Search

This Phase I/IIa open-label, single-arm clinical trial addressing advanced, refractory, metastatic breast cancer was conducted at six medical centers in the United States. We repeated inoculations with irradiated SV-BR-1-GM, a breast cancer cell line with antigen-presenting activity engineered to release granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), with pre-dose low-dose cyclophosphamide and post-dose local interferon alpha. Twenty-six patients were enrolled; 23 (88.5%) were inoculated, receiving a total of 79 inoculations. There were six Grade 4 and one Grade 5 adverse events noted (judged unrelated to SV-BR-1-GM). Disease control (stable disease [SD]) occurred in 8 of 16 evaluable patients; 4 showed objective regression of metastases, including 1 patient with near-complete regressions in 20 of 20 pulmonary lesions. All patients with regressions had human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matches with SV-BR-1-GM; non-responders were equally divided between matching and nonmatching ( p  = .01, Chi-squared), and having ≥2 HLA matches with SV-BR-1-GM ( n  = 6) correlated with clinical benefit. Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) testing to candida antigen and SV-BR-1-GM generated positive responses (≥5 mm) in 11 (42.3%) and 13 (50%) patients, respectively. Quantifying peripheral circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) showed that a drop in CAMLs was significantly correlated with an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS; 4.1 months vs. 1.8 months, p  = .0058). Eight of 10 patients significantly upregulated programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on CTCs/CAMLs with treatment ( p  = .0012). These observations support the safety of the Bria-IMT regimen, demonstrate clinical regressions, imply a role for HLA matching, and identify a possible value for monitoring CAMLs in peripheral blood.

Objectives: Racial and ethnic disparities in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among gynecologic cancer survivors are not well studied. We evaluated whether individual-level characteristics were associated with PROs in diverse gynecologic cancer survivors., Methods: Gynecologic cancer patients in an ambulatory oncology clinic completed a psychosocial and practical needs assessment before their appointments through the electronic medical record (EMR) patient portal. Assessments were available in English and Spanish. Fatigue, pain, physical function, depression, and anxiety were assessed with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) computer adaptive tests, and health-related quality of life was assessed by FACT-G7. PROs were dichotomized based on severity (normal/mild vs moderate/severe). Demographic and clinical information was collected. Analyses were performed using Chi-square, t-tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests., Results: A total of 582 women completed the assessment; 20% (n = 116) were racial minorities, and 54.5% (n = 310) were Hispanic. A total of 192 (32.8%) completed the assessments in Spanish. Hispanic patients had lower mean fatigue scores (49.31 vs 51.74, p = 0.01), and patients whose preferred language was Spanish had lower mean depression (47.63 vs 48.97, p = 0.05) and fatigue scores (48.27 vs 51.27, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the severity of PROs by race, ethnicity, or preferred language. QOL scores were worse in patients with high symptom severity for anxiety (p = 0.04) and physical functioning (p < 0.01). Current smokers had worse physical functioning (13.4% vs 6.5%, p = 0.03)., Conclusions: We found no significant differences in severity of PROs by race, ethnicity, or preferred language. Quality of life scores were worse for patients with high symptom severity for physical functioning and anxiety., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Avanzando Caminos (Leading Pathways): The Hispanic/Latino Cancer Survivorship Cohort Study aims to examine the influence of sociocultural, medical, stress-related, psychosocial, lifestyle, behavioral, and biological factors on symptom burden, health-related quality of life, and clinical outcomes among Hispanics/Latinos who have been previously treated for cancer. Avanzando Caminos is a prospective, cohort-based study of 3000 Hispanics/Latinos who completed primary cancer treatment within the past 5 years that is representative of the general Hispanic/Latino population in the United States. Participants will complete self-report measures at baseline (time [T] 1), 6 months (T2), 1 year (T3), 2 years (T4), 3 years (T5), 4 years (T6), and 5 years (T7). Blood samples drawn for assessment of leukocyte gene expression, cardiometabolic markers, and genetic admixture will be collected at baseline (T1), 1 year (T3), 3 years (T5), and 5 years (T7). Medical and cancer characteristics and clinical outcomes will be extracted from the electronic medical record and/or state cancer registry at each time point. Data analysis will include general latent variable modeling and latent growth modeling. Avanzando Caminos will fill critical gaps in knowledge in order to guide future secondary and tertiary prevention efforts to mitigate cancer disparities and optimize health-related quality of life among Hispanic/Latino cancer survivors., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The occurrence of multiple primary cancers (MPC) is thought to reflect increased cancer susceptibility in patients due to a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Here we conducted a retrospective review of 2,894 consecutive patients evaluated at a single institution and identified 31 (1.14%) individuals with a history of three or more primary cancers, then analyzed the genetic and environmental influences associated with their propensity for developing malignancies. We found that 35.5% of patients had a hereditary cancer syndrome (HCS), with high penetrance HCS in 72.7% of cases, suggesting that monogenic causes underly a significant proportion of triple primary cancer risk. Analysis of cancer frequencies found that the diagnosis of breast cancer was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of HCS, while the diagnosis of colorectal, prostate, and pancreas cancer was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of HCS. Comparison of HCS-positive and HCS-negative patients revealed similar demographic characteristics, mean age at first diagnosis, and family history of cancer. Moreover, no significant differences in lifestyle behaviors, occupational exposures, chronic health conditions, or treatment with chemotherapy and radiation were observed between HCS-positive and -negative groups, though outliers in tobacco smoking, as well as systemic treatment after both first and second primary cancers were observed. These findings indicate a robust contribution of HCS to cancer susceptibility among patients with triple primary cancers while environmental influences were less evident. This emphasizes the need for larger MPC cohorts incorporating additional genetic and environmental factors to more comprehensively characterize drivers of cancer risk., Prevention Relevance: In patients with three or more primary cancers, genetic predisposition explained a significant proportion of cases; however, treatment history, lifestyle habits, and other exposures appeared to play a less significant role. This highlights the value of early genetic screening and the need to develop more sensitive markers of cancer susceptibility. See related Spotlight, p. 193., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Describe the feasibility and implementation of an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated symptom and needs screening and referral system in a diverse racial/ethnic patient population in ambulatory oncology., Methods: Data were collected from an ambulatory oncology clinic at the University of Miami Health System from October 2019 to January 2021. Guided by a Patient Advisory Board and the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment model, My Wellness Check was developed to assess physical and psychologic symptoms and needs of ambulatory oncology patients before appointments to triage them to supportive services when elevated symptoms (eg, depression), barriers to care (eg, transportation and childcare), and nutritional needs were identified. Patients were assigned assessments at each appointment no more than once in a 30-day period starting at the second visit. Assessments were available in English and Spanish to serve the needs of the predominantly Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latino population., Results: From 1,232 assigned assessments, more than half (n = 739 assessments; 60.0%) were initiated by 506 unique patients. A total of 65.4% of English and 49.9% of Spanish assessments were initiated. Among all initiated assessments, the majority (85.1%) were completed at home via the patient portal. The most common endorsed items were nutritional needs (32.9%), followed by emotional symptoms (ie, depression and anxiety; 27.8%), practical needs (eg, financial concerns; 21.7%), and physical symptoms (17.6%). Across the physical symptom, social work, and nutrition-related alerts, 77.1%, 99.7%, and 78.8%, were addressed, respectively, by the corresponding oncology health professional, social work team member, or nutritionist., Conclusion: The results demonstrate encouraging feasibility and initial acceptability of implementing an EHR-integrated symptom and needs screening and referral system among diverse oncology patients. To our knowledge, this is the first EHR-integrated symptom and needs screening system implemented in routine oncology care for Spanish-speaking Hispanics/Latinos.