1. Influence of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Survival Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy in Pathologically Proven Positive and Negative Lymph Nodes.
- Author
-
Kaczmarek, Krystian, Małkiewicz, Bartosz, Skonieczna-Żydecka, Karolina, and Lemiński, Artur
- Subjects
LYMPH node physiology ,CYSTECTOMY ,BLADDER tumors ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,CANCER chemotherapy ,LYMPH nodes ,INSTITUTIONAL review boards ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,COMPARATIVE studies ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,COMBINED modality therapy ,OVERALL survival - Abstract
Simple Summary: Understanding how effective a treatment is before a major bladder surgery can help doctors to plan better patient care. Our research investigated the survival rates of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before having their bladders removed due to cancer. We wanted to examine if there were differences in survival for those who had certain signs of cancer in their lymph nodes after the chemotherapy. Our findings suggest that those who showed these signs and had received prior chemotherapy had a more challenging health outlook than those who directly went for surgery. This information is crucial as it may guide doctors to consider additional treatments and closer patient monitoring in certain cases. Our study helps to provide a clearer picture for both doctors and patients when making decisions about bladder cancer treatment. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to radical cystectomy (RC) typically show better survival outcomes than those undergoing immediate surgery for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, most studies have not considered the lymph node (LN) status when evaluating NAC's survival benefits. This study sought to delineate the impact of NAC on patients based on their pathologically determined LN status at the time of RC. We examined data from 1395 patients treated at two departments between 1991 and 2022. Of them, 481 had positive LNs. A comparison of overall survival (OS) outcomes revealed that patients without LN involvement ((y)pN0) benefited from NAC with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.692 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.524–0.915). In contrast, patients with (y)pN+ showed no improvement with NAC (HR 0.927, 95%CI 0.713–1.205). Notably, patients treated with NAC for stage
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF