Search

Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (dt-TGCT) is a benign clonal neoplastic proliferation arising from the synovium. Patients are often symptomatic, require multiple surgical procedures during their lifetime, and have reduced quality of life (QoL). Surgery is the main treatment with relapse rates ranging from 14 to 55%. The treatment strategy for patients with dt-TGCT is evolving. The purpose of this review is to describe current treatment options, and to highlight recent developments in the knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of dt-TGCT as well as related therapeutic implications.TGCT cells overexpress colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1), resulting in recruitment of CSF1 receptor (CSF1R)-bearing macrophages that are polyclonal and make up the bulk of the tumor, has led to clinical trials with CSF1R inhibitors. These inhibitors include small molecules such as pexidatinib, imatinib, nilotinib, DCC-3014 (vimseltinib), and the monoclonal antibody RG7155 (emactuzumab).In conclusion, D-TGCT impairs patients' QoL. The evidence that the pathogenetic loop of D-TGCT can be inhibited has changed the therapeutic armamentarium for this condition. Clinical trials of agents that target CSF1R are currently ongoing. All this new evidence should be taken into consideration within multidisciplinary management.

Supplementary Figures (From S1 to S10)

Supplementary Table S4 - Affinity energies of nilotinib and avapritinib for the different structures of MRP-1.

MRP-1 is implicated in multidrug resistance and was described as prognostic in high-risk patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in a previous study. The current research aimed to validate MRP-1 prognostic/predictive value in localized sarcomas treated with anthracyclines plus ifosfamide within the ISG-1001 phase III study. In addition, the inhibitory activity on MRP-1 was investigated in preclinical studies to identify new combinations able to increase the efficacy of standard chemotherapy in STS. MRP-1 expression was assessed by IHC in tissue microarrays from patients with STS and tested for correlation with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). In vitro studies tested the efficacy of MRP-1 inhibitors (nilotinib, ripretinib, selumetinib, and avapritinib) in sarcoma cell lines. The effect of combinations of the most active MRP-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy was measured on the basis of apoptosis. MRP-1 was evaluable in 231 of 264 cases who entered the study. MRP-1 expression (strong intensity) was independently associated with worse DFS [HR, 1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11–2.83; P = 0.016], in the multivariate analysis, with a trend for a worse OS (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.97–3.25; P = 0.062). In vitro studies showed that the addition of MRP-1 inhibitors (nilotinib or avapritinib) to doxorubicin plus palifosfamide, significantly increased cell death in SK-UT-1 and CP0024 cell lines. MRP-1 is an adverse predictive factor in localized high-risk patients with STS treated with neoadjuvant anthracyclines plus ifosfamide followed by surgery. In vitro findings support the clinical assessment of the combination of chemotherapy and MRP-1 inhibitors as a promising strategy to overcome the drug ceiling effect for chemotherapy.

Supplementary Data from Integrated Molecular Characterization of Patient-Derived Models Reveals Therapeutic Strategies for Treating CIC-DUX4 Sarcoma

Capicua-double homeobox 4 (CIC-DUX4)–rearranged sarcomas (CDS) are extremely rare, highly aggressive primary sarcomas that represent a major therapeutic challenge. Patients are treated according to Ewing sarcoma protocols, but CDS-specific therapies are strongly needed. In this study, RNA sequencing was performed on patient samples to identify a selective signature that differentiates CDS from Ewing sarcoma and other fusion-driven sarcomas. This signature was used to validate the representativeness of newly generated CDS experimental models—patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and PDX-derived cell lines—and to identify specific therapeutic vulnerabilities. Annotation analysis of differentially expressed genes and molecular gene validation highlighted an HMGA2/IGF2BP/IGF2/IGF1R/AKT/mTOR axis that characterizes CDS and renders the tumors particularly sensitive to combined treatments with trabectedin and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors. Trabectedin inhibited IGF2BP/IGF2/IGF1R activity, but dual inhibition of the PI3K and mTOR pathways was required to completely dampen downstream signaling mediators. Proof-of-principle efficacy for the combination of the dual AKT/mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 (dactolisib) with trabectedin was obtained in vitro and in vivo using CDS PDX-derived cell lines, demonstrating a strong inhibition of local tumor growth and multiorgan metastasis. Overall, the development of representative experimental models (PDXs and PDX-derived cell lines) has helped to identify the unique sensitivity of the CDS to AKT/mTOR inhibitors and trabectedin, revealing a mechanism-based therapeutic strategy to fight this lethal cancer.Significance:This study identifies altered HMGA2/IGF2BP/IGF2 signaling in CIC-DUX4 sarcomas and provides proof of principle for combination therapy with trabectedin and AKT/mTOR dual inhibitors to specifically combat the disease.

