Search

Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often develop resistance to current standard third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); no targeted treatments are approved in the osimertinib-relapsed setting. In this open-label, dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1 trial, the potential for improved anti-tumor activity by combining amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, with lazertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI, was evaluated in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC whose disease progressed on third-generation TKI monotherapy but were chemotherapy naive (CHRYSALIS cohort E). In the dose-escalation phase, the recommended phase 2 combination dose was established; in the dose-expansion phase, the primary endpoints were safety and overall response rate, and key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. The safety profile of amivantamab and lazertinib was generally consistent with previous experience of each agent alone, with 4% experiencing grade ≥3 events; no new safety signals were identified. In an exploratory cohort of 45 patients who were enrolled without biomarker selection, the primary endpoint of investigator-assessed overall response rate was 36% (95% confidence interval, 22-51). The median duration of response was 9.6 months, and the median progression-free survival was 4.9 months. Next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry analyses identified high EGFR and/or MET expression as potential predictive biomarkers of response, which will need to be validated with prospective assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02609776 .

PurposeEntrectinib potently inhibits tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRKAs)/B/C and ROS1, and previously induced deep [objective response rate (ORR) 57.4%] and durable [median duration of response (DoR) 10.4 months] responses in adults with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors from three phase I/II trials. This article expands prior reports with additional patients and longer follow-up.Patients and methodsPatients with locally advanced/metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors and ≥12 months' follow-up were included. Primary endpoints were ORR and DoR by blinded independent central review (BICR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial efficacy, and safety. The safety-evaluable populations included all patients who had received ≥1 entrectinib dose.ResultsAt clinical cut-off (August 31, 2020), the efficacy-evaluable population comprised 121 adults with 14 tumor types and ≥30 histologies. Median follow-up was 25.8 months; 61.2% of patients had a complete (n = 19) or partial response (n = 55). Median DoR was 20.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.0-38.2]; median PFS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 10.1-19.9). In 11 patients with BICR-assessed measurable central nervous system (CNS) disease, intracranial ORR was 63.6% (95% CI, 30.8-89.1) and median intracranial DoR was 22.1 (95% CI, 7.4-not estimable) months. The safety profile of entrectinib in adults and pediatric patients was aligned with previous reports. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1/2 and manageable/reversible with dose modifications. TRAE-related discontinuations occurred in 8.3% of patients.ConclusionsWith additional clinical experience, entrectinib continues to demonstrate durable systemic and intracranial responses and can address the unmet need of a CNS-active treatment in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors.

Purpose: The Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) is a nationwide cancer clinical trial group dedicated to advancing investigator-initiated trials (IITs) by conducting and supporting clinical trials. This study aims to review IITs conducted by KCSG and quantitatively evaluate the survival and financial benefits of IITs for patients. Materials and Methods: We reviewed IITs conducted by KCSG from 1998 to 2023, analyzing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) gains for participants. PFS and OS benefits were calculated as the difference in median survival times between the intervention and control groups, multiplied by the number of patients in the intervention group. Financial benefits were assessed based on the cost of investigational products provided. Results: From 1998 to 2023, KCSG conducted 310 IITs, with 133 completed and published. Of these, 21 were included in the survival analysis. The analysis revealed that 1,951 patients in the intervention groups gained a total of 2,558.4 months (213.2 years) of PFS and 2,501.6 months (208.5 years) of OS, with median gains of 1.31 months in PFS and 1.58 months in OS per patient. When analyzing only statistically significant results, PFS and OS gain per patients was 1.69 months and 3.02 months, respectively. Investigational drug cost analysis from six available IITs indicated that investigational products provided to 252 patients were valued at 10,400,077,294 won (approximately 8,046,481 US dollars), averaging about 41,270,148 won (approximately 31,930 US dollars) per patient. Conclusion: Our findings, based on analysis of published research, suggest that IITs conducted by KCSG led to survival benefits for participants and, in some studies, may have provided financial benefits by providing investment drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What is this summary about? This is a summary of a phase 2 clinical study called DeLLphi-301. The study looked at how effective and safe a medicine called tarlatamab was in participants with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Participants previously received at least two other treatments for their SCLC. Tarlatamab is a new medicine that locates a protein called DLL3 on the cancer, which allows T