Search

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) is one of the first responders to DNA damage and plays crucial roles in recruiting DNA repair proteins through its activity - poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation). The enrichment of DNA repair proteins at sites of DNA damage has been described as the formation of a biomolecular condensate. However, it remains unclear how exactly PARP1 and PARylation contribute to the formation and organization of DNA repair condensates. Using recombinant human single-strand repair proteins in vitro, we find that PARP1 readily forms viscous biomolecular condensates in a DNA-dependent manner and that this depends on its three zinc finger (ZnF) domains. PARylation enhances PARP1 condensation in a PAR chain length-dependent manner and increases the internal dynamics of PARP1 condensates. DNA and single-strand break repair proteins XRCC1, LigIII, Polβ, and FUS partition in PARP1 condensates, although in different patterns. While Polβ and FUS are both homogeneously mixed within PARP1 condensates, FUS enrichment is greatly enhanced upon PARylation whereas Polβ partitioning is not. XRCC1 and LigIII display an inhomogeneous organization within PARP1 condensates; their enrichment in these multiphase condensates is enhanced by PARylation. Functionally, PARP1 condensates concentrate short DNA fragments, which correlates with PARP1 clusters compacting long DNA and bridging DNA ends. Furthermore, the presence of PARP1 condensates significantly promotes DNA ligation upon PARylation. These findings provide insight into how PARP1 condensation and PARylation regulate the assembly and biochemical activities of DNA repair factors, which may inform on how PARPs function in DNA repair foci and other PAR-driven condensates in cells., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Mitochondrial apoptotic signaling cascades lead to the formation of the apoptosome, a 1.1-MDa heptameric protein scaffold that recruits and activates the caspase-9 protease. Once activated, caspase-9 cleaves and activates downstream effector caspases, triggering the onset of cell death through caspase-mediated proteolysis of cellular proteins. Failure to activate caspase-9 enables the evasion of programmed cell death, which occurs in various forms of cancer. Despite the critical apoptotic function of caspase-9, the structural mechanism by which it is activated on the apoptosome has remained elusive. Here, we used a combination of methyl-transverse relaxation-optimized NMR spectroscopy, protein engineering, and biochemical assays to study the activation of caspase-9 bound to the apoptosome. In the absence of peptide substrate, we observed that both caspase-9 and its isolated protease domain (PD) only very weakly dimerize with dissociation constants in the millimolar range. Methyl-NMR spectra of isotope-labeled caspase-9, within the 1.3-MDa native apoptosome complex or an engineered 480-kDa apoptosome mimic, reveal that the caspase-9 PD remains monomeric after recruitment to the scaffold. Binding to the apoptosome, therefore, organizes caspase-9 PDs so that they can rapidly and extensively dimerize only when substrate is present, providing an important layer in the regulation of caspase-9 activation. Our work highlights the unique role of NMR spectroscopy to structurally characterize protein domains that are flexibly tethered to large scaffolds, even in cases where the molecular targets are in excess of 1 MDa, as in the present example., Competing Interests: Competing interests statement:The authors declare no competing interest.

The AlphaFold Protein Structure Database contains predicted structures for millions of proteins. For the majority of human proteins that contain intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), which do not adopt a stable structure, it is generally assumed that these regions have low AlphaFold2 confidence scores that reflect low-confidence structural predictions. Here, we show that AlphaFold2 assigns confident structures to nearly 15% of human IDRs. By comparison to experimental NMR data for a subset of IDRs that are known to conditionally fold (i.e., upon binding or under other specific conditions), we find that AlphaFold2 often predicts the structure of the conditionally folded state. Based on databases of IDRs that are known to conditionally fold, we estimate that AlphaFold2 can identify conditionally folding IDRs at a precision as high as 88% at a 10% false positive rate, which is remarkable considering that conditionally folded IDR structures were minimally represented in its training data. We find that human disease mutations are nearly fivefold enriched in conditionally folded IDRs over IDRs in general and that up to 80% of IDRs in prokaryotes are predicted to conditionally fold, compared to less than 20% of eukaryotic IDRs. These results indicate that a large majority of IDRs in the proteomes of human and other eukaryotes function in the absence of conditional folding, but the regions that do acquire folds are more sensitive to mutations. We emphasize that the AlphaFold2 predictions do not reveal functionally relevant structural plasticity within IDRs and cannot offer realistic ensemble representations of conditionally folded IDRs.

Transcription factors play key roles in orchestrating a plethora of cellular mechanisms and controlling cellular homeostasis. Transcription factors share distinct DNA binding domains, which allows to group them into protein families. Among them, the Forkhead box O (FOXO) family contains transcription factors crucial for cellular homeostasis, longevity and response to stress. The dysregulation of FOXO signaling is linked to drug resistance in cancer therapy or cellular senescence, however, selective drugs targeting FOXOs are limited, thus knowledge about structure and dynamics of FOXO proteins is essential. Here, we provide an extensive study of structure and dynamics of all FOXO family members. We identify residues accounting for different dynamic and structural features. Furthermore, we show that the auto-inhibition of FOXO proteins by their C-terminal trans-activation domain is conserved throughout the family and that these interactions are not only possible intra-, but also inter-molecularly. This indicates a model in which FOXO transcription factors would modulate their activities by interacting mutually., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Authors.)