Search

Correctly diagnosing a rare childhood cancer such as sarcoma can be critical to assigning the correct treatment regimen. With a finite number of pathologists worldwide specializing in pediatric/young adult sarcoma histopathology, access to expert differential diagnosis early in case assessment is limited for many global regions. The lack of highly-trained sarcoma pathologists is especially pronounced in low to middle-income countries, where pathology expertise may be limited despite a similar rate of sarcoma incidence. To address this issue in part, we developed a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN)-based differential diagnosis system to act as a pre-pathologist screening tool that quantifies diagnosis likelihood amongst trained soft-tissue sarcoma subtypes based on whole histopathology tissue slides. The CNN model is trained on a cohort of 424 centrally-reviewed histopathology tissue slides of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma and clear-cell sarcoma tumors, all initially diagnosed at the originating institution and subsequently validated by central review. This CNN model was able to accurately classify the withheld testing cohort with resulting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under curve (AUC) values above 0.889 for all tested sarcoma subtypes. We subsequently used the CNN model to classify an externally-sourced cohort of human alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma samples and a cohort of 318 histopathology tissue sections from genetically engineered mouse models of rhabdomyosarcoma. Finally, we investigated the overall robustness of the trained CNN model with respect to histopathological variations such as anaplasia, and classification outcomes on histopathology slides from untrained disease models. Overall positive results from our validation studies coupled with the limited worldwide availability of sarcoma pathology expertise suggests the potential of machine learning to assist local pathologists in quickly narrowing the differential diagnosis of sarcoma subtype in children, adolescents, and young adults.

Background: Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (DDCS) is a rare subset of chondrosarcoma. It is an aggressive neoplasm characterized by a high rate of recurrent and metastatic disease with overall poor outcomes. Systemic therapy is often used to treat DDCS; however, the optimal regimen and timing are not well defined, with current guidelines recommending following osteosarcoma protocols. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with DDCS. Between 1 January 2004 and 1 January 2022, the databases from five academic sarcoma centers were reviewed. Patient and tumor factors, including age, sex, tumor size, site, location, the treatments rendered, and survival outcomes, were collected. Results: Seventy-four patients were identified and included in the analysis. Most patients presented with localized disease. Surgical resection was the mainstay of therapy. Chemotherapy was used predominantly in the metastatic setting. Partial responses were low (n = 4; 9%) and occurred upon treatment with doxorubicin with cisplatin or ifosfamide and single-agent pembrolizumab. For all other regimens, stable disease was the best response. Prolonged stable disease occurred with the use of pazopanib and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusions: DDCS has poor outcomes and conventional chemotherapy has limited benefit. Future studies should focus on defining the possible role of molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapy in the treatment of DDCS.

PURPOSE Antitumor activity in preclinical models and a phase I study of patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DD-LPS) was observed with selinexor. We evaluated the clinical benefit of selinexor in patients with previously treated DD-LPS whose sarcoma progressed on approved agents. METHODS SEAL was a phase II-III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients age 12 years or older with advanced DD-LPS who had received two-five lines of therapy were randomly assigned (2:1) to selinexor (60 mg) or placebo twice weekly in 6-week cycles (crossover permitted). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included for safety analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02606461 ). RESULTS Two hundred eighty-five patients were enrolled (selinexor, n = 188; placebo, n = 97). PFS was significantly longer with selinexor versus placebo: hazard ratio (HR) 0.70 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.95; one-sided P = .011; medians 2.8 v 2.1 months), as was time to next treatment: HR 0.50 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.66; one-sided P < .0001; medians 5.8 v 3.2 months). With crossover, no difference was observed in overall survival. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade versus grade 3 or 4 with selinexor were nausea (151 [80.7%] v 11 [5.9]), decreased appetite (113 [60.4%] v 14 [7.5%]), and fatigue (96 [51.3%] v 12 [6.4%]). Four (2.1%) and three (3.1%) patients died in the selinexor and placebo arms, respectively. Exploratory RNA sequencing analysis identified that the absence of CALB1 expression was associated with longer PFS with selinexor compared with placebo (median 6.9 v 2.2 months; HR, 0.19; P = .001). CONCLUSION Patients with advanced, refractory DD-LPS showed improved PFS and time to next treatment with selinexor compared with placebo. Supportive care and dose reductions mitigated side effects of selinexor. Prospective validation of CALB1 expression as a predictive biomarker for selinexor in DD-LPS is warranted.

