Search

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy. In the context of the current standard of care therapies in Canada, outcomes among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), particularly those with triple-class (or more) refractory disease remain poor. Immunotherapies have significantly changed the treatment landscape of MM. Since 2021, two BCMA-targeting CAR T-cell therapy products have been approved for RRMM—namely Idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) (ABECMA®) and Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta-cel) (CARVYKTI®), both of which are available in the US and Europe. Although they have shown unprecedented efficacy in RRMM, their clinical and logistical limitations must be acknowledged. MM CAR T-cell therapy is likely to be approved in Canada soon. Therefore, it is timely that we review the latest evidence for commercially available CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma, with a focus on its relevance and impact in the Canadian setting. There will be challenges to access and strategies must be in place to ensure equitable care for all Canadians with MM. Alongside haematologists working in the immune effector cell therapy programs, providers in the community will also play a role in the ongoing monitoring and management of long-term side effects including opportunistic infections and late neurotoxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disorder characterized by hemolytic anemia and vaso-occlusive episodes. Many adults with SCD require hospitalization for the management of acute manifestations. There appears to be a gap in the level of knowledge that general internal medicine (GIM) trainees possess regarding the treatment and management of SCD. METHODS: We created an online module that helps medical residents improve their knowledge about SCD. Participants were exposed to different scenarios related to SCD. A pre-and posttests were administered to detect improvement in knowledge and comfort when managing SCD and its acute complications. RESULTS: Thirty consecutive GIM residents participated. Of these, 20 completed the demographic survey, 17 completed the pretest, and 10 completed the posttest and usability survey. The median time to complete the module was 68 min. Fifty percent of participants were 1st-year postgraduation from medical school. Forty-five percent stated that they were uncomfortable managing patients with SCD 80% had cared for at least 1-5 patients with SCD. All reported having no SCD lectures in residency. The median pretest score was 12/20 (range, 8-15) and posttest score was 20.5/25 (range, 13-24). CONCLUSIONS: Residents agreed that the module was useful, helps understanding about SCD and its complication, and aids with clinical duties. This module demonstrated to be an effective educational tool that can support resident education during their internal medicine. Further strategies will be needed to improve the delivery of online modules to keep residents engaged with the module and attaint full benefit from these activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard consolidation treatment for eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). There is no standardized mobilization regimen for collection of CD34+ stem cells, which is crucial to the success of ASCT. Cyclophosphamide/GCSF is an effective regimen, although reported associated toxicities include risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). Since plerixafor was introduced in Canada, this mobilization agent has been increasingly used as needed with GCSF at Kingston Health Science Centre (KHSC), with elimination of cyclophosphamide. This single center, retrospective, quality improvement study evaluates mobilization and ASCT outcomes of MM patients who had undergone stem cell mobilization at KHSC with cyclophosphamide/GCSF+/−plerixafor without antibiotics, cyclophosphamide/GCSF+/−plerixafor with antibiotics, and GCSF+/−plerixafor without antibiotics. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted evaluating 137 patients. The primary outcome measure was FN rates with mobilization. Balancing measures include CD34+ cell collected, plerixafor usage, days of apheresis and transplant outcomes. Chi‐square, ANOVA, or Kruskal‐Wallis methods were used to test statistical significance where appropriate. Results: Our study noted a higher total and day one CD34+ count in the two groups utilizing cyclophosphamide in mobilization. All nine cases of FN occurred in these two groups (P <.05). Addition of antibiotics decreased, but did not eliminate risk of FN. There were no significant differences in the rate of plerixafor usage and number of apheresis days. Difference in transplant outcomes, including engraftment and transfusion support, were statistically but not clinically significant. A larger sample size may be needed to explore this fully. There was no significant difference in length of transplant hospital stay. Conclusion: The elimination of cyclophosphamide from mobilization regimens for MM appears to significantly reduce FN rates, without increasing balancing measures such as total number of apheresis days, plerixafor usage, duration of transplant hospitalization or mortality outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The prognostic value of kinetics of response to multiple myeloma (MM) therapy