Background: The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of orally administered PLX3397 in patients with pigmented villonodular synovitis or giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath (ENLIVEN) showed that pexidartinib provides a robust objective tumor response in adults with tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT) not amenable to improvement with surgery. Based on these results, in 2019, pexidartinib received accelerated approval in the United States in this population as a breakthrough therapy under an orphan drug designation. However, the ability of pexidartinib to relieve pain in ENLIVEN was not fully detailed, and the relationship between pain relief and objective tumor response was not described. Questions/purposes: (1) What level of pain relief was achieved by pexidartinib treatment in ENLIVEN? (2) How was pain relief related to objective tumor responses? (3) How durable was pain relief? Methods: The current study included planned primary and exploratory assessments of patient-assessed worst pain at the site of the tumor in the ENLIVEN trial. ENLIVEN was a phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in which adults with TGCT not amenable to improvement with surgery received pexidartinib or placebo for 24 weeks, after which eligible patients could receive open-label pexidartinib. Of 174 patients assessed for eligibility, 121 were randomized (50% [60] to placebo, 50% [61] to pexidartinib), and 120 were given either placebo or pexidartinib (59 received placebo and 61 received pexidartinib) and were included in an intent-to-treat analysis. Fifty-nine percent (71 of 120) of the overall treated population was female, and 88% (106 of 120) were White. Mean age was 45 +/- 13 years. Tumors were mostly in the lower extremities (92% [110 of 120]), most commonly in the knee (61% [73 of 120]) and ankle (18% [21 of 120]). As a secondary outcome, patients scored worst pain at the site of the tumor in the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). The primary definition of a pain response was a decrease of at least 30% in the weekly mean worst-pain NRS score and increase of less than 30% in narcotic analgesic use between baseline and week 25. Planned exploratory assessments of pain included the frequency of a pain response using alternative thresholds, including a decrease in worst-pain NRS score of 50% or more and a decrease of at least 2 points (minimum clinically important difference [MCID]), the magnitude of pain reduction between baseline and week 25, correlation between worst-pain NRS score and tumor shrinkage by RECIST 1.1 criteria, and the durability of the pain response during the open-label extension. Pain responses during the randomized portion of the trial were compared according to intention-to-treat analysis, with a one-sided threshold of p < 0.025 to reduce the risk of false-positive results. Pain assessment was complete for 59% (35 of 59) of patients in the placebo group and 54% (33 of 61) of patients in the pexidartinib group. Demographic and disease characteristics did not differ between the two treatment groups. Results: ®A difference in the primary assessment of a pain response was not detected between pexidartinib and placebo (response percentage 31% [19 of 61] [95% CI 21% to 44%] versus 15% [9 of 59] [95% CI 8% to 27%]; one-sided p = 0.03). In the exploratory analyses, pexidartinib provided a modest improvement in pain (response percentage 26% [16 of 61] [95% CI 17% to 38%] versus 10% [6 of 59] [95% CI 5% to 20%]; one-sided p = 0.02 using the 50% threshold and 31% [19 of 61] [95% CI 21% to 44%] versus 14% [8 of 59] [95% CI 7% to 25%]; one-sided p = 0.02 using the MCID threshold). The least-squares mean change in the weekly mean worst-pain NRS score between baseline and week 25 was larger in patients treated with pexidartinib than placebo (-2.5 [95% CI -3.0 to -1.9] versus -0.3 [95% CI -0.9 to 0.3]; p < 0.001), although the mean difference between the two groups (-2.2 [95% CI -3.0 to -1.4]) was just over the MCID. Improvement in the weekly mean worst-pain NRS score correlated with the reduction in tumor size (r = 0.44; p < 0.001) and tumor volume score (r = 0.61; p < 0.001). For patients in the open-label extension, the change in the worst-pain NRS score from baseline was similar to the change at the end of the randomized portion and just above the MCID (mean -2.7 +/- 2.2 after 25 weeks and -3.3 +/- 1.7 after 50 weeks of receiving pexidartinib). Conclusion: Based on the current study, a modest reduction in pain, just larger than the MCID, may be an added benefit of pexidartinib in these patients, although the findings are insufficient to justify the routine use of pexidartinib for pain relief.

