Search

Shoulder pain due to labral tears and biceps tendonitis is commonly found in softball players. Surgical options include labral repair and biceps tenodesis. While past studies are limited by heterogeneous study groups from multiple sports, this is the first study that assesses clinical outcomes and return to play rates for fast-pitch softball players./Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and return to play for fast-pitch softball players treated for a SLAP tear and recalcitrant biceps tendonitis with a biceps tenodesis compared with a traditional SLAP repair. We hypothesized that the biceps tenodesis would have comparable outcomes with a faster return to play compared to SLAP repair.We performed a retrospective analysis on fast-pitch softball players treated surgically for SLAP tear, recalcitrant biceps tendonitis or a combination between 2001 and 2019 at our institution. Inclusion criteria were fast-pitch softball players who underwent biceps tenodesis or a SLAP repair with greater than 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria involved slow-pitch softball players, patients with less than 2-year follow-up and patients who had undergone concomitant procedures on the ipsilateral shoulder at the time of SLAP repair or biceps tenodesis. Follow-up was either self-reported through OBERD, a PRO-managing software, or achieved over the phone. Follow-up data included: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES-S), Andrews Carson Score, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS), and our institution-specific return-to-play questionnaire. We statistically compared players who underwent biceps tenodesis or a SLAP repair, and compared pitchers with position players using Student t-tests and Fisher Exact Test with statistical significance determined to be p0.05.From 60 eligible patients identified, follow-up outcome data were successfully captured for 47 (78%). Of the 18 SLAP repair patients, 17 (94%) returned to full competition at an average of 7.9 months. Of the 29 patients who underwent biceps tenodesis, 27 (93%) returned to full competition at an average of 7.1 months. Statistical analysis of PRO scores for each group found no significant differences between any of the measures used to evaluate patient outcomes, including no statistical difference in pitchers compared with position players.In conclusion, this study demonstrated comparable outcomes between SLAP repairs and biceps tenodesis procedures among our study group of fast-pitch softball players. There was no significant difference between RTP times between the two groups.Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.

Context: Improper baseball pitching biomechanics are associated with increased stresses on the throwing elbow and shoulder as well as an increased risk of injury. Evidence Acquisition: Previous studies quantifying pitching kinematics and kinetics were reviewed. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Results: At the instant of lead foot contact, the elbow should be flexed approximately 90° with the shoulder at about 90° abduction, 20° horizontal abduction, and 45° external rotation. The stride length should be about 85% of the pitcher’s height with the lead foot in a slightly closed position. The pelvis should be rotated slightly open toward home plate with the upper torso in line with the pitching direction. Improper shoulder external rotation at foot contact is associated with increased elbow and shoulder torques and forces and may be corrected by changing the stride length and/or arm path. From foot contact to maximum shoulder external rotation to ball release, the pitcher should demonstrate a kinematic chain of lead knee extension, pelvis rotation, upper trunk rotation, elbow extension, and shoulder internal rotation. The lead knee should be flexed about 45° at foot contact and 30° at ball release. Corrective strategies for insufficient knee extension may involve technical issues (stride length, lead foot position, lead foot orientation) and/or strength and conditioning of the lower body. Improper pelvis and upper trunk rotation often indicate the need for core strength and flexibility. Maximum shoulder external rotation should be about 170°. Insufficient external rotation leads to low shoulder internal rotation velocity and low ball velocity. Deviation from 90° abduction decreases the ability to achieve maximum external rotation, increases elbow torque, and decreases the dynamic stability in the glenohumeral joint. Conclusion: Improved pitching biomechanics can increase performance and reduce risk of injury. SORT: Level C.

Background: Biomechanical efficiency, defined as fastball velocity per unit of normalized elbow varus torque, is a relatively new metric applied to improving the performance and health of baseball pitching. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this work was to evaluate kinematic parameters influencing biomechanical efficiency among professional and collegiate pitchers. Kinematic differences were compared between pitchers of high and low biomechanical efficiency. We hypothesized that professional pitchers would have greater biomechanical efficiency than collegiate pitchers. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A deidentified biomechanical database of 545 pitchers (447 professional, 98 collegiate) was analyzed. A multivariate linear regression model was used to evaluate significant findings a priori with α = .05. Additionally, biomechanical differences were identified between competition levels and between high and low biomechanical efficiency groups using Mann-Whitney U test (α = .05). Results: Competition level and 11 (of 21) kinematic variables explained 27% of the variance in biomechanical efficiency, with most of the predictors being throwing arm kinematics (elbow flexion at stride foot contact [SFC]: β, −1.47; SE, 0.26; shoulder abduction at SFC: β, −1.78; SE, 0.39; shoulder external rotation at SFC: β, 0.60; SE, 0.22; maximum external rotation [MER] angle: β, 1.82; SE, 0.42; shoulder horizontal adduction at MER: β, −3.42; SE, 0.71) (all P≤ .05). Professional pitchers had greater biomechanical efficiency than collegiate pitchers (711.0 ± 101.0 vs 657.0 ± 99.3, respectively; P < .001; d = 0.53). Compared with the low-efficiency group, the high-efficiency group had significantly lower normalized elbow varus torque with greater weight and height (high: 0.047 ± 0.004 %wt*ht vs. low: 0.063 ± 0.006 %wt*ht, P Conclusion: Professional pitchers had greater biomechanical efficiency than collegiate pitchers. Biomechanical efficiency was also affected by 11 kinematic variables identified in this study. Pitchers with higher efficiency had distinct differences in arm position, trunk side tilt, and lead-knee extension range of motion in the delivery. Thus, pitchers and baseball organizations should focus on these factors to lower normalized elbow varus torque relative to ball velocity.

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) surgery continues to demonstrate excellent clinical outcomes and a high return-to-play (RTP) rate with a low complication rate. Recent studies have demonstrated similar clinical outcomes for baseball players who have undergone either UCL reconstruction or UCL repair. In comparison, few studies have assessed the clinical outcomes of UCL surgery for nonthrowing athletes. Purpose/Hypothesis: The primary objective of this study is to provide clinical outcomes of UCL surgery performed in nonthrowing athletes at a single institution with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Our hypothesis was that these patients would have similar clinical outcomes, complication rates, and RTP rates when compared with throwing athletes. Level of Evidence: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: From our longitudinal elbow registry, 40 nonthrowing athletes were identified who underwent UCL surgery (repair or reconstruction) between 2011 and 2019. Participant characteristics were recorded: age, sex, laterality, arm dominance, sport, level of competition, and type of surgery (UCL repair or reconstruction). Outcomes included RTP rate and average time, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and complications. Results: From the 40 patients eligible for inclusion in this study with a minimum 2-year follow-up, 37 (93%) were successfully contacted: 16 male (43%) and 21 female (57%). Mean ± standard deviation age at the time of surgery was 18.0 ± 3.7 years. From the 37 technical procedures, 28 (76%) were UCL repairs and 9 (24%) were UCL reconstructions. For these patients, 15 (41%) had partial tears, 20 (54%) had complete tears, 1 (3%) had a medial epicondyle avulsion, and 1 (3%) had an unspecified pathology. Sports included football (n = 11), gymnastics (11), cheerleading (7), wrestling (4), volleyball (2), basketball (1), and acrobatics (1). Quarterbacks were excluded from the football patients, as quarterbacks are throwing athletes. Level of competition included high school (n = 26), college (8), professional (2), and youth sports (1). The RTP rate was 93% (26/28) at a mean 7.4 months for UCL repair and 100% (9/9) at a mean 10.0 months for UCL reconstruction. Mean ASES scores were 94.4 and 98.7 for UCL repair and reconstruction, respectively. Complications were low, with 2 patients in the UCL repair group requiring ulnar nerve transposition for ulnar nerve paresthesia. Conclusion: In nonthrowing athletes, patients undergoing UCL repair and UCL reconstruction show favorable outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up. RTP and clinical outcomes are consistent with previous studies in baseball players as well as a parallel ongoing study conducted on non–baseball throwing athletes.

