Search

Redescription of external morphology Based on a re-examination of the holotype and on the examination of the recently collected specimens RBINS 20301–20302, shown on Figures 3–6. Raw measurements and scale counts of the three specimens are provided in Table 2. Snout-vent length to 76 mm; total length> 229 mm (holotype). Tail 2.5 times SVL (based on RBINS 20302, the only specimen with a complete, original tail; the tail tip of RBINS 20301 is missing and is not healed). Body moderately depressed. Head distinct from neck, narrow (HL/HW ratio 1.8–2.1), long (HL/SVL ratio 0.25–0.30, proportionally longest in the subadult), depressed (HH/HL ratio 0.41–0.49, least depressed in the subadult). Head covered with symmetric plates. Rostral well visible in dorsal view. Frontonasal rounded anteriorly, slightly wider than long. A line of small tubercles along the posterior borders of the internasals, frontonasal and prefrontals (also along the lateral borders of the prefrontals in the subadult), “en forme de perles” (i.e., pearl-shaped) as described by Monard (1940). Suture between internasals subequal to suture between prefrontals (respectively 0.8 and 0.9 mm in RBINS 16301). Pupil round. Lower eyelid scaly. Canthus rostralis rounded. Lores near-vertical. Nostril opening in contact with 1 st supralabial, the anterior nasal and the two posterior, superposed, nasals. Four supraorbital scales, the anterior- and posteriormost small, separated from the supraciliaries by a continuous row of granular scales. In the holotype the anterior- and posteriormost supraoculars are entire, while in RBINS 20301 the anterior supraoculars are divided into two (left) or three (right) fragments and the posterior ones into three (left) or two (right) fragments. In RBINS 20302 the anterior supraoculars are divided into two fragments on each side, and the posterior supraoculars are unfragmented. Tympanic opening large, rounded, surrounded by smooth scales (i.e., no auricular denticulation), including a crescentic scale bordering the antero-dorsal limit of the tympanum. Seven or eight supralabials; one of them much enlarged and bordering the orbit, separating the five anterior supralabials (sometimes four, as on the left side of the holotype) from the two posterior ones. Frontal hexagonal, surrounded anteriorly by the two prefrontals, laterally by three supraoculars on each side, and posteriorly by the two frontoparietals. Anterior border of frontal pointing forward. Frontal narrow posteriorly. Length of frontal slightly smaller than distance between frontal and snout tip (respectively 4.1 and 5.1 mm in RBINS 16301). Frontoparietals pentagonal. Parietals large, nearly as long as frontal, separated by the interparietal scale and a small occipital. Pineal eye visible through the interparietal scale. Scales on the upper surface of the head smooth, except the pearl-shaped tubercles. Temporal area covered by an elongate, thin temporal plate along the parietal, and by smaller to granular scales. Six (in a single case seven) infralabials. Mental followed by four pairs of sublinguals, the first three in contact on the midline, the fourth pair separated from each other. Sublinguals progressively increasing in size posteriorly. Gular collar present and distinct, ventrally including five distinctly enlarged scales. The right profile and ventral view of the head, which had never been illustrated for the holotype so far, are shown on Figure 3. Mediodorsal scale rows not widened. Dorsal scales granular, in 67–70 longitudinal rows at midbody, those on the lower flanks nearly smooth, those on upper flanks and dorsum with a median, single, longitudinal keel. About 40 dorsal scales between legs. Six longitudinal rows of parallelepipedal or trapezoidal, widened, smooth, ventral scales; the two medioventral rows narrower than the lateral ones. Between the gular collar and the line of porebearing scales, 27 or 28 transversal rows of ventrals. A distinctly enlarged preanal plate, bordered laterally by a row of a few small preanals on each side. Femoral pores in a continuous row of 17–20. The left and right series of pores of RBINS 20301 and RBINS 20302 are separated by respectively three and two poreless scales (two in the holotype according to the Figure 3 in the original description, but actually three according to our observations). Subdigital lamellae of fingers and toes with two keels each. First finger shortest. Second finger longer than 5 th. Third and 4 th fingers longest, of subequal length. RBINS 20301 and RBINS 20302 both show 16/16 subdigital lamellae under the 4 th finger. When the leg is stretched alongside the body it extends anteriorly beyond the gular collar. Length of the feet comparable to head length. Toes without lateral denticulate fringes. First toe shortest. Second and 5 th toe of