cells to attack the cancer. T cells belong to the body's natural defense system known as the immune system. The DeLLphi-301 study separated participants into two groups to receive tarlatamab 10 mg or 100 mg to determine which dose best shrank SCLC with minimal side effects. All participants received a small first dose (1 mg tarlatamab) to decrease the risk of an immune system reaction called cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Tarlatamab was given through the participant's vein once every 2 weeks. This method of administration is known as intravenous (IV) infusion. What were the results of the DeLLphi-301 study? In the group given 10 mg tarlatamab, 40% of participants responded to treatment (cancer shrank). In the group given 100 mg tarlatamab, 32% of participants responded to treatment (cancer shrank). After taking tarlatamab at either dose, 59% of participants lived for at least 6 months without their cancer growing or getting worse. The most common side effect was CRS, which occurred in 51% of participants in the group given 10 mg tarlatamab and 61% of participants in the group given 100 mg tarlatamab. Other common side effects were decreased appetite, fever, constipation, and anemia. Some participants had a type of immune reaction called immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). A small number of participants (3%) stopped taking tarlatamab because of side effects related to tarlatamab. What do the results from the DeLLphi-301 study mean? The study found that tarlatamab given every 2 weeks shrank SCLC in participants with SCLC who received previous treatments. Participants given the 10 mg tarlatamab dose had fewer side effects than those given the 100 mg tarlatamab dose. Clinical Trial Registration:NCT05740566 (DeLLphi-304) (ClinicalTrials.gov) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: We report clinical activity and safety of sitravatinib in patients with advanced cancer from basket cohorts with specific molecular alterations, in a Phase Ib study. Materials & methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors harboring amplification, mutation, or rearrangement of MET, AXL, RET, NTRK, DDR2, KDR, PDGFRA, KIT or CBL received sitravatinib once daily. Primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Results: In total, 113 patients were enrolled following a median of 3 (range 1–18) prior systemic regimens. Altered RET (n = 31), CBL (n = 31) and MET (n = 17) were most frequent cohorts. Overall, 68.9% had reduced tumor volume and most (61.5%) had a best objective response of stable disease. ORR was highest in patients with RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (21.1%) but did not differ significantly from the null hypothesis (ORR ≤15%; p = 0.316). Median progression-free survival and overall survival (5.7 and 24.2 months, respectively) were also longest in the RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer cohort. Diarrhea (61.1%), fatigue (50.4%) and hypertension (46.9%) were the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild-to-moderate in severity. The study closed before the planned number of patients were enrolled in all cohorts. Conclusion: Sitravatinib had a manageable safety profile with modest signals of clinical activity in patients with molecularly selected solid tumors. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT02219711 Plain Language Summary We report findings from a clinical study of sitravatinib which included patients with cancer that could not be removed by surgery or had spread to other parts of the body. The tumors of these patients contained specific molecular changes in one of the following genes: MET, AXL, RET, NTRK, DDR2, KDR, PDGFRA, KIT or CBL. All patients received treatment with sitravatinib once a day. Change in tumor size over time was assessed to see how effective treatment with sitravatinib was. In total, 113 patients joined the study. Most patients had already received a median of three different types of medicines for their cancer (and up to 18 different types of anticancer medicines). Most patients had tumors that contained alterations in RET, CBL or MET genes. During the study, the percentage of patients who had a decrease in the tumor size was highest in the group with non-small cell lung cancer that contained an altered RET gene (21.1%). However, this level of response to sitravatinib was not considered high enough to be medically important. The most common side effects during the study were diarrhea (61.1%), fatigue (50.4%) and high blood pressure (46.9%). Most side effects were mild or moderate in severity. The study provided the opportunity to assess sitravatinib as a treatment for cancers with specific gene mutations that are uncommon; the study closed before the planned number of patients were enrolled. In conclusion, the side effects seen in patients who received sitravatinib were manageable. Signals of how well sitravatinib worked were modest in patients with cancer that had spread to other parts of the body and contained specific molecular changes. Article highlights Basket trials that enroll cohorts of patients with various tumor types that harbor specific molecular alterations can inform the activity of novel treatments for rare genetic drivers, helping ensure patients receive treatment that is based on the molecular signature of their disease. Sitravatinib (MGCD516) is an oral small molecule inhibitor that targets a spectrum of closely related receptor tyrosine kinases involved in cancer development, predominantly TAM family (TYRO3, AXL, MERTK) and split family (VEGFR2, MET, RET, KIT) receptors. We report clinical activity and safety with sitravatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors that harbored genetic alterations relevant to the mechanism of action of sitravatinib, who participated in the Phase Ib basket study cohorts of the first-in-human study. Overall, 