Search

Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies have dramatically improved outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma, but approximately half these patients will not have a durable benefit. Phase 1-2 trials of adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have shown promising responses, but data from phase 3 trials are lacking to determine the role of TILs in treating advanced melanoma. METHODS: In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with unresectable stage IIIC or IV melanoma in a 1:1 ratio to receive TIL or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 therapy (ipilimumab at 3 mg per kilogram of body weight). Infusion of at least 5×10(9) TILs was preceded by nonmyeloablative, lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine) and followed by high-dose interleukin-2. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients (86% with disease refractory to anti-programmed death 1 treatment) were assigned to receive TILs (84 patients) or ipilimumab (84 patients). In the intention-to-treat population, median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2 to 13.1) in the TIL group and 3.1 months (95% CI, 3.0 to 4.3) in the ipilimumab group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.72; P

CD34+cell harvest yield and quality

Legends

Purpose:Targeted radiotherapy with 131iodine-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG) is effective for neuroblastoma (NBL), although optimal scheduling during high-risk (HR) treatment is being investigated. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of stem cell apheresis and study hematologic reconstitution after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with HR-NBL treated with upfront 131I-MIBG-therapy.Experimental Design:In two prospective multicenter cohort studies, newly diagnosed patients with HR-NBL were treated with two courses of 131I-MIBG-therapy, followed by an HR-induction protocol. Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (e.g., CD34+ cell) harvest yield, required number of apheresis sessions, and time to neutrophil (>0.5 × 109/L) and platelet (>20 × 109/L) reconstitution after ASCT were analyzed and compared with “chemotherapy-only”–treated patients. Moreover, harvested CD34+ cells were functionally (viability and clonogenic capacity) and phenotypically (CD33, CD41, and CD62L) tested before cryopreservation (n = 44) and/or after thawing (n = 19).Results:Thirty-eight patients (47%) were treated with 131I-MIBG-therapy, 43 (53%) only with chemotherapy. Median cumulative 131I-MIBG dose/kg was 0.81 GBq (22.1 mCi). Median CD34+ cell harvest yield and apheresis days were comparable in both groups. Post ASCT, neutrophil recovery was similar (11 days vs. 10 days), whereas platelet recovery was delayed in 131I-MIBG- compared with chemotherapy-only–treated patients (29 days vs. 15 days, P = 0.037). Testing of harvested CD34+ cells revealed a reduced post-thaw viability in the 131I-MIBG-group. Moreover, the viable CD34+ population contained fewer cells expressing CD62L (L-selectin), a marker associated with rapid platelet recovery.Conclusions:Harvesting of CD34+ cells is feasible after 131I-MIBG. Platelet recovery after ASCT was delayed in 131I-MIBG-treated patients, possibly due to reinfusion of less viable and CD62L-expressing CD34+ cells, but without clinical complications. We provide evidence that peripheral stem cell apheresis is feasible after upfront 131I-MIBG-therapy in newly diagnosed patients with NBL. However, as the harvest of 131I-MIBG-treated patients contained lower viable CD34+ cell counts after thawing and platelet recovery after reinfusion was delayed, administration of 131I-MIBG after apheresis is preferred.

S1: Neutrophil recovery post ASCT S2: Clonogenic capacity harvested stem cells

Apart from controlling hematopoiesis, the bone marrow (BM) also serves as a secondary lymphoid organ, as it can induce naïve T cell priming by resident dendritic cells (DC). When analyzing DCs in murine BM, we uncovered that they are localized around sinusoids, can (cross)-present antigens, become activated upon intravenous LPS-injection, and for the most part belong to the cDC2 subtype which is associated with Th2/Th17 immunity. Gene-expression profiling revealed that BM-resident DCs are enriched for several c-type lectins, including Dectin-1, which can bind beta-glucans expressed on fungi and yeast. Indeed, DCs in BM were much more efficient in phagocytosis of both yeast-derived zymosan-particles and Aspergillus conidiae than their splenic counterparts, which was highly dependent on Dectin-1. DCs in human BM could also phagocytose zymosan, which was dependent on β1-integrins. Moreover, zymosan-stimulated BM-resident DCs enhanced the differentiation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells towards neutrophils, while also boosting the maintenance of these progenitors. Our findings signify an important role for BM DCs as translators between infection and hematopoiesis, particularly in anti-fungal immunity. The ability of BM-resident DCs to boost neutrophil formation is relevant from a clinical perspective and contributes to our understanding of the increased susceptibility for fungal infections following BM damage.

Ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) are frequently applied for therapeutic gene editing as well as fundamental research because the method is fast, viral free, and shows fewest off target effects. We evaluated various parameters to genetically engineer human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) using Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (spCas9) RNPs, and achieve gene editing efficiencies up to 80%. We find that guide RNA (gRNA) design is critical to achieve high gene editing efficiencies. However, finding effective gRNAs for HSPCs can be challenging, while the contribution of numerous in silico models is unclear. By screening more than 120 gRNAs, our data demonstrate that in silico gRNA prediction models are ineffective. In this study, we established a time- and cost-efficient in vitro transcribed gRNA screening model in K562 cells that predicts effective gRNAs for HSPCs. RNP based screening thus outperforms in silico modeling and we report that gene editing is equally efficient in distinct CD34+ HSPC subpopulations. Furthermore, no effects on cell proliferation, differentiation, or in vitro hematopoietic lineage commitment were observed. Finally, no upregulation of p21 expression was found, suggesting unperturbed HSPC homeostasis.

Ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) are frequently applied for therapeutic gene editing as well as fundamental research because the method is fast, viral free, and shows fewest off target effects. We evaluated various parameters to genetically engineer human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) using

BACKGROUND Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and nucleosomes, consisting of cfDNA and histones, are markers of cell activation and damage. In systemic inflammation these markers predict severity and fatality. However, the role of cfDNA in acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGvHD), a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), is unknown. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to investigate the role of cfDNA as a marker of aGvHD. METHODS We followed nucleosome levels in 37 allogeneic HSCT patients and an established xenotransplantation mouse model. We determined the origin of cfDNA with a species-specific polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS In the plasma of aGvHD patients, nucleosome levels significantly increased around the time of aGvHD diagnosis compared to pretransplant, concurrently with a significant increase of known aGvHD markers ST2 and REG3α. In mice, we confirmed that nucleosomes were elevated during clinically detectable aGvHD. We found cfDNA to be mainly of human origin and to a lesser extent of mouse origin, indicating that cfDNA is released by (proliferating) human xeno-reactive PBMC and damaged mouse cells. CONCLUSION We show increased cfDNA both in an aGvHD mouse model and in aGvHD patients. We also demonstrate that donor hematopoietic cells and to a lesser degree (damaged) host cells are the cellular source of cfDNA in aGvHD. We propose that nucleosomes and cfDNA might be an additive marker for aGvHD.