Search

Abstract MF-LOGP, a new method for determining a single component octanol–water partition coefficients ( $$LogP$$ LogP ) is presented which uses molecular formula as the only input. Octanol–water partition coefficients are useful in many applications, ranging from environmental fate and drug delivery. Currently, partition coefficients are either experimentally measured or predicted as a function of structural fragments, topological descriptors, or thermodynamic properties known or calculated from precise molecular structures. The MF-LOGP method presented here differs from classical methods as it does not require any structural information and uses molecular formula as the sole model input. MF-LOGP is therefore useful for situations in which the structure is unknown or where the use of a low dimensional, easily automatable, and computationally inexpensive calculations is required. MF-LOGP is a random forest algorithm that is trained and tested on 15,377 data points, using 10 features derived from the molecular formula to make $$LogP$$ LogP predictions. Using an independent validation set of 2713 data points, MF-LOGP was found to have an average $$RMSE$$ RMSE = 0.77 ± 0.007, $$MAE$$ MAE = 0.52 ± 0.003, and $${R}^{2}$$ R 2 = 0.83 ± 0.003. This performance fell within the spectrum of performances reported in the published literature for conventional higher dimensional models ( $$RMSE$$ RMSE = 0.42–1.54, $$MAE$$ MAE = 0.09–1.07, and $${R}^{2}$$ R 2 = 0.32–0.95). Compared with existing models, MF-LOGP requires a maximum of ten features and no structural information, thereby providing a practical and yet predictive tool. The development of MF-LOGP provides the groundwork for development of more physical prediction models leveraging big data analytical methods or complex multicomponent mixtures. Graphical Abstract

A chemical engineering student's knowledge of theory, experimental design, and real-world processes is tested and enforced in the Unit Operations laboratory courses. However, instructors are facing challenges of delivering high-quality, hands-on laboratory content with limited resources and increasingly large class sizes. Limited in-lab time is often inefficiently allocated to individualized instruction, which broadly diminishes students' opportunity for learning by restricting the quantity of data they are able to collect. In addition, teaching in-person laboratories with social distancing measures during the pandemic posed significant logistical and safety challenges and required alternative techniques to be explored and adapted. The technological strategies implemented in this work aimed to manage laboratory course content more efficiently by enhancing familiarization, operation, and safety of lab equipment during and prior to class time. This work demonstrates the evolution of several technological tools that evaluated synchronous hybrid lab offerings and asynchronous prelab training using remote controlled cameras, web-interfaces, and augmented reality. The effectiveness of the implemented technologies was assessed via post course surveys and both negative and positive students' responses were discussed.

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) has remarkable potential for efficient conversion of abundant, decentralized organic wastes into renewable fuels. Because waste is a highly distributed resource with context-dependent economic viability, selection of optimal deployment sites is slowed by the need to develop detailed techno-economic analyses (TEA) for the thousands of potential deployment locations, each with their own unique combinates of scale, proximity to infrastructure/markets, and feedstock properties. An economic modeling framework that requires only easily obtainable inputs for assessing economic performance would therefore allow multiplexed analysis of many thousands of cases, whereas traditional TEA would not be possible for more than a handful of cases. Within such a context, the present study uses machine learning to guide development of a TEA and modeling framework which provides accurate cost predictions using three key inputs – feedstock cost, biocrude yield, and process scale – to estimate the minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) that an HTL process can achieve. The structure of the proposed framework is informed and based on empirical observations of cost projections made by a detailed TEA over a wide range of feedstock costs, biocrude yields, and process scales. A machine learning guided process was used to identify, train, and test a series of models using auto-generated data for training and independently reported data for testing. The most accurate model consists of three terms and requires 6 adjustable parameters to predict independently published values of MFSP (N = 28) to within an average value of ± 20.4%. It is demonstrated that the reduced-order model’s predictions fall within 40% of the corresponding published values 95% of the time, and in the worst case, the associated discrepancy is 45.9%, suggesting that the accuracy of the machine learned model is indeed comparable to the TEAs that were used to build it. Moreover, the terms in the model are physically interpretable, conferring greater reliability to the use of its predictions. The model can be used to predict the dependence of MSFP on biocrude yield, scale, and feedstock cost; interestingly, MFSP is insensitive to biocrude yield and/or scale under many situations of interest and identifying the critical value for a given application is crucial to optimizing economic performance. The proposed model can be also extended to evaluate economic performance of newly developed HTL-based processes, including catalytic HTL, and the methodological framework used in this study is deemed appropriate for the development of machine learned TEA models in cases of other similar waste-to-energy technologies.