Search

Purpose: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing systemic treatment often experience toxicities. Although exercise may improve physical fitness and quality of life and counteract treatment toxicity, knowledge in patients with mCRC is limited. The ongoing randomized controlled AMICO trial evaluates the effects of supervised exercise on clinical outcomes. The present qualitative study was a pre-planned part of this trial aiming to capture adherence, satisfaction, and perceived effects of exercise among patients with mCRC., Methods: Patients with mCRC receiving first-line systemic treatment were randomized (1:1:1) to a control group or one of two supervised exercise arms including continuous aerobic exercise with either resistance exercises or high-intensity interval training. Semi-structured interviews with patients in the exercise arms were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Descriptive data on adherence (exercise logs) and satisfaction (questionnaire) was collected to complement and contextualize the qualitative findings., Results: Twenty-one patients were interviewed. Median exercise attendance was 67% [IQR 35-91], and the median satisfaction score was 8 [IQR 8-9] out of 10. Patients valued the guidance and knowledge of the physical therapist and expressed interindividual preferences regarding training content. Patients experienced that exercise improved their physical and mental wellbeing and helped them to endure treatment. Perceived exercise barriers were treatment toxicity, physical problems, and hospital appointments. Perceived exercise facilitators included adequate tailoring and internal or external motivation., Conclusion: Patients with mCRC appreciated exercise during systemic treatment and perceived several beneficial effects, both physically and mentally. Exercise attendance varied and barriers were mainly treatment- and disease-related., Trial Registration: Clinical trial., Gov Id: NCT04754672. Date of registration: 04-12-2020., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Medical Ethics Committee of East Netherlands (METC2020-6867) and institutional review boards of all participating hospitals. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Background: Patients with rectal cancer are often treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by a waiting period and surgical resection. Good or complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy might enable organ preservation, which highlights the need to increase response rates. Pre-clinical studies suggest that physical activity during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy may improve tumor downstaging., Purpose: To investigate whether physical activity and physical functioning of patients with rectal cancer at diagnosis are associated with tumor downstaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy., Materials and Methods: Patients were included if they participated in the Dutch Prospective ColoRectal Cancer Cohort, a nationwide cohort providing an infrastructure for scientific research, and received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Tumor downstaging was dichotomized into good/complete or moderate/poor downstaging. Physical activity (total physical activity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and Dutch physical activity guideline adherence) and physical functioning were assessed using questionnaires. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associations of physical activity and physical functioning with tumor downstaging, adjusted for relevant confounders., Results: 268 patients (aged 62 ± 11 years, 33 % female) with rectal cancer were included. Patients with moderate (OR = 2.07; 95%CI = 1.07 - 4.07; p = 0.03) or high (OR = 2.05; 95%CI = 1.05 - 4.07; p = 0.04) levels of MVPA were more likely to have good/complete tumor downstaging than patients with low levels. No significant associations with tumor downstaging were found for total physical activity, Dutch physical activity guideline adherence, and physical functioning., Conclusions: We found augmented tumor downstaging in patients with rectal cancer with moderate or high levels of self-reported MVPA before the start of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to patients with low levels., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chemotherapy for various stages of gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) is often neurotoxic. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) impairs health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study investigates the incidence and severity of CIPN and its association with HRQoL in patients with GEC., Patients and Methods: Patients who received chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy for GEC were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient-reported data (measured using the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 and EORTC QLQ-C30) were collected through the Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Esophageal-Gastric Cancer Patients (POCOP) at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment initiation. Linear mixed effects models were constructed to assess CIPN and the correlation between CIPN and HRQoL was analyzed using Spearman's correlation., Results: A total of 2,135 patients were included (chemoradiotherapy: 1,593; chemotherapy with curative intent: 295; palliative chemotherapy: 247). In all 3 treatment groups, CIPN significantly increased during treatment (adjusted mean score of CIPN at 6 months: chemoradiotherapy, 8.3 [baseline: 5.5]; chemotherapy with curative intent, 16.0 [baseline: 5.6]; palliative therapy, 25.4 [baseline: 10.7]). For chemoradiotherapy, the adjusted mean score continued to increase after treatment (24 months: 11.2). For chemotherapy with curative intent and palliative therapy, the adjusted mean score of CIPN decreased after treatment but did not return to baseline values. CIPN was negatively correlated with HRQoL in all treatment groups, although significance and strength of the correlation differed over time., Conclusions: Because of the poor prognosis of GEC, it is essential to consider side effects of (neurotoxic) treatment. The high prevalence and association with HRQoL indicate the need for early recognition of CIPN.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) raises considerable clinical challenges, including a high mortality rate once the tumor spreads to distant sites. At this advanced stage, more accurate prediction of prognosis and treatment outcome is urgently needed. The role of cancer immunity in metastatic CRC (mCRC) is poorly understood. Here, we explore cellular immune cell status in patients with multi-organ mCRC. We analyzed T cell infiltration in primary tumor sections, surveyed the lymphocytic landscape of liver metastases, and assessed circulating mononuclear immune cells. Besides asking whether immune cells are associated with survival at this stage of the disease, we investigated correlations between the different tissue types; as this could indicate a dominant immune phenotype. Taken together, our analyses corroborate previous observations that higher levels of CD8+ T lymphocytes link to better survival outcomes. Our findings therefore extend evidence from earlier stages of CRC to indicate an important role for cancer immunity in disease control even after metastatic spreading to multiple organs. This finding may help to improve predicting outcome of patients with mCRC and suggests a future role for immunotherapeutic strategies., Competing Interests: TdG received research funding from Idera Pharmaceuticals, consultancy fees from LAVA Therapeutics, GE Health, and Mendus, and holds stocks from LAVA Therapeutics. Other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.)

