11 results on '"Cupelli, L."'
Search Results
2. P25 EFFECT OF DARATUMUMAB ON STEM CELL YIELDS IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA: REPORT FROM THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA LAZIO GROUP
- Author
-
Fazio, F., primary, Passucci, M., additional, Lisi, C., additional, Micozzi, J., additional, Fianchi, L., additional, Di Landro, F., additional, Za, T., additional, Gumenyuk, S., additional, Ferraro, S., additional, Anaclerico, B., additional, De Padua, L., additional, Annibali, O., additional, Rago, A., additional, Piciocchi, A., additional, Bongarzoni, V., additional, Cupelli, L., additional, Mengarelli, A., additional, De Stefano, V., additional, Martelli, M., additional, and Petrucci, M.T., additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Efficacy and safety of netupitant/palonosetron combination (NEPA) in preventing nausea and vomiting in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients undergoing to chemomobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation
- Author
-
Di Renzo, N., Musso, M., Scime, R., Cupri, A., Perrone, T., De Risi, C., Pastore, D., Guarini, A., Mengarelli, A., Benedetti, F., Mazza, P., Capria, S., Chiusolo, Patrizia, Cupelli, L., Federico, V., Bozzoli, V., Messa, A. R., Matera, R., Seripa, D., Codega, P., Bonizzoni, E., Specchia, G., Chiusolo P. (ORCID:0000-0002-1355-1587), Di Renzo, N., Musso, M., Scime, R., Cupri, A., Perrone, T., De Risi, C., Pastore, D., Guarini, A., Mengarelli, A., Benedetti, F., Mazza, P., Capria, S., Chiusolo, Patrizia, Cupelli, L., Federico, V., Bozzoli, V., Messa, A. R., Matera, R., Seripa, D., Codega, P., Bonizzoni, E., Specchia, G., and Chiusolo P. (ORCID:0000-0002-1355-1587)
- Abstract
Purpose: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is particularly challenging for patients receiving highly emetogenic preparative regimens before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) due to the daily and continuous emetogenic stimulus of the multiple day chemotherapy. While studies have shown effective prevention of CINV during the conditioning phase with NK1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA)-containing regimens, there have been no studies evaluating antiemetic use during chemomobilization prior to ASCT. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, phase IIa study evaluated the efficacy of every-other-day dosing of NEPA administered during chemomobilization in patients with relapsed-refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Eighty-one patients participated. Results: Response rates were 77.8% for complete response (no emesis and no rescue use), 72.8% for complete control (complete response and no more than mild nausea), 86.4% for no emesis, and 82.7% for no rescue use during the overall phase (duration of chemomobilization through 48 h after). NEPA was well tolerated with no treatment-related adverse events reported. Conclusion: NEPA, administered with a simplified every-other-day schedule, show to be very effective in preventing CINV in patients at high risk of CINV undergoing to chemomobilization of hematopoietic stem cells prior to ASCT.
- Published
- 2022
4. PB1984: ELOTUZUMAB PLUS LENALIDOMIDE AND DEXAMETHASONE IN RELAPSED/REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA: EXTENDED 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF AN ITALIAN, MULTICENTER, EXPERIENCE OUTSIDE OF CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS
- Author
-
Bruzzese, A., primary, Derudas, D., additional, Galli, M., additional, Martino, E. A., additional, Rocco, S., additional, Conticello, C., additional, Califano, C., additional, Giuliani, N., additional, Mangicavalli, S., additional, Farina, G., additional, Lombardo, A., additional, Brunori, M., additional, Rossi, E., additional, Antonioli, E., additional, Ria, R., additional, Zambello, R., additional, Di Renzo, N., additional, Mele, G., additional, Marcacci, G., additional, Pietrantuono, G., additional, Palumbo, G., additional, Cascavilla, N., additional, Cerchione, C., additional, Belotti, A., additional, Criscuolo, C., additional, Uccello, G., additional, Curci, P., additional, Vigna, E., additional, Mendicino, F., additional, Iaccino, E., additional, Mimmi, S., additional, Botta, C., additional, Vincelli, D., additional, Sgherza, N., additional, Bonalumi, A., additional, Cupelli, L., additional, Stocchi, R., additional, Martino, M., additional, Ballanti, S., additional, Gangemi, D., additional, Gagliardi, A., additional, Gamberi, B., additional, Pompa, A., additional, Tripepi, G., additional, Frigeri, F., additional, Consoli, U., additional, Bringhen, S., additional, Zamagni, E., additional, Patriarca, F., additional, De Stefano, V., additional, Di Raimondo, F., additional, Palmieri, S., additional, Petrucci, M. T., additional, Offidani, M., additional, Musto, P., additional, Boccadoro, M., additional, Cavo, M., additional, Neri, A., additional, Morabito, F., additional, and Gentile, M., additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A prospective, multicenter study on hematopoietic stemcell mobilization with cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and 'on-demand' plerixafor in multiple myeloma patients treated with novel agents.
