Search

Lorena Lorefice,1 Maurizio Nicola D’Alterio,2 Davide Firinu,3 Giuseppe Fenu,4 Eleonora Cocco1 1Multiple Sclerosis Center, Binaghi Hospital, ASL Cagliari, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 2Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 3Clinical Immunology, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 4Department of Neurosciences, ARNAS Brotzu, Cagliari, ItalyCorrespondence: Lorena Lorefice, Multiple Sclerosis Center, Binaghi Hospital, ASL Cagliari, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, via Is Guadazzonis 2, Cagliari, 09126, Italy, Email lorena.lorefice@hotmail.itAbstract: Given the aging population, with a peak age-specific prevalence that is shifting beyond the age of 50, several women currently living with MS are very close to menopause. Menopause is usually characterized by several specific symptoms with adverse impacts on different aspects of a woman’s quality of life, such as fatigue, and cognitive, mood and bladder disorders, which overlap with symptoms of MS. Generally, after this biological transition, women with MS appear to be subject to less inflammatory activity. However, several studies have reported an increase of disability accumulation after menopause, suggesting that it is a turning point to a more progressive phase of the disease. This may be attributable to the hormonal and immunological changes associated with menopause, with several effects on neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration increasing due to the immunosenescence of aging. This review summarizes the hormonal and immunological changes associated with menopause, detailing the effects on MS symptoms, outcomes, and the aging process. Furthermore, possible interventions to improve patients’ quality of life are evaluated. In fact, it is increasingly necessary to improve the global management of MS women, as well as their lives, at this multifaceted turning point.Keywords: multiple sclerosis, menopause, hormone therapy, aging, best practice

With the recent introduction of a number of highly effective disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) and the resulting almost complete prevention of acute relapses in many patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), the interest of MS clinicians has gradually shifted from relapse prevention to counteraction of disease progression and the treatment of residual symptoms. Targeting the cannabinoid system with nabiximols is an approved and effective strategy for the treatment of spasticity secondary to MS. Recently, the concept of spasticity plus syndrome (SPS) was introduced to account for the evidence that spasticity often appears in MS patients in clusters with other symptoms (such as pain, bladder dysfunction, sleep, and mood disorders), where cannabinoids can also be effective due to their broader action on many immune and neuronal functions. Interestingly, outside these symptomatic benefits, extensive pre-clinical and clinical research indicated how the modulation of the cannabinoid system results in significant anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects, all potentially relevant for MS disease control. This evidence makes nabiximols a potential disease modifying symptomatic treatment (DMST), a concept introduced in an attempt to overcome the often artificial distinction between DMTs and symptomatic therapies (STs)., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Background: Evidence on the impact of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) during pregnancy in women with multiple sclerosis (MS) is limited., Objectives: To investigate disease activity and pregnancy outcomes in a retrospective cohort of women exposed to DMF in early pregnancy., Methods: Women discontinuing DMF after pregnancy confirmation were identified from 29 Italian MS Centers. Disease activity 12 months before conception, during pregnancy, and 12 months postpartum were recorded, exploring reactivation predictors. Pregnancy and fetal outcomes were assessed., Results: The study analyzed 137 pregnancies (12 pregnancy losses, 125 live births) from 137 women (mean age 32.9 ± 4.7 years), discontinuing DMF within a median (interquartile range (IQR)) interval of 4.9 (3.7-5.7) weeks from conception. In live birth pregnancies, annualized relapse rate (ARR) significantly decreased during pregnancy (ARR = 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-0.14, p = 0.021) compared to pre-conception (ARR = 0.21 (95% CI: 0.14-0.30)) and increased postpartum ((ARR = 0.22 (95% CI: 0.15-0.32), p = 0.006). Median time to first relapse (TTFR) was 3.16 (IQR: 1:87-5.42) months. Higher pre-conception relapse number (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.08-5.02) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS; HR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.17-2.74) were associated with shorter TTFR, while treatment resumption with longer TTFR (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.74). Fetal outcomes were unaffected by DMF exposure., Conclusion: DMF discontinuation does not increase relapse risk during pregnancy. Early therapy restart prevents postpartum relapses. Early DMF exposure shows no adverse fetal outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: D.L. received travel funding from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Horizon, Alexion speaking or consultation fees from Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Teva, Biogen, Roche, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer-Schering. S.B. received travel funding from Biogen and Bristol-Myers Squibb. F.B. reported receiving teaching honoraria from Novartis and personal fees from Eisai, Biogen, and Chiesi outside the submitted work. M.P.A. has received research grants honoraria as a speaker and member of Advisory Boards from Biogen, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Roche Celgene BMS, Janssen, Horizon. S.B. speaker honoraria and/or travel/congress grant from: Novartis, Merck-Serono, Alexion, BMS, Biogen, Roche, Janssen-Cilag. Research grant from Roche. G.B. received honoraria for speaking or consultation fee from Almirall, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, Roche. M.B. declares fees from Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, and Novartis. S.B. has been founded for advisory board, academic purposes and speech honoraria by Genzyme, Roche, Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis and Almirall. P.C. received honoraria for speaking and/or for consultancy and support for participation to scientific congresses from Almirall, Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Teva, Alexion, Celgene BMS, Janssen, Horizon. M.C. received personal compensations for public speaking from Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva and consulting fees from Roche and Zambon. D.C. is an Advisory Board member of Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceutical, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fee from Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. He is also the principal investigator in clinical trials for Bayer-Schering, Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme. E.C. received travel grant, speaker fee and consultancy from Biogen Idec, Teva, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche and Admirall. A.C. has served on scientific advisory boards for Merck-Serono, Sanofi-Genzyme, Biogen, Novartis, Almirall. She has received institutional research support from Roche and Biogen. A.C. received speaker honoraria from Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva and travel grants from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva; advisory boards member honoraria from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Teva. E.D.A. received speaking honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Bayer-Schering. M.D.F. participated on advisory boards and steering committees for and received speaker or writing honoraria, research support and funding for traveling from Alexion, BMS, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Horizon, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Siemens Healthineers, Teva