Search

Not available.

Advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) encompasses heterogeneous mastocytosis subtypes and is associated with poor outcomes. Although midostaurin was the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor to be approved for AdvSM patients, long-lasting responses are limited. The mutation-Adjusted Risk Score (MARS), the International Prognostic Scoring System for mastocytosis (IPSM) and the Global Prognostic Score for Systemic Mastocytosis (GPSM) have been established to characterize the outcomes of patients with overall AdvSM. However, given the outcome's dependency on the AdvSM subtype, prognostic characterization within each subtype is critical. We aimed to study the predictive ability using Harrell's concordance index of prognostic scores according to the AdvSM subtype. We conducted a nationwide retrospective study using the French mastocytosis reference center's registry and included all midostaurin-treated patients with C finding. Overall, 170 patients were identified: 46 aggressive SM (ASM), 11 mast cell leukemia (MCL), and 113 SM with associated hematological neoplasm (SM-AHN). All risk scores improved their discriminative value for overall survival (OS) when combined with the AdvSM subtype. The best predictive value was for adjusted MARS (C-index = 0.689), followed by GPSM (C-index = 0.677) and IPSM (C-index = 0.618). In a multivariable analysis, MARS stratification and the AdvSM subtype were both prognostic for OS. Accordingly, five subgroups of patients with AdvSM and a different median OS were identified: 9.9 months for MCL, 24 months for intermediate/high-risk SM-AHN, 33 months for intermediate/high-risk ASM, 58 months for low-risk SM-AHN and was not reached for low-risk ASM (p < 0.001). The AdvSM subtype and the MARS are the most predictive of OS and should prompt specific management., (© 2024 The Author(s). American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The preplanned interim analysis of the COMMANDS trial showed greater efficacy of luspatercept than epoetin alfa for treating anaemia in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-naive patients with transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. In this Article, we report the results of the primary analysis of the trial., Methods: COMMANDS is a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial conducted at 142 sites in 26 countries. Eligible patients were those aged 18 years or older, with myelodysplastic syndromes of very low risk, low risk, or intermediate risk (as defined by the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System), who were ESA-naive and transfusion dependent, and had a serum erythropoietin concentration of less than 500 U/L. Patients were stratified by baseline red blood cell transfusion burden, serum erythropoietin concentration, and ring sideroblast status, and randomly allocated (1:1) to receive luspatercept (1·0-1·75 mg/kg body weight, subcutaneously, once every 3 weeks) or epoetin alfa (450-1050 IU/kg body weight, subcutaneously, once a week; maximum total dose 80 000 IU) for at least 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was red blood cell transfusion independence lasting at least 12 weeks with a concurrent mean haemoglobin increase of at least 1·5 g/dL (weeks 1-24), evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03682536; active, not recruiting)., Findings: Between Jan 2, 2019, and Sept 29, 2022, 363 patients were screened and randomly allocated: 182 (50%) to luspatercept and 181 (50%) to epoetin alfa. Median age was 74 years (IQR 69-80), 162 (45%) patients were female, and 201 (55%) were male. 289 (80%) were White, 44 (12%) were Asian, and two (1%) were Black or African American. 23 (6%) were Hispanic or Latino and 311 (86%) were not Hispanic or Latino. Median follow-up for the primary endpoint was 17·2 months (10·4-27·7) for the luspatercept group and 16·9 months (10·1-26·6) for the epoetin alfa group. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the luspatercept group reached the primary endpoint (110 [60%] vs 63 [35%]; common risk difference on response rate 25·4% [95% CI 15·8-35·0]; p<0·0001). Median follow-up for safety analyses was 21·4 months (IQR 14·2-32·4) for the luspatercept group and 20·3 months (12·7-30·9) for the epoetin alfa group. Common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurring among luspatercept recipients (n=182) were hypertension (19 [10%] patients), anaemia (18 [10%]), pneumonia (ten [5%]), syncope (ten [5%]), neutropenia (nine [5%]), thrombocytopenia (eight [4%]), dyspnoea (eight [4%]), and myelodysplastic syndromes (six [3%]); and among epoetin alfa recipients (n=179) were anaemia (14 [8%]), pneumonia (14 [8%]), neutropenia (11 [6%]), myelodysplastic syndromes (ten [6%]), hypertension (eight [4%]), iron overload (seven [4%]), and COVID-19 pneumonia (six [3%]). The most common serious treatment-emergent adverse events in both groups were pneumonia (nine [5%] luspatercept recipients and 13 [7%] epoetin alfa recipients) and COVID-19 (eight [4%] luspatercept recipients and ten [6%] epoetin alfa recipients). One death (due to acute myeloid leukaemia) considered to be luspatercept-related was reported at the interim analysis., Interpretation: Luspatercept represents a new standard of care for ESA-naive patients with transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Significantly more patients had red blood cell transfusion independence and haematological