- Author
-
Mina R, Petrucci MT, Bonello F, Bongarzoni V, Saccardi R, Bertuglia G, Mengarelli A, Spadaro A, Lisi C, Curci P, Lemoli RM, Ballanti S, Floris R, Cupelli L, Tosi P, Olivieri A, Rota-Scalabrini D, Cangialosi C, Nozzoli C, Anaclerico B, Fazio F, Bruno B, Mancuso K, Corradini P, Milone G, and Boccadoro M
- Subjects
- Humans, Middle Aged, Male, Female, Aged, Prospective Studies, Adult, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation methods, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Transplantation, Autologous, Treatment Outcome, Multiple Myeloma therapy, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization methods, Cyclams administration & dosage, Cyclams therapeutic use, Benzylamines, Cyclophosphamide therapeutic use, Cyclophosphamide administration & dosage, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor administration & dosage, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor therapeutic use, Heterocyclic Compounds administration & dosage, Heterocyclic Compounds therapeutic use
- Abstract
High-dose melphalan plus autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard of care for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), and adequate hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collection is crucial to ensure hematologic recovery after ASCT. In this prospective, observational study we evaluated HSC mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), cyclophosphamide, and 'on-demand' plerixafor (in patients with <20×106 CD34+ cells/L after at least 4 days of G-CSF or failing to collect ≥1×106 CD34+ cells/kg after the first apheresis) in NDMM patients treated with novel agent-based induction therapy. The primary endpoint was the rate of poor mobilizers (patients collecting <2×106 CD34+ cells/kg or requiring plerixafor rescue to reach an adequate HSC harvest). Secondary endpoints included the rate of patients collecting ≥2×106 CD34+ cells/kg after plerixafor administration and the identification of factors predicting mobilization failure or plerixafor need. Overall, 301 patients (median age 60 years) were enrolled. Two hundred and eighty-seven of 301 (95%) and 274 of 301 (93%) patients collected ≥2×106 and ≥4×106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively, with a median of 9.9×106 CD34+ cells/kg collected. Poor mobilizers were 48 of 301 (16%): 34 of 301 (11%) required plerixafor rescue, and 14 of 301 (5%) failed HSC collection regardless of plerixafor. Thirty-four of 38 (90%) patients receiving plerixafor collected ≥2×106 CD34+ cells/kg. Bone marrow plasmacytosis at diagnosis >60% (odds ratio [OR]=4.14), lenalidomide use (OR=4.45), and grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities during induction (OR=3.53) were independently associated with a higher risk of mobilization failure or plerixafor need. Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF and 'on-demand' plerixafor is an effective strategy in NDMM patients treated with novel agents, resulting in a high rate of HSC collection and high HSC yield (clinicaltrials gov. identifier: NCT03406091).
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Consensus for Flow Cytometry Clinical Report on Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter Harmonization Process Merging Laboratory Experience and Clinical Needs.
