Search

Detection of neuronal antibodies for autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes relies on commercially available cell-based assays and lineblots. However, lineblots may reveal the presence of neuronal antibodies in patients with various non-autoimmune etiologies. Herein we describe patients with non-autoimmune etiologies (cohort B) and detectable neuronal antibodies and compare them to definite cases of autoimmune encephalitis (cohort A) for differences in clinical data. All patients positive for at least one neuronal antibody were retrospectively evaluated for autoimmune encephalitis and/or paraneoplastic neurological syndrome between 2016 and 2022. 39 cases in cohort B and 23 in cohort A were identified. In cohort B, most common diagnoses were neurodegenerative disorders in 9/39 (23.1%), brain tumors in 6/39 (15.4%) while most common detected antibodies were anti-titin (N10), anti-recoverin (N11), anti-Yo (N8) and all were detected in serum only. Differential aspects between cohort A and B were CSF pleocytosis (14/23 (60.8%) vs 11/35 (31.4%), p = 0.042, respectively), MRI features suggestive of encephalitis (6/23 (26.1%) vs 0 (0%), p = 0.002, respectively) and epilepsy restricted to temporal lobes (14/23 (60.9%) vs 2/30 (6.7%), p = 0.0003, respectively). A large proportion of lineblot results were non-specific when only serum was tested and were frequently found in non-autoimmune neurological conditions., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To assess the differences of treatment outcomes regarding disease activity in patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or alemtuzumab (ATZ)., Methods: Open-label prospective single-center observational cohort study, enrolling patients with highly active RMS for treatment with ATZ or HSCT between 2014 and 2021., Results: A total of 50 patients (31/50 (62 %) in HSCT vs 19/50 (38 %) in ATZ group) were included. There were no significant differences in relapse rate, MRI activity or disability worsening between the two study groups during the first two years after treatment onset. However, at 3 to 5 years follow-up, HSCT was superior to ATZ in all the aforementioned aspects. Kaplan-Meier analysis at 5 years post treatment revealed superiority of HSCT in relapse rate (69.6 % vs 95.7 %, p = 0.027), MRI activity (54.5 % vs 75.1 %, p = 0.038) and disability worsening (57.1 % vs 90.9 %, p =  0.031)., Conclusions: ATZ may halt disability progression early in the course of highly active RMS, but the disability starts accumulating later, while in HSCT patients disability improvement is consistent both 3 and 5 years after treatment onset., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest M.V. Conception and design of the study, primary data analysis, drafting of the manuscript; G.F.K. Overall revision for accuracy of the data, tables and Figures, scientific accuracy of the manuscript; R.K. Concept of the study, revision of the manuscript for scientific accuracy; V.T. Data analysis, drafting of the manuscript, revision for scientific accuracy; N.G. conception and design of the study, acquisition of the data, analysis and interpretation of the data, and drafting of the manuscript, revision for scientific accuracy. All of the authors discussed the results and contributed to and approved the final manuscript., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ofatumumab, the first fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is approved in several countries for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS)., Objective: To demonstrate the bioequivalence of ofatumumab administered by an autoinjector versus a pre-filled syringe (PFS) and to explore the effect of ofatumumab on B-cell depletion., Methods: APLIOS (NCT03560739) is a 12-week, open-label, parallel-group, phase-2 study in patients with RMS receiving subcutaneous ofatumumab 20 mg every 4 weeks (q4w) (from Week 4, after initial doses on Days 1, 7, and 14). Patients were randomized 10:10:1:1 to autoinjector or PFS in the abdomen, or autoinjector or PFS in the thigh, respectively. Bioequivalence was determined by area under the curve (AUC τ ) and maximum plasma concentration ( C max ) for Weeks 8-12. B-cell depletion and safety/tolerability were assessed., Results: A total of 256 patients contributed to the bioequivalence analyses (autoinjector-abdomen, n = 128; PFS-abdomen, n = 128). Abdominal ofatumumab pharmacokinetic exposure was bioequivalent for autoinjector and PFS (geometric mean AUC τ , 487.7 vs 474.1 h × µg/mL (ratio 1.03); C max , 1.409 vs 1.409 µg/mL (ratio 1.00)). B-cell counts (median cells/µL) depleted rapidly in all groups from 214.0 (baseline) to 2.0 (Day 14). Ofatumumab was well tolerated., Conclusion: Ofatumumab 20 mg q4w self-administered subcutaneously via autoinjector is bioequivalent to PFS administration and provides rapid B-cell depletion.