17 results on '"Glotz D"'
Search Results
2. Utilisation de l'Echantillon généraliste des bénéficiaires (EGB) pour décrire les modalités de prescription des traitements Immunosuppresseurs (IS) chez les transplantés rénaux en France
- Author
-
Anglicheau, D., primary, Bardoulat, I., additional, Arnaud, M., additional, Fouad, F., additional, Bregman, B., additional, Cotte, F-E., additional, Vadanici, R., additional, Durrbach, A., additional, and Glotz, D., additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Proposed Definitions of Antibody-Mediated Rejection for Use as a Clinical Trial Endpoint in Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Roufosse, C., Becker, J.U., Rabant, M., Seron, D., Bellini, M.I., Böhmig, G.A., Budde, K., Diekmann, F., Glotz, D., Hilbrands, L.B., Loupy, A., Oberbauer, R., Pengel, L., Schneeberger, S., Naesens, M., Roufosse, C., Becker, J.U., Rabant, M., Seron, D., Bellini, M.I., Böhmig, G.A., Budde, K., Diekmann, F., Glotz, D., Hilbrands, L.B., Loupy, A., Oberbauer, R., Pengel, L., Schneeberger, S., and Naesens, M.
- Abstract
Item does not contain fulltext, Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is caused by antibodies that recognize donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or other targets. As knowledge of AMR pathophysiology has increased, a combination of factors is necessary to confirm the diagnosis and phenotype. However, frequent modifications to the AMR definition have made it difficult to compare data and evaluate associations between AMR and graft outcome. The present paper was developed following a Broad Scientific Advice request from the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which explored whether updating guidelines on clinical trial endpoints would encourage innovations in kidney transplantation research. ESOT considers that an AMR diagnosis must be based on a combination of histopathological factors and presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies in the recipient. Evidence for associations between individual features of AMR and impaired graft outcome is noted for microvascular inflammation scores ≥2 and glomerular basement membrane splitting of >10% of the entire tuft in the most severely affected glomerulus. Together, these should form the basis for AMR-related endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation, although modifications and restrictions to the Banff diagnostic definition of AMR are proposed for this purpose. The EMA provided recommendations based on this Broad Scientific Advice request in December 2020; further discussion, and consensus on the restricted definition of the AMR endpoint, is required.
- Published
- 2022
4. Surrogate Endpoints for Late Kidney Transplantation Failure
- Author
-
Naesens, M., Budde, K., Hilbrands, L.B., Oberbauer, R., Bellini, M.I., Glotz, D., Grinyó, J., Heemann, U., Jochmans, I., Pengel, L., Reinders, M., Schneeberger, S., Loupy, A., Naesens, M., Budde, K., Hilbrands, L.B., Oberbauer, R., Bellini, M.I., Glotz, D., Grinyó, J., Heemann, U., Jochmans, I., Pengel, L., Reinders, M., Schneeberger, S., and Loupy, A.
- Abstract
Contains fulltext : 252106.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), In kidney transplant recipients, late graft failure is often multifactorial. In addition, primary endpoints in kidney transplantation studies seek to demonstrate the short-term efficacy and safety of clinical interventions. Although such endpoints might demonstrate short-term improvement in specific aspects of graft function or incidence of rejection, such findings do not automatically translate into meaningful long-term graft survival benefits. Combining many factors into a well-validated model is therefore more likely to predict long-term outcome and better reflect the complexity of late graft failure than using single endpoints. If conditional marketing authorization could be considered for therapies that aim to improve long-term outcomes following kidney transplantation, then the surrogate endpoint for graft failure in clinical trial settings needs clearer definition. This Consensus Report considers the potential benefits and drawbacks of several candidate surrogate endpoints (including estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, histological lesions, and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies) and composite scoring systems. The content was created from information prepared by a working group within the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT). The group submitted a Broad Scientific Advice request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), June 2020: the request focused on clinical trial design and endpoints in kidney transplantation. Following discussion and refinement, the EMA made final recommendations to ESOT in December 2020 regarding the potential to use surrogate endpoints in clinical studies that aim to improving late graft failure.
- Published
- 2022
5. Rationale for Surrogate Endpoints and Conditional Marketing Authorization of New Therapies for Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Naesens, M., Loupy, A., Hilbrands, L.B., Oberbauer, R., Bellini, M.I., Glotz, D., Grinyó, J., Heemann, U., Jochmans, I., Pengel, L., Reinders, M., Schneeberger, S., Budde, K., Naesens, M., Loupy, A., Hilbrands, L.B., Oberbauer, R., Bellini, M.I., Glotz, D., Grinyó, J., Heemann, U., Jochmans, I., Pengel, L., Reinders, M., Schneeberger, S., and Budde, K.
