Search

Level of medical intervention (LMI) has to be adapted to each patient in geriatric care. LMI scales intend to help nonintensive care (NIC) decisions, giving priority to patient choice and collegial discussion. In the present study, we aimed to assess the parameters associated with the NIC decision and whether these parameters differ from those associated with in-hospital mortality.Prospective observational study.All consecutive patients from a French 62-bed acute geriatric unit over 1 year.Factors from the geriatric assessment associated with the decision of NIC were compared with those associated with in-hospital and 1-year mortality, in univariate and multivariate analyses.In total, 1654 consecutive patients (median age 87 years) were included. Collegial reflection led to NIC decision for 532 patients (32%). In-hospital and 1-year mortality were 22% and 54% in the NIC group vs 2% and 27% in the rest of the cohort (P .001 for both). In multivariable analysis, high Charlson Comorbidity Index [odds ratio (OR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.23, per point], severe neurocognitive disorders (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.67-4.55), dependence (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.45-2.59), and nursing home residence (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.85-3.13) were highly associated with NIC decision but not with in-hospital mortality. Conversely, acute diseases had little impact on LMI despite their high short-term prognostic burden.Neurocognitive disorders and dependence were strongly associated with NIC decision, even though they were not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. The decision-making process of LMI therefore seems to go beyond the notion of short-term survival.

Lymphoid neoplasms are a heterogeneous group of lymphoid neoplastic diseases with multiple presentations, and varying prognoses. They are especially frequent in older patients (OPs) and the atypism of this frail elderly population can make the diagnostic process even more difficult. Blood lymphocyte immunophenotyping (BLI) is essential in rapid noninvasive diagnosis orientation and guides complementary investigations. To our knowledge, BLI prescription has never been evaluated in OPs. We hypothesized that, when there is a suspicion of lymphoid neoplasm in the geriatric population, a BLI is performed in view of various clinical or biological abnormalities. This study aimed to: (1) describe the characteristics of hospitalized OPs having undergone BLI for suspected lymphoid neoplasm, (2) identify the causes leading to BLI prescription, and (3) identify the most profitable criteria for BLI prescription. This was a descriptive retrospective study on 151 OPs aged ≥75 years who underwent BLI over a 2-year period. Regarding BLI prescriptions, eight had lymphocytosis, constituting the “lymphocytosis group” (LG+), while the 143 others had BLI prescribed for reasons other than lymphocytosis (LG−), mainly general weakness and anemia. In the LG−, we compared OPs with positive and negative BLI results. The criteria found to be profitable for BLI prescription were lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, lymphocytosis, and thrombocytopenia. BLI identified circulating lymphoid neoplasms (positive BLI) in 21/151 OPs, mainly marginal zone lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In polymorbid OPs, as per our study population, the diagnostic and therapeutic complexity explained in part the sole use of indirect and minimally invasive diagnostic techniques such as BLI.

Due to the diversity of the elderly population and medical practices, the decision to transfer elderly patients to an intensive care unit is complex. This study aimed to identify the criteria used to take an advance decision to limit transfer to an intensive care unit of patients hospitalised in an acute geriatric unit.This retrospective study included, over a ten-month period, patients75 years and hospitalised in an acute geriatric unit. They were divided into two groups according to whether or not an advanced decision to limit transfer to an intensive care unit had been taken.In total, 906 elderly patients were included in the study. Of them, 446 had no advance decision to limit transfer to an ICU. Univariate analysis showed a correlation between an advance decision to limit transfer to an ICU and a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of less than 20/30. Malnutrition had no impact on the advance decision. In multivariate analysis, the factors associated with an advance decision to limit transfer to an ICU were an age 85 years, a hospitalisation in the last six months (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.72, Confidence Interval (CI) 95% [1.23-2.39]), residence in a nursing home (OR = 1.93, 95% CI [1.18-0.16]) and the presence of bedsores (OR = 2.44, 95% CI [1.20-0.98]). A zero Charlson score was associated with the absence of an advance decision to limit transfer to an ICU (OR = 0.42, 95% CI [0.26-0.67]).Some criteria are common to geriatricians, intensive care doctors and emergency physicians, while others are discordant, illustrating differences in physicians' practices.