subequal length, shorter than the 3 rd and much shorter than the 4th. Subdigital lamellae under 4 th toe 23 to 26 (23 in the holotype, 25 or 26 in the two other specimens). Supracaudals much larger than dorsal scales. All supracaudal scales rectangular, presenting a strong median keel, each keel bearing a small tubercle at its posterior extremity. Subcaudals at the base of the tail smooth and rounded posteriorly, quickly becoming rectangular with a medial strong keel, but without a terminal tubercle on the keel. The tail of the holotype is broken. Monard (1940) mentioned 87 subcaudals, but the tail tip shows a uniform color contrasting with the anterior part of the tail, indicating that it is regenerated. The tail of the subadult RBINS 20302 is original, and shows 143 subcaudals. Coloration in life. Based on original description, RBINS 20301–20302 and Figures 3–7. The dorsal surface of the head is uniformly dark brown. The ventral surface of the head, the body and of the base of the tail is uniformly white. The background color of the sides of the head above the mouth line is dark brown, progressively darkening posteriorly to become black as the background color of the flanks and the first half of the dorsum. There is an alignment of white spots on the upper and lower lips and another on the temporal area, in continuity with four similar, irregular alignments of white spots along the whole length of the flanks. Four continuous, parallel white dorsal stripes extend from just behind the parietals till the posterior part of the dorsum where they fade and disappear (Figures 4–5 and 7). In the subadult these white stripes are irregular and discontinuous (Figure 6). From half-length of the trunk, the dorsal background color turns to reddish-brown (similar to the color of laterite), continuing to the tail. The upper surfaces of the proximal parts of the arms are black with white spots, turning to reddish-brown with irregular lighter spots on the distal parts of the arms. The upper surfaces of the legs show a reddish-brown background color with irregular lighter spots and markings. The lower surface of the tail progressively reaches posteriorly the uniform reddish-brown color uniformly covering the dorsal and lateral surfaces of the tail until its tip. The lower surfaces of the arms and legs are grayish-white, the palms are reddish-brown. Cranial osteology. Based on subadult male RBINS 20302. Snout and palatomaxillary bones The premaxilla is a single, dentigerous bone (Figure 8A–D). The alveolar shelf carries probably seven teeth (counting the sockets) and juts out caudad as two triangular processes touching the maxilla. There is a narrow, tapering, dorsocaudally directed nasal process that is almost as long as the nasals themselves and wedges the tapering tip between the nasals. The nasals are paired, almost flat elements that form a straight suture between themselves and an interdigitating suture with the frontal (Figure 8A, D). The anterior tips are pointed and diverge from each other to make room for the intercalating premaxillary nasal process. The nasals are the widest at about the mid-length where they project out laterally into a shark fin-shaped, anteriorly embayed protuberance slightly overlapping the maxillary facial process. The maxilla has a high facial process with a triangular posterodorsal process reaching the frontal and another small posterolateral process below it touching the prefrontal (Figure 8A–B). There is a semilunar embayment between these two processes. The alveolar border bears 15 pleurodont teeth. Right above the teeth, a palatal shelf medially expands (Figure 8C). The premaxillary process is short and slightly upturned and bifurcated into an anterolateral and an anteromedial process, as is common in many lacertids (Villa & Delfino 2019). The palatine is an edentulous, ventrally concave bone that overlaps the palatal shelf of maxilla laterally with a maxillary process (Figure 8C). This process also establishes contact with the prefrontal dorsolaterally. The squarish vomerine process overlaps the palatine process of the vomer. Between these two processes, namely the maxillary and the palatine, there is an anterior embayment and a ventral concavity corresponding to choana. Posteriorly the palatine ends in three little triangular protuberances of which the medial two overlap the pterygoid, and the lateral one laterally articulates to that bone. The palatines do not contact each other medially. The pterygoid is an edentulous, triradiate bone (Figure 8C). The anteromedial process of the pterygoid, which articulates with the palatine, is longer than the anterolateral process of the same that articulates with the ectopterygoid. The quadrate process of the pterygoid is slender, lateromedially compressed and is directed posterolateral. The