and Viatris. R.D. received honoraria as a speaker and member of advisory boards by: Merck-Serono, Roche, Novartis and travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Merck-Serono. R.F. has received consulting fees and honoraria for advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, and TEVA. E.F. has received travel grants from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, and Roche. M.F. is Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neurology, Associate Editor of Human Brain Mapping, Associate Editor of Radiology, and Associate Editor of Neurological Sciences; received compensation for consulting services from Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi; speaking activities from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Chiesi Italia SpA, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck-Serono, Neopharmed Gentili, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and Teva; participation in Advisory Boards for Alexion, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Takeda; scientific direction of educational events for Biogen, Merck, Roche, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme; he receives research support from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, and Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la SLA. M.F. published opinions in a medical journal on other pharmaceuticals and received financial support for travel and meeting attendance from Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Novartis. A.G. received honoraria for speaking and travel grants from Merck, Genzyme, Teva, Mylan, Roche and Novartis. F.G. received research funding from Sanofi-Genzyme and Biogen, fees for advisory boards and speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono and Roche, travel funding from Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, and Roche. A.I. received consulting fees from Janssen. R.L. received personal compensations for speaking or consultancy from Biogen, BMS, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Alexion. L.L. received travel grant, speaker fee and consultancy from Biogen Idec, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche and Almirall. M.L. has served on advisory boards and/or has received travel grants and/or speaker honoraria from Merck, Biogen, Almirall, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme. G.L. received speaker honoraria and/or consultancy from Biogen, Teva, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Almirall, Roche. G.M. received travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Horizon, Roche, Merck-Serono. M.M. received compensation for consulting services, speaking activities, and participation in advisory board from Alexion, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, CSL Behring, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Janssen, Merck-Serono, and Viatris; he received research support from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, and Roche. L.M. received honoraria for speaking activity at scientific meetings and/or advisory boards from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Roche, Alexion, Celgene, Almirall. G.N. received travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme, Horizon, Roche, Merck-Serono. F.P. reports grants from Biogen, grants from Merck, grants from FISM, grants from Onlus association, grants from University of Catania, personal fees from Almirall, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Biogen, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from TEVA, outside the submitted work. P.R. received travel expenses or honoraria for speaking or participating to advisory board by: Biogen idec, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi. S.R. has received travel expenses or honoraria for speaking or participating to advisory boardby: Biogen idec, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Teva, Roche, Bristol-Myers squibb. G.S. received travel expenses by Roche and Novartis. E.S. received speaker honoraria and/or consultancy from Biogen, Teva, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Almirall, and Roche. L.S. received congress grants from Merck-Serono, Biogen and board grants from Norvartis, Merck-Serono. M.P.S. has received consulting fees from Biogen, GeNeuro, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Teva. V.T. has received honoraria, travel grants and research grant support from FISM, Italian Ministry of Health, Alexion, Roche, Merck, Biogen, Novartis, Viatris, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Almirall, Horizon, Lundbeck, Sanofi, Janssen. D.V. has received travel grants and honoraria for Advisory Boards from Novartis, Roche, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, and Almirall. G.A.M. received ravel funding, speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva, Mylan, Bristol Mayers Squibb and research grants from Roche and Biogen. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

In multiple sclerosis (MS), alongside the physical symptoms, individuals often grapple with anxiety and depressive symptoms as prevalent comorbidity. Mood disturbances, frequently undertreated in clinical practice, significantly impact the quality of life of individuals with MS, exacerbating disability and hindering overall well-being. Furthermore, traditional antidepressant therapies are often associated with adverse events, such as sexual side effect, weight gain, which could limit their use in these patients. Vortioxetine is one of the most innovative antidepressant drugs in the current pharmacopeia. Its pharmacological profile includes serotonin reuptake inhibition, antagonism for hydroxytryptamine (HT) receptors 5-HT3, 5-HT1D and 5-HT7, partial agonism for 5-HT1B, and agonism for 5-HT1A. It has been shown to have a beneficial effect on depression-related cognitive dysfunction, as well as on anxiety, depression, anhedonia and emotional blunting. Recently a potential anti-inflammatory action was also described. Limited clinical studies have specifically explored the efficacy of vortioxetine in treating depressive symptoms in MS. However, extrapolating from existing research in major depressive disorder, it is plausible that vortioxetine's multimodal mechanism could provide a favorable therapeutic approach. This position paper, which summarizes the output of annual clinical meeting held by the DMSTs in MS Italian Study Group, is focused on the possible role that vortioxetine could play as symptomatic treatment (ST) of depressed patients with MS, hypothesizing a direct impact on the clinical course of the disease., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Artichokes ( Cynara scolymus L.) are valuable foods, thanks to their health benefits, but they generate significant waste during their production, harvesting, and processing, which poses sustainability issues. This study applied an agroprospecting approach to convert Tema artichoke biowaste (TB) into valuable resources, starting from a global perspective of the production chain to the targeted applications based on chemical and biological analysis. The major TB was identified in the outer bracts of the immature flower heads, which were collected throughout the harvesting season, extracted, and analyzed. The most abundant compounds were phenolic acids including chlorogenic acid and caffeoylquinic derivatives. Among flavonoids, cynaroside was the most abundant compound. Multivariate analysis distinguished batches by collection period, explaining 77.7% of the variance, with most compounds increasing in concentration later in the harvest season. Subsequently, TB extracts were analyzed for their potential in wound healing and anti-aging properties. Fibroblasts were used to assess the effect of selected extracts on cell migration through a scratch wound assay and on cellular senescence induced by etoposide. The results show a significant decrease in senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity, γH2AX nuclear accumulation, and both p53 and p21 protein levels. Overall, this study ascribes relevant anti-skin aging effects to TB, thus increasing its industrial value in cosmeceutical and nutraceutical applications.