Background: In ultra-rare sarcomas (URS) the conduction of prospective, randomized trials is challenging. Data from retrospective observational studies (ROS) may represent the best evidence available. ROS implicit limitations led to poor acceptance by the scientific community and regulatory authorities. In this context, an expert panel from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS), agreed on the need to establish a set of minimum requirements for conducting high-quality ROS on the activity of systemic therapies in URS. Methods: Representatives from > 25 worldwide sarcoma reference centres met in November 2020 and identified a list of topics summarizing the main issues encountered in ROS on URS. An online survey on these topics was distributed to the panel; results were summarized by descriptive statistics and discussed during a second meeting (November 2021). Results: Topics identified by the panel included the use of ROS results as external control data, the criteria for contributing centers selection, modalities for ensuring a correct pathological diagnosis and radiologic assessment, consistency of surveillance policies across centers, study end-points, risk of data duplication, results publication. Based on the answers to the survey (55 of 62 invited experts) and discussion the panel agreed on 18 statements summarizing principles of recommended practice. Conclusions: These recommendations will be disseminated by CTOS across the sarcoma community and incorporated in future ROS on URS, to maximize their quality and favor their use as control data when results from prospective studies are unavailable. These recommendations could help the optimal conduction of ROS also in other rare tumors.

BackgroundOX40 is a costimulatory receptor upregulated on antigen-activated T cells and constitutively expressed on regulatory T cells (Tregs). INCAGN01949, a fully human immunoglobulin G1κ anti-OX40 agonist monoclonal antibody, was designed to promote tumor-specific immunity by effector T-cell activation and Fcγ receptor-mediated Treg depletion. This first-in-human study was conducted to determine the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of INCAGN01949.MethodsPhase I/II, open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study conducted in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Patients received INCAGN01949 monotherapy (7–1400 mg) in 14-day cycles while deriving benefit. Safety measures, clinical activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic effects were assessed and summarized with descriptive statistics.ResultsEighty-seven patients were enrolled; most common tumor types were colorectal (17.2%), ovarian (8.0%), and non-small cell lung (6.9%) cancers. Patients received a median three (range 1–9) prior therapies, including immunotherapy in 24 patients (27.6%). Maximum tolerated dose was not reached; one patient (1.1%) receiving 350 mg dose reported dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 colitis. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 45 patients (51.7%), with fatigue (16 (18.4%)), rash (6 (6.9%)), and diarrhea (6 (6.9%)) being most frequent. One patient (1.1%) with metastatic gallbladder cancer achieved a partial response (duration of 6.3 months), and 23 patients (26.4%) achieved stable disease (lasting >6 months in one patient). OX40 receptor occupancy was maintained over 90% among all patients receiving doses of ≥200 mg, while no treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies were detected across all dose levels. Pharmacodynamic results demonstrated that treatment with INCAGN01949 did not enhance proliferation or activation of T cells in peripheral blood or reduce circulating Tregs, and analyses of tumor biopsies did not demonstrate any consistent increase in effector T-cell infiltration or function, or decrease in infiltrating Tregs.ConclusionNo safety concerns were observed with INCAGN01949 monotherapy in patients with metastatic or advanced solid tumors. However, tumor responses and pharmacodynamic effects on T cells in peripheral blood and post-therapy tumor biopsies were limited. Studies evaluating INCAGN01949 in combination with other therapies are needed to further evaluate the potential of OX40 agonism as a therapeutic approach in patients with advanced solid tumors.Trial registration numberNCT02923349.

