Search

Recent studies showed that patients with glioma can safely participate in early phase clinical trials; however, clinical benefits in this population were limited. We aimed to evaluate the benefit of molecular profiling to guide enrolment in early phase trials for patients with recurrent glioma.Records of patients enrolled in early phase trials of cytotoxic therapies, small molecule inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies from 2008 to 2018 were reviewed for clinico-pathological characteristics, toxicity, response, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). The primary objective was to evaluate response rates in molecularly-oriented versus non-molecularly-oriented patients.Eighty-eight patients were enrolled, of whom 45 (51.1%) patients were molecularly-oriented. Targets included IDH1/2 (n = 15), BRAF (n = 11), and FGFR1 (n = 3) mutations, FGFR2-3 fusions (n = 9), and mismatch repair deficiency (n = 7). Among patients with high-grade glioma (n = 74), the rate of stable disease ≥6 months and partial or complete response was 25.7% in molecularly-oriented versus 5.1% in non-molecularly-oriented patients (p = 0.02). Upon multivariable adjustment, baseline steroid use ≥20 mg prednisone equivalent per day was associated with shorter OS (OR 3.15 [95% CI 1.62-6.13], p = 0.0008), while molecular enrichment strategy was associated with longer OS (OR 0.40 [95% CI 0.22-0.73], p = 0.003). Nine (10.2%) patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity and no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in both cohorts.The use of molecular profiling to guide enrolment in early phase trials is feasible and might provide benefits to selected patients with glioma. Further studies are warranted to confirm these results in larger randomised settings and identify the patients most likely to benefit from this approach.

BackgroundIntratumoral immunotherapies are being tested in different solid tumors. They trigger local and systemic responses.1 2 BO-112 is a double stranded RNA nanoplexed with polyethyleneimine (PEI), which mimics a viral infection and mobilizes the immune system.In preclinical models and in a first in human clinical trial BO-112 activated dendritic cells, induced CD-8 infiltration, apoptosis and enhancement of immunogenic cell death and achieved an objective response in 2 out of 10 patients with melanoma with primary resistance to antiPD-1.3 4MethodsIn this phase 2 study, BO-112 plus pembrolizumab is evaluated in patients with advanced melanoma, who have developed progressive disease while on or within 12 weeks after anti-PD1/PD-L1 based therapy (either as first line or as adjuvant treatment). BO-112 is administered intratumorally once weekly in 1 to 8 tumor lesions, total dose 1 to 2 mg, for the first 7 weeks and thereafter every three weeks; pembrolizumab 200 mg is administered intravenously every three weeks. Overall response rate (ORR) is analyzed as primary endpoint by independent reviewer. Secondary objectives include disease control rate (DCR), duration of response and progression free survival (PFS); response assessment is done by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST; in addition, CD-8 and PD-L1 IHC, NGS, itRECIST and radiomics signatures are prospectively assessed. Key eligibility criteria include cutaneous or mucosal melanoma with known BRAF status; at least one lesion RECIST 1.1 measurable and amenable for IT injection. Enrollment has been completed on 26th August.ResultsWith 26 evaluable patients with a first response assessment, seven have progressive disease (PD), five have partial response (PR) and fourteen patients show stable disease (SD). Preliminary ORR is 19.2% and DCR is 73.1% at week 8. Three patients with PR at week 8 have undergone a second assessment at week 16, with further decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) in both injected and non-injected lesions. Three out of five patients with SD and a second assessment maintain SD, showing a decrease in SOD in two cases (figure 1). In addition, two patients with only skin lesions have a pathological complete response. CD8 and PD-L1 have increased in 8 and 7 out of 13 patients with paired biopsies, being related with clinical benefit (figure 2).Abstract 961 Figure 1Swimmer plot, efficacy data for evaluable patients undergoing at least one response assessmentAbstract 961 Figure 2Immunohistochemistry data for CPS and CD8 data from paired biopsiesConclusionsDespite these data being preliminary, there is a trend for benefit in terms of ORR and also in long lasting stable diseases. BO-112 is able to increase PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and increase CD8-T cell infiltrates.AcknowledgementsMerck, Pivotal SLU, Quibim radiomics, Pangaea laboratories, all participating sites and patientsTrial RegistrationNCT04570332ReferencesAznar MA, Planelles L, Perez-Olivares M, et al. Immunotherapeutic effects of intratumoral nanoplexed poly I:C. J Immunother Cancer. 2019 May 2;7(1):116.5. Hamid O, Ismail R, Puzanov I. Intratumoral immunotherapy-update 2019. The Oncologist 2020;25:e423–438.Márquez-Rodas I, Longo F, Rodríguez-Ruiz M, et al. Intratumoral nanoplexed poly I:C BO-112 in combination with systemic anti-PD-1 for patients with anti-PD-1-refractory tumors. Sci Transl Med 2020 Oct 14;12(565):eabb0391.Kalbasi A, Tariveranmoshabad M, Hakimi K, Kremer S, et al. A. Uncoupling interferon signaling and antigen presentation to overcome immunotherapy resistance due to JAK1 loss in melanoma. Sci Transl Med 2020 Oct 14;12(565):eabb0152.Ethics ApprovalThe study obtained ethics approval by Spanish Health Agency (AEMPS), on 11th December 2020, and French Health Agency (ANSM) on 27th January 2021; study obtained approval from two Ethics Committee: Vall D’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain on 7th December 2020 (number 467), and Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, CPP 20.11.10.38825 on 11th February 2021.For each study patient, written informed consent is obtained prior to any protocol-related activities. As part of this procedure, the principal investigator or one of his/her associates must explain orally and in writing the nature, duration, and purpose of the study, and the action of the study drug in such a manner that the patient is aware of the potential risks, inconveniences, or adverse effects that may occur. They should be informed that the patient may withdraw from the study at any time. They will receive all information that is required by the regulatory authorities and ICH guidelines. The ICF has been signed by the patient and a copy provided to them.ConsentN/A

Background: BO-112 is a double stranded synthetic RNA formulated with polyethyleneimine that mimics a viral infection. Through dendritic cells activation, increase in CD8 T-cell infiltration and interferons induction, it produces an immunogenic cell death. Phase 1 study (NCT02828098) showed ORR 20% in patients (pts) with anti PD-1 resistant melanoma (mel). Hence phase 2 trial was designed. Study design: Single arm study (NCT04570332) with intratumoral BO-112 plus intravenous pembrolizumab in pts with mel (cutaneous, acral or mucosal) and confirmed progressive disease (PD) while on anti-PD1 based therapy. Pts were treated with BO-112, 1-2 mg on a weekly basis for 7 weeks and thereafter Q3W in 1-8 different lesions. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered Q3W. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 by independent reviewer. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and safety. Exploratory objectives included radiomic signatures, itRECIST and evaluation of tumor microenvironment. At least 20% of pts had to achieve response in order to consider primary endpoint met. Results: Recruitment was completed 24th August 2021 with 42 pts; female 43%; median age 66 (rank 27-88). Table summarizes basal characteristics. With 40 evaluable for response pts, 10 achieved response (25%): 3 complete response (CR) and 7 partial response (PR). 17 pts (44%) achieved a stable disease (SD), meaning a DCR of 68% with 18 pts still on treatment. The 4 pts with a baseline LDH>3xULN developed PD no later than week 8. Responses per histology were: 66% mucosal, 28% cutaneous, 0% acral. Responses per BRAF/NRAS status were: BRAF mutant (Mut) 43%, NRAS Mut 31%, and BRAF/NRAS wild type (WT) 17%. 33 pts (79%) had at least one BO-112 related adverse event (AE) being only in 2 cases grade>3 (G4 infusion reaction and G3 myalgia). Most common related AEs were asthenia, pyrexia, diarrhea, vomiting and chills. Study treatment was not discontinued in any pts due to related AE. Conclusions: The primary efficacy endpoint has been met. Additionally, disease control (PR+CR+SD) is meaningful and durable in a population with no current standard treatment options. Very high LDH levels (LDH >3xULN) and acral mel could predict poor outcome. Safety profile was manageable without treatment discontinuation due to AEs. N (ITT pts, 42) (%) AJCC8 M1C/D 19 (45) BRAF Mut 7 (17) WT 35 (83) Previous treatment Ipilimumab-nivolumab 6 (15) Anti PD-1 monotherapy 33 (79) Other combo 3 (7) Prior line indication Adjuvant 11 (26) Advanced 31 (74) LDH >ULN 17 (41) Best ORR (IRCR evaluable pts, N=40) Global Mucosal Cutaneous Acral ORR 10 (25) 2 (66) 8 (28) 0 PR 7 (18) 1 (33) 6 (21) 0 CR 3 (8) 1 (33) 2* (7) 0 SD 17 (43) 1 (33) 13 (45) 3 (37) PD 13 (33) 0 8 (28) 5 (63) *2 pts had pathologic CR and RECIST SD Citation Format: Iván Márquez-Rodas, Caroline Dutriaux, Philippe Saiag, Luis de la Cruz Merino, Eduardo Castanon Álvarez, Caroline Robert, Juan F. Rodríguez-Moreno, Ana M. Arance, Pablo Cerezuela-Fuentes, Henry Montaudié, Miguel F. Sanmamed, María González Cao, Julie Charles, María Pilar López Criado, Alfonso Berrocal, Enrique de Miguel, Elisa Funk-Brentano, Sorilla Prey, María del Carmen Álamo de la Gala, Javier Sánchez López, Helena Escuin-Ordinas, Sonia Macia, Marisol Quintero, Marya F. Chaney, Stéphane Dalle. Efficacy of intratumoral BO-112 with systemic pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma refractory to anti-PD-1-based therapy: Final results of SPOTLIGHT203 phase 2 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT014.