Background: Injury to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the medial elbow has been treated successfully with ligament repair augmented with internal brace. Previous work has shown that this procedure does not overconstrain the ulnohumeral joint; however, the procedures were conducted by a single surgeon, which controlled for anchor placement and graft tensioning. Purpose/Hypothesis: Our purpose was to evaluate the reproducibility of contact mechanics and joint torque after UCL repair with internal brace as performed by different surgeons compared with repair by a single surgeon. It was hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in elbow contact mechanics, valgus torque, or torsional stiffness between the 2 groups. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Nine pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows were tested biomechanically under 3 conditions: UCL-intact (UCL-I), UCL-deficient (UCL-D), and UCL-repaired with internal brace augmentation (UCLR-IB). For each pair, 1 elbow was repaired by a single surgeon, and the contralateral elbow was repaired by 1 of 9 other surgeons. Testing consisted of valgus torsion between 0° and 5° with the elbow positioned at 90° of flexion. Ulnohumeral contact mechanics and overall joint torque and stiffness were measured and compared between surgeon groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the single-surgeon and multiple-surgeon groups regarding contact area ( P = .83), contact force ( P = .27), peak pressure ( P = .26), or peak force ( P = .30); however, contact pressure was significantly affected ( P = .02) by surgeon group. Compared with UCL-I, both UCL-D and UCLR-IB conditions had a significant overall effect on contact area ( P = .004) and contact force ( P = .05); however, contact pressure ( P = .56), peak pressure ( P = .27), and peak force ( P = .24) were not affected by injury condition. Measurements of elbow torque ( P = .28) and stiffness ( P = .98) were not significantly different between surgeon groups. Conclusion: UCL repair with internal brace provided consistent results among several surgeons when compared with a single surgeon. The procedure did not lead to joint overconstraint while also returning the ligament to near-intact levels of resisting valgus stress. Clinical Relevance: UCL repair with internal brace augmentation is a reproducible surgical technique that has good clinical outcomes in the literature.

Objectives: In the medical literature regarding injuries of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL), baseball players comprise a majority of the athletes studied. Baseball players endure repetitive valgus forces in the elbow that can cause damage to the UCL with the overhead throwing motion. However, there are limited studies in the literature regarding UCL injuries in non-baseball throwing athletes, specifically in softball, football, and javelin throwing. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated surgically for UCL injuries at our institution between April 2010 and July 2019. Our hypothesis was that there would be a high success rate of recovery among non-baseball throwing athletes with UCL injuries. Methods: Inclusion criteria for this study included patient who underwent either the surgical repair or reconstruction of the UCL in non-baseball throwing athletes with at least two-year follow-up. We excluded patients that had missing operative reports and any patients that participated in baseball. We retrospectively identified all patients eligible for the study and contacted them by phone to give informed consent and achieve follow-up data. For data collection, we used the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedics Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC), and our institution-specific Return to Play questionnaire. Results: After we applied the exclusion and inclusion criteria to our elbow database search, we identified 66 patients eligible for the study. Of the 66 patients, 34 patients had missing or incomplete operative reports, leaving 32 patients. Of the 32 patients, 26 patients (81%) were successfully contacted and followed up with. Of these 26 patients, 14 (54%) underwent UCL repair, whereas 12 (46%) underwent UCL reconstruction. The average age of participants at the time of surgery was 19.1, and the average post-operative time at follow-up was 4.68 years. Two patients had subsequent revision UCL procedures (6.3% failure rate). The surgical satisfaction in the 26 patients was an average of 9.67 out of 10. The average Andrews/Carson score was 92.5, and the average KJOC score was 90.6. Additionally, out of the 26 patients evaluated who played sports at the time of their arthroscopy, two had ceased athletic participation due to limitations of the elbow. Conclusions: In conclusion, we identified excellent clinical outcomes following UCL procedures in non-baseball throwing athletes with a 92% return to play rate and high surgical satisfaction and functional outcome scores. Further statistical analysis is needed for additional comparisons, including return-to-play between different sports, and outcome comparisons between different surgical techniques performed. However, this study significantly adds to the previously scarce literature on clinical outcomes following surgical treatment for UCL injuries in non-baseball throwing athletes.