- Abstract
Contains fulltext : 252103.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), Conditional marketing authorization (CMA) facilitates timely access to new drugs for illnesses with unmet clinical needs, such as late graft failure after kidney transplantation. Late graft failure remains a serious, burdensome, and life-threatening condition for recipients. This article has been developed from content prepared by members of a working group within the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) for a Broad Scientific Advice request, submitted by ESOT to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and reviewed by the EMA in 2020. The article presents the rationale for using surrogate endpoints in clinical trials aiming at improving late graft failure rates, to enable novel kidney transplantation therapies to be considered for CMA and improve access to medicines. The paper also provides background data to illustrate the relationship between primary and surrogate endpoints. Developing surrogate endpoints and a CMA strategy could be particularly beneficial for studies where the use of primary endpoints would yield insufficient statistical power or insufficient indication of long-term benefit following transplantation.
- Published
- 2022
6. Proposed Definitions of T Cell-Mediated Rejection and Tubulointerstitial Inflammation as Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Seron, D., Rabant, M., Becker, J.U., Roufosse, C., Bellini, M.I., Böhmig, G.A., Budde, K., Diekmann, F., Glotz, D., Hilbrands, L.B., Loupy, A., Oberbauer, R., Pengel, L., Schneeberger, S., Naesens, M., Seron, D., Rabant, M., Becker, J.U., Roufosse, C., Bellini, M.I., Böhmig, G.A., Budde, K., Diekmann, F., Glotz, D., Hilbrands, L.B., Loupy, A., Oberbauer, R., Pengel, L., Schneeberger, S., and Naesens, M.
- Abstract
Contains fulltext : 252101.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), The diagnosis of acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR) after kidney transplantation has considerable relevance for research purposes. Its definition is primarily based on tubulointerstitial inflammation and has changed little over time; aTCMR is therefore a suitable parameter for longitudinal data comparisons. In addition, because aTCMR is managed with antirejection therapies that carry additional risks, anxieties, and costs, it is a clinically meaningful endpoint for studies. This paper reviews the history and classifications of TCMR and characterizes its potential role in clinical trials: a role that largely depends on the nature of the biopsy taken (indication vs protocol), the level of inflammation observed (e.g., borderline changes vs full TCMR), concomitant chronic lesions (chronic active TCMR), and the therapeutic intervention planned. There is ongoing variability-and ambiguity-in clinical monitoring and management of TCMR. More research, to investigate the clinical relevance of borderline changes (especially in protocol biopsies) and effective therapeutic strategies that improve graft survival rates with minimal patient morbidity, is urgently required. The present paper was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the European Medicines Agency for discussion in 2020. This paper proposes to move toward refined definitions of aTCMR and borderline changes to be included as primary endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation.
- Published
- 2022
7. The role of donor hypertension and angiotensin II in the occurrence of early pancreas allograft thrombosis.
- Author
-
Masset C, Branchereau J, Buron F, Karam G, Rabeyrin M, Renaudin K, Le Borgne F, Badet L, Matillon X, Legendre C, Glotz D, Antoine C, Giral M, Dantal J, and Cantarovich D
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Adult, Risk Factors, Graft Survival, Allografts, Retrospective Studies, Graft Rejection immunology, Pancreas Transplantation adverse effects, Hypertension etiology, Thrombosis etiology, Tissue Donors, Angiotensin II
- Abstract
Background: About 10-20% of pancreas allografts are still lost in the early postoperative period despite the identification of numerous detrimental risk factors that correlate with graft thrombosis., Methods: We conducted a multicenter study including 899 pancreas transplant recipients between 2000 and 2018. Early pancreas failure due to complete thrombosis, long-term pancreas, kidney and patient survivals were analyzed and adjusted to donor, recipient and perioperative variables using a multivariate cause-specific Cox model stratified to transplant centers., Results: Pancreas from donors with history of hypertension (6.7%), as well as with high body mass index (BMI), were independently associated with an increased risk of pancreas failure within the first 30 post-operative days (respectively, HR= 2.57, 95% CI from 1.35 to 4.89 and HR= 1.11, 95% CI from 1.04 to 1.19). Interaction term between hypertension and BMI was negative. Donor hypertension also impacted long-term pancreas survival (HR= 1.88, 95% CI from 1.13 to 3.12). However, when pancreas survival was calculated after the postoperative day 30, donor hypertension was no longer a significant risk factor (HR= 1.22, 95% CI from 0.47 to 3.15). A lower pancreas survival was observed in patients receiving a pancreas from a hypertensive donor without RAAS (Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System) blockers compared to others (50% vs 14%, p < 0.001). Pancreas survival was similar among non-hypertensive donors and hypertensive ones under RAAS blockers., Conclusion: Donor hypertension was a significant and independent risk factor of pancreas failure. The well-known pathogenic role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system seems to be involved in the genesis of this immediate graft failure., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Masset, Branchereau, Buron, Karam, Rabeyrin, Renaudin, Le Borgne, Badet, Matillon, Legendre, Glotz, Antoine, Giral, Dantal, Cantarovich and DIVAT Consortium.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Restriction of interleukin-6 alters endothelial cell immunogenicity in an allogenic environment.