Background: Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) are a diverse family of mesenchymal tumors with myomelanocytic differentiation that disproportionately affect women and can be associated with tuberous sclerosis (TS). Although mTOR inhibition is widely used as first-line treatment, it is unclear what genomic alterations exist in these tumors and how they influence the response to therapy. Methods: This was a multicenter study conducted at five sites within the US. The data were collected from 1 January 2004 to 31 January 2021. We conducted a retrospective analysis to identify PEComa patients with next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and compared outcomes based on mutations. Results: No significant differences in survival were identified between TSC-1 and TSC-2 mutated PEComa or TSC-1/-2 versus other mutations. No significant difference was seen in progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line therapy between mTOR inhibition versus other systemic therapies. Conclusions: We were unable to detect differences in survival based on genomic alterations or PFS between mTOR inhibition versus other systemic therapies. Future studies should seek to identify other drivers of TSC-1/-2 silencing that could predict response to mTOR inhibition.

Background: Patients with sarcoma often require individualized treatment strategies and are likely to receive aggressive immunosuppressive therapies, which may place them at higher risk for severe COVID-19. We aimed to describe demographics, risk factors, and outcomes for patients with sarcoma and COVID-19. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with sarcoma and COVID-19 reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry (NCT04354701) from 17 March 2020 to 30 September 2021. Demographics, sarcoma histologic type, treatments, and COVID-19 outcomes were analyzed. Results: of 281 patients, 49% (n = 139) were hospitalized, 33% (n = 93) received supplemental oxygen, 11% (n = 31) were admitted to the ICU, and 6% (n = 16) received mechanical ventilation. A total of 23 (8%) died within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis and 44 (16%) died overall at the time of analysis. When evaluated by sarcoma subtype, patients with bone sarcoma and COVID-19 had a higher mortality rate than patients from a matched SEER cohort (13.5% vs 4.4%). Older age, poor performance status, recent systemic anti-cancer therapy, and lung metastases all contributed to higher COVID-19 severity. Conclusions: Patients with sarcoma have high rates of severe COVID-19 and those with bone sarcoma may have the greatest risk of death.

Cytotoxic chemotherapy has been the backbone of medical oncology for nearly a century for multiple cancer types. However, when treating advanced or metastatic disease toxicity, side effects, and acquired resistance often limit the duration of therapy. While randomized control trials have traditionally served as the proving ground for first and subsequent line therapies, rare tumor subtypes including soft tumor sarcoma (STS) provide unique challenges for developing robust treatment data. By developing human based in vitro models, we can investigate potential therapeutic mechanisms for STS. Fibrosarcoma is one distinct histologic STS subtype that relies heavily on anthracycline treatment in the first line setting, however, there are limited options once resistance develops. Anthracyclines, including doxorubicin, exert their effect through a variety of mechanisms including reactive oxygen species, DNA-adduct formation, and inhibiting topoisomerase II, histone eviction, calcium and iron homeostasis, and ceramide overproduction. However, there have also been multiple mechanisms of doxorubicin resistance including disruption of cell membrane, alteration of cell surface molecules, inactivation of drugs, gene amplification, activating alternative signaling pathways, and affecting cellular repair mechanisms. In order to investigate the role of anthracycline resistance in fibrosarcoma lines we acquired two human derived fibrosarcoma lines SW684 and HT-1080 from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Characterization of HT-1080 using publicly available datasets demonstrated that TP53, CDK2NA and NF1 serve as major driver mutations while SW684 relies on NRAS and IDH1 mutations. We further characterized these cell lines in vitro and noted that HT-1080 has a quick doubling time of 16 hours while SW684 has a doubling time of 91 hours. Additionally, after doxorubicin treatment, we found that HT-1080 is sensitive with an IC50 of 5.594 nanomolar while SW684 is relatively doxorubicin resistant with an IC50 of 28.915 micromolar. While proliferative rate may play a role in the sensitivities of these cell lines further characterization of the mechanism leading to doxorubicin resistance is needed. To that end, we are using a CRISPR-Cas9 approach for further genome wide screening of these fibrosarcoma lines in the presence of doxorubicin. Exploring the genetic mechanisms that result in development of doxorubicin resistance may reveal novel, targetable mechanisms expanding treatment durability in this rare STS. Citation Format: Rodney Dixon Dorand, Donna Dang, Elizabeth J. Davis, Ben Ho Park. Investigating doxorubicin resistance in fibrosarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3974.

