Search

BackgroundAppropriate use criteria (AUC) provide patient-centered physician guidance in test selection. An initial set of AUC was reported by the American Society of Dermatopathology (ASDP) in 2018. AUC reflect evidence collected at single timepoints and may be affected by evolving evidence and experience. The objective of this study was to update and expand AUC for selected tests.MethodsRAND/UCLA (RAND Corporation [Santa Monica, CA]/University of California Los Angeles) methodology used includes the following: (a) literature review; (b) review of previously rated tests and previously employed clinical scenarios; (c) selection of previously rated tests for new ratings; (d) development of new clinical scenarios; (e) selection of additional tests; (f) three rating rounds with feedback and group discussion after rounds 1 and 2.ResultsFor 220 clinical scenarios comprising lymphoproliferative (light chain clonality), melanocytic (comparative genomic hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter), vascular disorders (MYC), and inflammatory dermatoses (periodic acid-Schiff, Gömöri methenamine silver), consensus by panel raters was reached in 172 of 220 (78%) scenarios, with 103 of 148 (70%) rated "usually appropriate" or "rarely appropriate" and 45 of 148 (30%), "appropriateness uncertain."LimitationsThe study design only measures appropriateness. Cost, availability, test comparison, and additional clinical considerations are not measured. The possibility that the findings of this study may be influenced by the inherent biases of the dermatopathologists involved in the study cannot be excluded.ConclusionsAUC are reported for selected diagnostic tests in clinical scenarios that occur in dermatopathology practice. Adhering to AUC may reduce inappropriate test utilization and improve healthcare delivery.

Histiocytoid Sweet syndrome (H‐SS) is a histopathological variant of Sweet syndrome (SS) defined by cutaneous infiltration of immature myeloid cells morphologically resembling histiocytes. The association of H‐SS with underlying malignancy, particularly myelodysplastic syndromes, is well‐established. Myelodysplasia cutis (MDS‐cutis) has been proposed to describe cases historically diagnosed as H‐SS but characterized by shared clonality of the myeloid infiltrate in skin and bone marrow. Therefore, identifying patients who might have MDS‐cutis is critical for the management of the associated hematologic malignancy. VEXAS syndrome, an adult‐onset autoinflammatory disease, should also be included in the histopathologic differential diagnosis of H‐SS, as it shares clinical and pathologic features with MDS‐cutis. Through the presentation of two cases, we aim to highlight the defining features and key clinical implications of MDS‐cutis and VEXAS syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the implementation of digital dermatopathology at a multisite academic institution and its impact on trainees' perceptions. Through surveys and focus groups, trainees expressed favorable views on digital dermatopathology, citing benefits such as improved workflow efficiency and educational opportunities. While concerns about retaining conventional microscopy skills were raised, overall satisfaction with digital pathology platforms was high among trainees, indicating a positive reception to technological advancements in the field. [Extracted from the article]

