Search

To capture the dependence in the upper tail of a time series, we develop non‐negative regularly varying time series models that are constructed similarly to classical non‐extreme ARMA models. Rather than fully characterizing tail dependence of the time series, we define the concept of weak tail stationarity which allows us to describe a regularly varying time series via a measure of pairwise extremal dependencies, the tail pairwise dependence function (TPDF). We state consistency requirements among the finite‐dimensional collections of the elements of a regularly varying time series and show that the TPDF's value does not depend on the dimension of the random vector being considered. So that our models take non‐negative values, we use transformed‐linear operations. We show existence and stationarity of these models, and develop their properties such as the model TPDFs. We fit models to hourly windspeed and daily fire weather index data, and we find that the fitted transformed‐linear models produce better estimates of upper tail quantities than a traditional ARMA model, classical linear regularly varying models, a max‐ARMA model, and a Markov model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Wildfire risk is greatest during high winds after sustained periods of dry and hot conditions. This paper is a statistical extreme-event risk attribution study that aims to answer whether extreme wildfire seasons are more likely now than under past climate. This requires modeling temporal dependence at extreme levels. We propose the use of transformed-linear time series models, which are constructed similarly to traditional autoregressive–moving-average (ARMA) models while having a dependence structure that is tied to a widely used framework for extremes (regular variation). We fit the models to the extreme values of the seasonally adjusted fire weather index (FWI) time series to capture the dependence in the upper tail for past and present climate. We simulate 10 000 fire seasons from each fitted model and compare the proportion of simulated high-risk fire seasons to quantify the increase in risk. Our method suggests that the risk of experiencing an extreme wildfire season in Grand Lake, Colorado, under current climate has increased dramatically relative to the risk under the climate of the mid-twentieth century. Our method also finds some evidence of increased risk of extreme wildfire seasons in Quincy, California, but large uncertainties do not allow us to reject a null hypothesis of no change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]