Search

In combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment, the maxillary palatine suture is closed in most patients with insufficient maxillary width, and bony expansion of the maxilla cannot be achieved by dental expansion or rapid palatal expansion (RPE) which causes buccal inclination of the maxillary posterior teeth leading to unstable results. Therefore, segmental LeFort Ⅰ osteotomy and surgically assisted RPE are often used in clinical practice. In recent years, with the application of implant anchorage technology, implant anchorage assisted RPE has been gradually applied in orthognathic treatment. This article reviewed the indications, contraindications, complications, efficacy and long-term stability in different treatment approaches including segmental LeFort Ⅰ osteotomy, surgically assisted RPE and implant-supported maxillary skeletal expansion.

Objective: To investigate the antimicrobial resistance of food-borne diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) and the prevalence of mcr genes that mediates mobile colistin resistance in parts of China, 2020. Methods: For 91 DEC isolates recovered from food sources collected from Fujian province, Hebei province, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and Shanghai city in 2020, Vitek2 Compact biochemical identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing platform was used for the detection of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) against to 18 kinds of antimicrobial compounds belonging to 9 categories, and multi-polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) was used to detect the mcr-1 - mcr-9 genes, then a further AST, whole genome sequencing (WGS) and bioinformatics analysis were platformed for these DEC isolates which were PCR positive for mcr genes. Results: Seventy in 91 isolates showed different antimicrobial resistance levels to the drugs tested with a resistance rate of 76.92%. The isolates showed the highest antimicrobial resistance rates to ampicillin (69.23%, 63/91) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (59.34%, 54/91), respectively. The multiple drug-resistant rate was 47.25% (43/91). Two mcr-1 gene and ESBL (extended-spectrum beta-lactamase) positive EAEC (enteroaggregative Escherichia coli ) strains were detected. One of them was identified as serotype of O11:H6, which showed a resistance profile to 25 tested drugs referring to 10 classes, and 38 drug resistance genes were predicted by genome analysis. The other one was O16:H48 serotype, which was resistant to 21 tested drugs belonging to 7 classes and carried a new variant of mcr-1 gene ( mcr-1.35 ). Conclusion: An overall high-level antimicrobial resistance was found among foodborne DEC isolates recovered from parts of China in 2020, and so was the MDR (multi-drug resistance) condition. MDR strains carrying multiple resistance genes such as mcr-1 gene were detected, and a new variant of mcr-1 gene was also found. It is necessary to continue with a dynamic monitoring on DEC contamination and an ongoing research into antimicrobial resistance mechanisms.

Objective: To investigate the knowledge, use and barriers when prescribing GLP-1RA and SGLT2i among cardiologists, endocrinologists and general practitioners, and explore the influencing factors that hinder the use of these medications. Methods: A questionnaire was conducted among physicians in the above departments in Peking University Third Hospital and health service institutions at all levels in its medical consortium. A total of 342 physicians were involved. Among them, 40.6% (139) were cardiologists, 28.9% (99) were endocrinologists and 30.4% (104) were general practitioners; 66.7% (270) came from Beijing while 33.3% (72) from other provinces. The survey included clinicians' knowledge and current use of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i, and the possible reasons that influenced the prescription of these medications. Medical therapies of physicians were investigated by simulating different clinical scenarios. The difference of measures among physicians in different departments was compared. Results: A total of 342 physicians were involved, with the average age of 40 (35, 46) years old and the average working time of 13 (7, 20) years. Among them, 40.6% (139) were male. 77.5% (265) physicians had comprehensive knowledge of SGLT2i and prescribed it, which was higher than that for GLP-1RA (70.5%, 241) ( P <0.001). 21.1% (72) physicians prescribed SGLT2i more than 20 times per month, which was higher than that for GLP-1RA (8.2%, 28) ( P <0.001). Endocrinologists had more knowledge and prescribed more GLP-1RA and SGLT2i compared with other physicians (both P values < 0.001). 38.1% (53) cardiologists, 22.2% (22) endocrinologists, and 30.8% (32) general practitioners believed patients needed an endocrinologist to evaluate and adjust GLP-1RA, which was the primary barrier for the use of medications ( P= 0.042). 27.4% (38) cardiologists, 14.1% (14) endocrinologists, and 30.8% (32) general practitioners believed patients needed an endocrinologist to evaluate and adjust SGLT2i, which was the primary barrier for the use of medications ( P= 0.018). 21.6% (30) cardiologists, 45.5% (45) endocrinologists, and 31.7% (33) general practitioners believed side effects of SGLT2i was the primary barrier for the use of medications ( P< 0.001). For patients with unqualified glycemic control and cardiovascular complications, 65.4% (75) cardiologists, 69.7% (69) endocrinologists, and 43.3% (45) general practitioners chose the above medications ( P <0.001). For patients with qualified glycemic control, combined with cardiovascular complications and diabetic organ damage, 35.3% (49) cardiologists, 52.5% (52) endocrinologists, and 25.0% (26) general practitioners chose the above medications ( P< 0.001). Conclusions: Physicians had more knowledge and prescription of SGLT2i than that of GLP-1RA. Endocrinologists had more knowledge and prescription of the above medications than other physicians. The side effect of medications was potential primary barrier for the use of the novel hypoglycemic agent with cardiovascular benefits. In clinical practice, most of physicians considered that high-risk patients with cardiovascular comorbidities need to be referred to cardiologist or endocrinologist to adjust clinical therapies.