3012 Background: Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) is activated in response to replication stress from topoisomerase 1 inhibitors. Selective ATR inhibition with berzosertib potentiates the efficacy of irinotecan in colorectal mouse xenograft models. We hypothesized that berzosertib in combination with irinotecan is well tolerated, modulates the DNA damage repair response to irinotecan, and the combination is associated with clinical activity. Methods: This phase I study utilized a modified Storer’s up and down dose escalation design. Dose Levels (DLs) combined berzosertib 60 to 270 mg/m2 with irinotecan 180 mg/m2, every 2 weeks in a 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was identification of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) were secondary endpoints. The identification of molecular subpopulations sensitized to the combination was exploratory. Results: Between July 2016 and July 2021, 51 patients (pts) enrolled, of whom 50 received treatment. Pts most commonly had colorectal cancer (CRC, 39%), pancreatic cancer (24%), small cell lung cancer (SCLC, 6%) and non-small cell lung cancer (6%). The median number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (range, 2 to 11). In Stage I, 1 of 3 evaluable pts experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 lung infection at DL3 (berzosertib 180 mg/m2 - irinotecan 180 mg/m2), and Stage II was initiated enrolling cohorts of 5 pts. In Stage II, 4 of the first 11 pts treated at DL4 (berzosertib 270 mg/m2 - irinotecan 180 mg/m2) were unable to complete the DLT evaluation period due to clinically significant toxicity not meeting DLT criteria: grade 2 diarrhea (1 pt), grade 3 diarrhea (1 pt), and grade 3 neutrophil decrease (2 pts). The protocol was amended to limit dose escalation beyond DL4. At DL4, 1 of 21 evaluable pts experienced DLT (grade 4 febrile neutropenia). Most common treatment-related grade ≥ 3 toxicities were neutrophil decrease (34%), lymphocyte decrease (30%), WBC decrease (28%), anemia (20%), diarrhea (16%), fatigue (8%) and hypokalemia (8%). 2 partial responses were observed, occurring in pts with pancreatic cancer and ATM alterations: 32% decrease in an ATM E11828/ATM K1109* tumor lasting 15.3 months and 68% decrease in an ATM R3008H/germline ATM R1882* tumor ongoing at 11 months. An additional pt with ATM S214fs*40 mutant colorectal cancer (CRC) experienced a 26% decrease lasting 7.5 months. Conclusions: Berzosertib 270 mg/m2 - irinotecan 180 mg/m2 was declared the RP2D. The combination is associated with manageable side effects and promising disease activity in ATM mutant solid tumors. PK and PD studies are in process. Tumor biopsy studies are planned in a 15 pt dose expansion cohort at DL4, enrolling pts with CRC, pancreatic cancer, SCLC and DNA damage repair deficient tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT02595931.