Objective: No direct comparisons of the effect of natalizumab and ocrelizumab on progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and relapse-associated worsening (RAW) events are currently available. We aimed to compare the risk of achieving first 6 months confirmed PIRA and RAW events and irreversible Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 4.0 and 6.0 in a cohort of naïve patients treated with natalizumab or ocrelizumab from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Register., Methods: Patients with a first visit within 1 year from onset, treated with natalizumab or ocrelizumab, and ≥3 visits were extracted. Pairwise propensity score-matched analyses were performed. Risk of reaching the first PIRA, RAW, and EDSS 4.0 and 6.0 events were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to show cumulative probabilities of reaching outcomes., Results: In total, 770 subjects were included (natalizumab = 568; ocrelizumab = 212) and the propensity score-matching retrieved 195 pairs. No RAW events were found in natalizumab group and only 1 was reported in ocrelizumab group. A first PIRA event was reached by 23 natalizumab and 25 ocrelizumab exposed patients; 7 natalizumab- and 10 ocrelizumab-treated patients obtained an irreversible EDSS 4.0, while 13 natalizumab- and 15 ocrelizumab-treated patients reached an irreversible EDSS 6.0. No differences between the two groups were found in the risk (HR, 95%CI) of reaching a first PIRA (1.04, 0.59-1.84; p = 0.88) event, an irreversible EDSS 4.0 (1.23, 0.57-2.66; p = 0.60) and 6.0 (0.93, 0.32-2.68; p = 0.89)., Interpretation: Both medications strongly suppress RAW events and, in the short term, the risk of achieving PIRA events, EDSS 4.0 and 6.0 milestones is not significantly different., (© 2024 The Author(s). Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Introduction: CD20-depleting therapies are a real milestone in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). This study examined the ocrelizumab (OCR) use in patients with primary progressive (PP) and relapsing remitting (RR) MS, also evaluating the predictors of treatment response., Methods: Patients with MS treated with OCR between 2017 and 2022 were included, and OCR use trends examined. The patients' characteristics were assessed at baseline and after 24 months of OCR to assess the NEDA-3 status., Results: This study included 421 patients: 33 (7.9%) with PP and 388 (92.1%) with RR MS. Among these, 67 (17.3%) were naïve, while switchers from first- and second-line disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) were 199 (51.3%) and 122 (31.4%), respectively. An increasing trend in OCR use was reported. For six patients treated with rituximab, OCR was chosen to improve tolerability; for 390 switcher patients, the choice was due to ineffectiveness; and for 25, as an exit strategy from natalizumab due to JC virus positivity. NEDA-3 status was calculated for subjects exposed to 24 months of OCR and was achieved by 163/192 (84.9%) RR patients and 9/16 (56%) PP patients, with younger age (p = 0.048) and annualized relapse rate in the year previous to OCR (p = 0.005) emerging as determinants. For the 25 patients who switched to OCR after natalizumab, no clinical or MRI activity after 12 months was reported., Conclusion: OCR has been confirmed to be a highly efficacious option for patients with PP and RR MS, even proving to be a valid exit strategy for natalizumab., (© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Background: Bisphenol A (BPA; or 4,4'-isopropylidenediphenol) is an endocrine disrupting chemical. It was widely used in a variety of plastic-based manufactured products for several years. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recently reduced the Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) for BPA by 20,000 times due to concerns about immune-toxicity., Objective: We used human biomonitoring (HBM) data to investigate the general level of BPA exposure from 2007 to 2014 of European women aged 18-73 years (n = 4,226) and its determinants., Methods: Fifteen studies from 12 countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Luxembourg, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were included in the BPA Study protocol developed within the European Joint Programme HBM4EU. Seventy variables related to the BPA exposure were collected through a rigorous post-harmonization process. Linear mixed regression models were used to investigate the determinants of total urine BPA in the combined population., Results: Total BPA was quantified in 85-100 % of women in 14 out of 15 contributing studies. Only the Austrian PBAT study (Western Europe), which had a limit of quantification 2.5 to 25-fold higher than the other studies (LOQ=2.5 µg/L), found total BPA in less than 5 % of the urine samples analyzed. The geometric mean (GM) of total urine BPA ranged from 0.77 to 2.47 µg/L among the contributing studies. The lowest GM of total BPA was observed in France (Western Europe) from the ELFE subset (GM=0.77 µg/L (0.98 µg/g creatinine), n = 1741), and the highest levels were found in Belgium (Western Europe) and Greece (Southern Europe), from DEMOCOPHES (GM=2.47 µg/L (2.26 µg/g creatinine), n = 129) and HELIX-RHEA (GM=2.47 µg/L (2.44 µg/g creatinine), n = 194) subsets, respectively. One hundred percent of women in 14 out of 15 data collections in this study exceeded the health-based human biomonitoring guidance value for the general population (HBM-GV GenPop ) of 0.0115 µg total BPA/L urine derived from the updated EFSA's BPA TDI. Variables related to the measurement of total urine BPA and those related to the main socio-demographic characteristics (age, height, weight, education, smoking status) were collected in almost all studies, while several variables related to BPA exposure factors were not gathered in most of the original studies (consumption of beverages contained in plastic bottles, consumption of canned food or beverages, consumption of food in contact with plastic packaging, use of plastic film or plastic containers for food, having a plastic floor covering in the house, use of thermal paper…). No clear determinants of total urine BPA concentrations among European women were found. A broader range of data planned for collection in the original questionnaires of the contributing studies would have resulted in a more thorough investigation of the determinants of BPA exposure in European women., Conclusion: This study highlights the urgent need for action to further reduce exposure to BPA to protect the population, as is already the case in the European Union. The study also underscores the importance of pre-harmonizing HBM design and data for producing comparable data and interpretable results at a European-wide level, and to increase HBM uptake by regulatory agencies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: While NTRK fusion-positive cancers can be exquisitely sensitive to first-generation TRK inhibitors, resistance inevitably occurs, mediated in many cases by acquired NTRK mutations. Next-generation inhibitors (e.g., selitrectinib, repotrectinib) maintain activity against these TRK mutant tumors; however, there are no next-generation TRK inhibitors approved by the FDA and select trials have stopped treating patients. Thus, the identification of novel, potent and specific next-generation TRK inhibitors is a high priority., Methods: In silico modeling and in vitro kinase assays were performed on TRK wild type (WT) and TRK mutant kinases. Cell viability and clonogenic assays as well as western blots were performed on human primary and murine engineered NTRK fusion-positive TRK WT and mutant cell models. Finally, zurletrectinib was tested in vivo in human xenografts and murine orthotopic glioma models harboring TRK-resistant mutations., Results: In vitro kinase and in cell-based assays showed that zurletrectinib, while displaying similar potency against TRKA, TRKB, and TRKC WT kinases, was more active than other FDA approved or clinically tested 1 st - (larotrectinib) and next-generation (selitrectinib and repotrectinib) TRK inhibitors against most TRK inhibitor resistance mutations (13 out of 18). Similarly, zurletrectinib inhibited tumor growth in vivo in sub-cute xenograft models derived from NTRK fusion-positive cells at a dose 30 times lower when compared to selitrectinib. Computational modeling suggests this stronger activity to be the consequence of augmented binding affinity of zurletrectinib for TRK kinases. When compared to selitrectinib and repotrectinib, zurletrectinib showed increased brain penetration in rats 0.5 and 2 h following a single oral administration. Consistently, zurletrectinib significantly improved the survival of mice harboring orthotopic NTRK fusion-positive, TRK-mutant gliomas (median survival = 41.5, 66.5, and 104 days for selitrectinib, repotrectinib, and zurletrectinib respectively; P < 0.05)., Conclusion: Our data identifies zurletrectinib as a novel, highly potent next-generation TRK inhibitor with stronger in vivo brain penetration and intracranial activity than other next-generation agents., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: We investigated the occurrence and relative contribution of relapse-associated worsening (RAW) and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) to confirmed disability accrual (CDA) and transition to secondary progression (SP) in relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS)., Methods: Relapsing-onset MS patients with follow-up > / = 5 years (16,130) were extracted from the Italian MS Registry. CDA was a 6-month confirmed increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. Sustained disability accumulation (SDA) was a CDA with no EDSS improvement in all subsequent visits. Predictors of PIRA and RAW and the association between final EDSS score and type of CDA were assessed using logistic multivariable regression and multivariable ordinal regression models, respectively., Results: Over 11.8 ± 5.4 years, 16,731 CDA events occurred in 8998 (55.8%) patients. PIRA (12,175) accounted for 72.3% of CDA. SDA occurred in 8912 (73.2%) PIRA and 2583 (56.7%) RAW (p < 0.001). 4453 (27.6%) patients transitioned to SPMS, 4010 (73.2%) out of 5476 patients with sustained PIRA and 443 (24.8%) out of 1790 patients with non-sustained PIRA. In the multivariable ordinal regression analysis, higher final EDSS score was associated with PIRA (estimated coefficient 0.349, 95% CI 0.120-0.577, p = 0.003)., Discussion: In this real-world relapsing-onset MS cohort, PIRA was the main driver of disability accumulation and was associated with higher disability in the long term. Sustained PIRA was linked to transition to SP and could represent a more accurate PIRA definition and a criterion to mark the putative onset of the progressive phase., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The reason why some multiple sclerosis (MS) patients show disease activity after alemtuzumab (ALM) is still unclear, but ocrelizumab (OCR) could represent an interesting sequential therapeutic approach., Objectives: To investigate safety and efficacy of OCR in MS patients with disease activity after two ALM courses., Methods: Observational retrospective multi-centers Italian cohort study., Results: Seventy-two subjects were included. Mean follow-up (FU) was 2.4 (±1) years. Forty-five patients (62.5%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with infections accounting for 96.7% of cases. A reduction in total lymphocytes was observed between OCR start and 6 months FU, driven by BCD19+ lymphocytes depletion ( p < 0.001). Immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels decreased between OCR start and 6 months FU ( p < 0.001). At 2-year FU, relapse, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity and disability worsening-free survival were 92.1%, 90.8%, and 89.2%. The evidence of inflammatory activity between the two ALM courses was associated with higher risk of relapse, MRI activity, and NEDA-3 status loss in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS; p = 0.02, p = 0.05, p = 0.01, respectively)., Conclusions: OCR after two ALM courses seemed to be safe and effective. Early IgM hypogammaglobulinemia occurred in a high proportion of patients. The evidence of inflammatory activity between ALM courses seemed to increase the risk of MS re-activation on OCR treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: C. Lapucci has received honoraria for speaking, travel grants, and for participating in the advisory board from Merck, Sanofi, Novartis, Roche, Alexion. J. Frau served on scientific advisory boards for Biogen and Genzyme, and has received honoraria as a speaker from Merck Serono, Genzyme, Biogen, and Teva. E. Cocco reported grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Biogen and Merck; personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis; grants from Roche; and personal fees from Genzyme. G. Coghe received honoraria for consultancy or speaking from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, Genzyme, Serono, Teva, and Almirall. M. Petracca has received travel/meeting expenses from Novartis, Janssen, Roche, and Merck; speaking honoraria from HEALTH&LIFE S.r.l., AIM Education S.r.l., Biogen, Novartis, and FARECOMUNICAZIONE E20; honoraria for consulting services and advisory board participation from Biogen; research grants from Baroni Foundation and the Italian Ministry of University and Research. R. Lanzillo has received honoraria from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Teva. V. Brescia Morra has received research grants from the Italian MS Society and Roche, and honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. C.G. Nicoletti received travel funding from Biogen, Merck Serono, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Teva, Novartis, Bristol Mayer Squibb, Janssen, Almirall and consultation fees from Sanofi, Almirall, Merck- Serono, Roche, Novartis, and Biogen. She is a sub-investigator in clinical trials being conducted for Biogen, Merck Serono, Roche, Biogen, Sanofi, Novartis, Teva, Bristol Mayer Squibb. D. Landi has received travel funding from Biogen, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Teva, Bristol Myers Squibb, Mylan; speaking or consultations fees from Sanofi, Merck Serono, Teva, Biogen, Roche, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, BayerSchering. G. Marfia has received travel funding, speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen, Sanofi, Merck Serono, Novartis, Teva, Mylan, Bristol Mayers Squibb and research grants from Roche and Biogen. M. Vercellino has received congress grants, speaker fees and advisory board fees from Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme. P. Cavalla has received honoraria as speaker or travel grants to attend national and international conferences or consultation for advisory boards from Alexion, Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, Cellgene-BMS, Merck-Serono, Teva, Roche, Novartis, Sanof-Genzyme, and Janssen. A. Bianco has received honoraria for speaking, advisory board/consulting from Biogen, Novartis, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme. M. Mirabella has received honoraria for speaking, advisory board/consulting from Biogen, Novartis, Merck Serono, Roche, Almirall, Sanofi Genzyme, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Viatris, Alexion. He is principal investigator in clinical trials for Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, CSL Behring, Ultragenix, Argenx. V. Torri Clerici acted as an Advisory Board member of Biogen Idec, Novartis, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Almirall, Lundbeck and Bristol Myers Squibb; she received funding for traveling and honoraria for speaking or writing from Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Horizon, Merck Serono, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen and Almirall. She received support for research project by Almirall. E. Tomas received funding for work contract from Roche. M.T. Ferrò has received consultancy fees or speaker compensation from Sanofi, Bristol, Biogen Idec, and Novartis. L. Moiola has received honoraria for speaking and for participating in advisory board from Merck, Celgene, Biogen, Sanofi, Novartis, Roche, Alexion. M. Zaffaroni has received advisory board membership, speakers honoraria, travel support, research grants, consulting fees or clinical trial support from Actelion, Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, Celgene, Excemed, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Roche, Teva. M. Ronzoni has received travel grants for congresses participation from Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis e Merck. G. Novi has received speaker honoraria from Merck, Novartis, Roche, Alexion. M. Cellerino has received consulting fees from Novartis, Genzyme, Teva and Zambon. A. Uccelli has received grants (to his institution) from FISM, Biogen, Roche, Alexion, and Merck Serono and has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board (to his institution) for BD, Biogen, Iqvia, Sanofi, Roche, Alexion, and Bristol Myers Squibb. M. Inglese received grants from NIH, NMSS, and FISM; received fees for consultation from BMS, Janssen, Roche, Genzyme, Merck, Biogen and Novartis. P. Grossi, A. Nozzolillo, and F. Pinardi have nothing to disclose.

Given their critical role in plant reproduction and survival, seeds demand meticulous regulatory mechanisms to effectively store and mobilize reserves. Within seeds, the condition of storage reserves heavily depends on environmental stimuli and hormonal activation. Unlike non-protein reserves that commonly employ dedicated regulatory proteins for signaling, proteinaceous reserves may show a unique form of 'self-regulation', amplifying efficiency and precision in this process. Proteins rely on stability to carry out their functions. However, in specific physiological contexts, particularly in seed germination, protein instability becomes essential, fulfilling roles from signaling to regulation. In this study, the elongation factor 1-alpha has been identified as a main proteinaceous reserve in Nicotiana tabacum L. seeds and showed peculiar changes in stability based on tested chemical and physical conditions. A detailed biochemical analysis followed these steps to enhance our understanding of these protein attributes. The protein varied its behavior under different conditions of pH, temperature, and salt concentration, exhibiting shifts within physiological ranges. Notably, distinct solubility transitions were observed, with the elongation factor 1-alpha becoming insoluble upon reaching specific thresholds determined by the tested chemical and physical conditions. The findings are discussed within the context of seed signaling in response to environmental conditions during the key transitions of dormancy and germination., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Intraperitoneal co-delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs (CDs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) brings hope to improve treatment outcomes in patients with peritoneal metastasis from ovarian cancer (OC). However, current intraperitoneal drug delivery systems face issues such as rapid drug clearance from lymphatic drainage, heterogeneous drug distribution, and uncontrolled release of therapeutic agents into the peritoneal cavity. Herein, we developed an injectable nanohydrogel by combining carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS) with bioadhesive nanoparticles (BNPs) based on polylactic acid-hyperbranched polyglycerol. This system enables the codelivery of CD and ICI into the intraperitoneal space to extend drug retention. The nanohydrogel is formed by cross-linking of aldehyde groups on BNPs with amine groups on CMCS via reversible Schiff base bonds, with CD and ICI loaded separately into BNPs and CMCS network. BNP/CMCS nanohydrogel maintained the activity of the biomolecules and released drugs in a sustained manner over a 7 day period. The adhesive property, through the formation of Schiff bases with peritoneal tissues, confers BNPs with an extended residence time in the peritoneal cavity after being released from the nanohydrogel. In a mouse model, BNP/CMCS nanohydrogel loaded with paclitaxel (PTX) and anti-PD-1 antibodies (αPD-1) significantly suppressed peritoneal metastasis of OC compared to all other tested groups. In addition, no systemic toxicity of nanohydrogel-loaded PTX and αPD-1 was observed during the treatment, which supports potential translational applications of this delivery system.