dorsolateral surface of the quadrate process bears a small facet for the epipterygoid. The medial surface of this process bears a longitudinal groove for the attachment of the pterygomandibularis muscle (Daza et al. 2011; Das & Pramanick 2019). The ectopterygoid articulates medially to the ectopterygoid articular facet on the pterygoid anterolateral process (Figure 8C). Anteriorly it overlaps the palatal shelf of the maxilla and just contacts the palatine. The vomer forms the casing of the vomeronasal organ together with the septomaxilla (Figure 8C). Vomers contact each other medially except from their posterior medial margins. Anteriorly, they contact the maxilla. Posteriorly vomers touch the palatine. Anterolaterally vomers are narrow to create an opening for the vomeronasal fenestra. Behind this, vomers expand laterally, only to taper laterally again to for choana. The septomaxillae form the dorsal encasing of the vomeronasal organ (Figure 8A, D). The septomaxillae are concave ventrally. Their medial edges are turned dorsad. Anteroventrally the septomaxilla ends with two small, pointed processes. Except a small protuberance, there is no clear posteromedial process as in some Palaearctic lacertids (Villa & Delfino 2019). Chondrocranial braincase bones The braincase bones show some degree of fusion, although sutures are detectable, at least partially, between the otic capsule elements and the ventral braincase elements, namely the parabasisphenoid and the basioccipital. Prootic is a prominent element housing cochlea, anterior and horizontal (partly) semicircular canals and their ampullae (Figure 8B–C). The anterior semicircular canal forms a prominent bulge on the anterolateral surface, just behind the crista alaris. In this species, the crista alaris is a narrow semilunar projection immediately rostrad and somewhat medial to the anterior semicircular canal bulge (Figure 8B). Immediately below this bulge, begins a rather weakly developed crista prootica that runs caudad from this point. Ventrad to the crista prootica, the anterior margin of the prootic is embayed by the incisura prootica (Figure 8B). Ventrad to the incisura prootica notch, prootic projects rostrad into an obtusely triangular anterior inferior process. The bulge along the horizontal semicircular canal continues posteriorly as a prootic process to reach the anterior surface of the paroccipital process. On the medial surface of the prootic, there are two auditory nerve foramina. The prootic articulates (in this specimen, fused) with the otoccipital along the former’s posterior lateral margin. The paired otoccipital forms the occipital condyle with the basioccipital (Figure 8A, E). The otoccipitals are composite (of opisthotic and exoccipital), hollow, bulbous bones that encase the internal ear. Dorsally the otoccipitals project out into a prominent, posterolaterally directed, axe head-shaped (in posterior view) paroccipital process that is approximately one-third the length of the quadrate. The supratemporal attaches to the anterior surface of the lateral end of this process. Ventrad to the supratemporal facet, there is a facet for the quadrate. Dorsad to the basal tubera, the otoccipital has a very prominent, deep embayment of the recessus scalae tympani which is bordered anterodorsally by the crista interfenestralis. Posterodorsal to the lateral opening of the recessus scalae tympani, there is a vagus foramen. The position of the hypoglossal foramina could not be detected clearly in the scan. One of the two single elements of the ventral braincase is the parabasisphenoid (Figure 8C). The bone has an elongated, narrow parasphenoid rostrum. Behind this parasphenoid element, the basisphenoid begins to expand. On both sides of the base of the parasphenoid rostrum, a truncated looking trabecula cranii is present. Between the trabeculae, on the dorsal surface is situated the sella turcica.Two very small internal carotid foramina open within the sella turcica. Caudad to the sella turcica, the crista sellaris is present transversely. Two short, anteroventrally directed basipterygoid processes project out from the ventrolateral base of the basisphenoid (Figure 8C). These processes expand at their end. Dorsally and medially, the anterior vidian foramen pierces the basipterygoid process. The basioccipital is the ventral element of the braincase participating in the formation of the occipital condyle (Figure 8A, C, E). The bone is hexagonal, dorsally concave and in this specimen, partly fused with the otoccipital, the prootic and the parabasisphenoid. Ventrad to the lateral opening of the recessus scalae tympani, the basioccipital has a small protuberance, the basal tubera. The basioccipital forms the floor of the recessus scalae tympani. The supraoccipital consists of a dorsomedian roof for the foramen