- Author
-
Cordone I, Amodeo R, Bellesi S, Bottan F, Buccisano F, De Propris MS, Masi S, Panichi V, Scerpa MC, Annibali O, Bongarzoni V, Caravita di Toritto T, Coppetelli U, Cupelli L, de Fabritiis P, Franceschini L, Garzia M, Fiorini A, Laverde G, Mengarelli A, Za T, and Petrucci MT
- Abstract
Flow cytometry is a highly sensitive and specific approach for discriminating between normal and clonal plasma cells in multiple myeloma. Uniform response criteria after treatment have been established by the International Myeloma Working Group and the EuroFlow Group; however, the way in which flow cytometry data are reported has suffered from no collaborative or multicentre efforts. This study, involving 8 expert laboratories and 12 clinical hematology units of the Lazio region in Italy, aims to produce a uniform and shared report among the various Centres. From the pre-analytical phase to sample processing, data acquisition, analysis, and evaluation of the potential limitations and pitfalls of the entire process, the study reaches a final conclusion shared by laboratories and clinicians according to the most updated principles and recommendations. The aim was to identify the necessary data to be included in the clinical report by using multiple-choice questionnaires at every single stage of the process. An agreement of more than 75% of the laboratories was considered mandatory for the data to be included in the report. By ensuring the operational autonomy of each laboratory, this study provides a clear report that limits subjective interpretations and highlights possible bias in the process, better supporting clinical decision-making.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Casirivimab and Imdevimab for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.
- Author
-
Somersan-Karakaya S, Mylonakis E, Menon VP, Wells JC, Ali S, Sivapalasingam S, Sun Y, Bhore R, Mei J, Miller J, Cupelli L, Forleo-Neto E, Hooper AT, Hamilton JD, Pan C, Pham V, Zhao Y, Hosain R, Mahmood A, Davis JD, Turner KC, Kim Y, Cook A, Kowal B, Soo Y, DiCioccio AT, Geba GP, Stahl N, Lipsich L, Braunstein N, Herman GA, Yancopoulos GD, and Weinreich DM
- Subjects
- Humans, SARS-CoV-2, Double-Blind Method, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, COVID-19
- Abstract
Background: The open-label RECOVERY study reported improved survival in hospitalized, SARS-CoV-2 seronegative patients treated with casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS + IMD)., Methods: In this phase 1/2/3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted prior to widespread circulation of Delta and Omicron, hospitalized COVID-19 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to 2.4 g or 8.0 g CAS + IMD or placebo, and characterized at baseline for viral load and SARS-CoV-2 serostatus., Results: In total, 1336 patients on low-flow or no supplemental (low-flow/no) oxygen were treated. The primary endpoint was met in seronegative patients, the least-squares mean difference (CAS + IMD versus placebo) for time-weighted average change from baseline in viral load through day 7 was -0.28 log10 copies/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], -.51 to -.05; P = .0172). The primary clinical analysis of death or mechanical ventilation from day 6 to 29 in patients with high viral load had a strong positive trend but did not reach significance. CAS + IMD numerically reduced all-cause mortality in seronegative patients through day 29 (relative risk reduction, 55.6%; 95% CI, 24.2%-74.0%). No safety concerns were noted., Conclusions: In hospitalized COVID-19 patients on low-flow/no oxygen, CAS + IMD reduced viral load and likely improves clinical outcomes in the overall population, with the benefit driven by seronegative patients, and no harm observed in seropositive patients., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04426695., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. S. S.-K., S. A., Y. Sun, R. B., J. Mei, J. Miller, E. F.-N., C. P., V. P., Y. Z., A. M., J. D. D., Y. K., A. C., B. K., Y. Soo, A. T. D., G. P. G., L. L., N. B., and D. M. W. are employees/stockholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and report grants from Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). E. M. reports payments to his institution received from National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH/National Institute of General Medical Sciences, SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Pfizer, Chemic Labs/KODA Therapeutics, Cidara, and Leidos Biomedical Research Inc/NCI. V. P. M. and J. C. W. report grants from BARDA. S. S. is an Excision BioTherapeutics employee/stockholder and former Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, employee and current stockholder, and reports grants from BARDA. L. C. is a Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc employee and reports grants from BARDA. A. T. H. is a Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc employee/stockholder, a former Pfizer employee and current stockholder, has a patent pending with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc and reports grants from BARDA. J. D. H., K. C. T., and G. A. H. are employees/stockholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc and have a patent pending, which has been licensed and receiving royalties, with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. R. H. is a former employee and current stockholder of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and reports grants from BARDA. N. S. and G. D. Y. are employees/stockholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and have issued patents (US Patent Nos. 10 787 501, 10 954 289, and 10 975 139) and pending patents, which have been licensed and receiving royalties, with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and reports grants from BARDA. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Extended 3-year follow-up of a multicenter, retrospective clinical experience with 319 cases outside of controlled clinical trials.