- Author
-
Lion J, Maitre ML, de Truchis C, Taupin JL, Poussin K, Haziot A, Chong E, Glotz D, and Mooney N
- Subjects
- Humans, Endothelial Cells metabolism, Leukocytes, Mononuclear metabolism, Antibodies, Inflammation metabolism, Graft Rejection, HLA Antigens, Isoantibodies, Interleukin-6 metabolism, Kidney Transplantation
- Abstract
The microvascular endothelium of the renal transplant is the first site of graft interaction with the host immune system and is often injured in chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR). Microvascular inflammation is an independent determinant of AMR and heightens endothelial expression of HLA molecules thereby increasing the possibility of Donor Specific Antibody (DSA) binding. Endothelial cells produce IL-6 in the steady-state and this is increased by inflammation or by HLA-DR antibody binding in an allogeneic setting. Because IL-6 has been implicated in AMR, IL-6 blockade is currently under investigation as a therapeutic target. To further understand the role of IL-6 in endothelial cell immunogenicity, we have examined whether humanized antibody blockade of IL-6 altered endothelial cell interactions with allogeneic PBMC and after anti-HLA or DSA binding to endothelial cells in an in vitro human experimental model. Soluble factors, endothelial phenotype, Stat-3 activation, CD4
+ -T differentiation, and C4d deposition were examined. Blockade of IL-6 reduced endothelial cell secretion of IL-6 and of the monocyte chemoattractant MCP-1. Pre-activation of endothelial cells by anti-HLA or DSA binding increased IL-6 secretion, that was further increased by concurrent binding of both antibodies and this was inhibited by IL-6 blockade. Activation of Stat-3 in CD4+ -T mediated by soluble factors produced in endothelial-PBMC interactions, and endothelial differentiation of CD4+ -T cell subsets (Th1, Th17, Treg), were impaired whereas activation of Complement by anti-HLA antibody binding remained unchanged by IL-6 blockade. Together, these data identify EC-mediated pro-inflammatory responses (T cell expansion, EC auto-activation, chemokine secretion) targeted by IL-6 blockade., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. [Medication adherence in renal transplantation: Evaluation, predictive factors and impact on humoral alloreactivity].
- Author
-
Vengadessane S, Viglietti D, Sauvageon H, Glotz D, Lefaucheur C, Madelaine I, and Deville L
- Subjects
- Humans, Cross-Sectional Studies, Medication Adherence, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Report, Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use, Graft Rejection prevention & control, Kidney Transplantation
- Abstract
Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess medication adherence to immunosuppressive treatment in kidney transplanted patients, to identify predictive factors of medication non-adherence and to analyse its impact on the development of Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) de novo, biomarkers of rejection in transplant recipients., Methods: A cross-sectional single-centre study was conducted to assess medication adherence to immunosuppressive treatment with the BAASIS (Basel Assessment of Adherence Scale for Immunosuppressives) self-report questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine non-adherence predictive factors and its role in the development of DSA de novo., Results: A total of 212 renal transplanted patients completed the BAASIS questionnaire: 36,3 % were non-adherent to their immunosuppressive treatment. Patient's age and taking azathioprine were independent predictors of non-adherence and "married or living together" family status was a protective factor in the multivariate analysis. Medication non-adherence was associated with DSA de novo development in the multivariate model and it multiplied their risk of development by 3., Conclusions: This study, which detected a large proportion of patients who did not adhere to immunosuppressive treatment, highlighted non-adherence predictors and showed the association between non-adherence and development of DSA de novo. In case of non-adherent behavior, it is crucial to set up a personalised support for patients with a multidisciplinary approach of therapeutic education, in which the clinical pharmacist has a role., (Copyright © 2022 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Improving equity in kidney transplant allocation policies through a novel genetic metric: The Matched Donor Potential.