improvement with luspatercept than with epoetin alfa, with benefits observed across patient subgroups., Funding: Celgene and Acceleron Pharma., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Editorial and medical writing support were funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. MGDP reports receiving honoraria from and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from Bristol Myers Squibb. GG-M reports receiving consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb; research support from AbbVie, Astex, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chordia, Curis, Genentech, Novartis, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, and Zentalis; and honoraria from Astex and Curis. VS reports receiving honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis; travel support from AbbVie and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI BioPharma, Curis, Geron, Gilead, Keros, Menarini, Novartis, Servier, and Syros. AMZ reports receiving grant support from AbbVie, Amgen, Astex, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Geron, Kura, Novartis, Otsuka, Shattuck Labs, and Syros; and consulting fees and honoraria from AbbVie, Agios, Akeso Pharma, ALX Oncology, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, BeiGene, BioCryst, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chiesi, Daiichi Sankyo, Epizyme, Faron, Genentech, Geron, Gilead, Glycomimetics, Hikma, Janssen, Karyopharma, Keros, Kura, Kyowa Kirin, Lava Therapeutics, Medus, Notable, Novartis, Orum, Otsuka, Pfizer, Regeneron, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Schrodinger, Servier, Sumitomo Pharma, Syndax, Syros, Taiho, Takeda, Treadwell, Vincerx, and Zentalis. RSK reports receiving grant support from Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees from Geron, Janssen, and Sumitomo Pharma; speakers bureau fees from AbbVie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pharma Essentia, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Servio, and Sobi; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, DSI, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pharma Essentia, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Servio, Sobi, and Sumitomo Pharma. JS reports receiving grant support from Amgen Australia, Astex Pharmaceuticals, and Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees paid to himself from Astellas Pharma, Mundipharma, Novartis, Otsuka, and Pfizer; speakers bureau fees paid to himself and his institution from Mundipharma and Novartis; support for meeting attendance from AstraZeneca (no payment to healthcare provider); being a named investigator on patent PCT/AU2021/050562 assigned to his institution; trial steering committee fees paid to his institution from Bristol Myers Squibb; and serving an unpaid appointment on the Australasia Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group Scientific Advisory Committee. DV reports receiving consulting fees from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kite Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, and Sobi; honoraria from Agios, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gebro, Grifols, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kite Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Sobi; travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Sanofi, and Sobi; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Grifols, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Servier, and Sobi. AJ reports receiving support for study materials from Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb; honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis; travel support from AbbVie and Novartis; advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, and Novartis; and a leadership or fiduciary role as the head of the Czech MDS Group. JL, RP, SK, KLK, TP, and YL are employed by and own stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. JZ is employed by Bristol Myers Squibb. VP is employed by and owns stock in Bristol Myers Squibb and owns stock in Merck. SR is employed by, owns stock in, and has received travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb and owns stock in Celgene. AD reports receiving honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb; travel support from Johnson & Johnson; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from Swixx BioPharma. TC reports receiving consulting fees from AbbVie, Agios, BluePrint, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Servier; honoraria from Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Servier, and Takeda; travel support from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Servier, and Takeda. PF reports receiving grant support from AbbVie, Agios, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis; and honoraria from AbbVie, Agios, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis. UP reports receiving grant support paid to GWT-TUD, from Amgen and Janssen; grant support, paid to University of Leipzig, from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, and Novartis; consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Curis, Geron, Janssen, and Novartis; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis; and fees for serving on a steering committee and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb. All other authors declare no competing interests., (2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Not available.

Background and Aims: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is characterized by the accumulation of atypical mast cells (MCs) in organs. Liver histology of SM has been marginally described and accurate histological classification is critical, given the consequences of aggressive SM diagnosis. We aimed to describe the histological features associated with liver SM using updated tools., Methods: Using the database of the French Reference Centre for Mastocytosis, we retrospectively identified patients with a liver biopsy (LB) and a diagnosis of SM. All LB procedures were performed according to the local physician in charge and centrally reviewed by an expert pathologist., Results: A total of 28 patients were included: 6 had indolent SM, 9 had aggressive SM, and 13 had SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm. Twenty-five (89%) patients presented hepatomegaly, and 19 (68%) had portal hypertension. The LB frequently showed slight sinusoid dilatation (82%). Fibrosis was observed in 3/6 indolent SM and in almost all advanced SM cases (21/22), but none of them showed cirrhosis. A high MC burden (>50 MCs/high-power field) was correlated with elevated blood alkaline phosphatase levels (p = .030). The presence of portal hypertension was associated with a higher mean fibrosis grade (1.6 vs. 0.8 in its absence; p = .026). In advanced SM, the presence of nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) was associated with decreased overall survival (9.5 vs. 46.3 months, p = .002)., Conclusions: MC infiltration induced polymorphic hepatic lesions and the degree of fibrosis is associated with portal hypertension. NRH identifies a poor prognosis subgroup of patients with advanced SM. Assessing liver histology can aid in SM prognostic evaluation., (© 2024 The Authors. Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) corresponds to a rare and heterogeneous spectrum of diseases characterized by the accumulation of atypical mast cells (MCs). Advanced mastocytosis (Adv-SM) is associated with poor survival; in contrast, patients with non-advanced SM (non-Adv-SM) usually have a normal life expectancy but may experience poor quality of life. Despite recent therapeutic progress including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, new treatment options are needed for refractory and/or intolerant patients with both severely symptomatic and Adv-SM. In vitro, the mTOR pathway is activated in MCs from patients bearing the KIT D816V mutation. Furthermore, rapamycin induces the apoptosis of KIT D816V MCs selectively. In this nationwide study, we report the outcomes of patients diagnosed with SM and treated with a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (imTOR) within the French National Reference Center for mastocytosis (CEREMAST). All patients registered were relapsing, treatment-refractory, or ineligible for other cytoreductive therapy. Non-Adv-SM patients received imTOR as a monotherapy (rapamycin/everolimus), and Adv-SM patients received imTOR as a monotherapy or in combination with cytarabine. The objective response rate (ORR) in non-Adv-SM was 60% (partial response in 40% and major response in 20%), including reductions in skin involvement, mediator release symptoms, and serum tryptase. In the Adv-SM group, the ORR was 20% (including one major response and one partial response, both in patients with a KIT D816V mutation), which enabled a successful bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in one patient. Our results suggest that imTOR treatment has potential benefits in patients with SM harboring a KIT D816V mutation., (© 2024 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Mastocytosis and monoclonal mast cell (MC) activation syndrome (MMAS) are heterogeneous conditions characterized by the accumulation of atypical MCs. Despite the recurrent involvement of KIT mutations, the pathophysiologic origin of mastocytosis and MMAS is unclear. Although hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT, related to TPSAB1 gene duplication) is abnormally frequent in these diseases, it is not known whether the association is coincidental or causal., Objective: We evaluated the prevalence of HαT in all mastocytosis subtypes and MMAS and assessed the pathophysiologic association with HαT., Methods: Clinical data, laboratory data, KIT mutations, TPSAB1 duplication (assessed by droplet digital PCR), and HαT prevalence were retrospectively recorded for all patients with mastocytosis and MMAS registered in the French national referral center database and compared to a control cohort. To increase the power of our analysis for advanced systemic mastocytosis (advSM), we pooled our cohort with literature cases., Results: We included 583 patients (27 with MMAS and 556 with mastocytosis). The prevalence of HαT in mastocytosis was 12.6%, significantly higher than in the general population (5.7%, P = .002) and lower than in MMAS (33.3%, P = .02). HαT + patients were more likely to have anaphylactic reactions and less likely to have cutaneous lesions than HαT - patients (43.0% vs 24.4%, P = .006; 57.7% vs 75.6%, respectively, P = .006). In the pooled analysis, the prevalence of HαT was higher in advSM (11.5%) than in control cohorts (5.2%, P = .01)., Conclusion: Here we confirm the increase incidence of anaphylaxis in HαT + mastocytosis patients. The increased prevalence of HαT in all subtypes of systemic mastocytosis (including advSM) is suggestive of pathophysiologic involvement., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the standard-of-care treatment for anaemia in most patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes but responses are limited and transient. Luspatercept promotes late-stage erythroid maturation and has shown durable clinical efficacy in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. In this study, we report the results of a prespecified interim analysis of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa for the treatment of anaemia due to lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in the phase 3 COMMANDS trial., Methods: The phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled COMMANDS trial is being conducted at 142 sites in 26 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had a diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes of very low risk, low risk, or intermediate risk (per the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System), were ESA-naive, and required red blood cell transfusions (2-6 packed red blood cell units per 8 weeks for ≥8 weeks immediately before randomisation). Integrated response technology was used to randomly assign patients (1:1, block size 4) to luspatercept or epoetin alfa, stratified by baseline red blood cell transfusion burden (<4 units per 8 weeks vs ≥4 units per 8 weeks), endogenous serum erythropoietin concentration (≤200 U/L vs >200 to <500 U/L), and ring sideroblast status (positive vs negative). Luspatercept was administered subcutaneously once every 3 weeks starting at 1·0 mg/kg body weight with possible titration up to 1·75 mg/kg. Epoetin alfa was administered subcutaneously once a week starting at 450 IU/kg body weight with possible titration up to 1050 IU/kg (maximum permitted total dose of 80 000 IU). The primary endpoint was red blood cell transfusion independence for at least 12 weeks with a concurrent mean haemoglobin increase of at least 1·5 g/dL (weeks 1-24), assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The COMMANDS trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03682536 (active, not recruiting)., Findings: Between Jan 2, 2019 and Aug 31, 2022, 356 patients were randomly assigned to receive luspatercept (178 patients) or epoetin alfa (178 patients), comprising 198 (56%) men and 158 (44%) women (median age 74 years [IQR 69-80]). The interim efficacy analysis was done for 301 patients (147 in the luspatercept group and 154 in the epoetin alfa group) who completed 24 weeks of treatment or discontinued earlier. 86 (59%) of 147 patients in the luspatercept group and 48 (31%) of 154 patients in the epoetin alfa group reached the primary endpoint (common risk difference on response rate 26·6; 95% CI 15·8-37·4; p<0·0001). Median treatment exposure was longer for patients receiving luspatercept (42 weeks [IQR 20-73]) versus epoetin alfa (27 weeks [19-55]). The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events with luspatercept (≥3% patients) were hypertension, anaemia, dyspnoea, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, pneumonia, COVID-19, myelodysplastic syndromes, and syncope; and with epoetin alfa were anaemia, pneumonia, neutropenia, hypertension, iron overload, COVID-19 pneumonia, and myelodysplastic syndromes. The most common suspected treatment-related adverse events in the luspatercept group (≥3% patients, with the most common event occurring in 5% patients) were fatigue, asthenia, nausea, dyspnoea, hypertension, and headache; and none (≥3% patients) in the epoetin alfa group. One death after diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia was considered to be related to luspatercept treatment (44 days on treatment)., Interpretation: In this interim analysis, luspatercept improved the rate at which red blood cell transfusion independence and increased haemoglobin were achieved compared with epoetin alfa in ESA-naive patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Long-term follow-up and additional data will be needed to confirm these results and further refine findings in other subgroups of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, including non-mutated SF3B1 or ring sideroblast-negative subgroups., Funding: Celgene and Acceleron Pharma., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests UP reports receiving grant support, paid to GWT-TUD, from Amgen; lecture fees and grant support, paid to the University of Leipzig, from Amgen; fees for serving on a steering committee, consulting fees, and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb; grant support, paid to GWT-TUD, from Janssen Biotech; grant support, paid to University Dresden, from Merck and Novartis; lecture and consulting fees from Novartis; and consulting fees from AbbVie, Curis, and Geron. UP is also a member of the Medical and Scientific Advisory Board of the MDS Foundation. VS reports receiving research funding, paid to University of Florence, from Bristol Myers Squibb; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb; honoraria and travel support from Janssen; advisory board fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI BioPharma, Geron, Gilead, Novartis, Otsuka, Servier, and Syros; and serving as the President of the Scientific Committee of the Italian Foundation of Myelodysplastic Syndromes. AMZ reports receiving grant support from AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, Amgen, Aprea, Astex, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiff Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Medimmune, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Takeda, and Trovagene; consulting fees from AbbVie, Acceleron, Agios, Amgen, Aprea, Astellas Pharma, BeyondSpring, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiff Oncology, Cardinal Health, Daiichi Sankyo, Epizyme, Geron, Gilead, Incyte, Ionis, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Syndax, Taiho, Takeda, Trovagene, and Tyme; travel support from Cardiff Oncology, Novartis, and Pfizer; and serving on clinical trial committees of AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Geron, Gilead, Kura, and Novartis. RSK reports receiving grant support from Bristol Myers Squibb; speaker bureau fees from AbbVie, CTI BioPharma, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pharma Essentia, and Servio; and advisory board fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI BioPharma, Geron, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Taiho, and Rigel Pharmaceuticals. JS reports receiving trial-related costs, paid to Monash Health, from Bristol Myers Squibb; grant support, paid to Monash University, from Amgen Australia, Astex Pharmaceuticals, and Bristol Myers Squibb; consultancy fees from Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Mundipharma, Novartis, Otsuka, and Pfizer; speaker bureau fees from Mundipharma; holding patents WO2017/059319 A2 and WO2011/160170 A1, assigned to Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and WO2021/243421 A1, assigned to Monash University; and serving as a Deputy Chair of the Australasia Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group, Scientific Advisory Committee. DV reports receiving consulting fees from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kite Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, and Sobi; honoraria from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gebro, Grifols, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kite Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Sobi; travel support from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from Novartis. AJ reports receiving consulting fees from AbbVie and Bristol Myers Squibb; honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis; travel support from AbbVie; advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from AbbVie and Bristol Myers Squibb; and a leadership or fiduciary role in the Czech MDS Group. IST reports receiving consulting and speaker bureau fees from Pfizer. JL reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. JZ reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. ACG reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. SK reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. VP reports being employed by Bristol Myers Squibb and owning stock in Merck. KLK reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb and owning stock in Pfizer. SR reports being employed by, owning stock in, and receiving travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb. JKS reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. SH reports being employed by Bristol Myers Squibb. SV reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. TP reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. TC reports receiving consulting fees from AbbVie, Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Servier; honoraria from Celgene, Novartis, Servier, Syros, and Takeda; travel support from AbbVie, Celgene, Novartis, and Pfizer; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from Novartis. PF reports receiving honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies and serving as the chairman of the Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies. GG-M reports receiving grant support from Celgene. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Systemic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (SIADs) occur in 10-20% of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Recently identified VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) syndrome, associated with somatic mutations in UBA1 (Ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 1), encompasses a range of severe inflammatory conditions along with hematological abnormalities, including MDS. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the association between MDS and SIADs remain largely unknown, especially the roles of different myeloid immune cell subsets. The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate peripheral blood myeloid immune cells (dendritic cells (DC) and monocytes) by flow cytometry in MDS patients with associated SIAD (n = 14, most often including relapsing polychondritis or neutrophilic dermatoses) and to compare their distribution in MDS patients without SIAD (n = 23) and healthy controls (n = 7). Most MDS and MDS/SIAD patients had low-risk MDS. Eight of 14 (57%) MDS/SIAD patients carried UBA1 somatic mutations, defining VEXAS syndrome.Compared with MDS patients, most DC and monocyte subsets were significantly decreased in MDS/SIAD patients, especially in MDS patients with VEXAS syndrome. Our study provides the first overview of the peripheral blood immune myeloid cell distribution in MDS patients with associated SIADs and raises several hypotheses: possible redistribution to inflammation sites, increased apoptosis, or impaired development in the bone marrow., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: CPX-351, an encapsulated form of cytarabine and daunorubicin, has shown greater efficacy than the classic 3 + 7 treatment administration in secondary acute myeloid leukaemia. Given that higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia share similarities with secondary acute myeloid leukaemia, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of CPX-351 in this context., Methods: This investigator-initiated two-cohort phase 2 trial was conducted by the Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies, with 12 participating centres in France. It comprised cohort A (reported here and completed), which included patients in first-line treatment, and cohort B, which was stopped for lack of inclusion (ie, not enough patients met the inclusion criteria), for patients with hypomethylating agent failure that is not reported here. Cohort A enrolled patients with newly diagnosed higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (aged 18-70 years old) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Intravenous CPX-351 (100 mg/m 2 cytarabine and 44 mg/m 2 daunorubicin) was given on days 1, 3, and 5, with a second induction cycle given (same daily dose on days 1 and 3) if at least a partial response was not reached. Patients who responded could receive up to four monthly consolidation cycles (same daily dose on day 1) or allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Overall response rate after one or two induction courses according to European LeukemiaNet 2017 acute myeloid leukaemia was the primary endpoint after CPX-351 induction, whether patients received one or two induction cycles. Safety was assessed in all patients enrolled (in cohort A). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04273802., Findings: Between April 29, 2020, and Feb 10, 2021, 21 (68%) male and ten (32%) female patients were enrolled. 27 (87%) of 31 patients responded (95% CI 70-96). 16 (52%) of the 31 patients received at least one consolidation cycle. 30 (97%) of the 31 patients included were initially considered eligible for allogeneic HSCT and 29 (94%) of the 31 patients had the procedure. Median follow-up was 16·1 months (IQR 8·3-18·1). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were pulmonary (eight [26%] of 31 patients) and cardiovascular (six [19%] of 31 patients). There were 14 serious adverse events (mainly hospitalisation for infection [n=5] and only one was treatment-related) and no treatment-related death., Interpretation: CPX-351 appears to be active and safe in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia, allowing bridging to allogenic HSCT in most patients., Funding: Jazz Pharmaceuticals., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are hematological malignancies classically defined by the presence of cytopenia(s) and dysmorphic myeloid cells. It is now known that MDS can be preceded by a pre-malignant condition called clonal cytopenia of unknown significance (CCUS), which associates a clonality marker with cytopenia in the absence of criteria of dysplasia. However, to date, it is not clear whether chromosomal abnormalities should be considered in the definition of CCUS or if they carry a prognostic impact in CCUS patients. In this study, we analyzed the clinico-biological features and outcomes of 34 patients who presented with one or more cytopenias, an absence of significant dysplasia, and a presence of a chromosomal abnormality (CA). We named this entity chromosomal abnormality with cytopenia of undetermined significance (CACtUS). We show that these patients are slightly older than MDS patients and that they more frequently presented with normocytic anemia. Most CACtUS patients exhibited only one unbalanced CA. The number and type of mutations were comparable between CACtUS patients and MDS patients. Regardless of the cytogenetic abnormality, the clinicobiological characteristics, overall survival, and risk of progression to high-risk (HR) MDS were similar between CACtUS patients and low-risk MDS patients. Thus, we suggest that CACtUS patients can be considered as HR-CCUS and should receive the follow-up regimen recommended for MDS patients., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

The EUROPE phase 2 trial investigated the predictive value of biomarkers on the clinical efficacy of single agent romiplostim (ROM) treatment in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (LR-MDS) and thrombocytopenia within the 'European Myelodysplastic Neoplasms Cooperative Group' (EMSCO) network. A total of 77 patients with LR-MDS and a median platelet count of 25/nl were included, all patients received ROM at a starting dose of 750 μg by SC injection weekly. Thirty-two patients (42%) achieved a hematologic improvement of platelets (HI-P) with a median duration of 340 days. Neutrophil (HI-N) and erythroid (HI-E) responses were observed in three (4%) and seven (9%) patients, respectively. We could not confirm previous reports that HI-P correlated with baseline endogenous thrombopoietin levels and platelet transfusion history, but SRSF2 mutation status and hemoglobin levels at baseline were significantly linked to HI-P. Sequential analysis of variant allelic frequency of mutations like SRSF2 did not reveal an impact of ROM on clonal evolution in both responders and non-responders. In summary, our study confirms the safety and efficacy of ROM in LR-MDS patients and may allow to better define subgroups of patients with a high likelihood of response., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

