1. Accuracy of formulas for intraocular lens power for eyes undergoing descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and cataract surgery.
- Author
-
Boccia R, Scorcia V, Lanza M, Luciano G, Lucisano A, Sbordone S, Melillo P, and Simonelli F
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Aged, Female, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, Adult, Visual Acuity physiology, Phacoemulsification, Retrospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty methods, Lenses, Intraocular, Refraction, Ocular physiology, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Biometry methods, Optics and Photonics
- Abstract
Background: To compare accuracy in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in eyes undergoing combined cataract and Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (C-DSAEK) surgery of the following formulas: Barrett Universal II, EVO, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 2, Kane and SRK/T., Methods: 72 eyes from 72 patients (38 males, (53%)) with a mean age 68.08 ± 8.69 years (from 44 to 88 years old) underwent combined C-DSAEK were included. The IOL powers to implant were calculated with Barrett Universal II formula targeting -1 D refraction. Preoperative and postoperative data were used to obtain the median of absolute prediction errors (MAE) targeting emmetropia with every tested formula., Results: Means of MAE calculated were +1.45 D for Barrett Universal II, +1.37 D for EVO, +1.48 D for Haigis, +1.38 D for Hoffer Q, +1.37 D for Holladay 2, +1.39 D for Kane and +1.31 D for SRK/T. SRK/T MAE showed major significant (p < 0.01) differences compared to the other formulas., Discussion: Even if tested formulas are not able to accurately target emmetropia, SRK/T seems to be able to provide closer results in eyes undergoing C-DSAEK., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF