Search

This paper will review faculty development focus and programming at the early, mid and late career stages. Topics covered include challenges at each career stage, institutional and national programming currently available for the needs of faculty at that stage, and suggested best practices for development of new career focus and potential programs for each stage.

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a frequent incidental finding on computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED); however, its prognostic value is unclear. In this study, we interrogate the prognostic value of CAC identified on CTPA in predicting adverse outcomes in the evaluation of PE in the ED.In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 610 patients presenting to the ED in 2013 and evaluated with CTPA for suspected PE. Ordinal CAC scores were evaluated as absent (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3) in each of the 4 main coronary arteries. Composite CAC scores were subsequently compared against adverse clinical outcomes, defined as intensive care unit admission, hospital stay longer than 72 hours, or death during hospital course or at 6-month follow-up, using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Relevant exclusion criteria included a history of cardiovascular disease.In all, 365 patients met the inclusion criteria (231 women, mean age 56±16 y) with 132 patients (36%) having some degree of CAC and 16 (4%) having severe CAC. Known malignancy was present in 151 (41%) patients and composite adverse clinical outcomes were observed in 98 patients (32%). Age, presence of acute PE, malignancy, and presence of CAC were significant predictors of adverse outcomes on both univariate and multivariate analyses. CAC was not an independent predictor of short-term adverse outcomes on multivariate analysis ( P =0.06) when all patients were considered. However, when patients with known malignancy were excluded, CAC was an independent predictor of short-term adverse outcomes (odds ratio=2.5, confidence interval=1.1-5.5, P =0.03) independent of age and presence of PE.The presence of CAC on CT PA was predictive of adverse outcomes in patients without known cardiac disease presenting to the ED with suspected PE.

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate radiology imaging volumes at distinct time periods throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as a function of regional COVID-19 hospitalizations. Methods Radiology imaging volumes and statewide COVID-19 hospitalizations were collected, and four 28-day time periods throughout the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 were analyzed: pre-COVID-19 in January, the “first wave” of COVID-19 hospitalizations in April, the “recovery” time period in the summer of 2020 with a relative nadir of COVID-19 hospitalizations, and the “third wave” of COVID-19 hospitalizations in November. Imaging studies were categorized as inpatient, outpatient, or emergency department on the basis of patient location at the time of acquisition. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare daily imaging volumes during each discrete 28-day time period. Results Imaging volumes overall during the first wave of COVID-19 infections were 55% (11,098/20,011; P < .001) of pre-COVID-19 imaging volumes. Overall imaging volumes returned during the recovery time period to 99% (19,915/20,011; P = .725), and third-wave imaging volumes compared with the pre-COVID-19 period were significantly lower in the emergency department at 88.8% (7,951/8,955; P < .001), significantly higher for outpatients at 115.7% (8,818/7,621; P = .008), not significantly different for inpatients at 106% (3,650/3,435; P = .053), and overall unchanged when aggregated together at 102% (20,419/20,011; P = .629). Conclusions Medical imaging rebounded after the first wave of COVID-19 hospitalizations, with relative stability of utilization over the ensuing phases of the pandemic. As widespread COVID-19 vaccination continues to occur, future surges in COVID-19 hospitalizations will likely have a negligible impact on imaging utilization.

Since the first steps of creating the Alliance of Medical Student Educators in Radiology (AMSER) curriculum 20 years ago, dramatic advances in medical imaging, patient care, and medical education have occurred necessitating an update of this valuable resource. The 2020 update of the AMSER curriculum aims to address as many of these changes while providing a succinct resource that will hopefully remain useful for years to come. The updated AMSER curriculum document is freely available for download via the AMSER website at https://www.aur.org/en/affinity-groups/amser/curriculum.