 23 (18–56) years, p=0.998]. No correlation was observed between total 2019-EULAR/ACR score at diagnosis and SDI at last visit (r=0.007, p=0.913). Presence of renal domain at diagnosis was associated with renal damage at last visit (OR=3.6, 95%CI 1.2–10.4, p=0.017) and antiphospholipid antibodies domain predicted neuropsychiatric damage (OR=3.0, 95%CI 1.2–7.6, p=0.015). A ROC analysis identified that a cut-off >24 in 2019-EULAR/ACR score could predict a trend for renal damage (p=0.077) with a lower renal survival (Kaplan-Meier curve) for patients above this limit (p=0.029). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that 2019-EULAR/ACR score >24 at diagnosis (OR 4.583, 95%CI 1.052–19.962, p=0.043) was independently associated with renal damage. Specific domains in the 2019-EULAR/ACR criteria at diagnosis were associated with long-term organ-specific damage, particularly renal and neuropsychiatric harm. A 2019-EULAR/ACR score >24 predicted worse renal survival. Key Points • Presence of renal domain of the 2019-EULAR/ACR classification criteria at diagnosis was associated with long-term renal damage. • Presence of antiphospholipid antibodies domain at diagnosis was associated with long-term neuropsychiatric damage. • A 2019-EULAR/ACR overall score >24 at diagnosis was independently associated with renal damage and predicted worse renal long-term survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (PAPS) overlap clinical and immunological features. Therefore, misclassification of PAPS patients as SLE is a concern. The ACR/EULAR 2019 SLE classification has never been studied in PAPS. Objective: To verify if the ACR/EULAR 2019 SLE classification can correctly classify a PAPS patient as not having SLE and compare its performance with the SLICC 2012 SLE classification. Methods: One-hundred thrombotic PAPS patients who fulfilled the Sidney criteria were consecutively screened and those who attended the inclusion criteria were submitted to ACR/EULAR 2019 and SLICC 2012 classifications. Results: Sixty-seven PAPS patients were included in this study. The majority was female (89.6%) with median age at study inclusion of 45 years (35–53) and median PAPS disease duration of 13 years (8–19). PAPS correct classification was observed more often with ACR/EULAR 2019 than SLICC 2021 criteria (94.0% vs. 64.2%; p < 0.001). The 4 misclassified patients in ACR/EULAR 2019 were also misclassified in SLICC 2012. The comparison of misclassified patients to those correctly not classified as SLE resulted, for both criteria, in higher frequencies of hematological domain [ACR/EULAR 2019 (100% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.010) and SLICC 2012 (95.8% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.001)]. Further analysis of hematological manifestations revealed that for the ACR/EULAR 2019 leukopenia (100% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.004) and for the SLICC 2012 leukopenia/lymphopenia (91.7% vs. 7%, p < 0.001) were more frequent in misclassified group. Proteinuria (20.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.004) and low complement (45.8% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.033) were also more often observed in the incorrectly SLICC 2012 classified patients. Conclusion: ACR/EULAR 2019 had high accuracy for distinguishing PAPS from SLE, whereas the SLICC 2012 incorrectly classified more than one third of the PAPS patients as having SLE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess overall adrenal mineralocorticoid/glucocorticoid/androgen steroidogenesis in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) patients and the possible effect of prednisone on adrenal hormones and ovarian reserve. Methods: Fifty-one adult cSLE (ACR criteria) patients and 23 healthy controls were evaluated for adrenal steroidogenesis including mineralocorticoid (progesterone, deoxycorticosterone, aldosterone), glucocorticoid (17-OHprogesterone, 11-desoxycortisol, cortisol), and androgen (dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate, androstenedione, total testosterone, and dihydrotestosterone) hormones. Ovarian reserve assessment included follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol, anti-Müllerian hormone, ovarian volumes, and antral follicle count. Results: The median of current age [29.11 (19–39.8) vs. 30.8 (19.6–42.1) years, p = 0.502] was similar in adult cSLE and controls. Regarding mineralocorticoid/glucocorticoid, the median of progesterone (p = 0.003), 17-OH progesterone (p < 0.001), and 11-desoxycortisol (p = 0.036) were significantly lower in patients compared to controls. All androgen steroidogenesis hormones were reduced in the former group [dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (p < 0.001), androstenedione (p = 0.001), total testosterone (p = 0.005), and dihydrotestosterone (p < 0.001)]. Further comparison of patients with and without current use of prednisone and controls revealed a predominant impact on adrenal glucocorticoid and androgen steroidogenesis with reduced levels of 17-OH progesterone [0.17 (0–0.5) vs. 0.27 (0.1–2.9) vs. 0.33 (0.1–0.8) ng/mL, p < 0.001], dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate [0.155 (0–0.6) vs. 0.49 (0.1–1.6) vs. 1.11 (0.1–2.6) μg/mL, p < 0.001], androstenedione [0.56 (0.2–4.4) vs. 1.7 (0.5–4.5) vs. 2.33 (0.3–3.8) ng/mL, p < 0.001], total testosterone [12 (12–167) vs. 16 (12–28) vs. (16.5 (0–50) ng/d, p = 0.002], and dihydrotestosterone [92.68 (11.8–198.5) vs. 160.62 (37.9–842.1) vs. 188.3 (71.3–543.9) pg/ml, p < 0.001] in patients under this drug. In addition, patients with this therapy had reduced median ovarian volumes [4.14 (2–12) vs. 7.13 (2–25.7) vs. 5.18 (2.4–17.3) cm3, p = 0.028) that was not associated with cyclophosphamide cumulative dose (p > 0.05). The median prednisone dose was 15/mg/day (2.5–40). Conclusions: We provided novel evidence that cSLE patients have an overall androgen/glucocorticoid/mineralocorticoid adrenal suppression. Furthermore, low/moderate prednisone use seems to underlie these abnormalities and may also adversely affect ovarian reserve, independently of immunosuppressants. Key Points • cSLE patients have an overall androgen/glucocorticoid/mineralocorticoid adrenal suppression. • Low/moderate prednisone use may affect ovarian reserve, independently of immunosuppressants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Factors related to presentation of neuropsychiatric (NP) SLE manifestations, early in the course of the disease, and during follow up have not been clearly established. Purpose: To identify disease and non-disease related factors associated with NP manifestations in early SLE. Methods: We included 1193 patients from the GLADEL inception cohort free of NP involvement at cohort entry. We evaluated the association of demographic, clinical and laboratory data with NP involvement during follow-up. Statistical methods: Independent factors associated with NP involvement were identified using a multivariable Cox regression model. Results: Factors independently associated with NP manifestations were: mestizo ethnicity (HR 1.701, 95% CI 1.282–2.258, p = 0.0002), myalgias/myositis (HR 1.832, 95% CI 1.335–2.515, p = 0.0002), pneumonitis (HR 2.476, 95% CI 1.085–5.648, p = 0.0312), shrinking lung (HR 2.428, 95% CI 1.074–5.493, p = 0.0331) and hemolytic anemia (HR 1.629, 95% CI 1.130–2.347, p = 0.0089). Longer disease duration at cohort entry (13 to 24 months) was associated with a lower risk of developing NP manifestations (HR 0.642, 95% CI 0.441–0.934, p = 0.0206). Conclusions: Patients with myalgias/myositis, pneumonitis, shrinking lung and hemolytic anemia are at higher risk of NP involvement, whereas longer disease duration at cohort entry is associated with a lower risk of developing NP involvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The American Academy of Ophthalmology (2016-AAO) recommended hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) dose not to exceed 5 mg/kg/day (real body weight). Recently, it was reported that prescribed 2016-AAO dose provided adequate HCQ levels for most lupus nephritis (LN) patients, with low flare risk. However, the minimum HCQ dose required to keep adequate levels is unknown. Objectives: To evaluate if a further reduction in 2016-AAO dose (2–3 mg/kg/day) would sustain 12-month HCQ levels in LN patients with stable inactive disease. Methods: Seventy-three stable LN patients under prescribed full HCQ 2016-AAO dose for ≥6 months and adequate baseline HCQ levels (≥613.5 ng/mL) were divided in two groups: reduced 2016-AAO dose (2–3 mg/kg/day), n = 32, and full 2016-AAO dose (5 mg/kg/day), n = 41. All patients were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. HCQ levels were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Flare was defined as augment ≥ 3 in SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 and/or change in treatment. Rigorous clinical/laboratorial surveillance was performed. Results: Prospective evaluation revealed for reduced 2016-AAO dose group a decrease of HCQ levels from baseline to 3 months (1,404.9 ± 492.0 vs. 731.6 ± 385.0 ng/mL, p < 0.01), and sustained levels at 6 months (p = 0.273) and 12 months (p = 0.091) compared to 3 months. For the full 2016-AAO dose group, a decrease occurred only from baseline to 12 months (1343.5 ± 521.5 vs. 991.6 ± 576.3 ng/mL, p < 0.001). Frequencies of patients with inadequate levels at 6 months was higher in reduced 2016-AAO group than full 2016-AAO dose (59% vs. 24%, p = 0.005), as well as at 12 months (66% vs. 32%, p = 0.002). Six-month and 12-month flare frequencies were comparable for both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Prescribed HCQ low-dose regimen (2–3 mg/kg/day) does not sustain, for most patients, 6- and 12-month adequate HCQ levels. Full 2016-AAO dose maintained HCQ levels way above this limit. Trail registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03122431, registered on April 20, 2017 Key Points • Reduced American Academy of Ophthalmology (2016-AAO) hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) dose (2–3 mg/kg/day, real body weight) is unable to sustain HCQ blood levels within the safe cut-off defined for flare risk. • Full 2016-AAO dose (5 mg/kg/day) maintains a safe pattern of HCQ levels up to 12 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]