Search

Background: Femoral neurovascular injury is a serious complication in a direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty. However, dynamic neurovascular bundle location changes during the approach were not examined. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the effects of leg position on the femoral neurovascular bundle location using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: This study scanned 30 healthy volunteers (15 males and 15 females) with 3.0T MRI in a supine and 30-degree hip extension position with the left leg in a neutral rotation position and the right leg in a 45-degree external extension position. The minimum distance from the edge of the anterior acetabulum to the femoral nerve (dFN), artery, and vein were measured on axial T1-weighted images at the hip center level, as well as the angle to the horizontal line of the femoral nerve (aFN), artery (aFA), and vein from the anterior acetabulum. Results: The dFN in the supine position with external rotation was significantly larger than supine with neutral and extension with external rotation position (20.7, 19.5, and 19.0; p = 0.031 and 0.012, respectively). The aFA in supine with external rotation was significantly larger than in other postures (52.4°, 34.2°, and 36.2°, p < 0.001, respectively). The aFV in supine with external rotation was significantly larger than in supine with a neutral position (52.3° versus 47.7°, p = 0.037). The aFN in supine and external rotation was significantly larger than other postures (54.6, 38.2, and 33.0, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: This radiographic study revealed that the leg position affected the neurovascular bundle location. These movements can be the risk of direct neurovascular injury or traction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common disease of the hip in adults, and its etiology is divided into two groups: primary and secondary. Although acetabular dysplasia is the most frequent reason for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Japan, primary OA has increased recently. Although there are two types of femoral head migration in primary OA: superior and medial, there are some patients with prominent femoral head lateralization. This study aimed at evaluating the relationship between femoral head lateralization and bone morphology of the acetabulum and proximal femur using radiographic factors in primary OA of the hip. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted between 2008 and 2017 to assess 1308 hips with OA who underwent primary THAs at our institute. The diagnostic criteria for primary OA were Crowe type 1, Sharp's angle <45°, and center-edge (CE) angle >25°. We classified patients with primary OA into two groups based on femoral head lateralization: group L with lateralization or group N without. Radiographic factors included Sharp's angle, CE angle, acetabular inclination, acetabular depth ratio (ADR), acetabular head index (AHI), and femoral neck-shaft angle (FNA), all examined on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. Femoral neck anteversion was calculated using computerized axial tomography. Results. Primary OA was diagnosed in 210/1308 hips (16.1%) (group L: 112 hips (8.6%); group N: 98 (7.5%)). Patient demographics were not significantly different. Radiographic factors with observed significant differences between group L and group N were the average CE angle (33.0° vs. 35.1°, respectively, p = 0.009), ADR (251.6 vs. 273.4, p < 0.001), AHI (77.2 vs. 80.4, p < 0.001), and FNA (136.9° vs. 134.8°, p = 0.012). Conclusions. This investigation suggests that primary OA with femoral head lateralization demonstrated specific identifiable radiographic characteristics in the acetabulum and proximal femur that might contribute to hip joint instability such as the dysplastic hip. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cemented femoral component design including its mechanical behavior in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has influenced the occurrence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF). The main aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the calcar collar and surface finish in the cemented femoral component on the risk of PPFF.Materials and Methods: This retrospective review was undertaken of 1082 primary THAs in 912 patients using cemented femoral components followed for a minimum of five years (mean, 9.4 years; range, 5-24 years). The incidence of PPFF, patients' demographics and surgical details were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed for four different outcomes: any PPFF, revision of the femoral component for PPFF, aseptic loosening, and for any reason.Results: The overall incidence of PPFFs was 1.0% (n = 11): 1.4% (n = 10) in the collarless polished (CLP) group, none in the collared polished (CP) group and 0.6% (n = 1) in the collared non-polished (CNP) group (p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the femoral component at 12 years with PPFF as the end point was 97.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.9 to 99.8) in the collarless group and 99.7% (95% CI, 99.1 to 100) in the collared group (p = 0.048). With revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening as the end point, survivorship was 100.0% in the CLP and CP groups, and 98.1% (95% CI, 95.9 to 100) in the CNP group (CLP vs CP, p > 0.999; CLP vs CNP, p = 0.001; CP vs CNP, p = 0.112).Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the calcar collar in the cemented femoral component could play an important role to reduce the incidence of PPFF. The surface finish in the cemented femoral components influenced the incidence of femoral component revision for aseptic loosening over 5-12 years. Surgeons should consider not only the geometry and the mechanical function of the femoral components based on different design philosophies, but also potential complications associated with different designs that may require revision arthroplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. In primary and revision total hip arthroplasty, to prevent perioperative complications, the prediction of the optimal implant size is essential. Using three-dimensional computed tomography-based postoperative evaluation software, we explored the accuracy and the precision of measurement of the size, alignment, and position of the prosthetic components after total hip arthroplasty. Methods. Using postoperative evaluation software, the postoperative computed tomography data from 20 hips in 20 patients were evaluated. The component size, alignment, and three-dimensional positioning of the cup and stem were assessed. The concordance rates of the component, repeatability (intraobserver reliability), and reproducibility (interobserver reliability) of postoperative evaluation were calculated. The radiographic inclination and radiographic anteversion of the cup, anteversion, varus–valgus angle, and flexion–extension angles of the stem were measured for alignment. The implant positioning was measured along three axes, namely, X-axis (transverse), Y-axis (sagittal), and Z-axis (longitudinal). Results. The concordance rates of all parts are above 94%. The intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients of alignment measurement were very good for both cup (0.879–0.964) and stem (0.973–0.996). The intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients of cup positioning were very good (0.961–0.987) for all axes. The intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients of implant positioning were very good for the stem (0.879–0.995) for all axes. Conclusions. Computed tomography-based postoperative evaluation software was able to evaluate the size and position of total hip implants with high reproducibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]