Background: The Tenosynovial giant cell tumor Observational Platform Project (TOPP) registry is an international prospective study that -previously described the impact of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumour (D-TGCT) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a baseline snapshot. This analysis describes the impact of D-TGCT at 2-year follow-up based on treatment strategies. Material and Methods: TOPP was conducted at 12 sites (EU: 10; US: 2). Captured PRO measurements assessed at baseline, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups were Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Pain Interference, BPI Pain Severity, Worst Pain, EQ-5D-5L, Worst Stiffness, and -Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Treatment interventions were no current/planned treatment (Off-Treatment) and systemic treatment/surgery (On-Treatment). Results: A total of 176 patients (mean age: 43.5 years) were included in the full analysis set. For patients without active treatment strategy -(Off-Treatment) at baseline (n = 79), BPI Pain Interference (1.00 vs. 2.86) and BPI Pain Severity scores (1.50 vs. 3.00) were numerically favorable in patients remaining Off-Treatment compared with those who switched to an active treatment strategy at year 1. From 1-year to 2-year -follow-ups, patients who remained Off-Treatment had better BPI Pain Interference (0.57 vs. 2.57) and Worst Pain (2.0 vs. 4.5) scores compared with patients who switched to an alternative treatment strategy. In addition, EQ-5D VAS scores (80.0 vs. 65.0) were higher in patients who remained -Off-Treatment between 1-year and 2-year follow-ups compared with patients who changed treatment strategy. For patients receiving systemic treatment at baseline, numerically favorable scores were seen in patients remaining on systemic therapy at 1-year follow-up: BPI Pain Interference (2.79 vs. 5.93), BPI Pain Severity (3.63 vs. 6.38), Worst Pain (4.5 vs. 7.5), and Worst Stiffness (4.0 vs. 7.5). From 1-year to 2-year follow-up, EQ-5D VAS scores (77.5 vs. 65.0) were higher in patients who changed from systemic treatment to a different treatment strategy. Conclusion: These findings highlight the impact D-TGCT has on patient quality of life, and how treatment strategies may be influenced by these outcome measures. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02948088)The TOPP registry is an international prospective study that previously described the impact of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor on patient-reported outcomes from a baseline snapshot. This article reports a 2-year follow-up based on treatment strategies and could represent a benchmark for future clinical trials.

Background: Heterozygous isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations occur in about half of conventional central bone chondrosarcomas (CCBC). Aim of this study was to assess the frequency and prognostic impact of IDH mutations in high grade CCBC patients. Methods: 64 patients with G2 and G3 CCBC were included. DNA extraction, PCR amplification of IDH1/2 exon 4s, and sequencing analysis with Sanger were performed. Results: IDH mutations were detected in 24/54 patients (44%): IDH1 in 18, IDH2 in 4, and both IDH1/2 in 2 patients. The frequency of mutations was 37% in G2 vs. 69% in G3 (p = 0.039), and 100% in three Ollier disease associated chondrosarcoma. 5-year overall survival (OS) at 124 months (range 1-166) was 51%, with no significant difference based on the IDHmutational status: 61% in IDHmut vs 44% in IDH wild type (IDHwt). The 5-year relapse free survival (RFS) was 33% (95% CI:10-57) for IDHmut vs 57% (95%CI: 30-77) for IDHwt. Progression free survival (PFS) was 25% (95%CI:1-65) IDHmut vs. 16% (95%CI: 0.7-52) IDHwt. 55% (5/9) of IDHmut G2 became higher grade at the recurrence, as compared with 25% (3/12) of G2 IDHwt. Conclusions: This study shows a higher frequency of IDH mutations in G3 CCBC as compared with G2. No significant differences in OS, RFS, and PFS by mutational status were detected. After relapse, a higher rate of G3 for IDH mutated CCBC was observed.