- Author
-
Bruzzese A, Derudas D, Galli M, Martino EA, Rocco S, Conticello C, Califano C, Giuliani N, Mangiacavalli S, Farina G, Lombardo A, Brunori M, Rossi E, Antonioli E, Ria R, Zambello R, Di Renzo N, Mele G, Marcacci G, Pietrantuono G, Palumbo G, Cascavilla N, Cerchione C, Belotti A, Criscuolo C, Uccello G, Curci P, Vigna E, Mendicino F, Iaccino E, Mimmi S, Botta C, Vincelli D, Sgherza N, Bonalumi A, Cupelli L, Stocchi R, Martino M, Ballanti S, Gangemi D, Gagliardi A, Gamberi B, Pompa A, Tripepi G, Frigeri F, Consoli U, Bringhen S, Zamagni E, Patriarca F, De Stefano V, Di Raimondo F, Palmieri S, Petrucci MT, Offidani M, Musto P, Boccadoro M, Cavo M, Neri A, Morabito F, and Gentile M
- Subjects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Dexamethasone adverse effects, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lenalidomide therapeutic use, Retrospective Studies, Thalidomide adverse effects, Multiple Myeloma
- Abstract
The combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloRd) enhanced the clinical benefit over Rd with a manageable toxicity profile in the ELOQUENT-2 trial, leading to its approval in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The present study is a 3-year follow-up update of a previously published Italian real-life RRMM cohort of patients treated with EloRd. This revised analysis entered 319 RRMM patients accrued in 41 Italian centers. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range 6-55), 236 patients experienced disease progression or died. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 18.4 and 34 months, respectively. The updated multivariate analyses showed a significant reduction of PFS and OS benefit magnitude only in cases with International Staging System stage III. Major adverse events included grade 3/4 neutropenia (18.5%), anemia (15.4%), lymphocytopenia (12.5%), and thrombocytopenia (10.7%), while infection rates and pneumonia were 33.9% and 18.9%, respectively. No new safety signals with longer follow-up have been observed. Of 319 patients, 245 (76.7%) reached at least a partial remission. A significantly lower response rate was found in patients previously exposed to lenalidomide. In conclusion, our study confirms that EloRd is a safe and effective regimen for RRMM patients, maintaining benefits across multiple unfavorable subgroups., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients over 70 years: A GIMEMA Lazio Working Group experience in a retrospective case-control study.
- Author
-
Rago A, Annibali O, Tomarchio V, Coppetelli U, Fazio F, Cupelli L, Fiorini A, Piciocchi A, Tafuri A, and Caravita di Toritto T
- Subjects
- Aged, Case-Control Studies, Disease-Free Survival, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Stem Cell Transplantation, Transplantation, Autologous, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy, Multiple Myeloma therapy
- Abstract
High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) is the standard treatment for young patient ≤65 years with multiple myeloma (MM). The role of auto-SCT in elderly patients older than 70 years remains controversial in the era of novel agents and especially since the recent introduction of monoclonal antibodies (AbMo). In this study, we evaluated 12 patients with MM over 70 years old undergoing auto-SCT (elderly graft cohort) in seven centers of GIMEMA Working Group Lazio. We compared the baseline characteristics, treatment and outcome with 97 MM elderly patients who did not receive auto-SCT (nontransplant patients) from the same registry who were ≥ 70 years old, but did not undergo auto-SCT. The median progression free survival (PFS) for graft versus no-graft cohort was 56.4 versus 26.1 months, respectively. There was a trend for better PFS among graft compared to nontransplant patient (p = .1). On the other hand, the median overall survival for transplant versus nontransplant cohort was 107.6 versus 49.5 months (p = .02). Despite the small number of patients aged ≥70 years and ≤74 years, it seems that auto-SCT is well tolerated, safe and effective. Therefore, we propose that it should be considered an important treatment option in the era of new drugs in elderly fit patients with MM., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Efficacy and safety of netupitant/palonosetron combination (NEPA) in preventing nausea and vomiting in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients undergoing to chemomobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation.