Background: There is a lack of predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in melanoma. Immunohistochemistry and gene sequencing are frequently assessed as part of clinical research. Radiomic signatures may also add valuable information, based on parameters which can be related to immune infiltration, therefore defining an imaging biomarkers panel for this clinical scenario. BO-112 is a double stranded synthetic RNA formulated with polyethyleneimine (PEI) that, by mimicking the effect of a viral infection, mobilizes the immune system. The role of imaging biomarkers is being explored in the present phase II clinical trial. Study design: Single arm study with BO-112 plus pembrolizumab (NCT04570332) in patients with advanced melanoma in progression to anti-PD1 therapy. As part of exploratory objectives, a radiomics analysis was performed to detect changes in lesion texture features. Quantitative features were obtained by using Quibim Precision 2.9 platform (Quibim, Valencia, Spain) after the manual delineation of lesions on the CT study of each subject at each timepoint to obtain information about injected/non-injected lesions. Images were normalized by taking into account Hounsfield Units (HU) bias across scanners in a cross-calibration phantom and the Z-score. The difference (Delta) in the features between baseline and week 8 was calculated. Results: Studies were assessed based on event (progression) and based on whether lesions had been injected. Patients with only cutaneous disease were not included in this analysis. Out of 23 patients who had at least two imaging assessments, 6 developed progressive disease by week 8, and 17 subjects had no event by that time. Due to the small sample size, the radiomic analysis was based on hypothesis testing. With regards to volume, 50% of the non-progressing lesions reduced their value from that of the baseline. Regarding injected versus non-injected changes, up to 50% of injected lesions decreased their volume after 8 weeks of injected treatment whereas in non-injected lesions volume decreased in less than 25% of lesions. From the independent sample t-test of delta radiomics features against the injected/non-injected lesions variable, there were 4 features with a statistically significant difference between groups; all of them related to the Low Grey-Level Zone Emphasis. Specifically, Delta original GLRLM Low Grey-Level Run Emphasis showed the highest significant difference between injected and non-injected lesions (p=0.004), with higher and positive delta values in the injected group (75% injected lesions were above 0). Conclusions: Imaging biomarkers provide a large number of quantitative image features with a wide span of information, from size to heterogeneity of the tissue which may be indicator of tumor progression and immune infiltrate. In the analysis of radiomics features, delta GLRLM low grey-level zone emphasis was sensitive to the tumoral changes happening in injected lesions at week 8. This might add insights into the imaging-based evaluation of immune infiltration in intratumoral immunotherapy and the creation of associated imaging biomarkers panels. Citation Format: Paula Moreno, Philippe Saiag, Luis de la Cruz Merino, Caroline Dutriaux, Eduardo Castanon Álvarez, Caroline Robert, Juan F. Rodríguez-Moreno, Pablo Cerezuela-Fuentes, Ana M. Arance, Henry Montaudié, Miguel F. Sanmamed, María González Cao, María Pilar López Criado, Julie Charles, Alfonso Berrocal, Enrique de Miguel, Elisa Funk-Brentano, Pablo Sau Llanas, Sorilla Prey, Eva Muñoz-Couselo, Delvys Rodríguez Abreu, Juan Martin-Liberal, Ángel Alberich-Bayarri, Javier Sánchez López, Sonia Macia, Marisol Quintero, Marya F. Chaney, Stéphane Dalle, Iván Márquez-Rodas. Radiomic features in tumor assessment, preliminary results from a phase 2 study of intratumoral administration of BO-112 with pembrolizumab in patients with anti PD1 refractory melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT109.