In order to improve the outcome observed with azacitidine (AZA) in higher-risk Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), its combination with other drugs in MDS must be evaluated. So far, no combination has not been shown to be more effective than AZA alone. AZA-PLUS was a phase II trial that, in a "pick a winner" approach, randomly assigned patients with higher-risk MDS, CMML and low blast count AML to: AZA; AZA plus lenalidomide; AZA plus Valproic Acid or AZA plus Idarubicin. 322 patients were included. After six cycles, 69 (21.4%) CR + PR were observed with no benefit from any combination. Median EFS and OS were 17.2 and 19.7 months in the whole cohort, respectively, with no difference across randomised arms. Infection and rates of hospitalisation during the first six cycles were higher in the AZA-LEN And AZA-IDA arm, related to increased myelosuppression. Factors associated with better response were IPSS, favourable or intermediate karyotype, haemoglobin, lower circulating blast count, fibrinogen level and lower LDH, while poorer survival was seen in therapy-related MDS and, in the case of TP53, PTPN11 or CSF3R mutation. The combinations used did not improve the outcome obtained with AZA alone. However, our "pick a winner" randomised strategy may remain useful with potentially more active drugs to be tested in combination with AZA., (© 2022 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) are associated with systemic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (SIADs) in 10-30% of cases. The aims of this study were (i) to evaluate the prevalence of venous thromboembolism VTE in patients presenting with both MDS/CMML and SIADs, (ii) to describe risk factors associated with thrombosis, and (iii) to analyse the impact of VTE on overall survival and transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia in comparison to patients with MDS/CMML-associated SIADs without VTE., Methods: This retrospective multicentre case-control study was conducted among patients with MDS/CMML and dysimmune disorders and featured in the French retrospective database of the French Network of Dysimmune Disorders Associated with Hemopathies (MINHEMON), diagnosed with MDS/CMML and dysimmune disorders., Results: During a median follow-up of 16 months (5-48) VTE occurred in 35 patients (21.6 %) whereas 127 patients did not. Among those with VTE, 8 patients (22.9%) experienced two or more VTE. Common prothrombotic risk factors were not significantly different in patients with or without VTE. CMML was more frequent in patients without VTE (37 % vs. 14.3%, p=0.01), whereas myelodysplasic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) was higher in VTE patients (20 % vs. 5.5 %, p=0.01). In a multivariate analysis, only MDS/CMML progression at the time of VTE (odds ratio 28.82, 95 % CI (5.52-530.70) was significantly associated with VTE. When treated with an anticoagulation therapy, bleeding occurred in 19.4% of cases (6/31). Overall survival was not significantly different between patients with and without VTE (p=0.68). Leukaemia-free survival between groups was not significantly different (p=0.83)., Conclusions: VTE is a common complication in MDS/CMML-associated SIADSs with an increased risk of bleeding when treated by anticoagulants. In the MDS/CMML subgroup, SIADS flares and MDS/CMML progression seem to be prothrombotic risk factors.

We analyzed 526 consecutive acute myeloid leukemia patients refractory to or relapsing after chemotherapy. 270 patients received intensive salvage chemotherapy (IC), 97 azacitidine (AZA) and 159 best supportive care (BSC). Complete response was obtained in 37/19/0% ( p  = .0008). Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT) was performed in 39.3/10.3/0%. Median overall survival (OS) and 5-year OS were 8.2/9.6/2.2 months and 16/6/2% ( p  < .0001). Predictive factors of worse OS were post-myelodysplastic/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, bone marrow blasts ≥20%, adverse cytogenetics, AZA cycle ≥2 and no alloSCT at R/R for AZA and age, performance status, white blood cell count and myelodysplasia-related changes for IC. The impact of treatment was time-dependent: adjusted hazard ratio for OS was in favor of AZA up to 1 month, was not different between 1 and 7 months, then was in favor of IC after 7 months. While AZA represents a therapeutic option for the oldest patients, it does not lead to long-term survivors.

Background: MDS-RS patients are characterized by chronic anemia and a low risk of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) progression and they generally become Red Blood Cell (RBC) transfusion dependent (TD)., Study Design and Methods: We performed a retrospective "real-life" observational study of 6 months in 100 MDS-RS TD patients, recruited in 12 French centers, to describe transfusion characteristics, and evaluate the frequency and causes of hospitalizations, health costs, and morbidity, associated with transfusion dependency, in a French population of RBC transfusion-dependent MDS-RS patients., Results: 79% of the patients had high transfusion burden (HTB) and 21% low transfusion burden (LTB). HTB patients had a longer disease duration (6 vs. 3.7 years, p = 0.0078), more frequent iron chelation (82% vs. 50%, p = 0.0052) and higher serum ferritin (p = 0.03). During the 6-month study period, 22% of the patients required inpatient hospitalization, 36% of them for symptomatic anemia requiring emergency RBC transfusion. The 6-month median transfusion costs, including the cost of the day care facility, transportation to and from the hospital, iron chelation, and lab tests, was 16,188€/patient., Discussion: MDS-RS represents the archetypal type of chronically transfused lower-risk MDS. Most of those patients have a high transfusion burden and thus frequently need visits to the hospital's day care facility, and frequent hospitalizations, with an overall high median treatment cost. Those costs should be compared with costs of new treatments potentially able to avoid RBC transfusion dependence and to reduce the complications of chronic anemia in MDS-RS patients., (© 2022 AABB.)