is controversial. We aimed to expand the knowledge on this topic by reviewing the kinetics of response to both first‐ and second‐line MM therapy, utilizing a homogeneously treated cohort and analyzing separately both M‐spike and light chain (LC) responses for each patient. Methods: We reviewed all patients who received first‐line cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone induction followed by autologous transplant with melphalan and lenalidomide maintenance in our center between 2007 and 2019. Results: Analyzing 360 patients, we observed no correlation between response kinetics to first‐ versus second‐line therapy at the individual patient level. Time to best response to first‐line therapy was not a predictor of outcome; however, longer time to best response was highly predictive of a favorable outcome in the second‐line setting, independent of other factors. Patients with IgA‐MM cleared their M‐spike faster than IgG‐MM, probably reflecting different half‐lives of these isotypes rather than disease biology, as the clearance of LC in both subtypes was similar. Conclusions: Analyzing both M‐spike and LC responses in a homogenously treated cohort, we identified important insights regarding the prognostic value of kinetic patterns. Prospective analysis may shed more light on unsolved questions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The prevalence of multiple myeloma is increasing and there is a need to evaluate escalating therapy costs (Canadian Cancer Statistics A, 2020). The MYX.1 phase II trial showed that high‐dose weekly carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (wKCD) is efficacious in relapsed and refractory disease. We conducted a descriptive cost analysis, from the perspective of the Canadian public healthcare system, using trial data. Methods: The primary outcome was the mean total cost per patient. Resource utilization data were collected from all 75 trial patients over a trial time horizon. Costs are presented in Canadian dollars (2020). Results: The cost of treatment was calculated from the time of patient (pt) enrollment until the second data lock. The mean total cost was $203 336.08/pt (range $17 891.27‐$505 583.55) Canadian dollars (CAD, where 1 CAD = 0.67 Euro (EUR)) and $14 081.45/pt per cycle. The median number of cycles was 15. The predominant cost driver was the cost of chemotherapy accounting for an average of $179 332.78/pt or $12 419.17/pt per cycle. Carfilzomib acquisition accounted for the majority of chemotherapy costs – $162 471.65/pt or $11 251.50/pt per cycle. Fifty‐six percent (56%) of patients had at least one hospitalization during the trial period with an average cost of $12 657.86 per hospitalization. Three patients developed thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) with an average cost of $18 863.32/pt including the cost of hospitalizations and therapeutic plasma exchange. Conclusions: High‐dose wKCD is an active triplet regimen for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) associated with reduced total cost compared with twice‐weekly carfilzomib‐based regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard consolidation treatment for eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). There is no standardized mobilization regimen for collection of CD34+ stem cells, which is crucial to the success of ASCT. Cyclophosphamide/GCSF is an effective regimen, although reported associated toxicities include risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). Since plerixafor was introduced in Canada, this mobilization agent has been increasingly used as needed with GCSF at Kingston Health Science Centre (KHSC), with elimination of cyclophosphamide. This single center, retrospective, quality improvement study evaluates mobilization and ASCT outcomes of MM patients who had undergone stem cell mobilization at KHSC with cyclophosphamide/GCSF+/-plerixafor without antibiotics, cyclophosphamide/GCSF+/-plerixafor with antibiotics, and GCSF+/-plerixafor without antibiotics., Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted evaluating 137 patients. The primary outcome measure was FN rates with mobilization. Balancing measures include CD34+ cell collected, plerixafor usage, days of apheresis and transplant outcomes. Chi-square, ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis methods were used to test statistical significance where appropriate., Results: Our study noted a higher total and day one CD34+ count in the two groups utilizing cyclophosphamide in mobilization. All nine cases of FN occurred in these two groups (P < .05). Addition of antibiotics decreased, but did not eliminate risk of FN. There were no significant differences in the rate of plerixafor usage and number of apheresis days. Difference in transplant outcomes, including engraftment and transfusion support, were statistically but not clinically significant. A larger sample size may be needed to explore this fully. There was no significant difference in length of transplant hospital stay., Conclusion: The elimination of cyclophosphamide from mobilization regimens for MM appears to significantly reduce FN rates, without increasing balancing measures such as total number of apheresis days, plerixafor usage, duration of transplant hospitalization or mortality outcomes., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)