11581 Background: Desmoid tumors (DT) or aggressive fibromatosis are rare growths of fibroblastic connective tissue that can be locally aggressive but without metastatic potential. Most cases are sporadic, but 5-20% of cases are associated with Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Despite numerous systemic options, optimal choice is unclear, and there is a paucity of studies comparing efficacy based on tumor site. Liposomal doxorubicin (LD) can be an appealing option for DT patients (pts) given its favorable schedule and toxicity profile. In this study, we compared outcomes in pts with intra-abdominal (IA) and extra-abdominal (EA) DT who received LD. Methods: We identified pts with DT who were treated with LD between 1/2010 - and 2/2022 at two sarcoma centers. Tumor and pt characteristics and outcomes were clinically (symptom improvement) and radiologically (RECIST 1.1) assessed. Results: 40 pts with DT treated with LD were identified; 58% female and 42% male. Pt characteristics and outcomes are summarized in Table 1. Primary tumor site was IA in 21 (53%) pts. FAP was present more commonly in pts with IA vs EA DT, 8/21 (43%) and 4/19 (21%), respectively. In the IA cohort, LD was given as first (15/21, 71%), second (10%) or third (19%) line therapy. LD was used more commonly as a later line in the EA cohort with 16%, 52%, 16%, and 16% receiving it in first, second, third, and fourth lines, respectively. 37 pts were evaluable for response. Response rate in the IA cohort treated in first-line was 50% (8 of 16) and 10 of 12 evaluable pts had symptomatic improvement. No first-line responses were seen in the EA cohort. As later lines of therapy, 7/12 pts had disease control in the second line, 6/8 pts in the third line, and 1/2 pts in the fourth line with LD in the IA cohort. 1 patient had fourth line response to LD in the EA cohort. Disease control rate with LD was 72.5% across all pts. Reasons for early discontinuation of LD included progression or lack of symptom improvement (20%), allergic reaction (12.5%), adverse effects (7.5%), or infection (2.5%). No acute or long-term cardiotoxicity was reported. 2 pts had no signs of recurrence or symptoms at follow-up, 33 pts were alive with symptomatic DT, 1 patient died from disease, and 3 were lost to follow-up. Conclusions: In our study, LD provided tumor response, disease control, and symptomatic improvement regardless of location or prior therapy, with responses most frequently seen in IA DT in first line setting. Further studies should include comparison of efficacy, adverse effects, and patient-reported outcomes while accounting for tumor location and line of therapy. [Table: see text]

TPS11595 Background: CCS of the soft tissues is a rare and aggressive subtype of sarcoma that often starts in the tendons of the arms or legs. It is molecularly characterized by t(12;22)(q13;q12) translocation, resulting in EWSR1-ATF1 or EWSR1-CREB1 gene fusion. Despite reports of occasional responses to systemic therapies, currently available therapies have shown limited efficacy in advanced CCS. Therefore, there is a significant unmet medical need for more active agents in CCS. Devimistat is a stable intermediate of a lipoate analog that inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase and α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle preferentially within the mitochondria of cancer cells. Devimistat induces autophagy in cancer cells. In a metastatic mouse model of CCS, treatment with devimistat in combination with chloroquine significantly suppressed tumor growth (Egawa et al, 2018). Based on this data, we hypothesized that inhibition of autophagy with HCQ may sensitize cancer cells to devimistat with increased efficacy and acceptable toxicity. Given its expected synergy, we have initiated a single-arm phase I/II prospective, multicenter, open-label, non-randomized study to evaluate maximally tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of devimistat in combination with HCQ in patients with R/R CCS. Methods: In the phase 1 portion of the study, patients with R/R CCS and other fusion-positive R/R sarcomas will be enrolled and a standard 3+3 design will be followed to evaluate toxicity, MTD, and recommended phase 2 dose. There will be two patient groups based on weight, and dose escalation will be conducted separately for each group. Starting dose of HCQ will be 5mg/kg PO BID for patients < 45 kg and 200 mg PO BID for patients ≥45 kg on days 1 through 5 of every 28 days. The first dose of HCQ each day will be followed 2 hours later by 1,000 mg/m2 devimistat (for patients < 45 kg) and 2,000 mg/m2 of devimistat (for patients ≥ 45 kg) administered over 2 hours. A maximum of 36 patients will be enrolled for the phase I portion, 18 for each patient group. In the phase 2 portion of the study, only relapsed or refractory CCS patients will be enrolled, and the response rate will be determined using RECIST 1.1. In phase 2, pharmacokinetics, duration of response, clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and patient-reported outcomes will also be assessed. This portion of the study will utilize Simon’s admissible two-stage design with 29 patients. This study started enrolling participants in November 2021 and has dosed six patients to date. The first two dose-escalation cohorts for patients ≥45 kg have been completed without DLT and the third dose level will be opening shortly. Clinical trial information: NCT04593758.