- Author
-
Tambur AR, Audry B, Glotz D, and Jacquelinet C
- Subjects
- Humans, Tissue Donors, Kidney, HLA Antigens, Graft Survival, Histocompatibility Testing methods, Kidney Transplantation methods, Tissue and Organ Procurement
- Abstract
The demand for donors' kidneys continues to increase amid a shortage of available donors. Managing policies to thoughtfully allocate this scarce resource is a complex process. Although human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching has been shown to prolong graft survival, its relative contribution to allocation schemes is empirically compromised owing to competing priorities. We explored using a new metric, Matched Donor Potential (MDP), to facilitate improved HLA matching while promoting equity. We interrogated all active kidney waitlist patients (N = 164 427), their corresponding unacceptable antigen files, and all effective donors in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2017). Cause-specific hazard functions were evaluated to assess the potential impact of the MDP metric on deceased donor transplant access rates for all candidates. Access was affected by ethnicity, blood group type, and calculated Panel Reactive Antibody (cPRA). Importantly, we show that access to transplantation is influenced by the patient's own HLA makeup regardless of their ethnicity and by the HLA makeup of effective donors. The MDP metric demonstrates a high association with access to transplantation. Adjusting Cox models to include this new metric resulted in improved access to kidney transplantation for waitlist candidates of minority heritage while significantly promoting HLA matching. Thus, the MDP metric accounts for balanced, equitable organ allocation algorithms., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Restriction of interleukin-6 alters endothelial cell immunogenicity in an allogenic environment.
- Author
-
Lion J, Maitre ML, de Truchis C, Taupin JL, Poussin K, Haziot A, Chong E, Glotz D, and Mooney N
- Subjects
- Humans, Leukocytes, Mononuclear metabolism, Antibodies, HLA Antigens, Inflammation metabolism, Graft Rejection etiology, Isoantibodies, Interleukin-6 metabolism, Endothelial Cells metabolism
- Abstract
The microvascular endothelium of the renal transplant is the first site of graft interaction with the host immune system and is often injured in chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR). Microvascular inflammation is an independent determinant of AMR and heightens endothelial expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules thereby increasing the possibility of Donor Specific Antibody (DSA) binding. Endothelial cells (ECs) produce IL-6 in the steady-state that is increased by inflammation or by HLA-DR antibody binding in an allogeneic setting. Because IL-6 has been implicated in AMR, IL-6 blockade is currently under investigation as a therapeutic target. To further understand the role of IL-6 in EC immunogenicity, we have examined whether humanized antibody blockade of IL-6 altered EC interactions with allogeneic PBMC and after anti-HLA or DSA binding to ECs in an in vitro human experimental model. Soluble factors, endothelial phenotype, Stat-3 activation, CD4
+ -T differentiation and C4d deposition were examined. Blockade of IL-6 reduced EC secretion of IL-6 and of the monocyte chemoattractant MCP-1. Pre-activation of ECs by anti-HLA or DSA binding increased IL-6 secretion, that was further increased by concurrent binding of both antibodies and this was inhibited by IL-6 blockade. Activation of Stat-3 in CD4+ -T mediated by soluble factors produced in endothelial-PBMC interactions, and endothelial differentiation of CD4+ -T cell subsets (Th1, Treg), were impaired whereas activation of Complement by anti-HLA antibody binding remained unchanged by IL-6 blockade. Together, these data identify EC-mediated pro-inflammatory responses (T cell expansion, EC auto-activation, chemokine secretion) targeted by IL-6 blockade., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Proposed Definitions of Antibody-Mediated Rejection for Use as a Clinical Trial Endpoint in Kidney Transplantation.
