Search

Abstract Background Recently, the combination of venetoclax plus a hypomethylating agent (HMA; azacitidine ordecitabine) or low‐dose cytarabine (LDAC) showed promise in Phase III trials in previously untreated AML. In France at the time of this study, venetoclax was not yet approved for AML and there were therefore no formal usage recommendations. Here we report the first study in a French cohort that assessed venetoclax in combination with existing treatments for AML under real‐life conditions. Method This retrospective, real‐life study collected data on venetoclax use and management in a French cohort with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Result Of 118 patients, 81 were in second line/beyond (71.6% also hypomethylating agent [HMA]; 23.5% lowdose cytarabine [LDAC]) and 37 in first line. For venetoclax initiation, 57.3% underwent ramp up and 74.6% were hospitalized. Median venetoclax duration was 2.5 months (range 0.03‐16.2). With all treatment lines and regimens, most common grade 3/4 adverse events were hematologic (overall 96.4% of patients) and infections (57.1%). Dosage adjustments for drug interactions and safety varied between centers. In second‐line/beyond, median progression‐free survival was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7‐12.8) with venetoclax‐HMA and 3.4 months (1.3‐8.9) with venetoclax‐LDAC; overall response rate was 51.9% and 41.2%, respectively. Thus, we showed that venetoclax‐based treatment yields promising findings in patients with AML, but to address treatment complexity, practice harmonization is needed.

Abstract Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a fatal demyelinating disease of the central nervous system resulting from the reactivation of the John Cunningham virus (JCV). PML occurs almost exclusively during profound immune suppression but it can also be observed in immunocompromised subjects as part of an inflammatory immune reconstitution syndrome (IRIS) in patients receiving antiviral therapy. We report a case of PML in a 61‐year‐old patient with acute myeloid leukemia who had developed after discontinuation of durvalumab (anti‐PD‐L1) therapy initiated after multiple treatments. Results suggest that PML may result from two nonexclusive mechanisms: (i) an inhibition of the protective response of JCV‐specific T cells as a consequence of the blockade of the PD1‐PDL1 pathway, associated with a lack of compensatory expression of other inhibitory receptors by T cells and (ii) a neuroinflammatory response (PML‐IRIS) that may have contributed to virus reactivation.

Daunorubicin pharmacokinetics (PK) are characterised by an important inter-individual variability, which raises questions about the optimal dose regimen in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. The aim of the study is to assess the joint daunorubicin/daunorubicinol PK profile and to define an optimal population PK study design. Fourteen patients were enrolled in the PK ancillary study of the BIG-1 trial and 6–8 samples were taken up to 24 h after administration of the first dose of daunorubicin (90 mg/m2/day). Daunorubicin and daunorubicinol quantifications were assessed using a validated liquid chromatography technique coupled with a fluorescence detector method. Data were analysed using a non-compartmental approach and non-linear mixed effects modelling. Optimal sampling strategy was proposed using the R function PFIM. The median daunorubicin and daunorubicinol AUC0-tlast were 577 ng/mL·hr (Range: 375–1167) and 2200 ng/mL·hr (range: 933–4683), respectively. The median metabolic ratio was 0.32 (range: 0.1–0.44). Daunorubicin PK was best described by a three-compartment parent, two-compartment metabolite model, with a double first-order transformation of daunorubicin to metabolite. Body surface area and plasma creatinine had a significant impact on the daunorubicin and daunorubicinol PK. A practical optimal population design has been derived from this model with five sampling times per subject (0.5, 0.75, 2, 9, 24 h) and this can be used for a future population PK study.

Background: Recently, the combination of venetoclax plus a hypomethylating agent (HMA; azacitidine ordecitabine) or low‐dose cytarabine (LDAC) showed promise in Phase III trials in previously untreated AML. In France at the time of this study, venetoclax was not yet approved for AML and there were therefore no formal usage recommendations. Here we report the first study in a French cohort that assessed venetoclax in combination with existing treatments for AML under real‐life conditions. Method: This retrospective, real‐life study collected data on venetoclax use and management in a French cohort with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Result: Of 118 patients, 81 were in second line/beyond (71.6% also hypomethylating agent [HMA]; 23.5% lowdose cytarabine [LDAC]) and 37 in first line. For venetoclax initiation, 57.3% underwent ramp up and 74.6% were hospitalized. Median venetoclax duration was 2.5 months (range 0.03‐16.2). With all treatment lines and regimens, most common grade 3/4 adverse events were hematologic (overall 96.4% of patients) and infections (57.1%). Dosage adjustments for drug interactions and safety varied between centers. In second‐line/beyond, median progression‐free survival was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7‐12.8) with venetoclax‐HMA and 3.4 months (1.3‐8.9) with venetoclax‐LDAC; overall response rate was 51.9% and 41.2%, respectively. Thus, we showed that venetoclax‐based treatment yields promising findings in patients with AML, but to address treatment complexity, practice harmonization is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: We analysed long‐term outcome of patients receiving haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) as a first transplant for high‐risk Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). One hundred and ninety patients were included in this study, 63% of them had previously received brentuximab vedotin and/or checkpoint inhibitors. Seventy patients (37%) received an unrelated donor allo‐HSCT, 99 (51%) had myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and 60% had in vivo T‐cell/depleted grafts (TCD). The 100‐day cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II‐IV acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) was 25% and the 3‐year CI of chronic GVHD was 38%. The 3‐year CI of non‐relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse rate were 21% and 38% respectively. After a median follow‐up of 58 months, 3‐year overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were 58% and 41% respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that, in comparison to reduced‐intensity conditioning regimens with or without TCD, MAC using TCD had similar NRM and a lower risk of relapse leading to significantly better OS and PFS. MAC without TCD was associated with higher NRM and worse survival outcomes. These results suggest that in patients with high‐risk HL and candidates of allo‐HSCT, a MAC strategy with TCD might be the best option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, we discuss again the definition, the risk factor and guideline to treat the graft failure, the poor graft function and erythrobalstopenia. Graft failure is a severe but rare complication after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Despite disparity in the literature, we defined this complication and discussed the factor risks and recommendation for treatment based on new studies. Poor graft function is also a more frequent complication after HCT. New studies will soon be available to prove or not the current recommendation suggested in this article based on therapeutics medicine or cellular therapy. Erythroblastopenia, is a rarer complication post HCT. Despite anticipation for a better choice of compatibility donor/recipient, some patients still suffer from this complication., (Copyright © 2022 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)