Background: In ultra-rare sarcomas (URS) the conduction of prospective, randomized trials is challenging. Data from retrospective observational studies (ROS) may represent the best evidence available. ROS implicit limitations led to poor acceptance by the scientific community and regulatory authorities. In this context, an expert panel from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS), agreed on the need to establish a set of minimum requirements for conducting high-quality ROS on the activity of systemic therapies in URS. Methods: Representatives from > 25 worldwide sarcoma reference centres met in November 2020 and identified a list of topics summarizing the main issues encountered in ROS on URS. An online survey on these topics was distributed to the panel; results were summarized by descriptive statistics and discussed during a second meeting (November 2021). Results: Topics identified by the panel included the use of ROS results as external control data, the criteria for contributing centers selection, modalities for ensuring a correct pathological diagnosis and radiologic assessment, consistency of surveillance policies across centers, study end-points, risk of data duplication, results publication. Based on the answers to the survey (55 of 62 invited experts) and discussion the panel agreed on 18 statements summarizing principles of recommended practice. Conclusions: These recommendations will be disseminated by CTOS across the sarcoma community and incorporated in future ROS on URS, to maximize their quality and favor their use as control data when results from prospective studies are unavailable. These recommendations could help the optimal conduction of ROS also in other rare tumors.

Weitere Nicht-UDE Autoren sind nicht mit aufgeführt. enosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive, mesenchymal tumor arising from the joints, bursa and tendon sheaths. TGCT comprises a nodular- and a diffuse-type, with the former exhibiting mostly indolent course and the latter a locally aggressive behavior. Although usually not life-threatening, TGCT may cause chronic pain and adversely impact function and quality of life (QoL). CSFR1 inhibitors are effective with benefit on symptoms and QoL but are not available in most countries. The degree of uncertainty in selecting the most appropriate therapy and the lack of guidelines on the clinical management of TGCT make the adoption of new treatments inconsistent across the world, with suboptimal outcomes for patients. A global consensus meeting was organized in June 2022, involving experts from several disciplines and patient representatives from SPAGN to define the best evidence-based practice for the optimal approach to TGCT and generate the recommendations presented herein.

Background: According to retrospective osteosarcoma series, ABCB1/P-glycoprotein (Pgp) overexpression predicts for poor outcomes. A prospective trial to assess a risk-adapted treatment strategy using mifamurtide in Pgp+ patients was performed. Methods: This was a phase 2, multicenter, uncontrolled trial including patients 40 years old or younger with nonmetastatic extremity high-grade osteosarcoma stratified according to Pgp expression. All patients received high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MAP) preoperatively. In Pgp+ patients, mifamurtide was added postoperatively and combined with MAP for a good histologic response (necrosis ≥ 90%; good responders [GRs]) or with high-dose ifosfamide (HDIFO) at 3 g/m2/d on days 1 to 5 for a histologic response < 90% (poor responders [PRs]). Pgp– patients received MAP postoperatively. After an amendment, the cumulative dose of methotrexate was increased from 60 to 120 g/m2 (from 5 to 10 courses). The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). A postamendment analysis was performed. Results: In all, 279 patients were recruited, and 194 were included in the postamendment analysis: 70 (36%) were Pgp–, and 124 (64%) were Pgp+. The median follow-up was 51 months. For Pgp+ patients, 5-year EFS after definitive surgery (null hypothesis, 40%) was 69.8% (90% confidence interval [CI], 62.2%-76.2%): 59.8% in PRs and 83.7% in GRs. For Pgp– patients, the 5-year EFS rate was 66.4% (90% CI, 55.6%-75.1%). Conclusions: This study showed that adjuvant mifamurtide, combined with HDIFO for a poor response to induction chemotherapy, could improve EFS in Pgp+ patients. Overall, the outcomes compared favorably with previous series. Mifamurtide and HDIFO as salvage chemotherapy are worth further study.

