Search

Background Internet-based parental programmes may improve parental wellbeing and mitigate the burden of mental health issues during the perinatal period. However, few studies have explored the cost and clinical impacts of such interventions. In the present study, we sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness associated with an online cognitive behaviour therapy intervention ( Baby Steps Wellbeing) to an information-only programme (Baby Care). Methods An alongside-trial cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken using data from a randomised clinical trial comparing the Baby Steps Wellbeing intervention to Baby Care. Direct healthcare costs, as well as indirect costs attributed to income loss, were considered. The Assessment of Quality of Life-8 Dimensions multi-attribute utility instrument was used to estimate participant utilities, and subsequently calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated to assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. The economic evaluation adopted a societal perspective. Results In total, 496 parents were randomised to either the Baby Steps Wellbeing intervention or the Baby Care control arm. No significant differences in costs (−$27, 95% confidence interval (CI): −$1189–$1134) or QALYs (0.051, 95% CI: −0.097–0.200) were identified. Bootstrapped results showed that the Baby Steps Wellbeing programme was cost-saving and health improving in 38% of simulations and cost-effective in another 37% of simulations. Conclusions The Baby Steps Wellbeing programme was slightly cost-saving with slightly improved health outcomes compared with Baby Care. Bootstrapped results indicate the Baby Steps Wellbeing was cost-effective in 75% of simulations. Overall, the Baby Steps Wellbeing programme is an online programme that is cost-effective. Trial registration Australian & New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ANZCTR12614001256662.

For most treatment-seeking patients with severe Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), abstinence is the clinically indicated goal. Existing AUD motivation scales are non-specific about treatment consumption goals, which limit their effectiveness. Desires and mental imagery are relevant in the motivation for AUD treatment engagement. The Motivational Thought Frequency Scale for an abstinence goal (MTF-A) was adapted from the MTF for controlled drinking (MTF-CD). This study psychometrically evaluated the MTF-A in an alcohol-dependent sample engaged in treatment with a goal of abstinence. To enhance the clinical utility of the scale, a secondary aim was to evaluate a psychometrically equivalent short version of the MTF-A.A sample N of 329 treatment-seeking patients with AUD (mean age of 44.44 years, SD = 11.89 years, 72% male) who were undertaking a cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) program for abstinence completed the Motivational Thought Frequency Scale for Abstinence (MTF-A) and the Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire (SADQ). The MTF-A measured motivation for abstinence through four factors: intensity, self-efficacy imagery, incentives imagery, and availability. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were conducted to examine factor structure and model fit. Cronbach's alpha assessed internal consistency. Predictive validity was determined by logistic regression predicting first-session treatment non-attendance and alcohol consumption between baseline assessment and commencement of treatment, controlling for potential confounds.A four-factor structure provided the best fit for the MTF-A, compared with one- and three-factor models. A shortened 9-item MTF-A scale (S-MTF-A) provided better fit than the 13-item MTF-A scale. Both MTF-A and S-MTF-A displayed good internal consistency. Although both MTF-A and S-MTF-A successfully predicted first-session treatment non-attendance, neither predicted alcohol consumption between the baseline assessment and commencement of treatment.The model fit of the four-factor, 9-item S-MTF-A was superior to the original 13-item MTF-A. Both scales were predictive of participation of AUD treatment. Desires and mental imagery play an important role in AUD treatment motivation.

The final year of high school is a challenging phase of adolescents’ lives and substance use can play an important role. We examined changes in the frequency and quantity of alcohol and cannabis use, and demographic correlates among Grade 12 students of 2020. Students (N = 844) from nine schools retrospectively self-reported changes in substance use after the easing of COVID-19 lockdowns (back to school), compared to before the pandemic. Changes in use were examined with age, gender, Aboriginal or Torres Islander, parental and family characteristics, and truancy. Thirty-one percent of students reported that they used alcohol less frequently, and 24% reported that they used it more frequently compared to pre-COVID-19. Most students (46%) reported that they used cannabis less, while a subset reported using more frequently (22%). A history of truancy was associated with an increased frequency (OR = 2.13 [1.18–3.83]) of cannabis use. A substantial minority of adolescents used more alcohol and cannabis after the initial COVID-19 lockdown period. Students in their final year who reported increased use may benefit from increased support to manage their substance use.