Background: There is a lack of predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in melanoma. In terms of IHC, there is no strong rational to support the use of PD-L1 expression. BRAF mutations occur in 40-50% of melanomas and the MAPK pathway may also be activated by NRAS mutations. Patients harboring these mutations face usually a worse prognosis. BO-112 is a double stranded synthetic RNA formulated with polyethyleneimine (PEI) that, by mimicking the effect of a viral infection, mobilizes the immune system. Prior data from a phase I trial (NCT02828098) suggest that, when administered intratumorally, it causes an increase in CD8 infiltration and PD-L1 expression. The role of these and other biomarkers is being explored in the present phase II clinical trial. Study Design: Single arm study with BO-112 plus pembrolizumab (NCT04570332) in patients with advanced melanoma in progression to anti-PD1 therapy. Tumors were genotyped by next generation sequencing, whole exome sequencing and tumor mutation burden. Antitumor and immunological effects of the treatment in the tumor microenvironment were assessed by PDL1 and CD8 immunohistochemistry with a paired biopsy performed after 21 days of treatment. Results: A preliminary analysis has been performed, based on patients evaluable for clinical benefit (defined as response or stable disease>16 weeks). Samples from 35 patients have been analyzed, with 24 patients paired biopsies available. Patients with “cold” tumors (PD-L1 negative and CD8 low) at baseline had a trend to lack of clinical benefit. Only basal PD-L1 in the inflammatory component showed a statistically significant correlation with clinical outcome (4/20 (25%) tumors PDL1 IC negative had benefit versus 10/15 (67%) positive), p=0.0053. Fifteen patients had an increase in PD-L1 and 14 patients had increase in CD8 infiltrate after BO-112 treatment; the lack of increase in PDL1 and CD8 after treatment was also predictive of lack of response (p=0.04). BRAF/NRAS driver mutations correlated with positive outcome. Clinical benefit was observed in 4 of 17 (24%) patients not carrying activating mutations whereas 11 out of 18 (61%) patients with BRAF/NRAS activating mutations had clinical benefit (p=0.02), mainly in cutaneous histology (14% versus 65%, p=0.02). Mucosal melanoma patients (n=3) achieved an ORR 66.7% and DCR 100%. The two mucosal melanoma patients with partial response harbored SETD2 mutations and one of them showed extensive cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNGs), indicative of defects in DNA repair pathways. Regarding acral melanoma patients (n=9), no responses were observed, even in the single case with a NRAS mutation. The only patient achieving clinical benefit, with stable disease>16 weeks; had a unique mutation profile, with TP53 (inactivating) and KIT (activating) mutations. Conclusions: Patients basal mutant BRAF/NRAS could have more probability of benefit from BO-112 and pembrolizumab combination. PD-L1 and/or CD8 increase is an early marker of response. These findings could help to select patients in future clinical trials. Further investigation into predictive biomarkers is warranted. Citation Format: Ruth Roman, Philippe Saiag, Caroline Dutriaux, Luis de la Cruz Merino, Eduardo Castanon, Miguel F. Sanmamed, Caroline Robert, Juan F. Rodríguez-Moreno, Pablo Cerezuela-Fuentes, Ana M. Arance, María González Cao, Henry Montaudié, María Pilar López Criado, Julie Charles, Alfonso Berrocal, María del Carmen Álamo de la Gala, Enrique de Miguel, Elisa Funk-Brentano, Sorilla Prey, Eva Muñoz-Couselo, Delvys Rodríguez Abreu, Juan Martín-Liberal, Helena Escuin-Ordinas, Mark Branum, Sonia Macia, Marisol Quintero, Javier Sánchez López, Marya F. Chaney, Beatriz García-Peláez, Marta Vives-Usano, Miguel Ángel Molina, Stéphane Dalle, Iván Márquez-Rodas. Correlation of biomarkers and clinical benefit of intratumoral BO112 and pembrolizumab in patients with anti PD1 refractory melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT107.

