Search

Individual oncogenic KRAS mutants confer distinct differences in biochemical properties and signaling for reasons that are not well understood. KRAS activity is closely coupled to protein dynamics and is regulated through two interconverting conformations: state 1 (inactive, effector binding deficient) and state 2 (active, effector binding enabled). Here, we use 31P NMR to delineate the differences in state 1 and state 2 populations present in WT and common KRAS oncogenic mutants (G12C, G12D, G12V, G13D, and Q61L) bound to its natural substrate GTP or a commonly used nonhydrolyzable analog GppNHp (guanosine-5-[(β,γ)-imido] triphosphate). Our results show that GppNHp-bound proteins exhibit significant state 1 population, whereas GTP-bound KRAS is primarily (90% or more) in state 2 conformation. This observation suggests that the predominance of state 1 shown here and in other studies is related to GppNHp and is most likely nonexistent in cells. We characterize the impact of this differential conformational equilibrium of oncogenic KRAS on RAF1 kinase effector RAS-binding domain and intrinsic hydrolysis. Through a KRAS G12C drug discovery, we have identified a novel small-molecule inhibitor, BBO-8956, which is effective against both GDP- and GTP-bound KRAS G12C. We show that binding of this inhibitor significantly perturbs state 1-state 2 equilibrium and induces an inactive state 1 conformation in GTP-bound KRAS G12C. In the presence of BBO-8956, RAF1-RAS-binding domain is unable to induce a signaling competent state 2 conformation within the ternary complex, demonstrating the mechanism of action for this novel and active-conformation inhibitor.

RAS proteins cycling between the active-form (GTP-bound) and inactive-form (GDP-bound) play a key role in cell signaling pathways that control cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation. Mutations at codon 12, 13, and 61 in RAS are known to attenuate its GTPase activity favoring the RAS active state and constitutively active downstream signaling. This hyperactivation accounts for various malignancies including pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancers. Active KRAS is found to exist in equilibrium between two rapidly interconverting conformational states (State1-State2) in solution. Due to this dynamic feature of the protein, the 1H-15N correlation cross-peak signals of several amino acid (AA) residues of KRAS belonging to the flexible loop regions are absent from its 2D 1H-15N HSQC spectrum within and near physiological solution pH. A threonine to serine mutation at position 35 (T35S) shifts the interconverting equilibrium to State1 conformation and enables the emergence of such residues in the 2D 1H-15N HSQC spectrum due to gained conformational rigidity. We report here the 1HN, 15N, and 13C backbone resonance assignments for the 19.2 kDa (AA 1-169) protein constructs of KRAS-GppNHp harboring T35S mutation (KRAST35S/C118S-GppNHp) and of its oncogenic counterpart harboring the Q61L mutation (KRAST35S/Q61L/C118S-GppNHp) using heteronuclear, multidimensional NMR spectroscopy at 298 K. High resolution NMR data allowed the unambiguous assignments of 1H-15N correlation cross-peaks for all the residues except for Met1. Furthermore, 2D 1H-15N HSQC overlay of two proteins assisted in determination of Q61L mutation-induced chemical shift perturbations for select residues in the regions of P-loop, Switch-II, and helix α3.

This paper investigates the bond behavior between plain steel bars and high-performance concrete (HPC) to study the effect of embedment length and concrete compressive strength on bond performance. A total of 48 concrete specimens were cast and tested under uniaxial load. The main test parameters include the active bond length and concrete compressive strength. Test results show that the ratio of maximum bond stress to concrete compressive strength ranges from 0.12 to 0.17. Moreover, it can be concluded that the maximum bond stress is increased with an increase in concrete compressive strength and is decreased with a longer embedment length of plain steel bars. The adhesive bond stress is approximately 55% of the maximum bond stress. Finally, a new bond stress-slip model was proposed, and good agreement can be achieved between the test research and the theoretical prediction based on the proposed model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

RAS proteins cycling between the active-form (GTP-bound) and inactive-form (GDP-bound) play a key role in cell signaling pathways that control cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation. Mutations at codon 12, 13, and 61 in RAS are known to attenuate its GTPase activity favoring the RAS active state and constitutively active downstream signaling. This hyperactivation accounts for various malignancies including pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancers. Active KRAS is found to exist in equilibrium between two rapidly interconverting conformational states (State1–State2) in solution. Due to this dynamic feature of the protein, the 1H–15N correlation cross-peak signals of several amino acid (AA) residues of KRAS belonging to the flexible loop regions are absent from its 2D 1H–15N HSQC spectrum within and near physiological solution pH. A threonine to serine mutation at position 35 (T35S) shifts the interconverting equilibrium to State1 conformation and enables the emergence of such residues in the 2D 1H–15N HSQC spectrum due to gained conformational rigidity. We report here the 1HN, 15N, and 13C backbone resonance assignments for the 19.2 kDa (AA 1–169) protein constructs of KRAS-GppNHp harboring T35S mutation (KRAST35S/C118S-GppNHp) and of its oncogenic counterpart harboring the Q61L mutation (KRAST35S/Q61L/C118S-GppNHp) using heteronuclear, multidimensional NMR spectroscopy at 298 K. High resolution NMR data allowed the unambiguous assignments of 1H–15N correlation cross-peaks for all the residues except for Met1. Furthermore, 2D 1H–15N HSQC overlay of two proteins assisted in determination of Q61L mutation-induced chemical shift perturbations for select residues in the regions of P-loop, Switch-II, and helix α3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Individual oncogenic KRAS mutants confer distinct differences in biochemical properties and signaling for reasons that are not well understood. KRAS activity is closely coupled to protein dynamics and is regulated through two interconverting conformations: state 1 (inactive, effector binding deficient) and state 2 (active, effector binding enabled). Here, we use 31P NMR to delineate the differences in state 1 and state 2 populations present in WT and common KRAS oncogenic mutants (G12C, G12D, G12V, G13D, and Q61L) bound to its natural substrate GTP or a commonly used nonhydrolyzable analog GppNHp (guanosine-5'-[(β,γ)-imido] triphosphate). Our results show that GppNHp-bound proteins exhibit significant state 1 population, whereas GTP-bound KRAS is primarily (90% or more) in state 2 conformation. This observation suggests that the predominance of state 1 shown here and in other studies is related to GppNHp and is most likely nonexistent in cells. We characterize the impact of this differential conformational equilibrium of oncogenic KRAS on RAF1 kinase effector RAS-binding domain and intrinsic hydrolysis. Through a KRAS G12C drug discovery, we have identified a novel small-molecule inhibitor, BBO-8956, which is effective against both GDP- and GTP-bound KRAS G12C. We show that binding of this inhibitor significantly perturbs state 1-state 2 equilibrium and induces an inactive state 1 conformation in GTP-bound KRAS G12C. In the presence of BBO-8956, RAF1-RAS-binding domain is unable to induce a signaling competent state 2 conformation within the ternary complex, demonstrating the mechanism of action for this novel and active-conformation inhibitor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry enables high-throughput screening of covalent fragment libraries and SAR compound progressions of selective KRAS G12C inhibitors. Using the MALDI-TOF platform instead of the more traditional ESI-MS TOF/orbitrap instrumentation can radically shorten sample acquisition time, allowing up to 384 samples to be screened in 30 min. The typical throughput for a covalent library screen is 1152 samples per 8 h, including processing, calculation, and reporting steps. The throughput can be doubled without any significant assay modification., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

RAS proteins cycling between the active-form (GTP-bound) and inactive-form (GDP-bound) play a key role in cell signaling pathways that control cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation. Mutations at codon 12, 13, and 61 in RAS are known to attenuate its GTPase activity favoring the RAS active state and constitutively active downstream signaling. This hyperactivation accounts for various malignancies including pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancers. Active KRAS is found to exist in equilibrium between two rapidly interconverting conformational states (State1-State2) in solution. Due to this dynamic feature of the protein, the 1 H- 15 N correlation cross-peak signals of several amino acid (AA) residues of KRAS belonging to the flexible loop regions are absent from its 2D 1 H- 15 N HSQC spectrum within and near physiological solution pH. A threonine to serine mutation at position 35 (T35S) shifts the interconverting equilibrium to State1 conformation and enables the emergence of such residues in the 2D 1 H- 15 N HSQC spectrum due to gained conformational rigidity. We report here the 1 H N , 15 N, and 13 C backbone resonance assignments for the 19.2 kDa (AA 1-169) protein constructs of KRAS-GppNHp harboring T35S mutation (KRAS T35S/C118S -GppNHp) and of its oncogenic counterpart harboring the Q61L mutation (KRAS T35S/Q61L/C118S -GppNHp) using heteronuclear, multidimensional NMR spectroscopy at 298 K. High resolution NMR data allowed the unambiguous assignments of 1 H- 15 N correlation cross-peaks for all the residues except for Met1. Furthermore, 2D 1 H- 15 N HSQC overlay of two proteins assisted in determination of Q61L mutation-induced chemical shift perturbations for select residues in the regions of P-loop, Switch-II, and helix α3., (© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.)