magnum and two expanded and hollowed lateroventral wings partly encasing the inner ear (Figure 8A). In this species the processus ascendens is a very small, anteriorly truncated protuberance which does not reach the parietal (Figure 8E). This bone articulates with the prootic and the otoccipital. Dermal skull roofing bones The frontal bone is a single (fused in this specimen, condition in hatchlings is not known), elongated, skull roof element, being almost twice as long as the parietal in this species (Figure 8A, D). The frontal is wide at the rostral end and very wide at the caudal end and relatively narrower in the middle. A few digitiform processes from the frontals form interdigitating sutures with the nasals and the maxillae. The frontal articulates with the prefrontal along the anterior one-third of the former’s lateral margin. On the ventral surface of the frontal, along its outer margin, there is a crest, the crista cranii. The caudal end of the frontal expands markedly into two posterolateral processes with a squarish end and articulates with the parietal and the postfrontal. This particular specimen does not show any rugosity on the dorsal surface of the frontal. The parietal is a squarish, short, wide skull roof bone (Figure 8A–B). There are no anterolateral processes. However, there is a narrow, tapering posterolateral process on each side that articulates with the supratemporal and is just separated from the squamosal. These processes do not reach the paroccipital process of the otoccipital. There is a pineal foramen (Ledesma & Scarpetta 2018) piercing the parietal. There is a fossa parietalis (Oelrich 1956) at the midpoint of the embayed posterior margin of the parietal, though the processus ascendens from the supraoccipital is very weakly developed in this species and does not reach the fossa. Circumorbital bones The prefrontals are cavernous (in anteromedial view) bones that meet the frontals laterally, the maxillary facial process anteriorly and anterodorsally, the palatines ventrally and the lacrimals ventrolaterally (Figure 8A–B). The ventrolateral border of the orbitonasal flange of the parietal has a deep lacrimal notch. The orbitonasal flange projects ventrally into a posteroventral process medial to the lacrimal notch. Dorsally, the flange projects into a caudally directed process along the crista cranii. There is rather weak palpebral crest. The jugals are paired bones consisting of an anterior and a posterodorsal process, the former being more robust, especially close to the junction between the two, than the latter (Figure 8A–C). The anterior process tapers anteriorly and meets the lacrimal.This process articulates with the frontal anteroventrally and the ectopterygoid ventromedially. There is a faintly developed, caudally directed protuberance, the quadratojugal process, at the junction between the anterior and the posterodorsal processes. The slender posterodorsal process touches the postorbital. The lacrimal is a small sliver of a bone overlying the junction of the prefrontal, jugal and the maxilla (the prefrontal is just separated from the jugal), immediately caudad to the prefrontal lacrimal notch (Figure 8B). The postfrontal is a triradiate bone with a very slender anterolateral process articulating to the posterior lateral margin of the frontal, a weakly developed, triangular protuberance articulating to the anterodorsal margin of the postorbital and a robust, dagger-like posterior process wedged between the frontal and the parietal medially and the postorbital laterally (Figure 8A–B). The postorbital is situated below the postfrontal (Figure 8A–B). It consists of a short, triangular anteroventral process that contacts the posterodorsal process of the jugal and a longer posterior process touching the postfrontal and the squamosal, but the resolution of the scan did not permit determination of the exact end point of this process. In this specimen, the postfrontal and the postorbital do not extend more than one-third the length of the squamosal and thus, leave a prominent upper temporal fenestra open. There are prominent supraorbital ossifications above and scleral ring within the orbit (Figure 8A–B). Suspensorial and palatoquadrate derived bones The squamosals are a pair of J-shaped suspensorial bones (Figure 8A–B). Rostrally the squamosal is tapered and articulates medially to the postorbital. Posteriorly the bone curves ventrad and contacts the supratemporal dorsomedially and the quadrate ventrally. The ventrally curved caudal end of this bone is squarish. The supratemporals are small, curved bones with a tapered rostral and widened caudoventral end (Figure 8A–B). The caudoventral end bears an articulatory facet for the quadrate. Anterolaterally and anteromedially the supratemporal articulates with the squamosal and the