[Background] The value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is not completely understood. This study investigated the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to prognostic stratification based on the Sarculator nomogram for STS., [Methods] This study analyzed data from ISG-STS 1001, a randomized study that tested 3 cycles of neoadjuvant anthracycline plus ifosfamide (AI) or histology-tailored (HT) chemotherapy in adult patients with STS. The 10-year predicted overall survival (pr-OS) was estimated with the Sarculator and was stratified into higher (10-year pr-OS < 60%) and lower risk subgroups (10-year pr-OS ≥ 60%)., [Results] The median pr-OS was 0.63 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.51-0.72) for the entire study population, 0.62 (IQR, 0.51-0.70) for the AI arm, and 0.64 (IQR, 0.51-0.73) for the HT arm. Three- and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.93) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71-0.86) in lower risk patients and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.70-0.85) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.51-0.72) in the higher risk patients (log-rank test, P = .004). In higher risk patients, the 3- and 5-year Sarculator-predicted and study-observed OS rates were 0.68 and 0.58, respectively, and 0.85 and 0.66, respectively, in the AI arm (P = .04); the corresponding figures in the HT arm were 0.69 and 0.60, respectively, and 0.69 and 0.55, respectively (P > .99). In lower risk patients, the 3- and 5-year Sarculator-predicted and study-observed OS rates were 0.85 and 0.80, respectively, and 0.89 and 0.82, respectively, in the AI arm (P = .507); the corresponding figures in the HT arm were 0.87 and 0.81, respectively, and 0.86 and 0.74, respectively (P = .105)., [Conclusions] High-risk patients treated with AI performed better than predicted, and this adds to the evidence for the efficacy of neoadjuvant AI in STS., This was a nonfunded analysis. In the ISG-STS 1001 trial, PharmaMar provided trabectedin for the HG-MRLPS cohort. That trial was partially funded through a European Union grant (EUROSARC FP7 278472).

Primary spindle cell and pleomorphic sarcomas of bone represent an exceedingly rare group of mesenchymal malignancies that include "soft tissue" histotypes, as malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour. Outside the head and neck region, only 36 cases of primary malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour of bone have been described. We retrieved from our archives eight cases of primary malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour of bone arising outside the head and neck region, describing their clinical, radiological, and morphologic features. Our series, in which all but one patient died of diseases after a median of seven months, confirms that primary malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours of bone are aggressive tumours. Pathologists should be aware of this rare histotype. More aggressive and active adjuvant treatments should be investigated.

Background The Complexity INdex in SARComas (CINSARC) is a transcriptional signature derived from the expression of 67 genes involved in mitosis control and chromosome integrity. This study aims to assess CINSARC value of in an independent series of high-risk patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treated with preoperative chemotherapy within a prospective, randomized, phase III study (ISG-STS 1001). Patients and Methods Patients with available pre-treatment samples, treated with 3 cycles of either standard (ST) preoperative or histotype-tailored (HT) chemotherapy, were scored according to CINSARC (low-risk, C1; high-risk, C2). The 10-year overall survival probability (pr-OS) according to SARCULATOR was calculated, and patients were classified accordingly (low-risk, Sarc-LR, 10-year pr-OS>60%; high-risk, Sarc-HR, 10-year pr-OS

MRP-1 is implicated in multidrug resistance and was described as prognostic in high-risk patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in a previous study. The current research aimed to validate MRP-1 prognostic/predictive value in localized sarcomas treated with anthracyclines plus ifosfamide within the ISG-1001 phase III study. In addition, the inhibitory activity on MRP-1 was investigated in preclinical studies to identify new combinations able to increase the efficacy of standard chemotherapy in STS. MRP-1 expression was assessed by IHC in tissue microarrays from patients with STS and tested for correlation with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). In vitro studies tested the efficacy of MRP-1 inhibitors (nilotinib, ripretinib, selumetinib, and avapritinib) in sarcoma cell lines. The effect of combinations of the most active MRP-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy was measured on the basis of apoptosis. MRP-1 was evaluable in 231 of 264 cases who entered the study. MRP-1 expression (strong intensity) was independently associated with worse DFS [HR, 1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11–2.83; P = 0.016], in the multivariate analysis, with a trend for a worse OS (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.97–3.25; P = 0.062). In vitro studies showed that the addition of MRP-1 inhibitors (nilotinib or avapritinib) to doxorubicin plus palifosfamide, significantly increased cell death in SK-UT-1 and CP0024 cell lines. MRP-1 is an adverse predictive factor in localized high-risk patients with STS treated with neoadjuvant anthracyclines plus ifosfamide followed by surgery. In vitro findings support the clinical assessment of the combination of chemotherapy and MRP-1 inhibitors as a promising strategy to overcome the drug ceiling effect for chemotherapy., The study was partially funded through a European Union grant (EUROSARC FP7 278472). The authors would like to thank Patricio Ledesma Figueroa for Data Management. J. Martin-Broto, D.S. Moura and N. Hindi would like to thank the International Accelerator Award funded by Cancer Research UK [C56167/A29363], Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro [AIRC - 24297] and Fundacion Científica – Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer [Foundation AECC - GEACC19007MA]. D.S. Moura was supported by a Sara Borrell grant (CD20/00155) funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. C. Romagosa was supported by a grant from the “Programa d'impuls del talent i de l'ocupabilitat del PERIS 2016–2020.” J-Y. Blay would like to express gratitude for the support from NetSARC (INCA and DGOS) EURACAN (EC 739521) and LYRICAN (INCA-DGOS-INSERM 12563). The ISH1001 study was supported by Eurosarc (FP7–278742).

