Search

Abstract Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a form of thermal ablation, employs localized heat to induce protein denaturation in tissue cells, resulting in cell death. It has emerged as a viable treatment option for patients who are ineligible for surgery in various diseases, particularly liver cancer and other tumor‐related conditions. In addition to directly eliminating tumor cells, RFA also induces alterations in the infiltrating cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME), which can significantly impact treatment outcomes. Moreover, incomplete RFA (iRFA) may lead to tumor recurrence and metastasis. The current challenge is to enhance the efficacy of RFA by elucidating its underlying mechanisms. This review discusses the clinical applications of RFA in treating various diseases and the mechanisms that contribute to the survival and invasion of tumor cells following iRFA, including the roles of heat shock proteins, hypoxia, and autophagy. Additionally, we analyze‌ the changes occurring in infiltrating cells within the TME after iRFA. Finally, we provide a comprehensive summary of clinical trials involving RFA in conjunction with other treatment modalities in the field of cancer therapy, aiming to offer novel insights and references for improving the effectiveness of RFA.

Abstract Background Studies exploring whether metastatic organotropism and risk in gastric cancer (GC) differ by primary anatomical site are scarce. Methods This study included 15,260 and 1623 patients diagnosed with GC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry database and the Nanfang Hospital in China, respectively. Patients were stratified according to primary site of GC, and the incidence of metastasis to different organs was used to determine the metastatic organotropism for each GC subsite. Finally, the metastatic organotropism and risk were compared among the different subsite groups. Results Liver metastasis was the most common metastasis site in cardia GC, whereas other‐site metastases were more common in the body, antrum, overlapping lesions, and unspecified GCs. Liver and other‐site metastases were also frequently observed in the fundus, pylorus, lesser curvature, and greater curvature GCs. Patients with GC with definite primary tumor sites in the SEER and validation Nanfang hospital cohorts were compared by grouping as proximal and distal GCs for further analysis. In the SEER cohort, the top three metastatic sites of proximal GC were liver (21.4%), distant lymph node (LN) (14.6%), and other‐site (mainly peritoneum, 11.9%), whereas those of distal GC were other‐site (mainly peritoneum, 19.5%), liver (11.8%), and distant LN (9.5%). The incidence of metastasis to the liver, distant LN, lung, and brain was significantly higher in patients with proximal GC than in those with distal GC in both the SEER and Nanfang cohorts (p

Backgrounds: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are considered cornerstones of oncology treatment with durable anti-tumor efficacy, but the increasing use of ICIs is associated with the risk of developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Although ICI-associated pancreatic adverse events (AEs) have been reported in patients treated with ICIs, the clinical features and spectrum of pancreatic AEs are still not well-defined. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the association between pancreatic AEs and ICIs treatments and to characterize the main features of ICI-related pancreatic injury (ICIPI) based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Data from the first quarter of 2015 to the first quarter of 2021 in the database were extracted to conduct a disproportionality analysis. The selection of AEs related to the pancreas relied on previous studies and preferred terms from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Two main disproportionality analyses—the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC)—were used to evaluate potential associations between ICIs and pancreatic AEs. Results: In total, 2,364 cases of pancreatic AEs in response to ICIs were extracted from the FAERS database, of which, 647 were identified as ICI-associated pancreatitis and 1,293 were identified as ICI-associated diabetes mellitus. Generally, significant signals can be detected between pancreatic AEs and all ICIs treatments (ROR025 = 3.30, IC025 = 1.71). For monotherapy, the strongest signal associated with pancreatitis was reported for anti-PD-L1 (ROR025 = 1.75, IC025 = 0.76), whereas that with diabetes mellitus was reported for anti-PD-1 (ROR025 = 6.39, IC025 = 2.66). Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy showed stronger associations with both ICI-associated pancreatitis (ROR025 = 2.35, IC025 = 1.20 vs. ROR025 = 1.52, IC025 = 0.59) and ICI-associated diabetes mellitus (ROR025 = 9.53, IC025 = 3.23 vs. ROR025 = 5.63, IC025 = 2.48), but lower fatality proportion. Conclusions: ICIs were significantly associated with the over-reporting frequency of pancreatic AEs, in which combination therapy posed a higher reporting frequency. Therefore, patients should be informed of these potential toxicities before ICIs medications are administered.