- Author
-
Roufosse C, Becker JU, Rabant M, Seron D, Bellini MI, Böhmig GA, Budde K, Diekmann F, Glotz D, Hilbrands L, Loupy A, Oberbauer R, Pengel L, Schneeberger S, and Naesens M
- Subjects
- Antibodies, Biopsy, Graft Rejection, HLA Antigens, Humans, Isoantibodies, Kidney Transplantation
- Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is caused by antibodies that recognize donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or other targets. As knowledge of AMR pathophysiology has increased, a combination of factors is necessary to confirm the diagnosis and phenotype. However, frequent modifications to the AMR definition have made it difficult to compare data and evaluate associations between AMR and graft outcome. The present paper was developed following a Broad Scientific Advice request from the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which explored whether updating guidelines on clinical trial endpoints would encourage innovations in kidney transplantation research. ESOT considers that an AMR diagnosis must be based on a combination of histopathological factors and presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies in the recipient. Evidence for associations between individual features of AMR and impaired graft outcome is noted for microvascular inflammation scores ≥2 and glomerular basement membrane splitting of >10% of the entire tuft in the most severely affected glomerulus. Together, these should form the basis for AMR-related endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation, although modifications and restrictions to the Banff diagnostic definition of AMR are proposed for this purpose. The EMA provided recommendations based on this Broad Scientific Advice request in December 2020; further discussion, and consensus on the restricted definition of the AMR endpoint, is required., Competing Interests: CR is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. CR’s research activity is made possible with generous support from Sidharth and Indira Burman. JUB consults for Sanofi. MR has received lecture fees from Astellas and Chiesi; and research grant support (paid to institution) from Astellas and Chiesi for investigator-initiated studies. GB has received honoraria and/or research funding from Astellas, CareDx, CSL Behring, Fresenius, Hansa, Neovii, and Vitaeris. KB has received honoraria and/or research funding from Alexion, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Fresenius, Hansa, Hexal, Merck, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Siemens, and Veloxis. DG reports consultancy agreements and scientific boards for AstraZeneca, BMS, Hansa, and Sanofi. LH reports speaker fees from Astellas, consultancy and research support from Chiesi, consultancy for Novartis, and research support from Sandoz. RO has received grants/research support from Amgen, Astellas, and Chiesi; and speakers’ bureaux/honoraria from Amgen, Astellas, Chiesi, Hansa, Neovii, Novartis, and Teva. SS has received grants/research support from Bridge to Life, Chiesi, Neovii, Novartis, Organ Recovery Systems, and Sandoz; speakers’ bureaux/honoraria from Astellas, BMS, Chiesi, Novartis, OrganOx, and Sanofi; and consulting fees from Astellas, Atara, Merck, NefroHealth, Novartis, Sandoz, and Teva. The remaining authors declare that the work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Roufosse, Becker, Rabant, Seron, Bellini, Böhmig, Budde, Diekmann, Glotz, Hilbrands, Loupy, Oberbauer, Pengel, Schneeberger and Naesens.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Surrogate Endpoints for Late Kidney Transplantation Failure.
- Author
-
Naesens M, Budde K, Hilbrands L, Oberbauer R, Bellini MI, Glotz D, Grinyó J, Heemann U, Jochmans I, Pengel L, Reinders M, Schneeberger S, and Loupy A
- Subjects
- Biomarkers, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Graft Rejection etiology, Graft Rejection prevention & control, Graft Survival, HLA Antigens, Humans, Kidney, Transplant Recipients, Kidney Transplantation, Renal Insufficiency surgery
- Abstract
In kidney transplant recipients, late graft failure is often multifactorial. In addition, primary endpoints in kidney transplantation studies seek to demonstrate the short-term efficacy and safety of clinical interventions. Although such endpoints might demonstrate short-term improvement in specific aspects of graft function or incidence of rejection, such findings do not automatically translate into meaningful long-term graft survival benefits. Combining many factors into a well-validated model is therefore more likely to predict long-term outcome and better reflect the complexity of late graft failure than using single endpoints. If conditional marketing authorization could be considered for therapies that aim to improve long-term outcomes following kidney transplantation, then the surrogate endpoint for graft failure in clinical trial settings needs clearer definition. This Consensus Report considers the potential benefits and drawbacks of several candidate surrogate endpoints (including estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, histological lesions, and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies) and composite scoring systems. The content was created from information prepared by a working group within the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT). The group submitted a Broad Scientific Advice request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), June 2020: the request focused on clinical trial design and endpoints in kidney