Background: In 2-5% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) is amplified or overexpressed. Despite prior evidence that anti-HER2 therapy confers clinical benefit (CB) in one-third of these patients, it is not approved for this indication in Europe. In the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP), patients are treated with off-label drugs based on their molecular profile. Here, we present the results of the cohort 'trastuzumab/pertuzumab for treatment-refractory patients with RAS/BRAF-wild-type HER2amplified metastatic CRC (HER2+mCRC)'., Methods: Patients with progressive treatment-refractory RAS/BRAF-wild-type HER2+mCRC with measurable disease were included for trastuzumab plus pertuzumab treatment. Primary endpoints of DRUP are CB (defined as confirmed objective response (OR) or stable disease (SD) ≥ 16 weeks) and safety. Patients were enrolled using a Simon-like 2-stage model, with 8 patients in stage 1 and 24 patients in stage 2 if at least 1/8 patients had CB. To identify biomarkers for response, whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on pre-treatment biopsies., Results: CB was observed in 11/24 evaluable patients (46%) with HER2+mCRC, seven patients achieved an OR (29%). Median duration of response was 8.4 months. Patients had undergone a median of 3 prior treatment lines. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.3 months (95% CI 1.9-10.3) and 8.2 months (95% CI 7.2-14.7), respectively. No unexpected toxicities were observed. WGS provided potential explanations for resistance in 3/10 patients without CB, for whom WGS was available., Conclusions: The results of this study confirm a clinically significant benefit of trastuzumab plus pertuzumab treatment in patients with HER2+mCRC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Derk-Jan A. de Groot received funding for research grants from Siemens and Hoffman-La Roche. All outside the submitted work and all money had been received by the UMCG. Jeanine M.L. Roodhardt is a member of Advisory boards from Bayer, BMS, Merck-Serono, Pierre Fabre, Servier, GSK and Amgen (all paid to institution), received research funding from BMS, Pierre Fabre, Servier, Cleara, Xilis, DoMore diagnostics and HUB organoids B.V. (all paid to institution) and is a Board Member of Foundation Hubrecht Oragnoid Biobank. Liselot Valkenburg-van Iersel reported consulting fees from Sevier, Amgen and Pierre Fabre. Emile E. Voest is founder and current member of the supervisory board of the Hartwig Medical Foundation, independent non-executive director of Sanofi, co-founder of Mosaic Therapeutics, and a board member and founder of the Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment. He has received clinical study grants from Amgen, AstraZenica, BI, BMS, Clovis, Eli Lilly, GSK, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi, all paid to the Netherlands Cancer Institute. The other authors declare no conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and debilitating long-term side effect of cancer and its treatment. While exercise has been shown to effectively reduce CRF, the underlying mechanisms are not fully clear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the effects of a 4-month walking exercise program on fatigue severity and to explore potential underlying physiological, behavioral, and psychological mechanisms of action., Methods: We included 27 cancer survivors (59 ± 15 years, 37% female) with variable cancer diagnoses who were at least moderately fatigued and finished treatment between 6 and 36 months ago. This study with a quasi-experimental interrupted time-series design compared a 4-month walking intervention period with a 4-month control period. Measurements of fatigue and physiological, behavioral, and psychological factors were performed, supplemented with participants' perceptions on how exercise influenced their fatigue., Results: A significant and clinically relevant decrease in fatigue severity was found over time (β =  - 8.1, 95% CI =  - 12.1; - 4.2), but could not be attributed directly to the walking exercise intervention. Increases in muscle strength (β =  - 0.07, 95% CI =  - 0.12; - 0.02), physical activity (β =  - 0.1, 95% CI =  - 0.2; - 0.04), and sleep quality (β = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.3; 1.9), as well as decreases in muscle relaxation times (β = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.02; 0.16) and psychological distress (β = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.8; 1.3) were associated with reductions in fatigue severity. Resilience and physical well-being were perceived as most important constructs explaining the walking exercise effects on fatigue., Conclusion: Our findings reveal potential physiological, behavioral, and psychological mechanisms underlying the multidimensional effects of exercise on fatigue severity., Implications for Cancer Survivors: Incorporating resistance exercise and addressing resilience and physical well-being might improve the efficacy of exercise interventions for cancer survivors., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Maintaining a sufficient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is