Search

Lymphatic anomalies comprise a spectrum of disorders ranging from common localized microcystic and macrocystic lymphatic malformations (LMs) to rare complex lymphatic anomalies, including generalized lymphatic anomaly, Kaposiform lymph-angiomatosis, central conducting lymphatic anomaly, and Gorham-Stout disease. Imaging diagnosis of cystic LMs is generally straightforward, but complex lymphatic anomalies, particularly those with multiorgan involvement or diffuse disease, may be more challenging to diagnose. Complex lymphatic anomalies are rare but associated with high morbidity. Imaging plays an important role in their diagnosis, and radiologists may be the first clinicians to suggest the diagnosis. Furthermore, radiologists are regularly involved in management given the frequent need for image-guided interventions. For these reasons, it is crucial for radiologists to be familiar with the spectrum of entities comprising complex lymphatic anomalies and their typical imaging findings. In this article, we review the imaging findings of lymphatic anomalies, including LMs and complex lymphatic anomalies. We discuss characteristic imaging findings, multimodality imaging techniques used for evaluation, pearls and pitfalls in diagnosis, and potential complications. We also review recently discovered genetic changes underlying lymphatic anomaly development and the advent of new molecularly targeted therapies.

The goal of this report is to describe, through a series of 5 cases, the clinical response and safety of alpelisib (BYL719) use in children and adults withWe reviewed clinical records of 5 patients from October 2019 through September 2021 followed by the pediatric hematology and multidisciplinary vascular anomalies teams at the Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt (MCJCHV). All patients carried a clinical or genetic diagnosis of PROS and were treated with alpelisib provided by a Novartis managed access program.We highlight improvement in reported symptoms, objective overgrowth measurements, and quality of life to varying degrees in all patients. We note dose-dependent hyperglycemia and gastrointestinal side effects in 2 of the 5 patients. No patients experienced any serious side effects.This case series reports on the real-world use of PI3K-α inhibition in the management of PROS. Ongoing clinical trials will provide efficacy and safety data as these drugs become more widely used in patients with vascular anomalies and syndromes secondary to somatic

The care of patients with vascular anomalies is quickly becoming a complex field requiring high-quality, coordinated multidisciplinary care. In this article, we review the history of multidisciplinary care in this field, discuss the benefits of this model of care, and outline some of the essential components and structure of a successful vascular anomalies team. We provide an overview of two example programs and a roadmap for other centers to develop their own multidisciplinary vascular anomalies teams.

ImportanceVascular malformations (VMs) are rare disorders of vasculogenesis associated with substantial morbidity. Improved understanding of their genetic basis is increasingly guiding management, but logistical barriers to obtaining genetic testing in patients with VM may constrain treatment options.ObjectivesTo examine the institutional mechanisms for and obstacles to obtaining genetic testing for VM.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis survey study invited members of the Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Vascular Anomalies Interest Group, representing 81 vascular anomaly centers (VACs) serving individuals up to 18 years of age, to complete an electronic survey. Respondents were mostly pediatric hematologists-oncologists (PHOs) but included geneticists, genetic counselors, clinic administrators, and nurse practitioners. Responses that were received between March 1 and September 30, 2022, were analyzed with descriptive methods. Requirements for genetic testing by several genetics laboratories were also reviewed. Results were stratified by size of the VAC.Main Outcomes and MeasuresVascular anomaly center and associated clinician characteristics and practice patterns for ordering and obtaining insurance approval for genetic testing for VMs were collected.ResultsResponses were received from 55 of 81 clinicians, for a response rate of 67.9%. Most respondents were PHOs (50 [90.9%]). Most respondents (32 of 55 respondents [58.2%]) replied that they order genetic testing on 5 to 50 patients per year and reported a genetic testing volume increase of 2- to 10-fold over the past 3 years (38 of 53 respondents [71.7%]). Most testing was ordered by PHOs (35 of 53 respondents [66.0%]), followed by geneticists (28 [52.8%]) and genetic counselors (24 [45.3%]). In-house clinical testing was more common at large and medium-sized VACs. Small VACs were more likely to use oncology-based platforms, which potentially miss low-frequency allelic variants in VM. Logistics and barriers varied by size of the VAC. Obtaining prior authorization was the duty shared among PHOs, nurses, and administrative staff, but the burden of insurance denials and appeals were on PHOs (35 of 53 respondents [66.0%]). Lack of administrative support; unclear institutional, insurance, and laboratory requirements; and lack of clinician education were barriers to genetic testing at VACs of all sizes. The effort to obtain genetic testing for patients with VM, compared with patients with cancer, was perceived as excessive, despite genetic testing being considered standard of care for this population.Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this survey study showed the barriers to genetic testing for VM across VACs, described differences between VACs based on size, and proposed multiple interventions to support clinicians ordering genetic testing for VM. The results and recommendations should have broader application to clinicians caring for patients for whom molecular diagnosis is important to medical management.

PURPOSE: Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) activates the fibrinolytic protease plasmin, which is implicated in blood loss and transfusion. While antifibrinolytic drugs have improved blood loss and reduced transfusion, variable blood loss has been observed in similar PSF procedures treated with the same dose of antifibrinolytics. However, both the cause of this and the appropriate measures to determine antifibrinolytic efficacy during high-blood-loss spine surgery are unknown, making clinical trials to optimize antifibrinolytic dosing in PSF difficult. We hypothesized that patients undergoing PSF respond differently to antifibrinolytic dosing, resulting in variable blood loss, and that specific diagnostic markers of plasmin activity will accurately measure the efficacy of antifibrinolytics in PSF. METHODS: A prospective study of 17 patients undergoing elective PSF with the same dosing regimen of TXA was conducted. Surgery-induced plasmin activity was exhaustively analyzed in perioperative blood samples and correlated to measures of inflammation, bleeding, and transfusion. RESULTS: While markers of in vivo plasmin activation (PAP and D-dimer) suggested significant breakthrough plasmin activation and fibrinolysis (P < 0.01), in vitro plasmin assays, including TEG, did not detect plasmin activation. In vivo measures of breakthrough plasmin activation correlated with blood loss (R(2) = 0.400, 0.264; P < 0.01), transfusions (R(2) = 0.388; P < 0.01), and complement activation (R(2) = 0.346, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite all patients receiving a high dose of TXA, its efficacy among patients was variable, indicated by notable intra-operative plasmin activity. Markers of in vivo plasmin activation best correlated with clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that the efficacy of antifibrinolytic therapy to inhibit plasmin in PSF surgery should be determined by markers of in vivo plasmin activation in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-diagnostic.