Introduction Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases has been associated with increased survival at 5 years for osteosarcoma, but limited information is available on long-term outcome, role of repeated metastasectomies, and surgical sequelae in a pediatric population. We analyzed a consecutive series of children, adolescents, and young adults (AYA) treated by repeated lung metastasectomies during a period >40 years to estimate the clinical benefit and potential cure rate of salvage surgery. Methods All patients who underwent lung metastasectomy for osteosarcoma at the IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli of Bologna, University of Modena, and IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan from May 1973 to January 2014 were included. Overall survival (OS) at 20 years from the first metastasectomy was calculated. Results A total of 463 consecutive children and AYA were analyzed. Median age was 15.9 years (range 0.2–23.2 years) and median follow-up 18.6 years. The 5- and 20-year OS were 34.0% and 29.7% (95% CI 25.5–34.0%). Among the 138 (29.8%) alive patients, 42 (30.4%) had disease recurrence cured by repeated metastasectomies. Disease-free interval from primary tumor, number of metastases, and complete resection were the most relevant survival predictors at multivariable model analysis. Discussion The extended follow-up of this consecutive series shows that repeated lung metastasectomy can achieve a permanent cure when offered to properly selected patients with metastases from osteosarcoma.

11508 Background: An ISG, GEIS, FSG and PSG randomized trial on 3 cycles of neoadjuvant epirubicine+ifosfamide (EI) versus a histology-tailored (HT) regimen in selected localized high-risk STS showed some superiority of EI in all histologies with the exception of Myxoid Liposarcoma (MLPS) where EI and HT regimens seemed equivalent (J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2178-86). This MLPS cohort was expanded with the aim to assess the non-inferiority of the HT regimen compared to EI. Methods: This was a multicenter European randomized trial comparing EI versus a HT regimen. Patients (pts) had localized high-risk (grade = 3; size >5 cm; deeply seated) undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, synovial sarcoma or MLPS of extremities or trunk wall. Primary end-point was Disease Free Survival (DFS). Secondary end-point was Overall Survival (OS). The MLPS cohort was expanded after the results of the 3rd interim analysis (Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:812-22) in order to reject the hypothesis that HT regimen trabectedin is associated with a HR of relapse = 1.25 with a non-inferiority design. To this aim, a Bayesian monitoring approach was used until the probability that the true HR is higher than 1.25 was greater than 80% or smaller than 5%. Results: From May 2011 to June 2020, 101 pts affected by high-risk MLPS were randomized, 56 to EI and 45 to HT regimen. The median follow-up was 66 months (IQ range 37-89). Median size was 107 mm (IQ range 84-143), 108 mm (IQ range 86-150) in the EI and 106 mm (IQ range75-135) in the HT arm. The DFS and OS probabilities at 60 months were 0.86 and 0.73 (HR:0.60; 95%CI: 0.24-1.46; log rank p = 0.26 for DFS) and 0.88 and 0.90 (HR:1.20; 95%CI:0.37-3.93; log rank p = 0.77 for OS), in the HT and EI arm, respectively. 5-yr observed and Sarculator-predicted OS were 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.97) and 0.80 in all patients (p = 0.020), 0.90 (95% CI 0.81-1.00) and 0.79 in the EI arm (p = 0.049) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.77-1.00) and 0.81 in the HT arm (p = 0.204) respectively. Conclusions: In the expanded cohort of MLPS, the HT neoadjuvant therapy trabectedin was not inferior to EI. While survival in both arms was better than predicted by Sarculator, it is left to understand whether this patient population, who had on average a lower Sarculator-predicted risk of death compared with the rest of the trial population, may benefit from a neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01710176.

