Search

The efficacy and safety of levilimab (LVL) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been confirmed in controlled clinical trials. This article presents the results of a preliminary analysis of a non-interventional observational study of LVL in RA patients. Objective: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LVL in the treatment of patients with RA in real-world clinical practice. Materials and methods. The HELIOS study is a retrospective-prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study of retention rate of LVL therapy and the safety of LVL in patients with RA in real-world clinical practice. Patients received medical care, including LVL, according to routine clinical practice for the treatment of RA and Russian instructions for medical use of the drug. This article presents the results of an analysis of the efficacy and safety of LVL after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment. Efficacy was assessed using the DAS28-CRP/ESR, SDAI, CDAI and patient assessment of pain, fatigue and morning stiffness according to VAS (0–100 mm). Results and discussion. 524 patients from 42 medical centers in the Russian Federation were enrolled in the study from June 2022 to November 2023. The majority of patients were female (83.2 %) and the mean age of patients was 53 years. A statistically significant decrease in DAS28-CRP/ESR, SDAI, CDAI, patient assessment of pain, fatigue and morning stiffness (VAS) was observed after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, regardless of previous treatment with biologics or Jak inhibitors (JAKi). LVL was well tolerated by patients, the most frequently reported adverse events were infections, changes in peripheral blood and laboratory abnormalities characteristic of treatment with IL-6R inhibitors. Conclusion. In real-world clinical practice, LVL has been shown to be highly effective and well tolerated in patients with RA when prescribed as the first biologic disease-modifying antirheaumatic drus (bDMARD) and after switching from other bDMARDs or JAKi.

Background. Netakimab has shown high efficacy in controlled clinical trials in the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). This article presents results of an observational study of netakimab using in routine clinical practice.Methods. Patients were recruited for the study from August 2020 to December 2021 at 23 centers in the Russian Federation. The study included patients who were prescribed netakimab therapy before enrollment, so clinical and medical history data for the first visit were entered retrospectively, and following visits at weeks 12, 24 and 52 of therapy were collected within the study. Drug survival rate has been calculated according to Kaplan – Meier analysis.Results. The study included 137 patients (93 men and 14 women) with AS. The average age of patients was 42.3 (±11.9) years, 34.3% of patients had previously received therapy with genetically engineered biologic drugs, mainly tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. At the end of the analyzed period (52 weeks of therapy), 90.4% [95% CI: 85.4–95.7] of patients continued treatment with netakimab. The BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP showed statistically significant decreases in scores from baseline at all time points. Netakimab was well tolerated by patients; adverse effects (AEs), related to therapy according to the investigator’s opinion, were reported in 7 (5.1%) patients. 2 patients stopped taking netakimab due to AEs: terminal ileitis and chronic colitis.Conclusions. In real-world clinical practice, netakimab demonstrated high retention rates, a favorable safety profile, and sustained efficacy throughout the first year of therapy.

The beginning of the 21st century was marked by a simultaneous changes in view on pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Anti-TNFα inhibitors were the first biologics prescribed in axSpA. 20 year after the biological treatment was first prescribed we have enough data to understand their long-term efficacy.The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of etanercept in patients with axial spondyloarthritis based on data published in periodicals and clinical practice.Patients and methods. An analysis of publications from medical database and data from the St. Petersburg register of patients with rheumatic diseases (n=68) was performed to assess the effectiveness of etanercept in axSpA treatment in the long-term perspectives. Descriptive statistics methods were used.Results. In clinical studies and in real word practice, etanercept has shown high efficiency in reducing clinical, laboratory and visual manifestations of non-radiographic and radiographic axial spondyloarthritis at early and advanced stages of their development.Conclusions. In the long term, the use of etanercept is associated with an increasing slowdown in structural progression while maintaining a stable clinical and laboratory improvement. Discontinuation of treatment in the majority of patients leads to exacerbation of axSpA. At the same time, the low immunogenicity of etanercept allows the resumption of axSpA treatment with a high probability of re-achieving the lost effect with a low probability of secondary ineffectiveness or anaphylaxis.