Search

Background and Objective : Access to high-quality patient-derived brain tumor tissues is instrumental for translational neuro-oncology research. Glioblastoma tumor material resected by ultrasonic aspiration (UA) during surgery offers an abundant source of material; however, it is generally not used for research experiments. We hypothesize that UA-derived tumor tissue represents a source of tissue that accurately reflects the immune infiltrates of glioblastomas. Methods : In this study, we have utilized UA-derived tissue and performed a head-to-head comparison with paired resection tissue from the vital tumor core of the same patient. A combination of 16 fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies was designed to identify tumor-infiltrating T, B, and NK lymphocytes and characterize the TILs by spectral flow cytometry. Furthermore, a 5-plex panel was designed to spatially characterize the T cells, macrophages, and tumor cells on the paired UA and resection tissues. Results : UA-obtained cells exhibited a comparable yield and viability, as well as an abundance of tumor-infiltrating T, B, and NK lymphocytes compared to resection sample-derived cells. Importantly, we observed that there is a high concordance with respect to expression intensities of immune checkpoints by T cells in both types of tissue samples. Conclusions : These findings underscore the feasibility and reliability of utilizing the immune infiltrates from ultrasonic aspiration-acquired glioblastoma tissue.

In previous work we discovered that T lymphocytes play a prominent role in the rise of brain metastases of ER-negative breast cancers. In the present study we explored how T lymphocytes promote breast cancer cell penetration through the blood brain barrier (BBB). An in vitro BBB model was employed to study the effects of T lymphocytes on BBB trespassing capacity of three different breast carcinoma cell lines. Differential protein expression was explored by comparing the proteomes of the breast cancer cells before and after co-culture with activated T lymphocytes using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). siRNA was used to silence protein expression in the breast cancer cells to study contribution to in vitro BBB passage. Furthermore, protein expression in primary breast cancer tissues was explored and related to brain-metastatic potential. Co-culturing with activated T lymphocytes or their conditioned medium (CM) resulted in increased passage through the in vitro BBB. The effects were less for cell line MDA-MB-231-B2M2 (brain affinity) as compared to MDA-MB-231 and SK-BR-7. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics revealed significant alterations in the expression of 35 proteins by the breast cancer cell lines upon T cell contact. Among the proteins is coronin-1 A, a protein related to cell motility. Knockdown of CORO1A in the breast cancer cells reduced their ability to cross the artificial BBB to 60%. The effects were significantly less for the cell line derived from breast cancer with affinity for brain. The expression of coronin-1A was confirmed by immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR of 52 breast cancer samples of patients with metastasized breast cancers, with and without brain locations. Lastly, CORO1A upregulation was validated in a publicly available mRNA expression database from 204 primary breast cancers with known metastatic sites. We conclude that T lymphocytes trigger cancer cells to express proteins including coronin-1A that enable the cancer cells to cross an in vitro BBB. In addition, a prominent role of coronin-1A in the formation of cerebral metastases in breast cancer patients is strongly suggestive by its upregulation in tissue samples of breast cancer patients with brain metastases., Competing Interests: Declarations. Consent for publication: All authors have seen and approved the text for publication. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent: Institutional Review Board Statement: This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (MEC 02·953) and performed in adherence to the Code of Conduct of the Federation of Medical Scientific Societies in the Netherlands ( http://www.fmwv.nl/ ). Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Gastroesophageal cancer dynamics and drivers of clinical responses with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) remain poorly understood. Potential synergistic activity of dual programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) inhibition may help improve immunotherapy responses for these tumors. We report a phase Ib trial that evaluated neoadjuvant nivolumab (Arm A, n = 16) or nivolumab-relatlimab (Arm B, n = 16) in combination with chemoradiotherapy in 32 patients with resectable stage II/stage III gastroesophageal cancer together with an in-depth evaluation of pathological, molecular and functional immune responses. Primary endpoint was safety; the secondary endpoint was feasibility; exploratory endpoints included pathological complete (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The study met its primary safety endpoint in Arm A, although Arm B required modification to mitigate toxicity. pCR and MPR rates were 40% and 53.5% for Arm A and 21.4% and 57.1% for Arm B. Most common adverse events were fatigue, nausea, thrombocytopenia and dermatitis. Overall, 2-year RFS and OS rates were 72.5% and 82.6%, respectively. Higher baseline programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and LAG-3 expression were associated with deeper pathological responses. Exploratory analyses of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) showed that patients with undetectable ctDNA post-ICI induction, preoperatively and postoperatively had a significantly longer RFS and OS; ctDNA clearance was reflective of neoantigen-specific T cell responses. Our findings provide insights into the safety profile of combined PD-1 and LAG-3 blockade in gastroesophageal cancer and highlight the potential of ctDNA analysis to dynamically assess systemic tumor burden during neoadjuvant ICI that may open a therapeutic window for future intervention. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03044613 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Tumor mutation burden is an imperfect proxy of tumor foreignness and has therefore failed to consistently demonstrate clinical utility in predicting responses in the context of immunotherapy. We evaluated mutations in regions of the genome that are unlikely to undergo loss in a pan-cancer analysis across 31 tumor types (n = 9,242) and eight immunotherapy-treated cohorts of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, melanoma, mesothelioma, and head and neck cancer (n = 524). We discovered that mutations in single-copy regions and those present in multiple copies per cell constitute a persistent tumor mutation burden (pTMB) which is linked with therapeutic response to immune checkpoint blockade. Persistent mutations were retained in the context of tumor evolution under selective pressure of immunotherapy and tumors with a high pTMB content were characterized by a more inflamed tumor microenvironment. pTMB imposes an evolutionary bottleneck that cancer cells cannot overcome and may thus drive sustained immunologic tumor control in the context of immunotherapy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Despite treatment advancements with immunotherapy, our understanding of response relies on tissue-based, static tumor features such as tumor mutation burden (TMB) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. These approaches are limited in capturing the plasticity of tumor-immune system interactions under selective pressure of immune checkpoint blockade and predicting therapeutic response and long-term outcomes. Here, we investigate the relationship between serial assessment of peripheral blood cell counts and tumor burden dynamics in the context of an evolving tumor ecosystem during immune checkpoint blockade., Methods: Using machine learning, we integrated dynamics in peripheral blood immune cell subsets, including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), from 239 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and predicted clinical outcome with immune checkpoint blockade. We then sought to interpret NLR dynamics in the context of transcriptomic and T cell repertoire trajectories for 26 patients with early stage NSCLC who received neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade. We further determined the relationship between NLR dynamics, pathologic response and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) clearance., Results: Integrated dynamics of peripheral blood cell counts, predominantly NLR dynamics and changes in eosinophil levels, predicted clinical outcome, outperforming both TMB and PD-L1 expression. As early changes in NLR were a key predictor of response, we linked NLR dynamics with serial RNA sequencing deconvolution and T cell receptor sequencing to investigate differential tumor microenvironment reshaping during therapy for patients with reduction in peripheral NLR. Reductions in NLR were associated with induction of interferon-γ responses driving the expression of antigen presentation and proinflammatory gene sets coupled with reshaping of the intratumoral T cell repertoire. In addition, NLR dynamics reflected tumor regression assessed by pathological responses and complemented ctDNA kinetics in predicting long-term outcome. Elevated peripheral eosinophil levels during immune checkpoint blockade were correlated with therapeutic response in both metastatic and early stage cohorts., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that early dynamics in peripheral blood immune cell subsets reflect changes in the tumor microenvironment and capture antitumor immune responses, ultimately reflecting clinical outcomes with immune checkpoint blockade., Competing Interests: Competing interests: VA receives research funding to her institution from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Astra Zeneca. PMF has received research funding to his institution from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Corvus, Kyowa. He has also served as a consultant for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Iteos, Janssen, Mirati, Novartis, Sanofi and as a DSMB member for Polaris and Flame Therapeutics. KNS receives research funding to her institution from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, and Enara Bio, and holds founder’s equity in manaT Bio. VEV is a founder of Delfi Diagnostics and Personal Genome Diagnostics, serves on the Board of Directors and as a consultant for both organizations, and owns Delfi Diagnostics and Personal Genome Diagnostics stock, which are subject to certain restrictions under university policy. Additionally, Johns Hopkins University owns equity in Delfi Diagnostics and Personal Genome Diagnostics. VEV is an inventor of multiple licensed patents related to technologies from Johns Hopkins University. Some of these licenses and relationships are associated with equity or royalty payments directly to Johns Hopkins and VEV. VEV is an advisor to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Danaher, Genentech, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Within the last five years, VEV has been an advisor to Merck and Ignyta. These arrangements have been reviewed and approved by the Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. JW is a consultant for Personal Genome Diagnostics, is the founder and owner of Resphera Biosciences and holds patents, royalties or other intellectual property from Personal Genomic Diagnostics. JER is in the advisory board/consultant of Oncocyte, receives speaking fees for Astrazeneca, and has received research funding to his institution from Genetech/Roche, and Verastem. JB is in the advisory board/consultant of Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Genentech/Roche, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sanofi and Regeneron, receives grant research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS, Genentech/Roche, Merck, RAPT Therapeutics, Inc and Revolution Medicines and is in the Data and Safety Monitoring Board/Committees of GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi and Janssen. TS is in the advisory board/consultant of Cue Biopharma, Dracen, Innate, Nanobiotix, Merck, Sanofi, Synthekine, receives grant research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS, Cue Biopharma, Genentech/Roche, Merck, Nanobiotix, Synthekine, and is in the Data and Safety Monitoring Board/Committees of Astra Zeneca, and Nektar. VL has received research funding to his institution from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, SeaGen. He has also served as a consultant for Takeda, SeaGen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Guardant Health., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)