11559 Background: Over the last decade, the category of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas (URCS), defined by the absence of Ewing sarcoma-associated translocations, has emerged. Aim of this study was to assess prevalence of each entity and outcome after genomic classification. Methods: Ewing sarcoma and other URCS diagnosed between 1920 and 2020 were reviewed. All URCS with available material were analyzed with FISH, RT-qPCR and/or Archer FusionPlex Sarcoma Panel. Demographic and treatment were collected. Survival was analyzed in patients with available follow-up. Results: 1995 cases identified, 20 cases lacked material for further genetic analysis and were excluded. 1975 cases were classified as follows: 1925 Ewing sarcomas (97.47%), 25 CIC-rearranged sarcomas (1.27%), 16 BCOR-CCNB3 rearranged sarcomas (0.81%), 2 EWSR1-NFATC2 sarcoma (0.1%), one each as CIC-LEUTX and FUS-NFATC2 rearranged sarcoma (0.05% each), and 5 as unclassified URCS (0.25%). A different presentation according to tumor type was shown in 43/50 ultra-rare tumors (Table). Forty-one/50 cases had available follow-up: 20/41 patients underwent surgery, 14/41 surgery+radiotherapy, 6 radiotherapy only, and no local treatment for 1 patient. Chemotherapy was administrated to 36/41 patients (Ewing sarcoma drugs in 16/22 CIC-DUX-4 and 8/11 BCOR-CCNB3; osteosarcoma drugs in 2/11 BCOR-CCNB3, and doxorubicin/ifosfamide in 2/22 CIC-DUX4 and 2/5 URCS; not specified in 6 cases). The 3-years overall survival (OS) was 32.7%f for CIC-rearranged sarcomas (75% in localize disease, 7,7% for the advanced disease, p 0.0084), 81.8% for BCOR-CCNB3 sarcomas (87.5% localized, 66.7% advanced; p 0.0734), and 60% for URCS (p 0.057). 1 patient with CIC-LEUTX sarcoma presenting with metastases died 13 months from diagnosis, 1 patient with FUS-NFATC2 and 1 with EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrenged sarcomas were alive without disease at 8 and 5 years from onset. Conclusions: Prevalence of URCS characterized by a combination of morphologic observation ad molecular techniques is provided. The majority of the cases underwent surgery or surgery combined with radiotherapy, and Ewing-like chemotherapy. The survival difference among different entities underscores the need of accurate subclassification of round cell sarcomas. Novel drugs for CIC-DUX-4 sarcomas presenting with metastases are needed. [Table: see text]

11532 Background: Limited are data on high-grade osteosarcoma occurring in the spine. Wide resection is recommended, but it is a difficult and high morbidity procedure in the spine. High-energy particle therapy has been recently used. The goal of this study was to examine treatment and outcome of patients with osteosarcoma in the mobile spine. Methods: Spine high grade osteosarcoma patients who underwent surgery at the Rizzoli Institute between 2009 and 2020 were identified. Treatment, outcome, and prognostic factors in patients treated in a single institution were examined. Results: Characteristics of the 20 patients (8 female; 12 male) included: median age, 39.7 years (range, 14-71 years), 5 (25%) with tumors in the cervical spine, 6 (30%) with tumors in the thoracic spine, and 9 with tumors in the lumbar spine (45%); 14 (70%) patients with localized disease and 6 (30%) with metastatic disease at the time of presentation. Nineteen patients (95%) underwent chemotherapy, the majority were treated with MAP (methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin) regimen. In 12 patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy (n = 11) or chemotherapy and radiotherapy (n = 1), the median tumor % necrosis was 20 (IQR 20 - 40), with none achieving a good histologic response (> 90%). All patients underwent surgery. Adequate surgical margins were achieved in 5 patients (25%). In patients with positive margins, radiotherapy was administered to 8 (40%) patients. Four patients with positive margins after resection received photon neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Four patients received high-energy particles as adjuvant therapy after planned gross total excision. The median overall survival rate was 10.5 months (IQR 5.8 - 15.0) for patients with metastatic disease and 25.5 months (IQR 8.3 - 46.0) for patients with localized disease (P =.0501). Patients treated with planned intralesional gross total resection followed by adjuvant high-energy particle therapy had a significant higher disease-specific survival than patients with positive margins after resection with or without additional conventional radiotherapy (P =.023). Conclusions: Metastatic disease, is a poor prognostic factor for high grade osteosarcoma of the spine. Post-operative high-energy particle therapy improved overall survival in patients undergoing a planned gross total resection compared to intralesional resection in this series. Chemotherapy induced necrosis was low underscoring the need of more aggressive multidisciplinary approaches for these patients.