Search

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition with high morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of PE is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms, making reliable diagnostic tools essential. This study addresses the clinical impact of interassay variability in D-dimer measurements on the utilization and diagnostic yield of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)., Objectives: To investigate the effect of different D-dimer assays on the decision to perform CTPA and the subsequent diagnostic yield in patients with suspected PE., Methods: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study analyzed data from 3 teaching hospitals in the southwest region of the Netherlands, covering the years 2018, 2019, 2022, and 2023. The study included data from 40,096 clinically requested D-dimer results and 11,372 CTPA records of patients with suspected PE. The D-dimer assays used were the Roche Tina-quant and Siemens INNOVANCE., Results: The study found significant differences in CTPA utilization and diagnostic yield based on the D-dimer assay used. In 2018 to 2019, hospitals using the Roche Tina-quant assay ordered 21% fewer CTPA scans and had a 9% higher positivity rate compared with those using the Siemens INNOVANCE assay., Conclusion: The findings highlight the necessity for assay-specific cutoff values or, ideally, the standardization of the D-dimer assay to optimize the accuracy and efficiency of PE diagnosis. This study demonstrates that the choice of D-dimer assay significantly influences the clinical management of suspected PE, affecting both the number of CTPA scans performed and the positivity rate of these scans. Implementing assay-specific cutoff values or standardization of the D-dimer assay could reduce unnecessary CTPA scans, minimize patient exposure to radiation, and lower healthcare costs. These results advocate enhanced collaboration between clinicians and laboratory specialists to accurately interpret D-dimer results within the context of the specific assay used. Future research should validate these findings in prospective studies and explore standardized protocols that account for interassay variability., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Introduction: The Thomas-plot has proven to be a helpful tool to discriminate between different types of anemia. This plot combines the reticulocyte hemoglobin content (Ret-He) with the soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR)/log ferritin (fer) ratio. In this study, we designed an alternative Thomas-plot in which Ret-He is combined with the transferrin (Tf)/log ferritin ratio. We validated both Thomas-plots in a population of anemic patients and compared the performance to the current laboratory diagnostics of anemia., Methods: A total of 536 anemic patients were included. The first 188 patients were used to generate ROC curves to define the optimal cut-off values for both Thomas-plots. With the following 348 patients included we studied the performance of the alternative and classical Thomas-plots compared to current anemia diagnostics., Results: Cut-off values were defined (Ret-He: 31.2 pg, sTfR/log(fer): 0.91, and Tf/log(fer): 1.71). With both Thomas-plots the amount of e causa ignota (ECI) cases dropped from 39% to 27%. A more in depth analysis on the iron status of anemia of chronic disease (ACD) patients and a subdivision between latent and classical iron deficiencies could be made with the help of both plots. A shift from classical iron deficiency anemia (IDA) cases according to the classical Thomas-plot toward functional IDA according to the alternative Thomas-plot was observed., Conclusion: The alternative Thomas-plot is an effective tool that gives a more in depth view on the iron status of anemic patients. In addition, it is easier to implement due to the use of transferrin rather than the soluble transferrin receptor., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)