10511 Background: Sarcomas are rare and diverse malignancies with a subset developing in the context of heritable cancer predisposition syndromes. Data surrounding the frequency of inheritance and patient/genomic findings are limited. We aimed to describe the characteristics of patients with sarcoma referred for clinical genetic testing and to determine the prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants (PGV/LPGV). Methods: We performed retrospective chart reviews of patients with sarcoma referred to Michigan Medicine Cancer Genetics Clinic between 12/2006 and 1/2020 and Vanderbilt Hereditary Cancer Clinic between 1/2005 and 1/2019. Reviewers obtained medical/family history, cancer phenotype, and results of germline genetic testing. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess the prevalence of germline variants classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic according to American College of Medical Genetics criteria. Associations with clinical factors were tested for using Fisher’s exact test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: One-hundred sixteen patients with sarcoma underwent genetic evaluation during a 15-year period. Mean age at time of visit was 46 years (SD, 17.6 years; range, 1-80 years). Sixty-nine patients (59%) were female. The most common reasons for referral were personal history of multiple malignancies (n = 69, 59.4%), first degree relative (FDR) with malignancy (n = 67, 57.7%) and young age at diagnosis (age ≤ 18, n = 18, 15.5%). Forty-eight patients (41.4%) had both a history of multiple malignancies and a FDR with a malignancy. Eight patients had a FDR with sarcoma (6.9%). Of the 110 patients who underwent germline testing, 53 patients (48.2%) had a PGV/LPGV. Identified germline variants and frequencies are listed in the Table. There was no statistical significance between young age at diagnosis, history of personal malignancies, FDR with sarcoma, FDR with one or more malignancies, or multiple FDRs with malignancy and presence of a PGV/LPGV. Conclusions: In this multicenter study, approximately half of patients with sarcoma referred for cancer genetic testing had a PGV/LPGV associated with hereditary predisposition to cancer. There was no identified positive predictive factor for germline variants. Though TP53 was the most common, over 20 genetic variants were identified, supporting the consideration of multigene panel testing. Our study is limited to patients who were both referred to and attended genetic evaluation. Yet, the high frequency of pathogenic germline variants observed highlights the necessity for further investigation of the prevalence of and predictive factors for germline mutations in all sarcoma patients. Identified germline variants. [Table: see text]

e23500 Background: Sarcomas are a rare and heterogenous group of malignancies comprised of > 150 histologic subtypes. Adamantinoma-like Ewing sarcoma (ALES) is a rare, small round blue cell tumor that represents a variant of Ewing sarcoma (EWS). First described 20 years ago, ALES harbors a EWS subset defining EWS-related translocation; however, ALES has a complex epithelial differentiation component defining it as a distinct clinical entity. Most ALES cases arise in the head and neck, but it has also been reported in the extremities and thorax. Given the rarity of ALES, there is a paucity of literature to guide treatment and describe outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective review (January 1, 2010-January 1, 2022) at two sarcoma centers in the United States and identified 4 cases of ALES. Tumor and patient characteristics were described, and patient outcomes were assessed. Results: Four patients were identified. 3 (75%) were male. Median age at diagnosis was 37 years (range 23-57). Primary site of ALES was head and neck (50%) and thorax (50%). Median tumor size was 4 cm (2.7-5.5 cm). All patients underwent resection of their primary tumor, and two (50%)received adjuvant radiation therapy. All pts received/are receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. 75% of patients were treated with Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphane (VDC) alternating with Ifosfamide & Etoposide (IE) for 12-14 cycles. One patient received 4 cycles of adjuvant carboplatin and etoposide and radiation after an initial diagnosis of basaloid carcinoma but recurred 47 months later and diagnosed at ALES at that time. That patient underwent re-resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Ifosfamide (VAI). Median follow-up from initial diagnosis was 25 months (3-39 months). All patients are alive with no evidence of disease. Conclusions: Similar to treatment of EWS, a multidisciplinary strategy is paramount. VDC/IE is a reasonable treatment strategy. Further multicenter collaboration is essential to define clinical characterization of this rare sarcoma subtype and to guide treatment particularly in the relapsed or refractory setting.[Table: see text]