transplantation. Following discussion and refinement, the EMA made final recommendations to ESOT in December 2020 regarding the potential to use surrogate endpoints in clinical studies that aim to improving late graft failure., Competing Interests: KB has received honoraria and/or research funding from Alexion, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Fresenius, Hansa, Hexal, Merck, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Siemens, and Veloxis. LH reports speaker fees from Astellas, consultancy and research support from Chiesi, consultancy for Novartis, and research support from Sandoz. RO has received grants/research support from Amgen, Astellas, and Chiesi; and speakers’ bureaux/honoraria from Amgen, Astellas, Chiesi, Hansa, Neovii, Novartis, and Teva. DG reports consultancy agreements and scientific boards for AstraZeneca, BMS, Hansa, and Sanofi. UH has received grants/research support from Baxter, Chiesi, and Neovii; speakers’ bureaux/honoraria from Chiesi and Hansa; and consulting fees from Astellas, Hansa, Neovii, Novartis, and Teva. IJ’s institution has received speaker’s fees from XVIVO Perfusion. MR has received lecture fees from Astellas and Chiesi; and research grant support (paid to institution) from Astellas and Chiesi for investigator-initiated studies. SS has received grants/research support from Bridge to Life, Chiesi, Neovii, Novartis, Organ Recovery Systems, and Sandoz; speakers’ bureaux/honoraria from Astellas, BMS, Chiesi, Novartis, OrganOx, and Sanofi; and consulting fees from Astellas, Atara, Merck, NefroHealth, Novartis, Sandoz, and Teva. The remaining authors declare that the work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Naesens, Budde, Hilbrands, Oberbauer, Bellini, Glotz, Grinyó, Heemann, Jochmans, Pengel, Reinders, Schneeberger and Loupy.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Proposed Definitions of T Cell-Mediated Rejection and Tubulointerstitial Inflammation as Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation.
- Author
-
Seron D, Rabant M, Becker JU, Roufosse C, Bellini MI, Böhmig GA, Budde K, Diekmann F, Glotz D, Hilbrands L, Loupy A, Oberbauer R, Pengel L, Schneeberger S, and Naesens M
- Subjects
- Biopsy, Graft Rejection etiology, Humans, Inflammation pathology, Kidney pathology, T-Lymphocytes, Kidney Transplantation adverse effects, Kidney Transplantation methods
- Abstract
The diagnosis of acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR) after kidney transplantation has considerable relevance for research purposes. Its definition is primarily based on tubulointerstitial inflammation and has changed little over time; aTCMR is therefore a suitable parameter for longitudinal data comparisons. In addition, because aTCMR is managed with antirejection therapies that carry additional risks, anxieties, and costs, it is a clinically meaningful endpoint for studies. This paper reviews the history and classifications of TCMR and characterizes its potential role in clinical trials: a role that largely depends on the nature of the biopsy taken (indication vs protocol), the level of inflammation observed (e.g., borderline changes vs full TCMR), concomitant chronic lesions (chronic active TCMR), and the therapeutic intervention planned. There is ongoing variability-and ambiguity-in clinical monitoring and management of TCMR. More research, to investigate the clinical relevance of borderline changes (especially in protocol biopsies) and effective therapeutic strategies that improve graft survival rates with minimal patient morbidity, is urgently required. The present paper was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the European Medicines Agency for discussion in 2020. This paper proposes to move toward refined definitions of aTCMR and borderline changes to be included as primary endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation., Competing Interests: MR has received lecture fees from Astellas and Chiesi; and research grant support (paid to institution) for investigator-initiated studies from Astellas and Chiesi. JB consults for Sanofi. GB has received honoraria and/or research funding from Astellas, CareDx, CSL Behring, Fresenius, Hansa, Neovii, and Vitaeris. KB has received honoraria and/or research funding from Alexion, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Fresenius, Hansa, Hexal, Merck, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Siemens, and Veloxis. DG reports consultancy agreements and scientific boards for AstraZeneca, BMS, Hansa, and Sanofi. LH reports speaker fees from Astellas, consultancy and research support from Chiesi, consultancy for Novartis, and research support from Sandoz. RO has received grants/research support from Amgen, Astellas, and Chiesi; and speakers’ bureaux/honoraria from Amgen, Astellas, Chiesi, Hansa, Neovii, Novartis, and Teva. SS has received grants/research support from Bridge to Life, Chiesi, Neovii, Novartis, Organ Recovery Systems, and Sandoz; speakers’ bureaux/honoraria from Astellas, BMS, Chiesi, Novartis, OrganOx, and Sanofi; and consulting fees from Astellas, Atara, Merck, NefroHealth, Novartis, Sandoz, and Teva. The remaining authors declare that the work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Seron, Rabant, Becker, Roufosse, Bellini, Böhmig, Budde, Diekmann, Glotz, Hilbrands, Loupy, Oberbauer, Pengel, Schneeberger and Naesens.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Rationale for Surrogate Endpoints and Conditional Marketing Authorization of New Therapies for Kidney Transplantation.