Introduction: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been shown to improve disease outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. They may also impair the immune response to vaccines, including the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. However, available data on both the intrinsic immune effects of DMTs and their influence on cellular response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine are still incomplete., Methods: Here, we evaluated the immune cell effects of 3 DMTs on the response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination by comparing MS patients treated with one specific therapy (fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, or natalizumab) with both healthy controls and untreated patients. We profiled 23 B-cell traits, 57 T-cell traits, and 10 cytokines, both at basal level and after stimulation with a pool of SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides, in 79 MS patients, treated with DMTs or untreated, and 32 healthy controls. Measurements were made before vaccination and at three time points after immunization., Results and Discussion: MS patients treated with fingolimod showed the strongest immune cell dysregulation characterized by a reduction in all measured lymphocyte cell classes; the patients also had increased immune cell activation at baseline, accompanied by reduced specific immune cell response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Also, anti-spike specific B cells progressively increased over the three time points after vaccination, even when antibodies measured from the same samples instead showed a decline. Our findings demonstrate that repeated booster vaccinations in MS patients are crucial to overcoming the immune cell impairment caused by DMTs and achieving an immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine comparable to that of healthy controls., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Orrù, Serra, Marongiu, Lai, Lodde, Zoledziewska, Steri, Loizedda, Lobina, Piras, Virdis, Delogu, Marini, Mingoia, Floris, Masala, Castelli, Mostallino, Frau, Lorefice, Farina, Fronza, Carmagnini, Carta, Pilotto, Chessa, Devoto, Castiglia, Solla, Zarbo, Idda, Pitzalis, Cocco, Fiorillo and Cucca.)

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) include a rare group of autoimmune conditions that primarily affect the central nervous system. They are characterized by inflammation and damage to the optic nerves, brain and spinal cord, leading to severe vision impairment, locomotor disability and sphynteric disturbances. In the majority of cases, NMOSD arises due to specific serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies targeting aquaporin 4 (AQP4-IgG), which is the most prevalent water-channel protein of the central nervous system. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to manage symptoms and prevent long-term disability in NMOSD patients. NMOSD were previously associated with a poor prognosis. However, recently, a number of randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that biological therapies acting on key elements of NMOSD pathogenesis, such as B cells, interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway, and complement, have impressive efficacy in preventing the occurrence of clinical relapses. The approval of the initial drugs marks a revolutionary advancement in the treatment of NMOSD patients, significantly transforming therapeutic options and positively impacting their prognosis. In this review, we will provide an updated overview of the key immunopathological, clinical, laboratory, and neuroimaging aspects of NMOSD. Additionally, we will critically examine the latest advancements in NMOSD treatment approaches. Lastly, we will discuss key aspects regarding optimization of treatment strategies and their monitoring., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The use of patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) has dramatically improved drug development programs. PDXs (1) reproduce the pathological features and the genomic profile of the parental tumors more precisely than other preclinical models, and (2) more faithfully predict therapy response. However, PDXs have limitations. These include the inability to completely capture tumor heterogeneity and the role of the immune system, the low engraftment efficiency of certain tumor types, and the consequences of the human-host interactions. Recently, the use of novel mouse strains and specialized engraftment techniques has enabled the generation of "humanized" PDXs, partially overcoming such limitations. Importantly, establishing, characterizing, and maintaining PDXs is costly and requires a significant regulatory, administrative, clinical, and laboratory infrastructure. In this review, we will retrace the historical milestones that led to the implementation of PDXs for cancer research, review the most recent innovations in the field, and discuss future avenues to tackle deficiencies that still exist., (Copyright © 2024 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved.)

