Search

In recent years, to treat a diverse array of cancer forms, considerable advancements have been achieved in the field of cancer immunotherapies. However, these therapies encounter multiple challenges in clinical practice, such as high immune-mediated toxicity, insufficient accumulation in cancer tissues, and undesired off-target reactions. To tackle these limitations and enhance bioavailability, polymer micelles present potential solutions by enabling precise drug delivery to the target site, thus amplifying the effectiveness of immunotherapy. This review article offers an extensive survey of recent progress in cancer immunotherapy strategies utilizing micelles. These strategies include responsive and remodeling approaches to the tumor microenvironment (TME), modulation of immunosuppressive cells within the TME, enhancement of immune checkpoint inhibitors, utilization of cancer vaccine platforms, modulation of antigen presentation, manipulation of engineered T cells, and targeting other components of the TME. Subsequently, we delve into the present state and constraints linked to the clinical utilization of polymeric micelles. Collectively, polymer micelles demonstrate excellent prospects in tumor immunotherapy by effectively addressing the challenges associated with conventional cancer immunotherapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] The aim of this investigation is to clarify the effect of D-α-tocopheryl succinate (vitamin E succinate, VES) and distearoylphosphatidyl ethanolamine-poly(ethylene glycol) (DSPE-PEG) on the encapsulation and controlled release of doxorubicin (DOX) in nano-assemblies and their consequences on the anti-tumor efficacy of DOX. DOX molecules were successfully loaded into the hybrid micelles with VES and DSPE-PEG (VDPM) via thin-film hydration method, exhibiting a small hydrodynamic particle size (~30 nm) and a weak negative zeta potential of around −5 mv. The obtained DOX-loaded VDPM2 displayed retarded DOX release at pH of 7.4, while substantially accelerated drug release at acidic pH of 5.0. Furthermore, the DOX-loaded VDPM2 exhibited substantially slower drug release rate at pH 7.4 compared with the drug-loaded VDPM1 or DPM preparation, benefiting for decreasing the premature DOX release during blood circulation. In vitro cell experiment indicated that DOX-loaded micelles (DPM, VDPM1 and VDPM2) improved the cellular uptake of DOX in 4T1 and MDA-MB-231 cells. The existence of VES component in the structure of DOX-loaded micelles had no obvious influence on the subcellular distribution of the encapsulated DOX molecules. Furthermore, the DOX-loaded VDPM2 exhibited more pronounced cytotoxicity to 4T1 and MDA-MB-231 cancerous cells compared with DOX-loaded DPM and free DOX solution. The hybrid nanocarriers including VES and DSPE-PEG selectively induced intracellular ROS accumulation and increased level of cytoplasmic calcium ion in cancerous cells by interacting with mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum, bringing about the improved cytotoxicity of DOX. In vivo antitumor efficacy investigation of DOX-loaded VDPM2 against 4T1 xenograft-bearing mice displayed satisfied therapeutic activity with negligible systemic toxicity, as evidenced by the histological analysis and change of body weight. The proposed DOX-loaded VDPM preparation, as a mulifunctional chemotherapeutic nanomedicine system, holds great potential and bright prospect for clinical tumor therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]