- Author
-
Di Renzo N, Musso M, Scimè R, Cupri A, Perrone T, De Risi C, Pastore D, Guarini A, Mengarelli A, Benedetti F, Mazza P, Capria S, Chiusolo P, Cupelli L, Federico V, Bozzoli V, Messa AR, Matera R, Seripa D, Codega P, Bonizzoni E, and Specchia G
- Subjects
- Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects, Drug Therapy, Combination adverse effects, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Humans, Transplantation, Autologous, Treatment Outcome, Antiemetics adverse effects, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin drug therapy, Nausea chemically induced, Nausea prevention & control, Palonosetron adverse effects, Vomiting chemically induced, Vomiting prevention & control
- Abstract
Purpose: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is particularly challenging for patients receiving highly emetogenic preparative regimens before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) due to the daily and continuous emetogenic stimulus of the multiple day chemotherapy. While studies have shown effective prevention of CINV during the conditioning phase with NK
1 receptor antagonist (NK1 RA)-containing regimens, there have been no studies evaluating antiemetic use during chemomobilization prior to ASCT., Methods: This multicenter, open-label, phase IIa study evaluated the efficacy of every-other-day dosing of NEPA administered during chemomobilization in patients with relapsed-refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Eighty-one patients participated., Results: Response rates were 77.8% for complete response (no emesis and no rescue use), 72.8% for complete control (complete response and no more than mild nausea), 86.4% for no emesis, and 82.7% for no rescue use during the overall phase (duration of chemomobilization through 48 h after). NEPA was well tolerated with no treatment-related adverse events reported., Conclusion: NEPA, administered with a simplified every-other-day schedule, show to be very effective in preventing CINV in patients at high risk of CINV undergoing to chemomobilization of hematopoietic stem cells prior to ASCT., (© 2021. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Daratumumab combined with dexamethasone and lenalidomide or bortezomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients: Report from the multiple myeloma GIMEMA Lazio group.
- Author
-
Fazio F, Franceschini L, Tomarchio V, Rago A, Garzia MG, Cupelli L, Bongarzoni V, Andriani A, Gumenyuk S, Tafuri A, Siniscalchi A, Piciocchi A, De Fabritiis P, De Rosa L, Caravita di Toritto T, Annibali O, Cantonetti M, and Petrucci MT
- Abstract
The multiple myeloma (MM) treatment has changed over the last years due to the introduction of novel drugs. Despite improvements in the MM outcome, MM remains an incurable disease. Daratumumab is a human IgGK monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 with tumor activity associated with immunomodulatory mechanism. In combination with standard of care regimens, including bortezomib (Vd) or lenalidomide (Rd), daratumumab prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and in new diagnosis MM. We report the data of the MM GIMEMA Lazio group in 171 heavily treated pts who received daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) or daratumumab, velcade and dexamethasone (DVd). The overall response rate was 80%, and the overall survival (OS) and PFS were 84% and 77%, respectively. In addition, pts treated with DRd showed a better median PFS compared to pts treated with DVd, at 12 and 24 months, respectively. The most common hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TAEs) were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. The most common nonhematologic TAEs were peripheral sensory neuropathy and infections. Our data confirmed that DRd or DVd therapy is effective and safe in RRMM pts, and our real-life analysis could support the physicians regarding the choice of optimal therapy in this setting of pts., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported., (© 2022 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.