Search

Your search keyword '"Gennaro Fiorentino"' showing total 2 results
Start Over Author "Gennaro Fiorentino" Publication Year Range Last 3 years
2 results on '"Gennaro Fiorentino"'

1. The international Hip Outcome Tool 12 questionnaire (iHOT-12): an Italian language cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Author

Filippo Randelli, Alberto Fioruzzi, Alice Clemente, Alessandra Radaelli, Alessandra Menon, Danilo Di Via, Clemente Caria, Manuel Giovanni Mazzoleni, Claudio Buono, Paolo Di Benedetto, Michele Paciotti, Rocco Papalia, Gennaro Fiorentino, Marco Collarile, Manlio Panasci, Christian Carulli, Marco Rosolani, Federico Della Rocca, Simona Cerulli, Domenico Potestio, Michele Conati, Alberto Costantini, Gian Nicola Bisciotti, Alessandro Aprato, Loris Perticarini, Nicola Santori, Mattia Loppini, Giuseppe Solarino, Giovanni Vicenti, Vito Pavone, Alberto Di Martino, and Fabrizio Rivera

Subjects
Hip, Proms, iHOT12, Score, Validation, Italian, Orthopedic surgery, RD701-811
Abstract

Abstract Background Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are essential for evaluating disease-related quality of life. The International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT12) assesses various aspects of hip-related symptoms, function, sports participation, and social limitations. This study aimed to adapt and validate an Italian version of the iHOT12 according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Materials and methods A multicenter observational cohort study was conducted to translate and validate the iHOT-12 into Italian (iHOT-12-ita) and assess its psychometric properties. Following international guidelines, we translated and culturally adapted the iHOT-12-ita. Patients with hip pain included in the study completed the iHOT-12-ita and mHHS-ita questionnaires at three timepoints: initial consultation (T0), 10–20 days later (T1), and at least 2 months after treatment (T2): hip injection, hip arthroscopy or total hip replacement. The evaluation of the iHOT-12-ita psychometric properties was conducted following the COSMIN checklist, assessing its reliability, responsiveness, interpretability, and acceptability. Results Between May 2019 to September 2022, 104 patients were included, from two tertiary hip surgery referral center clinics, they completed both questionnaires and were available for data analysis. The psychometric evaluations revealed robust test–retest reliability on 27 patients at T1, with a Lin coefficient of 0.709 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.553–0.888] and a high Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.745. At T2 after treatment, there was significant responsiveness (p

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Clinical and radiological outcomes of autologous humeral bone grafting for radial head reconstruction: a minimum 2-year follow-up

Author

Riccardo D’Ambrosi, Federico Giuseppe Usuelli, Gennaro Fiorentino, Francesco Catellani, and Mario Arduini

Subjects
musculoskeletal diseases, Joint Instability, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, Elbow, Pain, Bone healing, Bone grafting, Prosthesis, Fracture Fixation, Internal, Elbow Joint, Autograft, medicine, Settore MED/33 - Malattie Apparato Locomotore, Humans, Bone graft, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Humerus, Prospective Studies, Radial head reconstruction, Upper limb, Range of Motion, Articular, Retrospective Studies, Bone Transplantation, business.industry, musculoskeletal system, Surgery, medicine.anatomical_structure, Treatment Outcome, Radial head fracture, Range of motion, business, Radius Fractures, Follow-Up Studies
Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the clinical and functional results of radial head reconstruction with an autologous bone graft from distal humerus in 12 patients, with a follow-up for a period of 24 months. From March 2017 to June 2018, we surgically treated 12 patients using an autologous bone graft from the lateral distal metaphysis of the homolateral humerus. Patients were divided into two groups: -Group A consisted of patients with previous failed ORIF for radial head fracture. Patients underwent revision surgery at an average time of 7 months (between 6 to 8 months) from the first surgery. All the patients reported pain during the elbow range of motion with no gross clinical signs or instability of the joint. They all presented standard X-ray and CT-scan of the elbow suggestive of non-union fracture. None of them presented osteoarthritic modification at the time of surgery. -Group B consisted of patients reporting acute irreparable radial head fractures. Patients were evaluated clinically at 6-, 12-, and 24-months duration according to Disabilities of the Arm. Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and Visual analogue score for pain (VAS);, range of motion (ROM) was evaluated at 6 and 24 months after surgery. Plain radiographs on anteroposterior and lateral views of the elbow were evaluated at final follow-up. In both, groups (A and B) patients showed a significant improvement with regards to VAS, MEPS, and DASH at each follow-up (p

Published
2022

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results