113 heavily pre-treated patients were enrolled; patients with tumors containing alterations in RET (n = 31), CBL (n = 31) and MET (n = 17) were the most frequent cohorts. Overall, the clinical activity of sitravatinib was modest: while most patients (68.9%) experienced a reduction in tumor volume, the majority (61.5%) had a best objective response of stable disease. Objective response rate was highest in patients with RET-rearranged NSCLC (21.1%) but this did not differ significantly from the null hypothesis (ORR ≤15%; p = 0.316). Despite the basket-cohort approach to enrollment, fewer patients than planned were enrolled across the cohorts in the timeframe of the study; this prevented further refinement of molecular alteration subtypes for which sitravatinib may have clinical utility. Sitravatinib had a manageable safety profile: most adverse events were mild-to-moderate in severity, with diarrhea (61.1%), fatigue (50.4%) and hypertension (46.9%) being most frequently observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spartalizumab (PDR001) is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). We conducted a single-arm, phase 2 trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of spartalizumab in patients with refractory esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients with histologically confirmed ESCC who experienced disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy received 300 mg of intravenous spartalizumab every three weeks until disease progression or occurrence of unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed objective response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Adverse events were closely monitored throughout the study. From March 2020 through April 2021, 44 patients with ESCC were enrolled. Of the 44 patients, the objective response rate was 20.5% (95% confidence interval: 8.5–32.4). With a median follow-up of 10.9 months, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.2 months and 11.2 months, respectively. In addition, the median duration of response was 24.7 months. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was grade 3 dysphagia (eight [18%] patients). Biomarker analyses explored programmed cell death ligand 1 and CD20 as potential predictive markers for PD-1 blockade. Spartalizumab showed promising activity with a manageable safety profile, indicating its potential as a new treatment option for patients with refractory ESCC. Trial registration: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT03785496. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evidence from the Phase III PACIFIC trial established durvalumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting PD-L1, following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) as a global standard of care for patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There remains an unmet need to improve upon the outcomes achieved with the PACIFIC regimen. Combining durvalumab with other immunotherapies may improve outcomes further. Two such immunotherapies include oleclumab, an mAb targeting CD73, and monalizumab, an mAb targeting NKG2A. Both agents demonstrated antitumor activity in early-phase trials. PACIFIC-9 (NCT05221840) is an international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial comparing durvalumab plus either oleclumab or monalizumab with durvalumab plus placebo in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC and no disease progression following cCRT. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05221840 (ClinicalTrials.gov) Plain Language Summary Durvalumab is a treatment that helps the body's immune system to identify and attack cancer cells by binding to a protein called PD-L1. Studies show that durvalumab lowers the risk of cancer growing or spreading, and prolongs survival, when administered after chemotherapy and radiation therapy ('chemoradiotherapy') in patients with a type of lung cancer called stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for whom surgery is not an option. Two antibody treatments have been developed that may help a patient's immune system to identify and attack cancer cells. Oleclumab binds to a protein on cancer cells called CD73, which prevents the production of adenosine, a chemical that obstructs the immune system from attacking the cancer. Monalizumab binds to NKG2A, a protein on immune cells that inhibits their ability to destroy cancer cells. Early studies suggest that combining either of these treatments with durvalumab may be better than durvalumab alone for slowing the growth and spread of cancer in patients with NSCLC. PACIFIC-9 is a study that aims to recruit approximately 999 patients with stage III NSCLC for whom surgery is not an option and who have completed chemoradiotherapy without the cancer growing or spreading. Patients will be randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive up to a year of treatment with durvalumab plus oleclumab, durvalumab plus monalizumab or durvalumab plus placebo. The primary measure of efficacy is the length of time that patients remain alive without the cancer growing or spreading for each combination versus durvalumab plus placebo. Executive summary The PACIFIC regimen Durvalumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to PD-L1 and overcomes PD-L1 mediated inhibition of T-cell activation, allowing T cells to recognize and kill tumor cells. The Phase III placebo-controlled, PACIFIC trial (NCT02125461) demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival with durvalumab in patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease had not progressed following platinum-based, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT); the PACIFIC regimen is now a global standard of care in this population. Oleclumab & monalizumab Extracellular adenosine can act as an immunosuppressant within the tumor