TPS3166 Background: The forkhead box family transcription factor FOXP3 is essential for T regulatory cells (Tregs) development and immune suppressive function. Tregs are an integral component of the adaptive immune system and contribute to maintaining tolerance to self-antigens and preventing autoimmune diseases. In the context of cancer, however, Tregs contribute to tumor progression by suppressing antitumor immunity. To date inhibition of Treg-mediated immunosuppression tested in the clinic has lacked specificity. Targeting FOXP3 provides a selective approach to impair the immunosuppressive function of Tregs but targeting transcription factors has been a challenge using conventional drug modalities. AZD8701 employs next-generation antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) technology (Ionis Pharmaceuticals) to bind mRNA with high affinity and selectively reduce human Foxp3 mRNA expression levels. Foxp3-specific ASOs promote potent dose-dependent reductions in Foxp3 mRNA and protein in vitro. In preclinical models, AZD8701 induced Foxp3 knockdown results in Tregs with a reduced immunosuppressive capacity, loss of immunosuppressive markers, and increased markers of activation on CD8+ T-cells. AZD8701 reduces tumor growth as monotherapy in preclinical models and increased tumor inhibition is obtained by combining AZD8701 with a PD-L1 inhibitor. Methods: This is a Phase I multicenter study of AZD8701 alone or in combination with durvalumab in participants with selected advanced solid tumors. Eligible patients must have ECOG performance status 0 or 1, measurable target lesion per RECIST v1.1 and be diagnosed with selected tumor types as described below. Monotherapy and combination dose escalation phase is open for participants with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), gastroesophageal cancer, melanoma, cervical cancer, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and/or solid tumors that have demonstrated a response to prior programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-[L]1) treatment (as defined by duration of response > 18 weeks). Participants with NSCLC, HNSCC, TNBC, and ccRCC will be included in the pharmacodynamic cohort at the selected monotherapy dose and/or disease expansion cohorts. The primary objectives are to assess safety and tolerability and to determine the preliminary antitumor activity of AZD8701 (objective response rate) when administered as monotherapy or in combination with durvalumab. Secondary endpoints include, disease control rate, duration of response, progression free survival and overall survival, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (including changes in Foxp3 mRNA in paired tumor samples). The trial is currently recruiting. Clinical trial information: NCT04504669.

201 Background: Dostarlimab is a programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) blocking antibody that is approved in the US as a monotherapy in adult patients (pts) with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer that has progressed on or following prior treatment with a platinum-containing regimen or dMMR recurrent or advanced solid tumors that have progressed on or following prior treatment and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. Here, we report on the antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in pts with dMMR colorectal cancer (CRC), a post-hoc subgroup analysis of cohort F of the GARNET trial. Methods: GARNET is a phase 1, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of dostarlimab monotherapy in pts with advanced or recurrent solid tumors. Cohort F of the GARNET expansion cohorts enrolled pts with dMMR/MSI-H or POLε mutated non-endometrial solid tumors, including pts with CRC. Pts must have progressed per blinded independent central review (BICR) following prior systemic therapy for advanced disease. Pts with CRC were required to have progressive disease after or been intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. Pts received 500 mg intravenous dostarlimab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by 1000 mg every 6 weeks until discontinuation. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response by BICR per RECIST v1.1. Pts were included in the efficacy analysis if they received ≥1 dose of dostarlimab, had measurable disease at baseline, and had ≥24 weeks of follow-up. All pts who received ≥1 dose of dostarlimab were included in the safety analysis. Results: As of the March 01, 2020 interim analysis data cut, 141 pts with dMMR non-endometrial solid tumors were included in the safety analysis, with 106 in the efficacy analysis. Of the pts in the efficacy analysis, 69 (65.1%) had CRC. Confirmed ORR by BICR per RECIST v1.1 in pts with dMMR CRC was 36.2% (95% CI, 25.0%–48.7%). There were 3 complete responses and 22 partial responses. At the data cut, 23 pts (92%) were still on treatment. Median duration of response had not been reached for pts with CRC. In the overall dMMR non-endometrial solid tumor population, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 68.1% of pts, with 8.5% of pts experiencing at least 1 grade ≥3 TRAE. The most common grade ≥3 TRAE was lipase increased in 2 (1.4%) of pts. Only 5 pts (3.5%) discontinued dostarlimab due to at TRAE. Treatment-related serious AEs were reported in 9 (6.4%) pts. Conclusions: Dostarlimab demonstrated durable clinically meaningful antitumor activity in pts with dMMR CRC, which was consistent with that seen in patients with dMMR non-CRC solid tumors. No new safety signals were detected in patients with dMMR non-endometrial solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT02715284.