Evaluation of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) involves tangential biopsies of a suspicious lesion that is sent for frozen sections and evaluated by a Mohs micrographic surgeon. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have made possible the development of sophisticated clinical decision support systems to provide real-time feedback to clinicians that could have a role in optimizing the diagnostic workup of BCC. There were 287 annotated whole-slide images of frozen sections from tangential biopsies, of which 121 contained BCC, that were used to train and test an AI pipeline to recognize BCC. Regions of interest were annotated by a senior dermatology resident, an experienced dermatopathologist and an experienced Mohs surgeon, with concordance of annotations noted on final review. Final performance metrics included a sensitivity and specificity of 0.73 and 0.88, respectively. Our results on a relatively small dataset suggest the feasibility of developing an AI system to aid in the workup and management of BCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Within the past two decades, biologic therapy has become vital in the management of several refractory inflammatory dermatoses. Diagnoses for which biologic therapy was initiated included: atopic dermatitis (AD) (53%), psoriasis (30%), Crohn's disease (12%), and hidradenitis suppurativa (6%). Development of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma following exposure to biologic therapy: a Mayo Clinic retrospective analysis. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Certain autoimmune bullous dermatoses are mediated by autoantibodies of the IgG4 subclass. We determined the diagnostic impact of adding IgG4 to our conventional direct immunofluorescence (DIF) panel. Methods: For all cases submitted to our referral laboratory for DIF over 1 month (n = 630), we performed IgG4 testing and collected consecutive biopsy specimens showing definite or indeterminate linear or cell‐surface deposition of IgG, IgG4, and/or C3. On retrospective blinded review, we classified the pattern and whether the findings were definite, indeterminate, or negative. When present, substantial background staining was recorded. Results: Seventy DIF specimens met the inclusion criteria. Of 22 (31.4%) specimens equivocal for linear or cell‐surface deposition, 9 (40.9%) had definitive IgG4 findings, either linear (3 of 14 equivocal linear cases; 21.4%) or cell‐surface (6 of 8 equivocal cell‐surface cases; 75.0%). Background deposition was substantial in 14 cases (20.0%) for IgG but in none for C3 or IgG4. Conclusion: IgG4 allowed the classification of over 40% of DIF cases that were otherwise equivocal by IgG and C3. IgG4 staining showed lower levels of non‐specific background staining than IgG or C3. IgG4 appears to contribute most value in cases with cell‐surface deposition or with equivocal linear IgG deposition and negative C3 results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dear Editor, Skin of color (SOC), defined as skin of racial groups with skin darker than that of Caucasian individuals, is under represented in medical training for dermatology. We present two patients with SOC and pregnancy dermatoses, one of whom has PG and one of whom has PEP, to illustrate some differences in the clinical presentation of these pregnancy dermatoses in patients with SOC. However, the dermatologic manifestations of both of these pregnancy dermatoses in SOC differ from those in Caucasians of European or Arab ancestry in that erythema can be more subtle and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation more prominent. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Appropriate use criteria (AUC) provide patient-centered physician guidance in test selection. An initial set of AUC was reported by the American Society of Dermatopathology (ASDP) in 2018. AUC reflect evidence collected at single timepoints and may be affected by evolving evidence and experience. The objective of this study was to update and expand AUC for selected tests. Methods: RAND/UCLA (RAND Corporation [Santa Monica, CA]/University of California Los Angeles) methodology used includes the following: (a) literature review; (b) review of previously rated tests and previously employed clinical scenarios; (c) selection of previously rated tests for new ratings; (d) development of new clinical scenarios; (e) selection of additional tests; (f) three rating rounds with feedback and group discussion after rounds 1 and 2. Results: For 220 clinical scenarios comprising lymphoproliferative (light chain clonality), melanocytic (comparative genomic hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter), vascular disorders (MYC), and inflammatory dermatoses (periodic acid-Schiff, Gömöri methenamine silver), consensus by panel raters was reached in 172 of 220 (78%) scenarios, with 103 of 148 (70%) rated "usually appropriate" or "rarely appropriate" and 45 of 148 (30%), "appropriateness uncertain." Limitations: The study design only measures appropriateness. Cost, availability, test comparison, and additional clinical considerations are not measured. The possibility that the findings of this study may be influenced by the inherent biases of the dermatopathologists involved in the study cannot be excluded. Conclusions: AUC are reported for selected diagnostic tests in clinical scenarios that occur in dermatopathology practice. Adhering to AUC may reduce inappropriate test utilization and improve healthcare delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

T-cell gene rearrangement studies have demonstrated T-cell clonality with documented linkage to cutaneous T-cell lymphomas and Hodgkin's disease.3 We discuss a patient who presented with PLEVA and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL), a B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder. The latter, impaired immunity, seems the most plausible to explain the concurrent development of PLEVA, a predominant T-cell disorder, and a B-cell mediated neoplasm. Pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA) is a cutaneous CD8+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by recurrent erythematous-brownish macules, papules, or papulovesicles with predilection for the trunk.1 Lesions self-resolve and undergo necrosis, crusting, and ultimately scarring. [Extracted from the article]