- Author
-
Naesens M, Loupy A, Hilbrands L, Oberbauer R, Bellini MI, Glotz D, Grinyó J, Heemann U, Jochmans I, Pengel L, Reinders M, Schneeberger S, and Budde K
- Subjects
- Biomarkers, Humans, Marketing, Drug Approval, Kidney Transplantation
- Abstract
Conditional marketing authorization (CMA) facilitates timely access to new drugs for illnesses with unmet clinical needs, such as late graft failure after kidney transplantation. Late graft failure remains a serious, burdensome, and life-threatening condition for recipients. This article has been developed from content prepared by members of a working group within the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) for a Broad Scientific Advice request, submitted by ESOT to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and reviewed by the EMA in 2020. The article presents the rationale for using surrogate endpoints in clinical trials aiming at improving late graft failure rates, to enable novel kidney transplantation therapies to be considered for CMA and improve access to medicines. The paper also provides background data to illustrate the relationship between primary and surrogate endpoints. Developing surrogate endpoints and a CMA strategy could be particularly beneficial for studies where the use of primary endpoints would yield insufficient statistical power or insufficient indication of long-term benefit following transplantation., Competing Interests: LH reports speaker fees from Astellas, consultancy and research support from Chiesi, consultancy for Novartis, and research support from Sandoz. RO has received grants/research support from Amgen, Astellas, and Chiesi; and speakers' bureaux/honoraria from Amgen, Astellas, Chiesi, Hansa, Neovii, Novartis, and Teva. SS has received grants/research support from Bridge to Life, Chiesi, Neovii, Novartis, Organ Recovery Systems, and Sandoz; speakers' bureaux/honoraria from Astellas, BMS, Chiesi, Novartis, OrganOx, and Sanofi; and consulting fees from Astellas, Atara, Merck, NefroHealth, Novartis, Sandoz, and Teva. DG reports consultancy agreements and scientific boards for AstraZeneca, BMS, Hansa, and Sanofi. UH has received grants/research support from Baxter, Chiesi, and Neovii; speakers' bureaux/honoraria from Chiesi and Hansa; and consulting fees from Astellas, Hansa, Neovii, Novartis, and Teva. IJ's institution has received speaker's fees from XVIVO Perfusion. MR has received lecture fees from Astellas and Chiesi; and research grant support (paid to institution) from Astellas and Chiesi for investigator-initiated studies. SS has received grants/research support from Bridge to Life, Chiesi, Neovii, Novartis, Organ Recovery Systems, and Sandoz; speakers' bureaux/honoraria from Astellas, BMS, Chiesi, Novartis, OrganOx, and Sanofi; and consulting fees from Astellas, Atara, Merck, NefroHealth, Novartis, Sandoz, and Teva. KB has received honoraria and/or research funding from Alexion, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Fresenius, Hansa, Hexal, Merck, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Siemens, and Veloxis. The remaining authors declare that the work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Naesens, Loupy, Hilbrands, Oberbauer, Bellini, Glotz, Grinyó, Heemann, Jochmans, Pengel, Reinders, Schneeberger and Budde.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. The MHC class I MICA gene is a histocompatibility antigen in kidney transplantation.