e23562 Background: Ifosfamide, an alkylating agent used commonly in both hematologic and solid tumor malignancies, carries a notable risk for neurotoxicity/encephalopathy. Ifosfamide is available as both a reconstituted powder formulation and a solution for injection. Literature has shown that there may be higher rates of ifosfamide neurotoxicity/encephalopathy (INT/E) with the solution compared to the reconstituted powder. The primary objective of this study was to compare the rates of neurotoxicity/encephalopathy in association with the two available pharmaceutical formulations of ifosfamide. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of adult patients receiving at least one dose of either available pharmaceutical formulation of ifosfamide. The primary outcome was the incidence of formulation-associated INT/E. Secondary outcomes included additional risk factors for development of INT/E. Results: Of 218 patients evaluated, 212 were included in the study with 56 patients receiving the reconstituted powder formulation and 156 patients receiving the solution for injection formulation of ifosfamide. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, including dose of ifosfamide received, use of INT/E prophylaxis, and renal and hepatic function. INT/E occurred in 4 patients (7.1%) receiving the reconstituted powder formulation vs 32 patients (20.5%) receiving the solution for injection (p = 0.022) Evaluation and analysis of additional risk factors for development of INT/E are ongoing, including the impact of baseline demographics, ifosfamide dosing, renal and hepatic function, and concomitant medications. Conclusions: In this study, hematology/oncology patients who were treated with ifosfamide had significantly lower rates of INT/E with the reconstituted powder formulation compared to the solution for injection. Further analysis regarding additional risk factors for INT/E development is ongoing.[Table: see text]

11528 Background: Chondrosarcoma is one of the most common bone malignancies in adults, and the third most common in pediatric patients (pts). The most prevalent subtype, conventional chondrosarcoma, is a slow growing tumor that is historically known to be refractory to chemotherapy. Anecdotal reports indicated a role for anti-PD-(L)1 in the treatment of this disease. This is the first prospective report on the efficacy of the PD-L1-targeting agent, atezolizumab, in this rare disease. Methods: Patients (pts) ages 2 and older with unresectable grade 2 or 3 conventional chondrosarcoma were eligible. No prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment was allowed, otherwise pts were eligible irrespective of prior therapies as long as protocol-specified washout period requirements were met. Pts received atezolizumab 1200 mg (15 mg/kg with 1200 mg cap in pediatric pts) once every 21 days. Imaging was carried out at end of cycle 3, and then every two cycles. Research biopsies were collected from adult pts prior to C1D1, prior to C3D1, and at progression. Immuno-pharmacodynamic (IO-PD) studies were performed on paired tumor samples and circulating immune cells to help elucidate signaling pathways mediating the immune response, with focus on subsets of effector cells in the tumor microenvironment. Results: A total of 9 pts (7 males, 2 females) were enrolled in 6 centers across the US and Canada. Six pts were Caucasian/White, 1 Asian, 1 Hispanic, and 1 unknown. Median age was 49 years (42-72). No objective responses were seen. Three pts (33%) experienced disease stability (SD) per RECIST 1.1, for a median duration of 21 weeks as of data cutoff (January 2022). A patient with SD remains on active treatment (tx) for 35 weeks. Three patients had no tx-related adverse events (AEs). Six pts (67%) experienced at least one tx-related AE. Two patients experienced > G2 AEs, but only one was considered tx-related (lymphopenia). Immune-related AEs were all G1/2 and included hepatitis (2), hypothyroidism (1), hyperthyroidism (1), and maculopapular rash (1). IO-PD studies are ongoing and will be reported at the conference if available. Conclusions: Atezolizumab was well-tolerated but demonstrated limited activity in this cohort of pts with few treatment options. Ongoing IO-PD studies will provide insight into atezolizumab’s effect upon immune cell content and activation in the tumor microenvironment that will help design future immunotherapy trials in this disease and other sarcoma types. The study was funded by NCI Contract HHSN261201500003I. Clinical trial information: NCT04458922.