posterolateral process of the parietal, respectively. The epipterygoid is a rather nondescript rod-like bone that articulates to the pterygoid right behind t, Published as part of Pauwels, Olivier S. G., Das, Sunandan, Camara, Lewei Boyo, Chirio, Laurent, Doumbia, Joseph, D'Acoz, Cédric D'Udekem, Dufour, Sylvain, Margraf, Nicolas & Sonet, Gontran, 2023, Rediscovery, range extension, phylogenetic relationships and updated diagnosis of the Ornate Long-tailed Lizard Latastia ornata Monard, 1940 (Squamata: Lacertidae), pp. 501-524 in Zootaxa 5296 (4) on pages 507-517, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5296.4.1, http://zenodo.org/record/7984314, {"references":["Monard, A. (1940) Resultats de la mission scientifique du Dr. Monard en Guinee portugaise, 1937 - 1938. VIII. Reptiles. Arquivos do Museu Bocage, 11, 147 - 182, pl.","Villa, A. & Delfino, M. (2019) A comparative atlas of the skull osteology of European lizards (Reptilia: Squamata). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 187 (3), 829 - 928. https: // doi. org / 10.1093 / zoolinnean / zlz 035","Daza, J. D., Diogo, R., Johnston, P. & Abdala, V. (2011) Jaw adductor muscles across lepidosaurs: a reappraisal. The Anatomical Record, 294 (10), 1765 - 1782. https: // doi. org / 10.1002 / ar. 21467","Das, S. & Pramanick, K. (2019) Comparative anatomy and homology of jaw adductor muscles of some South Asian colubroid snakes (Serpentes: Colubroidea). Vertebrate Zoology, 69 (1), 93 - 102. https: // doi. org / 10.26049 / VZ 69 - 1 - 2019 - 04","Ledesma, D. T. & Scarpetta, S. G. (2018) The skull of the gerrhonotine lizard Elgaria panamintina (Squamata: Anguidae). PloS ONE, 13 (6), e 0199584. https: // doi. org / 10.1371 / journal. pone. 0199584","Oelrich, T. M. (1956) The anatomy of the head of Ctenosaura pectinata (Iguanidae). University of Michigan Museum of Zoology Miscellaneous Publications, 94, 1 - 122.","Good, D. A. (1987) A phylogenetic analysis of cranial osteology in the gerrhonotine lizards. Journal of Herpetology, 21, 285 - 297. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 1563970"]}

Micrelapidae new family. Type genus: Micrelaps Boettger, 1880. Type species: Micrelaps muelleri Boettger, 1880. Etymology: Boettger (Bottger ¨) did not give the etymology for the generic nomen but was almost certainly from the Latin adjective micro-, derived from the Greek mikros (small), and elaps, the Latinised form of the Greek noun´ellops or´elaps (literally sea-fish or serpent, but here in reference to the snake genus Elaps, now a synonym of Homoroselaps). Micrelapidae fam. nov. is derived from Micrelaps by the taking the stem elap- of the root word of the nomen. Content: Micrelaps muelleri Boettger, 1880, Micrelaps bicoloratus Sternfeld, 1908, Micrelaps vaillanti Mocquard, 1888, Brachyophis revoili Mocquard, 1888. Diagnosis and definition: In the crania of Micrelaps and Brachyophis we examined the ectopterygoid was laterally and medially expanded at the point of contact with the pterygoid, with this expansion not being contiguous with the ectopterygoid anterolateral and anteromedial lobes (Fig. 4, Supplementary material fig. 53, 54). The lateral expansion is a posterolaterally and somewhat ventrally directed, very prominent protuberance continuous with a ridge on the ventral surface of the pterygoid. This character state was not present in any other cranium we examined and is very likely a synapomorphy of the family. Other common cranial characters include a premaxilla adapted for a fossorial lifestyle, premaxillary transverse processes closely approaching the maxilla, a short maxilla with ascending processes abutting the prefrontal, well-developed, grooved fangs below the orbit, preceded by a diastema and 2 – 3 teeth, an ectopterygoid deeply forked into anterolateral and anteromedial lobes that articulate with maxillary ectopterygoid processes leaving a foramen in the middle, prefrontal and parietal supraorbital processes laterally bordering the frontal and almost meeting each other, a tendency towards fusion of cranial bones (especially because the supratemporal is absent, very likely fused to the quadrate in Brachyophis and to posterior chondrocranial elements in Micrelaps), and a short quadrate. Brachyophis, however, differs from the type genus in possessing a postorbital (versus postorbital absent in Micrelaps), dorsolateral adductor ridges on the parietal (versus a single sagittal ridge in Micrelaps), only a faint pseudocoronoid ridge on the dentary (versus a prominent process in Micrelaps). Scalation characters that are common in both genera include 1 nasal, 7 supralabials, 15 smooth dorsal scale rows, absence of a loreal, 2 anal shields. Ventrals range from 170 to 280 and subcaudals (paired) 16 – 32 in Micrelaps (Boulenger, 1896; De Witte and Laurent, 1947; Rasmussen, 2002; Werner