important in the palliative treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The ORCHESTRA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01792934) is designed to prospectively evaluate overall survival benefit and impact on HRQoL of tumor debulking when added to first-line palliative systemic therapy in patients with multiorgan mCRC. In the present study, we report the HRQoL associated with this combination treatment compared with standard systemic therapy., Methods: Patients included in the ORCHESTRA trial with clinical benefit after 3 or 4 cycles of first-line palliative systemic therapy with fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin with or without bevacizumab were randomly assigned to maximal tumor debulking followed by systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone. Patients completed the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory questionnaire at prespecified time points during treatment. Between-group differences in HRQoL over time were evaluated with linear mixed model analyses. A pattern mixture approach was applied to correct for missing questionnaires due to progressive disease., Results: A total of 300 patients were randomized to the intervention arm (n=148) or the standard arm (n=152). No statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in HRQoL and fatigue were observed when tumor debulking was added to systemic therapy. In patients of both study arms, HRQoL after 1 year of treatment was not significantly different from HRQoL at the time of randomization. Patients in the intervention arm experienced serious adverse events (SAEs) twice as often as patients in the standard arm (P≤.001)., Conclusions: Maximal tumor debulking in combination with palliative systemic therapy in patients with multiorgan mCRC was significantly associated with more SAEs resulting from local therapy but no difference in HRQoL compared with palliative systemic therapy alone. There is a remarkable lack of association between the occurrence of SAEs and impact on HRQoL.

Purpose: Positron emission tomography imaging of zirconium-89-labelled monoclonal antibodies ( 89 Zr-Immuno-PET) allows for visualisation and quantification of antibody uptake in tumours in vivo. Patlak linearization provides distribution volume (V T ) and nett influx rate (K i ) values, representing reversible and irreversible uptake, respectively. Standardised uptake value (SUV) and tumour-to-plasma/tumour-to-blood ratio (TPR/TBR) are often used, but their validity depends on the comparability of plasma kinetics and clearances. This study assesses the validity of SUV, TPR and TBR against Patlak K i for quantifying irreversible 89 Zr-Immuno-PET uptake in tumours., Methods: Ten patients received 37 MBq 10 mg 89 Zr-anti-EGFR with 500 mg/m 2 unlabelled mAbs. Five patients received two doses of 37 MBq 89 Zr-anti-HER3: 8-24 mg for the first administration and 24 mg-30 mg/kg for the second. Seven tumours from four patients showed 89 Zr-anti-EGFR uptake, and 18 tumours from five patients showed 89 Zr-anti-HER3 uptake. SUV peak, TPR peak and TBR peak values were obtained from one to six days p.i. Patlak linearization was applied to tumour time activity curves and plasma samples to obtain K i ., Results: For 89 Zr-anti-EGFR, there was a small variability along the linear regression line between SUV (- 0.51-0.57), TPR (- 0.06‒0.11) and TBR (- 0.13‒0.16) on day 6 versus K i . Similar doses of 89 Zr-anti-HER3 showed similar variability for SUV (- 1.3‒1.0), TPR (- 1.1‒0.53) and TBR (- 1.5‒0.72) on day 5 versus K i . However, for the second administration of 89 Zr-anti-HER3 with a large variability in administered mass doses, SUV showed a larger variability (- 1.4‒2.3) along the regression line with K i , which improved when using TPR (- 0.38-0.32) or TBR (- 0.56‒0.46)., Conclusion: SUV, TPR and TBR at late time points were valid for quantifying irreversible lesional 89 Zr-Immuno-PET uptake when constant mass doses were administered. However, for variable mass doses, only TPR and TBR provided reliable values for irreversible uptake, but not SUV, because SUV does not take patient and mass dose-specific plasma clearance into account., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

RAS genes are the most frequently mutated oncogenes in cancer. These mutations occur in roughly half of the patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). RAS mutant tumors are resistant to therapy with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Therefore, patients with RAS mutant CRC currently have few effective therapy options. RAS mutations lead to constitutively active RAS GTPases, involved in multiple downstream signaling pathways. These alterations are associated with a tumor microenvironment (TME) that drives immune evasion and disease progression by mechanisms that remain incompletely understood. In this review, we focus on the available evidence in the literature explaining the potential effects of RAS mutations on the CRC microenvironment. Ongoing efforts to influence the TME by targeting mutant RAS and thereby sensitizing these tumors to immunotherapy will be discussed as well., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)