578 Background: GSK-3β overexpression is associated with worse prognosis and chemotherapy resistance in PDAC. GSK-3β inhibition reverses chemotherapy-resistance by inhibiting chemotherapy-induced, ATR-mediated, DNA damage response. 9-ING-41 has significant anti-tumor activity through apoptosis induction, anti-fibrotic activity and NK/T-cell effector stimulation. We hypothesized that 9-ING-41 in combination with GnP chemotherapy would lead to anti-tumor activity, with improved tumor responses in patients with advanced PDAC in the first line setting. Methods: Primary endpoint is disease control rate (DCR). DCR = confirmed complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥ 16 weeks (wks). Secondary endpoints are safety and ORR (overall response rates). Eligibility: Advanced PDAC, ECOG PS 0-2, no prior therapy in the metastatic setting and no systemic therapy in prior 6 months. Pts received 9-ING-41 15mg/kg IV twice-weekly with G 1,000 mg/m2 and nP 125 mg/m2 on days 1,8,15 of a 28-day cycle. Simon 2-Stage Design for DCR of 65% and null hypothesis of 50% (historical control), 80% power and 2 sided-significance level of.05. Up to 23 fully evaluable pts planned for stage 1 and if ≥ 12 evaluable patients achieve a DCR 37 additional pts will be enrolled on a second stage or a randomized study commenced. Results: As of Sept 27, 2021, 42 pts enrolled. Median age: 67. 24 females, 18 males. 38 pts with metastatic and 4 with locally advanced disease. Prior adjuvant therapy: 4 pts each FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based. No 9-ING-41-attributable SAEs to date. 9-ING-41 attributed AEs: visual disturbance: 24 (75%) G1/2, 1 (3%) G3; infusion reactions 9 (28%) G1/2. Chemotherapy-related AEs: anemia 13 (40%) G1/2, 1 (3%) G3; neutropenia 2 (6%) G1/2, 13 (40%) G3/4; thrombocytopenia 9 (28%) G1/2, 2 (6%) G3/4; diarrhea 8 (25%) G1/2, 4 (13%) G3; fatigue 9 (28%) G1/2, 3 (9%) G3; nausea/vomiting 24 (75%) G1/2, 1 (3%) G3; constipation 9 (28%) G1/2; febrile neutropenia 5 (16%) G3/4. In 21 pts currently evaluable for response, DCR was 62% and ORR 43%. There were 2 confirmed CRs, 6 confirmed and 1 unconfirmed PRs, 4 SD and 8 disease progressions were observed. Amongst responder’s median duration of response has not yet been reached. Conclusions: 9-ING-41 plus GnP demonstrated encouraging clinical activity but chemotherapy-related AEs were significant. Based on efficacy data to date, including confirmed CRs, we have commenced a randomized phase 2 study, evaluating 9-ING-41 plus GnP vs Gn P alone. Enrollment to the randomized study is now open (NCT03678883). Clinical trial information: NCT03678883.