- Author
-
Carapito R, Aouadi I, Verniquet M, Untrau M, Pichot A, Beaudrey T, Bassand X, Meyer S, Faucher L, Posson J, Morlon A, Kotova I, Delbos F, Walencik A, Aarnink A, Kennel A, Suberbielle C, Taupin JL, Matern BM, Spierings E, Congy-Jolivet N, Essaydi A, Perrin P, Blancher A, Charron D, Cereb N, Maumy-Bertrand M, Bertrand F, Garrigue V, Pernin V, Weekers L, Naesens M, Kamar N, Legendre C, Glotz D, Caillard S, Ladrière M, Giral M, Anglicheau D, Süsal C, and Bahram S
- Subjects
- Graft Rejection genetics, Graft Survival genetics, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I genetics, Humans, Kidney Transplantation
- Abstract
The identity of histocompatibility loci, besides human leukocyte antigen (HLA), remains elusive. The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I MICA gene is a candidate histocompatibility locus. Here, we investigate its role in a French multicenter cohort of 1,356 kidney transplants. MICA mismatches were associated with decreased graft survival (hazard ratio (HR), 2.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.45-3.11; P < 0.001). Both before and after transplantation anti-MICA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were strongly associated with increased antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) (HR, 3.79; 95% CI: 1.94-7.39; P < 0.001; HR, 9.92; 95% CI: 7.43-13.20; P < 0.001, respectively). This effect was synergetic with that of anti-HLA DSA before and after transplantation (HR, 25.68; 95% CI: 3.31-199.41; P = 0.002; HR, 82.67; 95% CI: 33.67-202.97; P < 0.001, respectively). De novo-developed anti-MICA DSA were the most harmful because they were also associated with reduced graft survival (HR, 1.29; 95% CI: 1.05-1.58; P = 0.014). Finally, the damaging effect of anti-MICA DSA on graft survival was confirmed in an independent cohort of 168 patients with ABMR (HR, 1.71; 95% CI: 1.02-2.86; P = 0.041). In conclusion, assessment of MICA matching and immunization for the identification of patients at high risk for transplant rejection and loss is warranted., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Impact of targeted hypothermia in expanded-criteria organ donors on recipient kidney-graft function: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (HYPOREME).
- Author
-
Brulé N, Canet E, Péré M, Feuillet F, Hourmant M, Asehnoune K, Rozec B, Duveau A, Dube L, Pierrot M, Humbert S, Tirot P, Boyer JM, Martin-Lefevre L, Labadie F, Robert R, Benard T, Kerforne T, Thierry A, Lesieur O, Vincent JF, Lesouhaitier M, Larmet R, Vigneau C, Goepp A, Bouju P, Quentin C, Egreteau PY, Huet O, Renault A, Le Meur Y, Venhard JC, Buchler M, Michel O, Voellmy MH, Herve F, Schnell D, Courte A, Glotz D, Amrouche L, Hazzan M, Kamar N, Moal V, Bourenne J, Le Quintrec-Donnette M, Morelon E, Boulain T, Grimbert P, Heng AE, Merville P, Garin A, Hiesse C, Fermier B, Mousson C, Guyot-Colosio C, Bouvier N, Rerolle JP, Durrbach A, Drouin S, Caillard S, Frimat L, Girerd S, Albano L, Rostaing L, Bertrand D, Hertig A, Westeel PF, Montini F, Delpierre E, Dorez D, Alamartine E, Ouisse C, Sebille V, and Reignier J
- Subjects
- Graft Survival, Humans, Kidney, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Tissue Donors, Hypothermia etiology, Kidney Transplantation adverse effects, Transplants
- Abstract
Introduction: Expanded-criteria donors (ECDs) are used to reduce the shortage of kidneys for transplantation. However, kidneys from ECDs are associated with an increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF), a risk factor for allograft loss and mortality. HYPOREME will be a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing targeted hypothermia to normothermia in ECDs, in a country where the use of machine perfusion for organ storage is the standard of care. We hypothesise that hypothermia will decrease the incidence of DGF., Methods and Analysis: HYPOREME is a multicentre RCT comparing the effect on kidney function in recipients of targeted hypothermia (34°C-35°C) and normothermia (36.5°C-37.5°C) in the ECDs. The temperature intervention starts from randomisation and is maintained until aortic clamping in the operating room. We aim to enrol 289 ECDs in order to analyse the kidney function of 516 recipients in the 53 participating centres. The primary outcome is the occurrence of DGF in kidney recipients, defined as a requirement for renal replacement therapy within 7 days after transplantation (not counting a single session for hyperkalemia during the first 24 hours). Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients with individual organs transplanted in each group; the number of organs transplanted from each ECD and the vital status and kidney function of the recipients 7 days, 28 days, 3 months and 1 year after transplantation. An interim analysis is planned after the enrolment of 258 kidney recipients., Ethics and Dissemination: The trial was approved by the ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society (CE-SRLF-16-07) on 26 April 2016 and by the competent French authorities on 20 April 2016 (Comité de Protection des Personnes-TOURS-Région Centre-Ouest 1, registration #2016-S3). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented during national and international scientific meetings., Trial Registration Number: NCT03098706., Competing Interests: Competing interests: EC received fees for lectures and conference talks and had travel and accommodation expenses related to attending scientific meetings covered by Gilead, Baxter and Sanofi-Genzyme., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.