Search

Introduction: Achievement of an initial complete remission (CR) following induction chemotherapy is tightly correlated with survival in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, yet patients in CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) still experience improved outcomes compared with nonresponding patients. Whether CRi predicts prognosis in patients referred to an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is incompletely defined. In this analysis, we evaluated whether clinical outcomes of transplanted AML patients in CR and CRi were significantly different. Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis of all de novo AML patients who underwent an allo-SCT between 2001 and 2015. The cohort included all adult patients with AML who underwent a first allo-SCT either in first or second CR or CRi at the time of transplantation. Results: The study cohort included 186 CR patients and 44 CRi patients. In univariate analysis, CRi was associated with inferior 3-year survival and 3-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) compared to CR (41 vs. 62%; p = 0.022 and 27 vs. 10%; p = 0.006, respectively). In multivariate analysis, CRi was associated with decreased rates of survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.01; 95% CI, 1.24–3.25; p = 0.005) and NRM (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.6–7.8; p = 0.002). Conclusion: CRi in transplanted AML patients is potentially a potent predictor of increased NRM and survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Patients with FLT3‐mutated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) that relapse or are refractory (R/R) to intensive induction have poor outcomes. Gilteritinib has recently become standard‐of‐care for patients with R/R FLT3‐mutated AML. We investigated whether adding venetoclax to gilteritinib (gilt‐ven) improves outcomes as compared with gilteritinib monotherapy. We included patients treated with gilteritinib (n = 19) and gilt‐ven (n = 17) for R/R AML after intensive chemotherapy. Gilteritinib and gilt‐ven groups did not differ in terms of mCRc rates (53% and 65%, p = 0.51) and realization of allogeneic haematopoietic stem‐cell transplantation (HSCT, 47% and 35%, p = 0.5). Overall survival (OS) was comparable between groups, although a trend towards better OS was seen with gilt‐ven (12‐month OS 58.8% [95% CI 39.5%–87.6%]) versus gilteritinib (42.1% [95% CI 24.9%–71.3%] for gilteritinib). Early salvage with gilt‐ven versus any other gilteritinib‐based approach was associated with the best outcome (p = 0.031). Combination therapy was associated with increased haematological toxicity. In summary, gilt‐ven did not improve remissions or HSCT‐realization rates in patients with R/R FLT3‐mutated AML as compared with gilteritinib and was associated with increased haematological toxicity. Although OS did not differ, a trend towards better survival was suggested with gilt‐ven and a survival benefit was shown for gilt‐ven approach when sequenced early for salvage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT2) is a therapeutic option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) relapsing after a first transplant (HSCT1). However, patients allocated to HSCT2 may be a selected group with better prognosis and the added efficacy of HSCT2 is not well established. We retrospectively analyzed 407 consecutive patients with relapsed AML/MDS after HSCT1. Sixty-two patients had HSCT2 (15%) and 345 did not. The 2-year cumulative incidence rates of non-relapse mortality and relapse after HSCT2 were 26% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 17-39%) and 50% (95% CI: 39-65%), respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates were 25% (95% CI: 14-36%) and 7% (95% CI: 4-10%) in the HSCT2 and no-HSCT2 groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified female gender (hazard ratio [HR]=0.31, P=0.001), short remission duration after HSCT1 (HR=2.31, P=0.05), acute graft-versus-host disease after HSCT1 (HR=2.27, P=0.035), HSCT2 from a haplo-identical donor (HR=13.4, P=0.001) or matched unrelated donor (HR=4.53, P=0.007) and relapse after HSCT1 in earlier years (HR=2.46, P=0.02) as factors predicting overall survival after HSCT2. Multivariate analysis of all patients including HSCT2 as a timedependent variable identified relapse within 6 months after HSCT1 (HR=2.32, P<0.001), acute graft-versus-host disease before relapse (HR=1.47, P=0.005), myeloablative conditioning in HSCT1 (HR=0.67, P=0.011), female gender (HR=0.71, P=0.007), relapse in earlier years (HR=1.33, P=0.031) and not having HSCT2 (HR=1.66, P=0.010) as predictive of overall survival after relapse. In conclusion, HSCT2 is associated with longer survival compared to non-transplant treatments and may be the preferred approach in a subset of patients with relapsed AML/MDS after HSCT1.

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutational status is a pivotal prognosticator in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and significantly increases the risk of disease relapse. However, it remains unclear whether in FLT3-ITD patients referred for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), baseline cytogenetics significantly impacts clinical outcome. Using the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry, we performed a retrospective analysis of 1631 FLT3-ITD AML patients who underwent allo-SCT with the aim of determining the influence of cytogenetic risk category on patient outcomes. Median patient age was 49 years and median follow-up duration was 36 months. Two-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and incidence of relapse were 54% and 31.6%, respectively. Non-relapse mortality was experienced by 14.4% with a 2-year overall survival (OS) of 60.1%. On multivariate analysis, LFS was significantly lower in patients with intermediate and adverse risk cytogenetics compared with those with favorable risk cytogenetics, (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.06; p = .02), and (HR = 01.65, 95% CI, 1.13-2.40; p = .009), respectively. OS was significantly lower in patients with adverse risk cytogenetics compared with patients with favorable risk cytogenetics (HR = 1.74, 95% CI, 1.16-2.61; p = .008) with a trend toward lower OS in patients with intermediate risk cytogenetics compared to those with favorable risk cytogenetics (HR = 1.43, 95% CI, 1.00-2.05; p = .052). In addition, adverse risk patients and intermediate risk patients experienced higher relapse rates compared with favorable risk patients (HR = 1.83, 95% CI, 1.13-2.94; p = .013 and HR = 1.82, 95% CI, 1.19-2.77; p = .005). Overall, cytogenetic studies aid in refinement of risk stratification in transplanted FLT3-ITD AML patients., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)