Introduction: People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) exhibit a spectrum of needs that extend beyond solely disease-related determinants. Investigating unmet needs from the patient perspective may address daily difficulties and optimize care. Our aim was to identify patterns of unmet needs among PwMS and their determinants., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional multicentre study. Data were collected through an anonymous, self-administered online form. To cluster PwMS according to their main unmet needs, we performed agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to visualize cluster distribution. Pairwise comparisons were used to evaluate demographics and clinical distribution among clusters., Results: Out of 1764 mailed questionnaires, we received 690 responses. Access to primary care was the main contributor to the overall unmet need burden. Four patterns were identified: cluster C1, 'information-seekers with few unmet needs'; cluster C2, 'high unmet needs'; cluster C3, 'socially and assistance-dependent'; cluster C4, 'self-sufficient with few unmet needs'. PCA identified two main components in determining the patterns: the 'public sphere' (access to information and care) and the 'private sphere' (need for assistance and social life). Older age, lower education, longer disease duration and higher disability characterized clusters with more unmet needs in the private sphere. However, demographic and clinical factors failed in explaining the four identified patterns., Conclusion: Our study identified four unmet need patterns among PwMS, emphasizing the importance of personalized care. While clinical and demographic factors provide some insight, additional variables warrant further investigation to fully understand unmet needs in PwMS., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: in the early stages of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), initiating high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (HE DMTs) may represent an optimal strategy for delaying neurological damage and long-term disease progression, especially in highly active MS patients (HAMS). Natalizumab (NAT) and Ocrelizumab (OCR) are recognized as HE DMTs with significant anti-inflammatory effects. This study investigates NEDA-3 achievement in treatment-naïve HAMS patients receiving NAT or OCR over three years., Methods: we retrospectively enrolled treatment-naïve HAMS patients undergoing NAT or OCR, collecting demographic, clinical, and instrumental data before and after treatment initiation to compare with propensity score analysis disease activity, time to disability worsening, and NEDA-3 achievement., Results: we recruited 281 HAMS patients with a mean age of 32.7 years (SD 10.33), treated with NAT (157) or OCR (124). After three years, the Kaplan-Meier probability of achieving NEDA-3 was 66.0 % (95 % CI: 57.3 % - 76.0 %) with OCR and 68.2 % (95 % CI: 59.9 % - 77.7 %) with NAT without significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.27) DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: starting HE DMT with monoclonal antibodies for HAMS could achieve NEDA-3 in a high percentage of patients without differences between NAT or OCR., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Irene Schiavetti reports a relationship with Roche, Biogen, Horizon, Novartis, Hoya, Hippocrates Research, D.M.G Italia, Eyepharma, DreamsLab that includes: consulting or advisory. Livia Pasquali reports a relationship with Alexion, Biogen, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, Roche that includes: consulting or advisory and travel reimbursement. Elisabetta Signoriello reports a relationship with Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis, Teva that includes: board membership and travel reimbursement. Maria Pia Sormani reports a relationship with Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Teva, Genzyme, Roche, Novartis, GeNeuro, Medday that includes: consulting or advisory. Jessica Frau reports a relationship with Biogen, Bristol, Novartis, Genzyme, Merck, Teva, Alexion that includes: board membership, consulting or advisory, and speaking and lecture fees. Daniele Caliendo reports a relationship with Merck that includes: funding grants. Alessio Signori reports a relationship with Roche, Horizon, Novartis that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Andrea Surcinelli reports a relationship with Roche, Merck, Biogen, Sanofi, Novartis that includes: travel reimbursement. Simona Bonavita reports a relationship with Novartis, Merck-Serono, Alexion, BMS, Biogen, Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Horizon that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Roberta Fantozzi reports a relationship with Novartis, Roche, Merck Serono, Bristol-Myers Squibb that includes: board membership and consulting or advisory. Antonio Carotenuto reports a relationship with Almirall, ECTRIMS- MAGNIMS, Biogen, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Ipsen, Novartis that includes: funding grants. Doriana Landi reports a relationship with Biogen, Merck Serono, Teva, Bristol Myers Squibb, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Horizon, Alexion, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Bayer-Schering that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Giacomo Lus reports a relationship with Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi- Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Teva neuroscience that includes: funding grants. Eleonora Cocco reports a relationship with Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Genzyme that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Matteo Lucchini reports a relationship with Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Almirall, Horizon, Bayer that includes: consulting or advisory, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Girolama Alessandra Marfia reports a relationship with Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Teva, Mylan, Bristol Mayers Squibb, Roche, Biogen that includes: consulting or advisory, funding grants, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Matteo Foschi reports a relationship with Merck, Biogen, Sanofi, Roche, Novartis that includes: consulting or advisory and travel reimbursement. Massimiliano Mirabella reports a relationship with Bayer Schering, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Teva, Mylan, Almirall, CSL Behring, Roche, Ultragenix that includes: board membership, consulting or advisory, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Diego Centonze reports a relationship with Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Protagon, Sandoz, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Alexion, Mitsubishi, Teva, Celgene that includes: board membership, funding grants, and non-financial support. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Treatment options for secondary progressive MS (SPMS) are limited, especially considering that the new drugs recently approved are licensed for actively relapsing patients. We aimed to compare the disability progression in a real-world cohort of SPMS patients treated with natalizumab (NTZ) or interferon beta-1b (IFNb-1b). This multicenter retrospective enrolled patients with a diagnosis of SPMS according to 2014 Lublin criteria, who received NTZ or IFNb-1b for at least 48 months between the 1st June 2012 and the 15th May 2018 ​at 33 Italian MS centers contributing to the Italian MS Registry NTZ or IFNb-1b. Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale worsening (CEW) and progression independent of relapse (PIRA) were evaluated. In order to correct for non-randomization, a propensity score matching of the groups was performed. Out of 5206 MS patients identified at the time of data extraction, 421 SPMS patients treated with NTZ (224 [53.2%] females, mean age 45.3 ​± ​25.4 years) and 353 with IFNb-1b (133 [37.8%] females, mean age 48.5 ​± ​19.8 years) were enrolled. After applying the matching procedure, 102 patients were retained in the NTZ group and 98 in the IFNb-2b group. The proportion of patients who reached the 48-month 1-point CEW was significantly higher in IFNb-1b compared to NTZ group (58.2% versus 30.4%, p ​= ​0.01). The proportion of patients who developed PIRA at 48 months were significantly higher in IFNb-1b compared to NTZ (72.4% versus 40.2%, p ​= ​0.01). EDSS before treatment initiation and SPMS duration were risk factors for disability progression in terms of PIRA (HR 2.54, 25%CI 1.67-5.7; p ​= ​0.006 and HR 2.04, 25%CI 1.22-3.35; p ​= ​0.01, respectively). Patients treated with IFNb-1b were 1.64 times more to likely to develop PIRA (HR 1.64, 25%CI 1.04-4.87; p ​= ​0.001). Treatment with NTZ in SPMS patients showed more favorable disability outcomes compared to IFNb-1b with beneficial effects over 48 months., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest CGC has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. UA reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. MPA has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. RB reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. AB has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. SB served as speaker and/or advisory board fee, and/or travel grant from Novartis, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Biogen-Idec, Merck-Serono. VBM received fees for consultancies or public speaking from Merck, Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Genzyme and Biogen. PC has served as an advisory board member for Almirall, Biogen, Merck-Serono, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Teva; she has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. EC reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. AC reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. SC has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. GDL reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. ADS reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. MF is Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neurology; received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; and receives research support from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Roche, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, and ARiSLA(Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la SLA). AG reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. CG reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. FG received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. GL reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. DM reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. GTM has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. GAM has served as an advisory board member and received speaker honoraria, congress, travel and accommodation expense compensations from Merck, Teva, Mylan, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Almirall, Biogen and Sanofi Genzyme. LM reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. DP has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. IP reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. PR reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. MR received travel grants and fees for consulting and public speaking from Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme-Sanofi, Merck Serono, Mylan and Novartis. GS has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. CS has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. RT reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. ST reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. MT has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. MV reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. VL reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. MZ has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. FP has received honoraria for speaking activities by Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he also served as advisory board member the following companies: Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he was also funded by Pfizer and FISM for epidemiological studies; he received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: ChatGPT is an open-source natural language processing software that replies to users' queries. We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess people living with Multiple Sclerosis' (PwMS) preferences, satisfaction, and empathy toward two alternate responses to four frequently-asked questions, one authored by a group of neurologists, the other by ChatGPT., Methods: An online form was sent through digital communication platforms. PwMS were blind to the author of each response and were asked to express their preference for each alternate response to the four questions. The overall satisfaction was assessed using a Likert scale (1-5); the Consultation and Relational Empathy scale was employed to assess perceived empathy., Results: We included 1133 PwMS (age, 45.26 ± 11.50 years; females, 68.49%). ChatGPT's responses showed significantly higher empathy scores (Coeff = 1.38; 95% CI = 0.65, 2.11; p > z < 0.01), when compared with neurologists' responses. No association was found between ChatGPT' responses and mean satisfaction (Coeff = 0.03; 95% CI = - 0.01, 0.07; p = 0.157). College graduate, when compared with high school education responder, had significantly lower likelihood to prefer ChatGPT response (IRR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.79, 0.95; p < 0.01)., Conclusions: ChatGPT-authored responses provided higher empathy than neurologists. Although AI holds potential, physicians should prepare to interact with increasingly digitized patients and guide them on responsible AI use. Future development should consider tailoring AIs' responses to individual characteristics. Within the progressive digitalization of the population, ChatGPT could emerge as a helpful support in healthcare management rather than an alternative., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Silyl-heterocycles offer a unique handle to expand and explore chemical space, reactivity, and functionality. The shortage of catalytic methods for the preparation of diverse and functionalized silyl-heterocycles however limits widespread exploration and exploitation. Herein the borane-catalyzed intramolecular 1,1-carboboration of silyl-alkynes has been developed for the synthesis of 2,3-dihydrosilolyl and silylcyclobut-2-enyl boronic esters. Successful, catalytic carboboration has been achieved on a variety of functionally diverse silyl-alkynes, using a borane catalyst and transborylation-enabled turnover. Mechanistic studies, including 13 C-labelling, computational studies, and single-turnover experiments, suggest a reaction pathway proceeding by 1,2-hydroboration, 1,1-carboboration, and transborylation to release the alkenyl boronic ester product and regenerate the borane catalyst., (© 2024 The Authors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Spinocerebellar ataxia 38 (SCA 38) is a very rare autosomal dominant inherited disorder caused by a mutation in ELOV5 gene, specifically expressed in cerebellar Purkinje cells, encoding an enzyme involved in the synthesis of fatty acids. Seven symptomatic SCA 38 patients of a Sardinian family were administered 15 sessions of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a cross-over study, employing deltoid cerebellar-only (C-tDCS) and cerebello-spinal (CS-tDCS) cathodal montage. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline (T0), after 15 sessions of tDCS (T1) and after 1 month of follow-up (T2). Modified International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (MICARS) and the Robertson dysarthria profile were used to rate ataxic and dysarthric symptoms, respectively. Alertness and split attention tests from Zimmermann test battery for attentional performance were employed to rate attentive functions. Moreover, 3D computerized gait analysis was employed to obtain a quantitative measure of efficacy of tDCS on motor symptoms. While clinical data showed that both CS and C-tDCS improved motor, dysarthric, and cognitive scores, the quantitative analysis of gait revealed significant improvement in spatio-temporal parameters only for C-tDCS treatment. Present findings, yet preliminary and limited by the small size of the tested sample, confirm the therapeutic potential of cerebellar tDCS in improving motor and cognitive symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxias and underline the need to obtain quantitative and objective measures to monitor the efficacy of a therapeutic treatment and to design tailored rehabilitative interventions. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05951010., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)