Search

Hong Kong employed a strategy of intermittent public health and social measures alongside increasingly stringent travel regulations to eliminate domestic SARS-CoV-2 transmission. By analyzing 1899 genome sequences (>18% of confirmed cases) from 23-January-2020 to 26-January-2021, we reveal the effects of fluctuating control measures on the evolution and epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 lineages in Hong Kong. Despite numerous importations, only three introductions were responsible for 90% of locally-acquired cases. Community outbreaks were caused by novel introductions rather than a resurgence of circulating strains. Thus, local outbreak prevention requires strong border control and community surveillance, especially during periods of less stringent social restriction. Non-adherence to prolonged preventative measures may explain sustained local transmission observed during wave four in late 2020 and early 2021. We also found that, due to a tight transmission bottleneck, transmission of low-frequency single nucleotide variants between hosts is rare.

We described the frequency of residential case clusters and the efficiency of compulsory testing in identifying cases using buildings targeted in compulsory testing and locally infected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases matched by residence in Hong Kong. Most of the buildings (4246 of 7688, 55.2%) with COVID-19 cases identified had only 1 reported case, and 13% of the daily reported cases were detected through compulsory testing. Compulsory testing notices could be essential in attempting to eliminate infections (“zero COVID”) and have an impact early in an epidemic, but they appear to be relatively inefficient in response to sustained community transmission.

BackgroundDespite relatively few reports of residential case clusters of COVID-19, building-wide compulsory testing notices on residential apartment blocks are frequently applied in Hong Kong with the aim of identifying cases and reducing transmission.MethodsWe aimed to describe the frequency of residential case clusters and the efficiency of compulsory testing notices in identifying cases. The residences of locally infected COVID-19 cases in Hong Kong were grouped to quantify the number of cases per residence.Buildings targeted in compulsory testing notices were matched with the residence of cases to estimate the number of cases identified.ResultsWe found that most of the residential buildings (4246/7688, 55.2%) with a confirmed COVID-19 case had only one reported case. In the fourth and the fifth epidemic wave in Hong Kong, we estimated that compulsory testing notices detected 29 cases (95% confidence interval: 26, 32) and 46 cases (44, 48) from every 100 buildings tested (each with hundreds of residents), respectively. Approximately 13% of the daily reported cases were identified through compulsory testing notices.ConclusionsCompulsory testing notices can be an essential method when attempting to maintain local elimination (‘zero covid’) and most impactful early in an epidemic when the benefit remains of stemming a new wave. Compulsory testing therefore appears to be a relatively inefficient control measure in response to sustained community transmission in the community.

BackgroundHong Kong has enforced stringent travel restrictions particularly for inbound travellers since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2. Understanding the characteristics of imported COVID-19 cases is important for establishing evidence-based control measures.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study to summarise the characteristics of cases classified as imported cases that were detected on or soon after arrival into Hong Kong from 13 November 2020 through to 31 January 2022, when all arriving persons were required to quarantine in a hotel or a designated quarantine facility. We analysed individual demographics, and clinical information including symptoms and disease severity, virus variants, and Ct values.ResultsThere were 2269 imported COVID-19 cases aged 0-85 years identified in Hong Kong. Almost half (48.6%) of the imported cases were detected on arrival. A shorter median delay from arrival to isolation was observed in Delta and Omicron cases (3 days) than cases infected with the ancestral strain and other variants (12 days; pConclusionsTesting inbound travellers at arrival and during on-arrival quarantine can detect imported cases early although it may not be sufficient to prevent all introductions of COVID-19 into the community. Public health measures should be adjusted in responses to the emergence of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 based on the epidemiologic evidence from continuous surveillance.

