Search

ObjectiveProject 1 of the Preclinical Multicenter Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Antiepileptogenic Therapy (EpiBioS4Rx) consortium aims to identify preclinical biomarkers for antiepileptogenic therapies following traumatic brain injury (TBI). The international participating centers in Finland, Australia, and the United States have made a concerted effort to ensure protocol harmonization. Here, we evaluate the success of harmonization process by assessing the timing, coverage, and performance between the study sites.MethodWe collected data on animal housing conditions, lateral fluid-percussion injury model production, postoperative care, mortality, post-TBI physiological monitoring, timing of blood sampling and quality, MR imaging timing and protocols, and duration of video-electroencephalography (EEG) follow-up using common data elements. Learning effect in harmonization was assessed by comparing procedural accuracy between the early and late stages of the project.ResultsThe animal housing conditions were comparable between the study sites but the postoperative care procedures varied. Impact pressure, duration of apnea, righting reflex, and acute mortality differed between the study sites (p  0.05). Plasma quality was poor in 4% of the samples in UEF, 1% in Monash and 14% in UCLA. More than 97% of the final cohort were MR imaged at all timepoints in all study sites. The timing of imaging did not differ on D2 and D9 (p > 0.05), but varied at D30, 5 months, and ex vivo timepoints (p  0.05). A decrease in acute mortality and increase in plasma quality across time reflected a learning effect in the TBI production and blood sampling protocols.SignificanceOur study is the first demonstration of the feasibility of protocol harmonization for performing powered preclinical multi-center trials for biomarker and therapy discovery of post-traumatic epilepsy.

Preclinical MRI studies have been utilized for the discovery of biomarkers that predict post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE). However, these single site studies often lack statistical power due to limited and homogeneous datasets. Therefore, multisite studies, such as the Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Antiepileptogenic Therapy (EpiBioS4Rx), are developed to create large, heterogeneous datasets that can lead to more statistically significant results. EpiBioS4Rx collects preclinical data internationally across sites, including the United States, Finland, and Australia. However, in doing so, there are robust normalization and harmonization processes that are required to obtain statistically significant and generalizable results. This work describes the tools and procedures used to harmonize multisite, multimodal preclinical imaging data acquired by EpiBioS4Rx. There were four main harmonization processes that were utilized, including file format harmonization, naming convention harmonization, image coordinate system harmonization, and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics harmonization. By using Python tools and bash scripts, the file formats, file names, and image coordinate systems are harmonized across all the sites. To harmonize DTI metrics, values are estimated for each voxel in an image to generate a histogram representing the whole image. Then, the Quantitative Imaging Toolkit (QIT) modules are utilized to scale the mode to a value of one and depict the subsequent harmonized histogram. The standardization of file formats, naming conventions, coordinate systems, and DTI metrics are qualitatively assessed. The histograms of the DTI metrics were generated for all the individual rodents per site. For inter-site analysis, an average of the individual scans was calculated to create a histogram that represents each site. In order to ensure the analysis can be run at the level of individual animals, the sham and TBI cohort were analyzed separately, which depicted the same harmonization factor. The results demonstrate that these processes qualitatively standardize the file formats, naming conventions, coordinate systems, and DTI metrics of the data. This assists in the ability to share data across the study, as well as disseminate tools that can help other researchers to strengthen the statistical power of their studies and analyze data more cohesively.

Objective: Project 1 of the Preclinical Multicenter Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Antiepileptogenic Therapy (EpiBioS4Rx) consortium aims to identify preclinical biomarkers for antiepileptogenic therapies following traumatic brain injury (TBI). The international participating centers in Finland, Australia, and the United States have made a concerted effort to ensure protocol harmonization. Here, we evaluate the success of harmonization process by assessing the timing, coverage, and performance between the study sites., Method: We collected data on animal housing conditions, lateral fluid-percussion injury model production, postoperative care, mortality, post-TBI physiological monitoring, timing of blood sampling and quality, MR imaging timing and protocols, and duration of video-electroencephalography (EEG) follow-up using common data elements. Learning effect in harmonization was assessed by comparing procedural accuracy between the early and late stages of the project., Results: The animal housing conditions were comparable between the study sites but the postoperative care procedures varied. Impact pressure, duration of apnea, righting reflex, and acute mortality differed between the study sites (p < 0.001). The severity of TBI on D2 post TBI assessed using the composite neuroscore test was similar between the sites, but recovery of acute somato-motor deficits varied (p < 0.001). A total of 99% of rats included in the final cohort in UEF, 100% in Monash, and 79% in UCLA had blood samples taken at all time points. The timing of sampling differed on day (D)2 (p < 0.05) but not D9 (p > 0.05). Plasma quality was poor in 4% of the samples in UEF, 1% in Monash and 14% in UCLA. More than 97% of the final cohort were MR imaged at all timepoints in all study sites. The timing of imaging did not differ on D2 and D9 (p > 0.05), but varied at D30, 5 months, and ex vivo timepoints (p < 0.001). The percentage of rats that completed the monthly high-density video-EEG follow-up and the duration of video-EEG recording on the 7th post-injury month used for seizure detection for diagnosis of post-traumatic epilepsy differed between the sites (p < 0.001), yet the prevalence of PTE (UEF 21%, Monash 22%, UCLA 23%) was comparable between the sites (p > 0.05). A decrease in acute mortality and increase in plasma quality across time reflected a learning effect in the TBI production and blood sampling protocols., Significance: Our study is the first demonstration of the feasibility of protocol harmonization for performing powered preclinical multi-center trials for biomarker and therapy discovery of post-traumatic epilepsy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Brain atrophy induced by traumatic brain injury (TBI) progresses in parallel with epileptogenesis over time, and thus accurate placement of intracerebral electrodes to monitor seizure initiation and spread at the chronic postinjury phase is challenging. We evaluated in adult male Sprague Dawley rats whether adjusting atlas-based electrode coordinates on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increases electrode placement accuracy and the effect of chronic electrode implantations on TBI-induced brain atrophy. One group of rats (EEG cohort) was implanted with two intracortical (anterior and posterior) and a hippocampal electrode right after TBI to target coordinates calculated using a rat brain atlas. Another group (MRI cohort) was implanted with the same electrodes, but using T2-weighted MRI to adjust the planned atlas-based 3D coordinates of each electrode. Histological analysis revealed that the anterior cortical electrode was in the cortex in 83% (25% in targeted layer V) of the EEG cohort and 76% (31%) of the MRI cohort. The posterior cortical electrode was in the cortex in 40% of the EEG cohort and 60% of the MRI cohort. Without MRI-guided adjustment of electrode tip coordinates, 58% of the posterior cortical electrodes in the MRI cohort will be in the lesion cavity, as revealed by simulated electrode placement on histological images. The hippocampal electrode was accurately placed in 82% of the EEG cohort and 86% of the MRI cohort. Misplacement of intracortical electrodes related to their rostral shift due to TBI-induced cortical and hippocampal atrophy and caudal retraction of the brain, and was more severe ipsilaterally than contralaterally (p < 0.001). Total lesion area in cortical subfields targeted by the electrodes (primary somatosensory cortex, visual cortex) was similar between cohorts (p > 0.05). MRI-guided adjustment of coordinates for electrodes improved the success rate of intracortical electrode tip placement nearly to that at the acute postinjury phase (68% vs. 62%), particularly in the posterior brain, which exhibited the most severe postinjury atrophy. Overall, MRI-guided electrode implantation improved the quality and interpretation of the origin of EEG-recorded signals.