et al., 2006; Spawls et al., 2018). In Brachyophis, ventrals range from 103 to 123 and subcaudals (single) 8 – 14 (De Witte and Laurent, 1947; Lanza, 1966). Brachyophis has a large, azygous occipital shield (Boulenger, 1896). Micrelaps and Brachyophis possess a rectal caecum and a short genital sinus in the female, two soft tissue traits used to cluster these two genera by Underwood and Kochva (1993). Distribution: Micrelaps spp. is distributed in eastern and northeastern Africa and western Asia. Brachyophis is limited to Somalia in north-eastern Africa. Distribution: Micrelaps spp. is distributed in eastern and northeastern Africa and western Asia. Brachyophis is limited to Somalia in north-eastern Africa. Remarks: Geniez (2018) commented that Micrelaps “could constitute a separate family within its own right, that of Micrelapsidae”. Bar et al. (2021) likewise wrote that “. The actual placement of the genus [Micrelaps] is often poorly supported within studies and inconsistent across them. We suspect it will soon be placed in its own family — as is the norm in taxonomy these days. We predict this family, containing a single genus (Micrelaps), will be called Micrelapidae.”. However, these authors did not explicitly express that they are erecting a new family for these snakes. Rather, it was a suggestion about what should/could be done. It therefore is not in accordance with Article 16.1 and Recommendation 16A of The Code (ICZN, 1999). They also did not also provide characters for the express purpose of differentiating or diagnosing “Micrelapsidae” or “ Micrelapidae ”, nor did they cite a work containing the same (again, very likely because a nomenclatural act presumably was not the intention of Geniez [2018] and it was not the intention of SM, who wrote this in Bar et al. [2021] either) and this contravenes Articles 13.1.1, 13.1.2 and Recommendation 13A of The Code. Hence, we regard the nomen “Micrelapsidae” as unavailable. The ZooBank LSID for this taxonomic action is urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D8475246-AD8E-4886-AB55- 12F6F242E9C4., Published as part of Das, Sunandan, Greenbaum, Eli, Meiri, Shai, Bauer, Aaron M., Burbrink, Frank T., Raxworthy, Christopher J., Weinell, Jeffrey L., Brown, Rafe M., Brecko, Jonathan, Pauwels, Olivier S. G., Rabibisoa, Nirhy, Raselimanana, Achille P. & Merila, Juha, 2023, Ultraconserved elements-based phylogenomic systematics of the snake superfamily Elapoidea, with the description of a new Afro-Asian family, pp. 1-11 in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 180 on pages 8-9, DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107700, http://zenodo.org/record/7746501, {"references":["Sternfeld, R., 1908. Zur Schlangenfauna Ostafrikas. I. Schlangen aus Sud-Abessinien. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin 4, 239 - 247.","Mocquard, F., 1888. Sur une collection de Reptiles et de Batraciens rapport´es des Pays Comalis et de Zanzibar par M. G. R´evoil. M´emoires Publies par la Soci´ete´ Philomathique a l' occasion du Centenaire de sa fondation 1788 - 1888, 109 - 134.","Boulenger, G. A., 1896. Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural History). Volume III, containing the Colubridae (Opisthoglyphae and Proteroglyphae), Amblycephalidae, and Viperidae. Trustees of the British Museum, London.","de Witte, G. - F., Laurent, R., 1947. R´evision d' un groupe de Colubridae africains: genres Calamelaps, Miodon, Aparallactus et formes affines. M´em. Mus. R. His. Nat. Belg. 29, 1 - 134.","Rasmussen, J. B., 2002. A review of the African members of the genus Micrelaps Boettger 1880 (Serpentes Atractaspididae). Tropical Zoology 15, 71 - 87.","Werner, Y. L., Babocsay, G., Carmely, H., Thuna, M., 2006. Micrelaps in the southern Levant: variation, sexual dimorphism, and a new species (Serpentes: Atractaspididae). Zool. Middle East 38, 29 - 48.","Spawls, S., Howell, K., Hinkel, H., Menegon, M., 2018. Field Guide to East African Reptiles, second edition. Bloomsbury Wildlife, London.","Lanza, B., 1966. Il genere Brachyophis e descrizione di una nuova forma (Reptilia, Serpentes, Colubridae). Monit. Zool. Ital. 74, 30 - 48.","Underwood, G., Kochva, E., 1993. On the affinities of the burrowing asps Atractaspis (Serpentes: Atractaspididae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 107, 3 - 64.","Geniez, P., 2018. Snakes of Europe, North Africa and the Middle East: A Photographic Guide. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.","Bar, A., Haimovitch, G., Meiri, S., 2021. Field guide to the amphibians and reptiles of, Israel. Edition. Chimaira, Frankfurt Am Main.","ICZN (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature), 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, fourth edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London."]}