Superspreading, or overdispersion in transmission, is a feature of SARS-CoV-2 transmission which results in surging epidemics and large clusters of infection. The dispersion parameter is a statistical parameter used to characterize and quantify heterogeneity. In the context of measuring transmissibility, it is analogous to measures of superspreading potential among populations by assuming that collective offspring distribution follows a negative-binomial distribution. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on globally reported dispersion parameters of SARS-CoV-2 infection. All searches were carried out on 10 September 2021 in PubMed for articles published from 1 January 2020 to 10 September 2021. Multiple estimates of the dispersion parameter have been published for 17 studies, which could be related to where and when the data were obtained, in 8 countries (e.g. China, the United States, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore). High heterogeneity was reported among the included studies. The mean estimates of dispersion parameters range from 0.06 to 2.97 over eight countries, the pooled estimate was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.79), with changing means over countries and decreasing slightly with the increasing reproduction number. The expected proportion of cases accounting for 80% of all transmissions is 19% (95% CrI: 7, 34) globally. The study location and method were found to be important drivers for diversity in estimates of dispersion parameters. While under high potential of superspreading, larger outbreaks could still occur with the import of the COVID-19 virus by traveling even when an epidemic seems to be under control.

BackgroundOn-arrival quarantine has been one of the primary measures used to prevent the introduction of COVID-19 into Hong Kong since the start of the pandemic. Most on-arrival quarantines have been done in hotels, with the duration of quarantine and testing frequency during quarantine varying throughout the pandemic for various reasons. However, hotels are not necessarily designed with infection control in mind. We aimed to study the potential risk of transmission between persons in on-arrival quarantine.MethodsWe examined data on each laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 case identified in on-arrival quarantine in a hotel in Hong Kong between 1 May 2020 and 31 January 2022. We sequenced the full genomes of viruses from cases that overlapped with other confirmed cases in terms of the hotel of stay, date of arrival and date of testing positive. A combination of epidemiological information and sequence information was then used to identify probable transmission events.FindingsAmong 221 imported cases that overlapped with other quarantined cases, phylogenetic analysis identified eight suspected clusters comprising 20 cases in total. Only three of these clusters had been recognised as hotel transmission events.InterpretationWe have identified potential occurrences of COVID-19 transmission within hotel quarantine in Hong Kong demonstrating the underlying low but non-zero risk associated with sequestering arrivals within hotels. In future pandemics, on-arrival quarantine in hotels could be used to delay the introduction of infection, but the construction of purpose-built facilities for on-arrival quarantine might be necessary to minimize importation risk.FundingHealth and Medical Research Fund, Hong Kong

China experienced a resurgence of seasonal influenza activity throughout 2021 despite intermittent control measures and prolonged international border closure. We show genomic evidence for multiple A(H3N2), A(H1N1), and B/Victoria transmission lineages circulating over 3 years, with the 2021 resurgence mainly driven by two B/Victoria clades. Phylodynamic analysis revealed unsampled ancestry prior to widespread outbreaks in December 2020, showing that influenza lineages can circulate cryptically under non-pharmaceutical interventions enacted against COVID-19. Novel haemagglutinin gene mutations and altered age profiles of infected individuals were observed, and Jiangxi province was identified as a major source for nationwide outbreaks. Following major holiday periods, fluctuations in the effective reproduction number were observed, underscoring the importance of influenza vaccination prior to holiday periods or travel. Extensive heterogeneity in seasonal influenza circulation patterns in China determined by historical strain circulation indicates that a better understanding of demographic patterns is needed for improving effective controls.

The serial interval distribution is used to approximate the generation time distribution, an essential parameter to predict the effective reproductive number “Rt”, a measure of transmissibility. However, serial interval distributions may change as an epidemic progresses rather than remaining constant. Here we show that serial intervals in Hong Kong varied over time, closely associated with the temporal variation in COVID-19 case profiles and public health and social measures that were implemented in response to surges in community transmission. Quantification of the variation over time in serial intervals led to improved estimation of Rt, and provided additional insights into the impact of public health measures on transmission of infections.One-Sentence SummaryReal-time estimates of serial interval distributions can improve assessment of COVID-19 transmission dynamics and control.