microenvironment; oleclumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to and blocks CD73, an enzyme on the surface of tumor cells that drives the production of extracellular adenosine. NKG2A is a receptor on T cells and natural killer (NK) cells that can inhibit T cell and NK cell effector function when it binds to HLA-E; monalizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to NKG2A, preventing it from inhibiting NK and T cell function. In the open-label, randomized, Phase II COAST trial (NCT03822351) the combination of durvalumab with oleclumab, and durvalumab with monalizumab, were both associated with encouraging clinical activity compared with durvalumab alone in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC and no progression after cCRT; the findings of COAST support further evaluation of these combinations in a Phase III trial. PACIFIC-9 PACIFIC-9 (NCT05221840) is an international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial comparing the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus oleclumab and durvalumab plus monalizumab versus durvalumab plus placebo in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC. The trial is enrolling men and women aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically documented, unresectable, stage III NSCLC according to the TNM system as described in the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer staging manual (8th edition), whose disease has not progressed following definitive, platinum-based cCRT. The primary end point is PFS, defined as time from randomization until progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review, or death due to any cause. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Despite the availability of several epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), most patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) eventually develop resistance to these agents. Notably, EGFR _C797S mutations confer resistance to the third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib and no approved post-osimertinib targeted pharmacology options are currently available. BLU-945 is a novel, reversible, and orally available next-generation EGFR-TKI that selectively targets EGFR-activating (EGFR m) and resistance mutations (including EGFR_C797S) with nanomolar potency while sparing wild-type EGFR in vitro. Methods: In vitro activity of BLU-945 as a single agent and in combination with osimertinib was tested in engineered EGFR -mutant cell lines as well as patient-derived cells and patient-derived organoids. In vivo activity was evaluated in osimertinib-resistant patient-derived xenograft mouse models. Three patient cases from the global, first-in-human, phase I/II SYMPHONY trial (NCT04862780) demonstrating the clinical efficacy of BLU-945 were reported. Results: In vitro BLU-945 demonstrated inhibited cell viability and growth of EGFR -mutant/osimertinib-resistant cell lines. BLU-945 demonstrated in vivo tumor shrinkage in osimertinib-resistant models of NSCLC (osimertinib second line: EGFR _L858R/C797S and third line: EGFR _ex19del/T790M/C797S and L858R/T790M/C797S) both as monotherapy and in combination with osimertinib. BLU-945 also demonstrated tumor shrinkage in patients from the SYMPHONY trial. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the preclinical and early clinical activity of BLU-945 in EGFR m NSCLC progressing on previous EGFR-TKIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sasanlimab (PF-06801591), a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody, binds to programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), preventing ligand (PD-L1) interaction. Objectives: To evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, tolerability, and efficacy of two subcutaneous sasanlimab dosing regimens. Design: An open-label study consisting of phases Ib and II. Phase Ib: non-randomized, dose escalation, and expansion study in Asian participants with advanced malignancies. Phase II: conducted globally in participants with non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 positive or PD-L1 status unknown tumors; participants were randomized 1:2 to receive subcutaneous sasanlimab 300 mg once every 4 weeks (300 mg-Q4W) or 600 mg once every 6 weeks (600 mg-Q6W). Methods: Primary endpoint in phase Ib: dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring in first treatment cycle; in phase II: C trough and AUC. Results: A total of 155 participants (phase Ib, n = 34; phase II, n = 121) received sasanlimab. Phase Ib: no DLT reported. Phase II: ratio of adjusted geometric mean for AUCtau was 231.2 (90% CI, 190.1–281.2) and C trough was 111.5 (90% CI, 86.3–144.0) following 600 mg-Q6W (test) versus 300 mg-Q4W (reference). Phase Ib: grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 1/4 (25%) and 3/12 (25%) participants treated in 300 mg-Q4W dose escalation and expansion cohorts, respectively. Phase II: grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 3/41 (7.3%) and 3/80 (3.8%) participants treated with 300 mg-Q4W and 600 mg-Q6W, respectively; no grade 4/5 TRAEs. Phase II: confirmed objective response was observed in 11/41 (26.8% (95% CI, 14.2–42.9)) and 12/80 (15.0% (95% CI, 8.0–24.7)) participants treated with 300 mg-Q4W and 600 mg-Q6W, respectively. Conclusions: Phase Ib regimens were considered safe with no DLTs reported. In phase II, 600 mg-Q6W regimen criteria were met for AUCtau and C trough metrics to support PK-based extrapolation of efficacy of alternative regimen. Regimens were well tolerated, showing anti-tumor activity in participants with advanced solid tumors. Administration of sasanlimab at a dose of 600 mg-Q6W subcutaneously may serve as a convenient alternative to 300 mg-Q4W administration. Trial registration: NCT04181788 (ClinicalTrials.gov); 2019-003818-14 (EudraCT). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]